<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>xstryker&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/xstryker/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/xstryker/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/xstryker//2293</id>
   <updated>2008-05-28T11:36:55Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>MT-Gov: Schweitzer 55, Brown 30</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/mtgov-schweitzer-55-brown-30.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.197253</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-28T11:36:55Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-28T11:36:55Z</updated>
   
   <summary>The latest Mason-Dixon poll in Montana also included the Governor&apos;s race. Democratic incumbent (and netroots fave) Brian Scweitzer leads Roy Brown 55 to 30, exactly the same margin as in December&apos;s poll. You can find this and the other 4...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>xstryker</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/xstryker/">
      <![CDATA[The latest Mason-Dixon poll in Montana <a href="http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2008/05/26/news/state/22-statepoll_s.txt">also included the Governor's race</a>. Democratic incumbent (and netroots fave) Brian Scweitzer leads Roy Brown 55 to 30, exactly the same margin as in December's poll.<a href="http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/2008/05/26/news/state/22-statepoll_s.txt"></a> You can find this and the other 4 Montana races polled (MT-Pres (D), MT-Pres, MT-Sen, MT-AL) as well as December's senate and gov. polls on Election Inspection's <a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/montana/">Montana</a> page.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>OH-14: Memorial Day Donor Bomb for Bill O&apos;Neill</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/oh14-memorial-day-donor-bomb-f.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.197055</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-26T20:43:02Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-26T20:43:02Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Cross-posted on Election Inspection.Ohio&apos;s 14th district is in the suburbs of Cleveland - exactly the kind of place where Democrats have been making inroads in the past two cycles. The PVI of the district is R+2 - a very winnable...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>xstryker</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/xstryker/">
      <![CDATA[Cross-posted on <a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com">Election Inspection</a>.<br /><br />Ohio's 14th district is in the suburbs of Cleveland - exactly the kind of place where Democrats have been making inroads in the past two cycles. The PVI of the district is R+2 - a very winnable district. Steve LaTourette has a scandal against him and an opponent who's both a Vietnam Vet and an elected Judge. We need to send O'Neill money to help get this race onto the DCCC radar and attract attention from VoteVets as well. That's right, the only barrier to this race becoming competitive is money, the one thing nearly any of us can help with. <a href="http://www.actblue.com/page/eimemorialday">Send a lot or a little</a> to a veteran running for congress this Memorial Day.<br /><br />Bill O'Neill is a Vietnam veteran who received a Bronze Star - that's patriotism that no flag pin can match. He's also been a civil rights lawyer, a small businessman, and a union organizer - a man who understands the economic challenges faced by Ohioans who've felt the brunt of the Bush Economy. In more recent years, he's been one of the most respected appellate judges in Ohio - a man of integrity who can be trusted to make sure that no man, even the President of the United States, is above the law. He stepped down from the bench in June 2007 to run for Congress, because he knows a judge cannot be compromised by the trials of campaigning. <a href="http://www.oneill08.com/homepage">Learn more about O'Neill</a>.<br /><br />Steve LaTourette is scum - he cheated on his wife with his former chief of staff, who was lobbying his commiteee, who LaTourette then remarried after getting a divorce. So he's literally in bed with a lobbyist, and she suddenly got all sorts of new clients. For example, she represents the Cleveland-Cuyahoga County Port Authority, while he's the ranking member on the Subcommittee on Coast Guard and Maritime, a part of the Transportation and Infrastructure committee. This isn't why the GOP removed him as chair of the Ethics committee, of course - they simply didn't like his toothless admonishment (with no penalties) of Tom Delay. LaTourette quickly fell in line after that. <a href="http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2004/10/05/lobbyist/index.html">Salon article on LaTourette</a> by Cliff Schecter. LaTourette has a perfect score on the Family Values card according to
the GOP - that is, unless you count his own family values. (Is that why
people think he's a moderate?)<br /><br />So please - rec this diary, spread the word, and <a href="http://www.actblue.com/page/eimemorialday">Donate to Bill O'Neill!</a>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Election Inspection&apos;s final predictions for IN and NC</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/election-inspections-final-pre.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.193421</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-06T15:44:52Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-06T15:44:52Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Election Inspection&apos;s final predictions: Indiana:X Stryker: Clinton by 6.5% for 4 net delegatesElliot: Clinton by 3.4% for zero net delegates North Carolina:X Stryker: Obama by 12% for 11 net delegatesElliot: Obama by 18.8% for 15 net delegates...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>xstryker</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/xstryker/">
      <![CDATA[<p><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/2008/05/06/final-indiana-and-north-carolina-polls/">Election Inspection's</a> final predictions:</p>
<p>Indiana:<br />X Stryker: Clinton by 6.5% for 4 net delegates<br />Elliot: Clinton by 3.4% for zero net delegates</p>
<p>North Carolina:<br />X Stryker: Obama by 12% for 11 net delegates<br />Elliot: Obama by 18.8% for 15 net delegates</p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Latest IN, NC polls</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/latest-in-nc-polls.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.193098</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-05T12:58:26Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-05T12:58:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[&lt;a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/latest-indiana-north-carolina-polls-monday-round-1/"&gt;Latest Indiana and North Carolina polls:&lt;/a&gt;Zogby IN: Obama 44, Clinton 42Suffolk U. IN: Clinton 49, Obama 43Zogby NC: Obama 48, Clinton 40InsiderAdvantage NC: Obama 48, Clinton 40In southern states, InsiderAdvantage is usually about 7 points off in Clinton's favor,...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>xstryker</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/xstryker/">
      <![CDATA[&lt;a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/2008/05/05/latest-indiana-north-carolina-polls-monday-round-1/"&gt;Latest Indiana and North Carolina polls:&lt;/a&gt;<br /><br />Zogby IN: Obama 44, Clinton 42<br />Suffolk U. IN: Clinton 49, Obama 43<br />Zogby NC: Obama 48, Clinton 40<br />InsiderAdvantage NC: Obama 48, Clinton 40<br /><br />In southern states, InsiderAdvantage is usually about 7 points off in Clinton's favor, so just consider that a 10 point lead for Obama.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>InsiderAdvantage: Clinton by 2 in North Carolina</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/insideradvantage-clinton-by-2.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.192304</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-01T03:55:19Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-01T03:55:19Z</updated>
   
