« Ode to a Bleeding Heart | Wattree's Blog | Could Obama Fall Victim to a Change We Can't Believe in? »

Joe Lieberman: To Hell with the American People


BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE

Joe Lieberman: To Hell with the American People

Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) has announced that if the senate includes a public option to healthcare reform he's prepared to side with the Republicans in a filibuster to prevent the bill from coming up for a vote. In other words, he's prepared to fight to block the will of the American people.

This is the same Joe Lieberman that Democrats sweat blood and treasure to support in his bid for vice president in the 2000 election; the same Joe Lieberman who signed a pledge with seven Republicans and six other Democrats not to filibuster any of Bush's judicial nominations in 2005; and the very same Joe Lieberman whose own Connecticut constituents polled 21 to 68% (a 47% margin) in favor of a public option. But he doesn't care about all of that. All he cares about is protecting his cash cow - the insurance industry.

It should disgust this man to even look at himself in the mirror. But obviously he has more greed than shame. Thus, while a Senator cannot be recalled, the people of Connecticut should add a scarlet letter to his name by passing a resolution renouncing him, apologizing to the American people, and demanding that he resign. And in the meantime, the Democrats should strip him of all seniority and banish him from their caucus, because this man lacks the honor of Benedict Arnold.

Let us take a moment to place Lieberman's treachery in perspective. Think of healthcare like buying gas. Let's say we have two gas stations right across the street from one another. At gas station one, RepubliGas, where the average citizen is forced to buy gas, the gas is six dollars a gallon. And not only is the gas high, but we're forced to pay the cashier before we pump. Then after we pay, if we find that there is no gas in the pump, when we go back to the cashier to get our money back, he simply points to a sign that says, "ALL SALES ARE FINAL. PURCHASE AT YOUR OWN RISK. That would be fine if we had other options, but the problem with that is RepubliGas is the only gas station that we're allow to buy gas.

Then right across the street is DemoGas. At DemoGas the gas is only two dollars a gallon. And not only that, you're guaranteed that you get the gas you pay for. But there's only one problem. DemoGas is only allowed to sell gas to the elderly, federal employees, and members of congress. So President Obama decides that's not fair. He feels that all of the people should be treated equally, so he writes legislation to that effect. But then, Joe Lieberman and his cohorts in congress, who are being generously paid by RepubliGas, come together and indulge in all manner of political obstructionism to prevent the senate from being allowed to even vote on the matter.

Then even though the American people are shouting that it's not fair, and complain that they can't get to work, and their children can't get to school, these so-called representatives of the people completely ignore them. After all, they're comfortable in their lives, they're getting cheap gas, and they're being paid well by RepubliGas just to maintain the status quo. So in short, they say, "To hell with the American people. Let them eat cake."

That's exactly what's happening with healthcare reform. So this is about more than just healthcare - it's about a system that has completely broken down. This is about a congress that we've spoiled, and allowed to give themselves so many perks and raises that they can no longer identify with the very people they're suppose to be representing. They've become a class within themselves, and have started thinking of themselves as royalty. They've become a group that Marie Antoinette would envy, and the very thing that our founding fathers fought hardest against.

Many of these people claim that they're worried about the cost of healthcare, and they're concerned about leaving a debt on our children. But they lie. They didn't give a wit about our children when earlier this year they voted themselves a $93,000 increase in (get this) "petty cash" - each. Then a month later they gave themselves an additional $4,700 raise. And they did all this while their constituents were suffering, losing homes and jobs, and the country was in the midst of the deepest recession since the great depression. But now, they're willing to move Heaven and Earth to avoid giving the people who elected them affordable healthcare.

So again, this is about much more than just healthcare. This is about maintaining the integrity of the United States as a nation "of the people, by the people, and for the people." If we let these people get away with thumbing their nose at us after the American people have made it clear that we want robust healthcare reform, we will render ourselves completely meaningless.

During the last century, big business and the American people were a partnership. The business community hired us to manufacture their goods, and paid us a living wage that was sufficient to purchase those things that we manufactured. It was a symbiotic relationship. They paid us well, and guaranteed us jobs for life, which gave us the confidence to borrow from the banks and purchased what they produced. It was perfect.

But now, in this new world economy where big business is selling their goods all over the world, and competing with countries who are paying their workers pennies a day, the American worker is no longer looked upon an asset, but more of a liability. Those same American businesses who once relied on the American worker are now international in scope. So they now look upon the American worker, with our relatively high wages, as an extravagance that they can do without. While they still want to sell us their goods, they no longer want to pay us to produce those goods.

