<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Zell&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/zell/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/zell/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/zell//2141</id>
   <updated>2008-06-01T01:10:48Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Video of one of the Clinton supporters from today&apos;s meeting speaking her mind.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/video-of-one-of-the-clinton-su.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.197926</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-01T01:10:48Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-01T01:10:48Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Hoo, boy....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Zell</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/zell/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://wjno.blogspot.com/2008/05/clinton-supporter-goes-berserk.html">Hoo, boy</a>.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Hillary Clinton now needs a larger percentage of remaining superdelegates than she did before Pennsylvania.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/hillary-clinton-now-needs-a-la.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.190930</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-23T22:09:21Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-23T22:09:21Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[&lt;a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/hillary-clinton-now-needs-70-o.php"&gt;One month ago&lt;/a&gt;, Hillary Clinton needed 70% of the remaining superdelegates.&nbsp; Since a fairly large primary just occurred, I figured I'd see what she needs now.According to CBS, the current pledged delegate counts are the following:Obama, pledged: 1486Clinton, pledged:...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Zell</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/zell/">
      <![CDATA[&lt;a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/hillary-clinton-now-needs-70-o.php"&gt;One month ago&lt;/a&gt;, Hillary Clinton needed 70% of the remaining superdelegates.&nbsp; Since a fairly large primary just occurred, I figured I'd see what she needs now.<br /><br />According to CBS, the current pledged delegate counts are the following:<br /><br />Obama, pledged: 1486<br />Clinton, pledged: 1328<br /><br />In total, there are 3253 pledged delegates.&nbsp; This means that there are 439 pledged delegates who are currently unaccounted for.<br /><br /><br />Let's<br />
assume that each candidate will get roughly half (which doesn't seem<br />
like an awful assumption) - 219 or 220.&nbsp; Let's say Obama gets 219, and Clinton 220.<br /><br />That means that at the end of the primaries, the pledged delegate count will be approximately:<br /><br />Obama: 1705<br />Clinton: 1548<br /><br />Again according to CBS, the current superdelegate counts are:<br /><br />Obama: 229<br />Clinton: 257<br /><br />Which brings us to:<br /><br />Obama: 1934<br />Clinton: 1805<br /><br /><br />A candidate will need at least 2025 votes to wrap it up.&nbsp; Which means:<br /><br />Obama needs 91 more superdelegates<br />Clinton needs 220 more superdelegates<br /><br />There<br />
are a total of 795 superdelegates, 462 of which have already expressed<br />
a preference.&nbsp; Leaving 309 superdelegates currently available.<br /><br />Which means:<br /><br />Obama needs 29.4% of the remaining superdelegates.<br /><br />Clinton needs 71.2% of the remaining superdelegates.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Hillary Clinton now needs 70% of the remaining superdelegates.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/hillary-clinton-now-needs-70-o.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.184912</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-21T23:36:01Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-21T23:36:01Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[According to CBS, the current pledged delegate counts are the following:Obama, pledged: 1403Clinton, pledged: 1236In total, there are 3253 pledged delegates.&nbsp; This means that there are 614 pledged delegates who are currently unaccounted for.Let's assume that each candidate will get...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Zell</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/zell/">
      <![CDATA[According to CBS, the current pledged delegate counts are the following:<br /><br />Obama, pledged: 1403<br />Clinton, pledged: 1236<br /><br />In total, there are 3253 pledged delegates.&nbsp; This means that there are 614 pledged delegates who are currently unaccounted for.<br /><br />Let's
assume that each candidate will get roughly half (which doesn't seem
like an awful assumption) - 307.<br /><br />That means that at the end of the primaries, the pledged delegate count will be approximately:<br /><br />Obama: 1710<br />Clinton: 1543<br /><br />Again according to CBS, the current superdelegate counts are:<br /><br />Obama: 213<br />Clinton: 249<br /><br />Which brings us to:<br /><br />Obama: 1923<br />Clinton: 1792<br /><br />A candidate will need at least 2025 votes to wrap it up.&nbsp; Which means:<br /><br />Obama needs 102 more superdelegates<br />Clinton needs 233 more superdelegates<br /><br />There
