« Ooh, can I be in a militia, too? | worthlesscitizen's Blog | The right's answer to "Obama Youth": train children in antiterrorism and border control! »
News from Bachmann
I put myself on Michelle Bachmann's e-mail list, mainly because her rhetoric seems to approach the most reprehensible that today's elected officials can get away with. It's useful, I think, to keep an eye on how that rhetoric develops. Some highlights:
- The House just voted to "fund ACORN," after Barney Frank succeeded with his "ACORN amendment." Bachmann, of course, was a major opponent. She ends her bit on ACORN with a gloomy eye to America's dark future: "If Congress can't draw the line with funding for organizations investigated for criminal activities in more than a dozen states, where will it draw the line?"
- Bachmann warns of a coming "debate over socialized medicine." She's worried that "this will mean rationed care, especially for the most vulnerable; reduced consumer choices; and an inefficient and ineffective delivery of the very best medical care in the world." More than this, though, she expresses concern that national healthcare--I'm sorry, "socialized medicine"--will go the way of Medicare. By which she means this:
Take Medicare as an example. When it was created in 1965, it was said to be a backstop. Benefits were limited and retirees actually paid a significant portion of the costs. That year, Medicare was estimated to cost $3.1 billion by 1970. But it actually came in at $6.8 billion. Today, it costs $455 billion and the costs continue to rise substantially.
- She goes on to quote the WSJ: "This one is about whether to turn 17% of the U.S. economy entirely and permanently into the arms of the government."
- Number of instances in which "Democrat" is used as an adjective: 2
Advertisement
















Bless you for putting yourself on her email list. And thank you for keeping us up to date.
May 12, 2009 12:47 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just be careful! Remember Lord of the Ring's Saruman and that Nietzsche quote:
“When you gaze long into the abyss the abyss also gazes into you..."
May 12, 2009 7:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks a lot. Now I'm going to have nightmares.
May 12, 2009 8:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL! Sorry.
May 12, 2009 8:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Wash your screen and your eyes!
May 12, 2009 10:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Here's is an amazing statistic. If we removed 17% of the US Economy, how much economy would we have left? 100%!!!
If you dig a hole and replace half the dirt, what do you have left? Half a hole?
It it very disturbing that we as a people have reduced medicine to a commodity to be traded in the form of stocks, very, very disturbing.
May 12, 2009 2:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Isn't the main angle on Single Payer from the cost point of view that it will save something like 25% of that 17%, by reducing overhead and profit burdens on the payment side of health care? That is, it would save 4% of GDP and allow that 4% to flow improved macro services (cover more people or conditions).
What I'm curious about: How many people buy Bachmann's lines, whether uncritically or from some semblance of principle.
May 12, 2009 3:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Remember that guy in Sicko (M Moore's flick) who had to choose what finger to re-attach based on cost? Yup, health care that can place a dollar amount on a finger is what America is about.
We talk about selling kidneys being illegal, but it seems just one step removed from what we have now.
May 12, 2009 7:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
That lady makes my state look bad. Just remember we have good people here too, like Minnesota Amy, Good Ole Al-who will soon be seated--Representative Oberstar...
She and Palin and plumber joe should start a school or something. Call it Miss History or some such.
May 12, 2009 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
We already have rationed health care.
It's just that right now, it's rationed by how rich you are, rather than how much you need it.
May 12, 2009 7:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Precisely.
May 12, 2009 8:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
What is the alternative, communism?
That's a partly serious question, btw.
May 12, 2009 8:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
How many alternatives would you like?
My preferred system is a practical hybrid: there's a rationing system based on need-and-funds (a national, single-payer health care system), plus a secondary, for-pay system (with private insurers if they want to enter into that market) that the rich and famous can use to get whatever pampering they like.
(Note that this is pretty much what is practiced in most of the civilized world.)
May 12, 2009 11:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
So you still support rationing based on ability to pay. I am not clear on how this is all that different. And many people of modest means but good insurance now do get very expensive procedures (a friend had paid knee replacements, yes, two, at about $100K each. I glad for her personally but appalled otherwise).
Sounds to me like you prefer to change the name but keep the game the same.
May 12, 2009 11:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
You miss the point (I think perhaps deliberately, given your pattern of comments). In your example, if someone needs knee replacements, any citizen in need should be able to get the standard replacements, done in the standard way, with the standard pre- and post-care. If you have extra money to spend (whether or not via private insurance), though, you can get the Latest and Greatest (or maybe not any better) Platinum Alloy Knee With PowerBoost Joint, done in a hospital that provides an extra three weeks of private nursing service, Wolfgang Puck meals, and so on. It's just that you can't stick the taxpayers for the $250,000 Platinum Alloy Knee With PowerBoost upgrade, nor the extra $175,000 in hospital bills.
May 13, 2009 3:30 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is no such thing as standard knees, so no, I didn't miss the point. There is no standard need for knee surgery, either. It's a very expensive bad habit.
Please leave you abusive ad hominem trash elsewhere.
May 13, 2009 3:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
I like to refer to her as Botch Woman (as a take-off from Bach-man). I think it fits!
May 12, 2009 8:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Worthless - ACORN is a worthless organization and should not be receiving any federal money. They have already received tens of millions and they are under criminal indictment. I'd rather waste my money on GMAC (just kidding).
May 12, 2009 9:28 PM | Reply | Permalink
It's a dirty job but I guess somebody's got to do it. Bless you. At least it's e-mail and not video. You don't have to fight the hypnotic blank psychotic space alien stare. There's evidence it has weird effects on socialists, you know.
I too suffer many indignities for the cause. I somehow managed to get on Jim DeMint's list.
Apparently in the Bachmann worldview it's acceptable that health care represents nearly a fifth of GDP. Add banking (another fifth) and nearly forty percent of the US economy is devoted to dispensing medicine, fixing knees and lending money. No wonder we can't compete.
May 13, 2009 1:58 AM | Reply | Permalink