That left small businesses to step in and fill the vacuum left by the large corporations. But the insurance industry, who became comfortable with the deep pockets of the large corporations, refuse to adjust to the new reality. That's why it's essential that we have a public option to bring stability to skyrocketing heathcare costs under control. It's the only way that small businesses,and thus, our economy, can survive.

One of the things that prevent small and medium size businesses from hiring more workers is not the wages, but their inability to satisfy the insatiable greed of the healthcare industry. Walmart, one of the largest corporations in the world, has been struggling with the healthcare issue for years, and has been highly criticized for their refusal to provide affordable healthcare for their employees.

Ceci Connolly pointed out in the Washington Post that "Though proud of what it sees as dramatic progress, Wal-Mart itself warns that in a global market with a weakened economy, it cannot -- or will not be able to -- accept annual health-care increases of about 8 percent indefinitely." Thus, if Walmart is having a problem with the cost of healthcare, just imagine what it's doing to the bottom line of small businesses.

Yet, these fat cat politicians are content to sit back and watch America suffer in order to feather their own nests - and very well. Because the insurance industry is willing to pay these Republicans and Liebercrats huge sums of money to prevent the government from reining in the industry's greed. And even though these politicians know full well that the greed of the insurance industry is a drag on our economy and costing the American people jobs, lives, and personal hardships, this group of prima donnas have decided to place their own interests before the welfare of the American people.

But a new twist has been added this time. This is the first time that a politician has been as blatant in his treachery as Joe Lieberman. In a very real sense, he has all but literally told 47% of his own constituents to go straight to Hell. And the reason he thinks that he can get away with it is because Bush and Cheney proved for eight solid years that the American people are so disengaged that politicians get away with anything.

So if the American people ever expect to return to the standard of living that we've come to expect, we're going to have to undo that precedent here and now. It is incumbent upon us to network, and begin to replace every politician that gives any indication that he or she is trying to ignore the will of the people - and we should start with Joe Lieberman - that will send a strong message to all future politicians, no matter who they are or how charming they seem to be, that in this country, it's the people who are running things.

On the other hand, the consequences of our failure to act on this matter will be both chilling and unavoidable. The fact is, if we fail to mount a forceful response to the treachery of Joe Lieberman and his cohorts, we will establish a precedent that will ultimately lead to Americans becoming the first new peasants of the new world order.


  Eric L. Wattree

wattree.blogspot.com  

Religious bigotry: It's not that I hate everyone who doesn't look, think, and act like me - it's just that God does.


14 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

No mandate without a true public option that cuts costs and is available to all Americans.

There will not be competition when only 10 to 35 million people will have the 'option' of purchasing the weak public options that congress is considering.

The comnpetition will not be significant enough if the public option is not made availble to all Americans.

Reid and Durbin say that reconciliation is still an option. I think a bill that is very strong and includes a robust public option passed by reconciliation, recognizing that some things may be lost during reconciliation, would be much better than the having a long, ugly fight over the weak bill that may never get an up or down vote.

Rates must be brought down!

Lieberman, like Grima Wormtongue, will get what he deserves.

user-pic

From keyboard to God's ear.

user-pic

Health care will pass in the House. The most liberal bill that 218 can handle and this will be done with Pelosi and her two lieutenants and Rahm in the background. HOW FAR CAN WE GO? that is the question for the leaders.

In the Senate, by hook or crook, a bill will pass with 55 votes. Might even be a couple who vote present.

If the dems think that a fraud has been perpetrated by lieberman and a filibuster works; it will be thrown in the budget. The dem leadership is not stupid.

I know that this is a life or death situation for hundreds of thousands of Americans over the next few years.

But it is interesting to watch as this chess game, or these chess games play out.

A bunch of polls are going to be 'all in' on this one to mix metaphors.

user-pic

"The competition will not be significant enough if the public option is not made available to all Americans"

Definitely a rhetorical coup for the Dems that they've been able to weld the word competition onto a government funded health insurance program. Still a bit of a joke. You look at the public school system, seems to be very little competition. And that's where we could be headed.

I'd love to see true free market health care, ending Medicare and Medicaid, ending malpractice lawsuits, allowing doctors without a medical license to practice and allowing doctors to refuse care to people who can’t pay etc. That won’t happen right now.

Right now I'm glad Lieberman is willing to filibuster the public option. Unfortunately I think that some kind of bill will be passed, but if the public option dies, maybe that’s the best we can hope for.

user-pic

Um, yeah, the free market and removing regulations has just done wonders for our financial system. The rich have been able to rob the rest of the country blind... if that's what you mean by a true free market. Guess it's your slow way of killing the rest of us off then.

Other, more grown up nations that have been around a lot longer than us, they figured out that life is better if you give everyone the basic right and responsbility of health/life.