   <summary>InsiderAdvantage has a poll out showing Clinton up by 2 in North Carolina.Election Inspection lays out why InsiderAdvantage polls are worthless in North Carolina.Namely, it&apos;s because they&apos;ve been absurdly wrong in every state east of the Mississippi and south of...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>xstryker</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/xstryker/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://www.southernpoliticalreport.com/downloads/uploaded/43_InsiderAdvantage_Majority_Opinion_NC_Dem_Poll_%284-30-08%29.pdf">InsiderAdvantage</a> has a poll out showing Clinton up by 2 in North Carolina.<br /><br /><a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com/2008/04/30/insider-advantage-sucks/">Election Inspection</a> lays out why InsiderAdvantage polls are worthless in North Carolina.<br /><br />Namely, it's because they've been absurdly wrong in every state east of the Mississippi and south of the Mason-Dixon, by 12-20 points in Clinton's favor every single time. So, basically, just add 12-20 to Obama's number, and voila! You have the same range that every other pollster predicts in this race.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>New Quinnipiac poll</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/new-quinnipiac-poll.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.178491</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-14T14:46:20Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-14T14:46:20Z</updated>
   
   <summary>As reported on my blog, Election Inspection, new Quinnipiac polls show Clinton up by 21 in Ohio and 16 in PA. There are general election matchups for both these states as well as Florida, and they show about the same...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>xstryker</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/xstryker/">
      <![CDATA[As reported on my blog, <a href="http://electioninspection.wordpress.com">Election Inspection</a>, new Quinnipiac polls show Clinton up by 21 in Ohio and 16 in PA. There are general election matchups for both these states as well as Florida, and they show about the same result for Obama and Clinton (resembling the Kerry numbers) except in PA where Hillary gets a regional boost.]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