are a total of 795 superdelegates, 462 of which have already expressed
a preference.&nbsp; Leaving 333 superdelegates currently available.<br /><br />Which means:<br /><br />Obama needs 30.6% of the remaining superdelegates.<br /><br />Clinton needs 70.0% of the remaining superdelegates.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Are the votes of superdelegates public?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/are-the-votes-of-superdelegate.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.183718</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-16T02:01:46Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-16T02:01:46Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[Obviously, lots of them have publicly indicated that they intend to support a certain candidate.&nbsp; And lots more surely will.But when it comes time for them to actually place their vote, is it necessarily public?...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Zell</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/zell/">
      <![CDATA[Obviously, lots of them have publicly indicated that they intend to support a certain candidate.&nbsp; And lots more surely will.<br /><br />But when it comes time for them to actually place their vote, is it necessarily public?<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>How many superdelegates each candidate needs.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/how-many-superdelegates-each-c.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.183151</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-13T00:28:05Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-13T00:28:05Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[There's been a lot of talk recently along the lines of "Clinton needs 64% of the remaining delegates".&nbsp; Well, she's almost certainly not going to get 64% of the remaining pledged delegates, so this got me wondering: how many more...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>Zell</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/zell/">
      <![CDATA[There's been a lot of talk recently along the lines of "Clinton needs 64% of the remaining delegates".&nbsp; Well, she's almost certainly not going to get 64% of the remaining <i>pledged </i>delegates, so this got me wondering: how many more superdelegates does each candidate realistically need, at this point?<br /><br />According to CBS, the current counts are the following:<br /><br />Obama, pledged: 1392<br />Clinton, pledged: 1226<br /><br />In total, there are 3253 pledged delegates.&nbsp; This means that there are 635 pledged delegates who are currently unaccounted for.<br /><br />Let's assume that each candidate will get roughly half (which doesn't seem like an awful assumption) - 317 or 318.&nbsp; Hell, we'll give the 318 to Clinton, just to be magnanimous.<br /><br />That means that at the end of the primaries, the pledged delegate count will be approximately:<br /><br />Obama: 1709<br />Clinton: 1544<br /><br />Again according to CBS, the current superdelegate counts are:<br /><br />Obama: 202<br />Clinton: 245<br /><br />Which brings us to:<br /><br />Obama: 1911<br />Clinton: 1789<br /><br />A candidate will need at least 2025 votes to wrap it up.&nbsp; Which means:<br /><br />Obama needs 114 more superdelegates<br />Clinton needs 236 more superdelegates<br /><br />There are a total of 795 superdelegates, 447 of which have already expressed a preference.&nbsp; Leaving 348 superdelegates currently available.<br /><br />Which means:<br /><br />Obama needs slightly less than one out of every three remaining superdelegates.<br /><br />Clinton needs slightly more than two out of every three remaining superdelegates.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Two bugs in the new TPM</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/two-bugs-in-the-new-tpm.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.179977</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-25T14:34:55Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-25T14:53:39Z</updated>
   
   <summary>1. If you look at a user&apos;s profile, the &quot;latest posts&quot; section shows the user&apos;s oldest posts, not their latest posts.2. If you try to post a comment after you&apos;ve been inactive for a while, a username/password box will appear...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Zell</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/zell/">
      <![CDATA[<p>1. If you look at a user's profile, the "latest posts" section shows the user's <em>oldest</em> posts, not their latest posts.<br /><br />2. If you try to post a comment after you've been inactive for a while, a username/password box will appear after you hit "submit", and will tell you that you have to log in.&nbsp; If you then type your username and password, and hit submit, it will tell you that your username and password are invalid.&nbsp; Every time.&nbsp; I know that I'm not typing them wrong, because if I simply hit "submit" again <em>after</em> it told me "invalid", <em>without</em> modifying them, it always accepts them.<br /><br />Bonus question:<br /><br />3. Is there a place to post bugs?<br /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