Leiberman is Grima Wormtongue in a suit. He will get exactly what he deserves and it won't be pretty. Life will never end well for a man like him.

user-pic

"Um, yeah, the free market and removing regulations has just done wonders for our financial system."

I catch a hint of sarcasm here, but the reality is that our financial system works quite well, and would work even better if it were further deregulated. I recommend “Meltdown” by Thomas Woods.

"The rich have been able to rob the rest of the country blind..."
There are thieves in every social group. But remember, Madoff mainly robbed from other rich people, not the masses. Or do you take it as an article of faith that all successful people had to steal to get to the top?

"if that's what you mean by a true free market."
Stealing is never a free market.

"Guess it's your slow way of killing the rest of us off then."

Is that really what's happening? The population of the poor is increasing, its the rich who are dying off by not having children.

user-pic

PirateRotbard,

Here's what you get when you give the vultures of the the free market free rein:

"(CBS/AP) A top court has dismissed thousands of juvenile convictions issued by a judge charged in a corruption scandal.

The Pennsylvania Supreme Court on Thursday threw out more than five years' worth of cases heard by former Luzerne County Judge Mark Ciavarella. He is charged with accepting millions of dollars in kickbacks to send youths to private detention centers."

user-pic

Wattree,

I guess you saw the Michael Moore movie also?

As someone who hates taxes, I hate taxes whether they fund the social programs or the military or prisons.

Lower taxes and there will be less money for prisons, private or public. Less people rotting their life away.

user-pic

Actually, PR, I haven't seen Michael Moore's movie. But it's funny you would mention taxes. Our tax policy is one of the few things that I agree with conservatives about.

Even though I'm far less than rich, I've always felt that making the rich pay a higher percentage of their income, simply because they're rich, is a non-progressive concept. If everybody pays the same percentage of their income, simple math levels the playing field.

I'm convinced that if progressives had refrained from indulging in that little piece of hypocrisy, there'd be a lot fewer Republicans. It is an unjust policy, and should be considered un-Amrican.

But then, we often ignore our "ideals" when it's convenient - ask Cheney.

user-pic

You seem to forget, a lot of people will die too. Or is that what you are hoping for?

You like the sound of that? Dead people? Because of policies you endorse? If you do, here's hoping you run up against those policies, the hard way - say, getting into some sort of scrape where you show up at an ER, without ID, unconscious, and find yourself up against one of those doctors who will not treat you because you have no way to provide evidence of ability to pay.

It will in fact be the ultimate validation of your policies, won't it? Too bad for you (though not for most of us) you would not be around to celebrate your pathetic "victory".

user-pic

Old Grouch,

If you really are Old, you probably know that we all eventually die, don't you?

Wouldn't you rather live your life as someone with honor?

The free market has given America(even the very poor) a very high standard of living. We need to keep our hands off, so that the standard of living will continue to rise and there will be the best possible life for our grandchildren.

user-pic

And I repeat, PR:

"During the last century, big business and the American people were a partnership. The business community hired us to manufacture their goods, and paid us a living wage that was sufficient to purchase those things that we manufactured. It was a symbiotic relationship. They paid us well, and guarantee a job for life, which gave us the confidence to borrow from the banks and purchased what they produced. It was perfect.

But now, in this new world economy where big business is selling their goods all over the world, and competing with countries who are paying their workers pennies a day, the American worker is no longer an asset, but a liability. Those same American businesses who once relied on the American worker are now international in scope. So they now look upon the American worker with, our relative high wages, as an extravagance that they can do without. While they still want to sell us their goods, they no longer want to pay us to produce those goods."

Things have changed.

user-pic

Your right things have changed.

But we haven't stopped employing workers. And we haven't stopped exporting products to other countries.

http://www.trade.gov/press/press_releases/2009/export-factsheet_021109.pdf

Some products are better suited to be built in other countries. SOme in this countries. Not a problem.

user-pic

PR, you said:

"Some products are better suited to be built in other countries. SOme in this countries. Not a problem."

But it seems that the United States taxpayer is always suitable for these international corporations to run back to when they're in trouble.

GM, for example. They build cars and provide jobs all over the world, but where did they come when they were about to go under? You got it - to us. Why didn't they seek help from one of those other countries that were more "conducive" to free enterprise?

Leave a comment

Wattree

user-pic

Following: 9
Followers: 41

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

Bio

Eric L. Wattree is a writer, poet, and musician, born in Los Angeles. He’s a columnist for The Los Angeles Sentinel and The Black Star News. He’s also the author of A Message From the Hood, and a contributing writer to Your Black World, and The Huffington Post.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address