<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>Yalin&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/yalin/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/yalin/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/yalin//2442</id>
   <updated>2008-09-06T23:24:35Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>On The Cusp of a Landslide. Keep Fighting!</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/on-the-cusp-of-a-landslide-kee.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.214296</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-06T23:24:35Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-06T23:24:35Z</updated>
   
   <summary> I believe this election is on the cusp of becoming a landslide for Obama, and I believe that&apos;s why the McCain campaign panicked and chose Palin at the last minute without vetting her.We keep seeing diaries with the latest...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Yalin</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Muckraker" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/yalin/">
      <![CDATA[





<p>I believe this election is on
the cusp of becoming a landslide for Obama, and I believe that's why
the McCain campaign panicked and chose Palin at the last minute without
vetting her.</p><p>We keep seeing diaries with the latest Gallup, Rasmussen, CBS, etc
polling showing a tightening or expanding race. But one thing I have
not seen anyone do yet is put this in historical perspective.</p><p>Once you do that, you see just how strong Obama is in this election
cycle, and why the republicans are so dispirited and downtrodden.<strong><br /></strong></p><p><strong>This, more than any other election in my 31 years, is ours
to lose. We MUST keep fighting, not only to win, but to utterly
decimate the republican party nationwide.</strong></p><p>The one thing I take away
from all of these polls is that an additional 2 million democrats were
registered between 2006 and January of this year. The republicans lost
almost half a million from their rolls.</p>

<p>Add on top of that the millions of new registrations of blacks,
hispanics, and young people during the protracted democratic primaries,
as well as the further reduction of republicans during the same time,
and you have a lot of new voters in the pool that aren't typically
captured in this polling.</p>

<p>Now as far as polling goes, I like <a href="http://www.gallup.com">Gallup</a> and <a href="http://www.rasmussen.com">Rasmussen</a> for national numbers because they do rolling averages and poll over a thousand people per night. I look at <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com">Real Clear Politics</a>, <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com">Five Thirty Eight</a>, <a href="http://www.electoral-vote.com">Electoral Vote</a>, and <a href="http://www.pollster.com">Pollster</a> to look at the state-by-state numbers, since those are far more important than national numbers anyway.</p>

<p>With Obama ahead nationally by anywhere from 2-7pts depending on the
poll, and ahead by a substantial margin in the electoral vote count on
a state by state basis, it would take a gaffe of catastrophic
proportions, or some other enormous game changer, to see McCain win.
Taking into consideration all of those newly registered voters and the
sheer ground game the Obama campaign has built up over the past couple
of years, and I think there's a hidden cushion there that isn't
necessarily shown in the polling.</p>

<p><strong>I'm not saying it's a done deal and that people can sit back and relax</strong>, but the numbers are just not in McCain's favor by any stretch of the imagination.</p>

<p>Pollster, Five Thirty Eight, and Electoral Vote are all pointing to
a 300+ EV victory for Obama going by the state polling. That is thus
far translating to roughly a 3-5% popular vote win.</p>

<p><strong>At this stage of the election season, it's actually
comparable to what happened in 1980 when Ronald Reagan was the
insurgent candidate and Carter was the incumbent. John McCain isn't the
incumbent President, but he is the incumbent party. At this point
Reagan was actually tracking weaker #s than Obama. Once the debates
happened, however, it turned from a relatively close election into a
landslide.</strong></p>

<p>That's why I think the debates are going to be so crucial. Obama
needs to show the american people that he can not only stand toe to toe
with McCain in the debates, but that he is in fact in charge of all of
the knowledge McCain and the republicans accuse him of having no
knowledge of.</p>

<p>Given responses such as this, I have complete and utter faith that this will happen.</p><p>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L31go6-LAs0<br /></p>

<p></p>

<p>As we get closer and closer to election day, I believe that this
will turn away from a 300+ EV victory with a 3-5% popular vote victory
to something closer to 6-10% and possibly even 320-350+ EV.</p>

<p>The precedent for this kind of election (right track/wrong track,
sour economy, sour mood of the country) does exist in history. The only
precedent that I believe could keep this from being a real laugher is,
unfortunately, the color of Obama's skin.</p>

<p>But in the end, I don't think that will be anywhere near enough to cause Obama to lose.</p>

<p>Now that said, let's look at some other historical information. WAPO article found, courtesy of dansac's <a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/6/163110/9871/549/589313">recced diary</a>, shows that the Obama campaign registered 49,000 new voters in Virginia, in August, alone.</p>

<p>Almost 260,000 new voters have registered there courtesy of the
Obama campaign GOTV ground game since the primaries began. 142,000
during the primaries and another 114,000 since June. If they hold pace
that will be another 90-110k registrations in September and October.
They're saying that could add another 1-2% to his popular vote totals
in VA and be enough, along with the general indicators that are
pointing toward movement in that state, to put the state in Obama's
column.</p>

<p>When you look at the fact that Bush won VA by 9pts in 2004, that's
an enormous turnaround for Obama to even be ahead right now by 2-3pts
in VA.</p>

<p>Here are some others. #s courtesy of Pollster, Electoral Vote, and Five Thirty Eight.</p>

