« 2012 and the Mayans: It's not like Apocalypse is the end of the world or anything | William K. Wolfrum's Blog | Sarah Palin - An All-American hero endorsing Japanese footwear »

Democrats set to adopt Republican "Always vote against Democrats" strategy


As someone who has spent a great deal of time perusing the American political landscape, I can say that my political prognostication skills have improved likewise. And I can say with complete certainty that I can clearly see the next move the Democratic Party will be making.

You see, after the recent elections that saw Democrats take a horrifying defeat by only gaining two seats in the House of Representatives, many Dem factions have already started practicing making their best mealy-mouthed faces in bathroom mirrors. With Health-care reform, Afghanistan, unemployment and other things on the table, this is a time when historic actions are demanded. And if there's one thing Democrats don't do much of these days, is historic actions.

No, the time is to flee. There are the 2010 elections of being the party that tried to solve things never solved anything at the ballot box. And with President Barack Obama's popularity numbers ominously falling and rising willy-nilly (but generally within the polls' percentage for error considerations), it's time to find respite in rhetoric rather than reform.

On this, the Democrats will be using a popular Republican tactic - always vote against the Democrats.

You see, Republicans have long been students of percentages. And not silly percentages about how the public overwhelmingly desires government-run health care. But real numbers. Like the fact that there's technically a 94 percent chance they'll get re-elected. Right off the bat, they have a big ace-in-the-hole long term and the freedom to spend their time reacting to daily popularity polls.

One wouldn't imagine that - strong appearances to the contrary aside - a President with an approval rating of 56 percent would worry much if that number dropped to, say, 55 percent. Over at the GOP, it's a commencement of synchronized circle-jerk of hyperbole. And they've done it for so long, every player knows their part.

Drudge gets a tip from Zogby about a 1 percent drop in Obama's popularity. Drudge runs in under the banner-long headline of "The Obama Dream is Over!" (A quote he got from an "unnamed political campaign advisor.") Then, simultaneously, 14 billion conservative bloggers post various themes on it, 38 percent of them with a theme of "America finally noticing Obama's a Black guy."

From there, every elected Republican spends the day answering every question with the Drudge-created quote about Obama, and how obviously America approves of a his work stalling or filibustering everything that comes to his desk. Democrats then spend the day answering questions from reporters like "Some are saying the Obama Dream is over, is it?"

Texas is a stunning example of how well Republicans band together under the banner of "No!!" In the House vote on the health-care reform bill, every Republican from Texas in the House stood up and said "No!!"

And here's the thing, I'd have a better chance of winning a Nobel Peace Prize than of most getting the chance of getting decent health-care insurance in Texas. OK, bad example. I'd have a better chance of receiving a Nobel Prize for Physics than of most receiving the chance of getting decent health-care insurance in Texas. You see where I'm going with this.

But that's one stubborn stand for ideology - regardless of whether that ideology changes the moment Rush Limbaugh says so. Mostly, though, it's a stand handed down by the Party Elders (such as Limbaugh). If something would represent a Democratic victory, it must be stopped, at all costs. And that decree is followed with little or Cao exception.

Basically, if you're representing a state where 25 percent of the population is without health insurance, you vote yes on whichever reform plan has the best shot of passing. And you do that if the only thing you get out if it is some syringes and band-aids. To vote otherwise is a complete dereliction of duty.

But it's a strategy. And removing all human emotion and compassion from the equation, it's a stunningly powerful tactic. Democrats can never really commit to the overall evilness of shoving it right down voters' throats, which really makes it all that much worse. While Democrats hold a knife in one hand, they hold a lollipop in the other while apologizing profusely. Republicans have knives in both hands and tell everyone listening that it was the damned liberals that brought them to this.

This is the plan many Democrats will go, however. With Village People like David Broder and Peggy Noonan shrieking for a liberal shift to the right like teenaged Jonas Brothers fans, many Democrats will desperately fight for the mythical middle-of-the-roaders - the same ones who said they were undecided the night before the Obama-John McCain Presidential election. And Democrats will court that vote by voting against Democrats.

It's going to happen. It's not like I'm Kreskin, here. So if it's going to happen anyway, why not make it look like a plan?

-WKW


7 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Actually I think it is more like democrats and republicans always voting against citizens strategy. Their collective actions always seem to end with citizens getting the short end of the stick. That is hardly the fault of only one. When these 535 people fail they fail as a country. Not as a party or as individuals.

user-pic

Wolfrum! I know the crushing defeat by only winning two open congressional seats, it is horrible isn't it!
I've been reading the Martin Eisenstadt book... Oh God, I've been laughing, hard. It is hard to put down, and in that he seems to be sort of stalking you, and he mentions your name in the forward, you must, absolutely must get at least a dime every time he/they sell a copy of their book!
as always rec'd!

user-pic

I figured that the more politically astute a person is, the more they'll enjoy that book. I figured it would be right up your ally.

I quite like Mirvish & Gorlin actually. It's that damned Eisenstadt who haunts me ;)

user-pic

That picture of 'Martin', Mika and Amy says it all!

user-pic

You've got them pegged perfectly WKW! Not only are the DC Democrats cowards, but they're just plain stupid to boot!

user-pic

hahaahah. I have to render unto you the Dayly Line of the Day Award for this here TPMCafe Site, given to all of you from all of me for this gem:

You see, after the recent elections that saw Democrats take a horrifying defeat by only gaining two seats in the House of Representatives, many Dem factions have already started practicing making their best mealy-mouthed faces in bathroom mirrors

I mean you have to go back five years now to find a Congressional Election year where the repubs came out on top.

user-pic

Thank you for clarifying the difference in the probability of your winning the two very different Nobel prizes.

Leave a comment

William K. Wolfrum

user-pic

Following: 27
Followers: 50

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Website: www.williamkwolfrum.com
  • Location Brazil
  • Party Unaffiliated
  • Politics Extremely left on social issues, moderate on economic issues.

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs William K. Wolfrum Chronicles, Crooks & Liars, Dvorak

Bio

Through it all, I've maintained a comically oversized neck. On Twitter @wolfrum

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address