Seating delegates from FL and MI
and MI is irrelevant to how RBC should decide on the seating of FL and MI delegates. I believe what is critically more important is our respect of democratic right of each individual to have his/her vote counted. That is far more an important consideration than some party leaders violating some party rules.
The FL case is particularly vexing if their full rights are not
restored because it was the GOP-led legislature and Governor who advanced the date. Nevertheless, voters in both states are being denied their rights through no fault of their own. They did their civic duty and followed state law by coming out to vote.
In the case of MI, it’s unfortunate that Obama withdrew his
name. What difference did it make when his name in FL was on the ballot? The import of his withdrawal pales in comparison to the voting right of each voter in considering restoring the voters full rights.
In Michigan, candidates were not under any obligation or pledge to withdraw their names on the ballot. Obama chose to and that was a bad choice. He signaled to the MI voters that he didn't value their votes. All he cared for was not to go down in defeat since the polls showed Hillary far ahead. But what about his voters wish to be heard? Obama made a political choice and he lost (so did his voters who voted uncommitted instead since Obama's campaign campaigned for them to vote uncommitted).




