Political Contributions and the Reform of the Criminal Justice System

It's been a great week at TPM. My final post will focus on a few more issues for President Obama and attorney general-designate Eric Holder, as well as some closing words on my 1960s experience in the context of our current moment.
President Obama has enough on his plate that needs urgent attention without adding more. So does attorney general-designate Holder. But there are two areas that cry out for attention even if they do not appear to have the urgency of other issues: political contributions and reform of the criminal justice system. The President need not take substantive positions on these issues right away, but both are ripe for independent bipartisan commissions to examine. Obama can then make his own independent decisions in the light of what an informed bipartisan group concludes.
I think it is obvious that elected officials' dependence on money to run elections makes difficult their independent judgment on policy. Repeated attempts to resolve the problem through legislation have been, at best, watered-down versions of what is necessary. The money that lobbyists earn and contribute is evidence of the importance to business of government laws and regulations, and it is proper that interests be heard. But accompanying argument with money does not improve the chance of rational resolution. Serious conflicts of interest abound, affecting the confidence the general public has in the integrity of both elected and appointed officials.
(Note: Nick Katzenbach is the author of the new book Some of It Was Fun: Working with RFK and LBJ.)