<p><strong>North Dakota:</strong> Bush won by 27pts. Obama tied to ahead by 3.
<br /><strong>South Dakota:</strong> Bush won by 22pts. Obama's within 4-6.
<br /><strong>Indiana:</strong> Bush won by 21pts. Obama's within 2-4.
<br /><strong>Montana:</strong> Bush won by 20pts. Obama's tied to ahead by 3.
<br /><strong>Georgia:</strong> Bush won by 17pts. Obama's within 6-7pts.
<br /><strong>North Carolina:</strong> Bush won by 12pts. Obama's within 3.
<br /><strong>Virginia:</strong> Bush won by 9pts. Obama's ahead by 1-2 or tied.</p>

<p>The story continues in every other republican stronghold.</p>

<p>Additionally, look at the election simulations from Five Thirty Eight:</p>

<p></p>

<p>What do you see? The highest proportion of simulations ends with
McCain receiving roughly 260 electoral votes. The highest proportion of
simulations ends with Obama receiving 310-330 votes.</p>

<p><em><strong>But beyond that, you notice that the standard deviation from the magic 270 EV count EXCLUSIVELY favors Obama.</strong></em> You see no blue below 270 and no red above 270.</p>

<p>As I said at the beginning, I believe this election is on the cusp
of becoming a landslide for Obama, and I believe that's why the McCain
campaign panicked and chose Palin at the last minute without vetting
her.</p>

<p><strong>Again folks, in short this is our election to lose.</strong></p>

<p><strong>So please join with me in phone banking if you can. Join
with your fellow Obama supporters in canvassing if you can. Donate to
the Obama campaign if you can.</strong></p>

<p><strong><a href="http://my.barackobama.com/page/outreach/view/main/mgpfundraising">I'm
phone banking and I've setup a fundraising drive just a few days ago.
In that time I've been able to raise $855, so please click this link to
go to my personal fundraising page and help me reach my goal of $5000.
&nbsp;We are on the cusp folks. Let's keep this rolling.</a></strong></p>



]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Obama Retrieved My Vote. Palin Reopened My Wallet.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/obama-retrieved-my-vote-palin.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.213790</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-05T05:12:37Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-05T05:12:37Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Two months ago I was so embittered by Obama&apos;s lack of support for our constitutional rights that I withdrew my $450 donation to his campaign, removed myself from all of the campaign mailing lists, and vowed to myself that I...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Yalin</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/yalin/">
      <![CDATA[Two months ago I was so embittered by Obama's lack of support for our
constitutional rights that I withdrew my $450 donation to his campaign,
removed myself from all of the campaign mailing lists, and vowed to
myself that I was not going to vote this November.<br />
<br />
Last week the DNC, and in particular Obama's speech, touched me so greatly that my vote for him was restored.<br />
<br />
On Tuesday, Joe Lieberman touched me so greatly that I decided to
start calling every state I can on every weekend from now until the
election passes.<br />
<br />
On Wednesday, Sarah Palin reopened my wallet and restored my full-throated support to Obama.<br />
<br />
I listened as Sarah Palin, without establishing who she is and what she
stands for, insulted community organizing as a trivial activity. Rather
than say what she was for, she let us know that she was against
anything Obama.<br />
<br />
Instead of going after the specifics of Obama's proposals, Palin
attacked Obama's patriotism. Instead of answering the critics charges
of graft and corruption in Alaska during her watch as Mayor of Wasilla
and Governor, she attacked the media's right to do its job. Instead of
trying to win over the vast swath of independents and women who have
already been put off by the scandals and the lack of vetting by the
McCain campaign, she appealed directly to the base in a speech that can
be best described to these ears as bitter, partisan, angry, and
unbelievably sarcastic.<br />
<br />
That speech right there is why I can no longer sit, half-in and
half-out, on the sidelines of this election. We as a nation cannot
afford another 4-8 years, and with Palin potentially another 12-16
years, of this kind of divisive, petty, us-against-them politics.<br />
<br />
&lt;a
href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/7/2/223046/0372/410/545729"&gt;I
am still quite upset with Obama over FISA as well as with those
supporters who were so willing to go republican-lite in their drive to
prop up anything he does as gospel, inviolate to criticism.&lt;/a&gt;<br />
<br />
But I can put that aside just enough to work for him and donate to his
campaign, full bore, while offering that criticism and continued
dissent. I will never stop believing that politicians should be held
accountable, no matter what their political affiliation. But what I saw
last night reminded me in full why the McCain-Palin ticket must be
defeated come November 4th.<br />
<br />
It's not just a defeat for them politically or the republican party.
It's a defeat of the smallness of politics that George W. Bush, Karl
Rove, Dick Cheney, and the rest of the republicans have driven us to
over the past 8 years. It is a defeat of a politics that would rather
see this country continue forward divided, not for the sake of the
country, but for the sake of power.<br />
<br />
Last week, Obama said that John McCain loves this country and wants to
do the best thing for it even if they disagree on how to do it. After
last night's speech, I cannot believe that they have any desire to
truly help this country in anything but to encourage the growth of our
deepest divisions, hatreds, suspicions, and wedges.<br />
<br />
That cannot happen. And I'll be damned if I let that happen while having the power to make even a small dent.<br />
<br />
So today, I not only returned the $450 I retrieved from the Obama
campaign, I added another $200 on top of that. In another few weeks I
will make another donation of $350 to bring my campaign contributions
to $1,000 for the cycle.<br />
<br />
I have created a fundraising page with a goal of $5,000 that I will be
spreading to friends and family. I ask that you help me reach that goal.<br />
<br />
http://my.barackobama.com/page/outreach/view/main/mgpfundraising<br />
<br />
Cross posted at &lt;a href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/9/4/133425/4110/293/586518"&gt;Daily Kos&lt;/a&gt; and MyDD<br />
]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Six of Nine</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/06/six-of-nine.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.199518</id>
   
