I'd wager the nearest bar to me is a likely spot for the first drunken shooting in AZ due to the inverse relationship of IQ to testosterone levels of most of its male patrons.
 
The NRA's comment about holding a shooter responsible really doesn't do much for their image. It reminds me of a conversation I had with a conservative years ago. She was a Republican because her father and overbearing brother were; she herself was fairly ignorant but able to parrot back the party-line about most things. I asked her why she was against any and all restrictions/regulations on gun ownership. She responded, "Republicans are all about personal responsibility. If someone shoots or kills someone, of course they should go to prison. Of course they should be held responsible for that!", as though she'd said something very meaningful that might win her the argument. I then asked, "What about the dead guy?" She just stammered around a little and finally admitted that she hadn't really considered that. I wonder what the NRA's take on that is?