   <published>2008-06-10T06:50:27Z</published>
   <updated>2008-06-10T06:50:27Z</updated>
   
   <summary>This has been cross-posted at MyDD and Daily Kos. Something dawned on me as I contemplated the upcoming Presidential Election. We are about to witness one of the greatest turning overs of the Supreme Court in the history of the...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>Yalin</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/yalin/">
      <![CDATA[<p><em>This has been cross-posted at <a href="http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/6/10/22147/0350">MyDD</a> and </em><em><a href="http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/6/10/12811/1439/758/533169">Daily Kos</a>.</em></p>

<p>Something dawned on me as I contemplated the upcoming Presidential
Election. We are about to witness one of the greatest turning overs of
the Supreme Court in the <em><strong>history</strong></em> of the United States.</p><p>Six
of Nine Supreme Court Justices, by the end of the 2nd term of the next
President of the United States, will be 70 years or older.</p>

<p><strong>Age as of January, 2009, Inauguration Day:</strong></p>

<p>Justice John Paul Stevens: 88 years
<br />Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 74 years
<br /><strong>Justice Antonin Scalia: 72 years -- Conservative</strong>
<br /><strong>Justice Anthony Kennedy: 71 years -- Swing Vote Conservative</strong>
<br />Justice Stephen Breyer: 70 years
<br /><strong>Justice David Souter: 69 years -- Swing Vote</strong></p>

<p>Clearly, the liberal wing of the Supreme Court is set to retire completely within the next decade. See below:</p>

<p><strong>Age as of January, 2017, Inauguration Day of the following President:</strong></p>

<p>Justice John Paul Stevens: 96 years
<br />Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: 82 years
<br /><strong>Justice Antonin Scalia: 80 years -- Conservative</strong>
<br /><strong>Justice Anthony Kennedy: 79 years -- Swing Vote Conservative</strong>
<br />Justice Stephen Breyer: 78 years
<br /><strong>Justice David Souter: 77 years -- Swing Vote</strong></p>

<p>And coming up shortly thereafter in 2017?</p>

<p>Justice Clarence Thomas: 68 years
<br />Justice Samuel Alito: 66 years
<br />Justice John Roberts: 62 years</p>

<p>In other words, the next President will literally define the Supreme
Court for a generation in a way that no other President has had an
opportunity to do since Franklin Delano Roosevelt when he appointed 9
Justices during his 12 years in office.</p>

<p>Repeat that again. FDR.</p>

<p>Say it one more time for emphasis. <strong>F. D. R.</strong></p>

<p>The only other President who would have come close to FDR during the
last 60 years would be Dwight Eisenhower, who selected 5 Justices
during his tenure from 1953 - 1961.</p>

<p>Ahead of FDR for most appointees in United States history? <strong>George Washington</strong>. Yes, one of the founding fathers of this nation who was able to appoint 11 justices.</p>

<p>By comparison, the only Presidents in the past 50 years to have
served multiple terms, i.e., George W. Bush, Bill Clinton, and Ronald
Reagan, each received two appointments.</p>

<p>I cannot stress enough how that much more important it is that
Barack Obama secure the White House in light of this fact. If you care
about the Environment, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gonzales_v._Carhart">Women's rights</a>, Gay rights, the right of <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Al_Odah_v._United_States">non-US</a> and <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hudson_v._Michigan">US Citizens</a> to not be unlawfully spied upon and detained in secret prisons, Union rights, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Garcetti_v._Ceballos">Free Speech</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parents_v._Seattle">Diversity</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crawford_v._Marion_County_Election_Board">Voting rights</a>, <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baze_v._Rees">the rights of those who are in Prison</a>,
and a whole slew of other issues such as Digital Property Rights and
Eminent Domain, then you must recognize that this coming President will
have enormous power to shape the judicial direction of this country for
decades.</p>

<p>We <strong>MUST</strong> elect Barack Obama to ensure the outcome
that sees us move forward, not stay stagnant or even worse, fall
backward. It is the nature of this nation's history to push onward in
the face of conservative thought that would see the status quo of the
human condition remain in perpetuity.</p>

<p>We have an opportunity to shatter that status quo in a way that has
not been done in more than half a century. We must grasp it and hold
firm.</p>

<p>Please share your thoughts.</p>

]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
