The Republican Vision for America - Divide and Conquer
BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE
The Republican Vision for America - Divide and Conquer
The current situation in Iran is perfectly analogous to what's going on here in the United States. The vast majority of the people want a common-sense approach to domestic and world politics, while the old guard, stuck in the blind animosities of the past, are determined to promote and exploit those animosities for their own end, and at any cost - including the misery and death of their own people. In Iran the old guard is represented by Mahmoud Ahmadinejad; in the U.S., Dick Cheney and Rush Limbaugh. In Iran they are called jihadist, while in the U.S. we refer to them as the Republican Party.
Like the jihadist in the Middle East, Republican wing-nuts claim to be acting on a mission from God. Also like their counterparts in the Middle East, these GOP leaders believe that the end justifies the means, which leaves them free to lie, cheat, steal, torture, and kill innocent people. Their primary method of operation is to take a germ of truth, then infuse it with false conclusions and lies to poison and inflame the minds of the people to act against their own interest. Just like the jihadist, they specialize in using the people's own ignorance against them in order to divide and conquer.
But it seems that the people of both cultures have said enough is enough. Due to unprecedented corruption during the Republican administration, and the belief by many Americans that they'd been robbed of both the 2000 and 2004 elections, in the 2006 election the people voted Republicans out of office by the largest numbers in a generation. Then in a more graphic break with the past, in 2008 Barack Obama was voted into office as the first African American president of the United States. The people of Iran are currently in a struggle with their old guard as well. They too believe that a desperate and corrupt old guard has attempted to steal their vote.
It's still too early to determine the outcome of the struggle between the will of the people and the jihadists in Iran, since as we speak there's rioting in the street, and Iran's Guardian Council (the old guard) has agreed to recount the votes. But here in the United States, the Republican Party has embarked upon a scorched Earth policy, and a strategy of divide and conquer. Their primary goal seems to be to sabotage the nation's recovery by keeping the people divided. Thereafter, if they're successful, they intend to regain power by simply saying, we told you so. Thus, they've dedicated their existence to making America suffer for the next four years.
A Clear example of the Republican Party's method of operation can be seen in the activities of Rabbi Nachum Shifren. Rabbi Shifren has become a perennial Republican candidate for the 26th District of the California State Senate. I first came into contact with him when he began to contact many of us in the Black press with a message of working to improve the Los Angeles Unified School District.
Republicans always build their lies on a germ of truth - after all, who could possibly disagree that we have a dysfunctional educational system. But like many Republican wing-nuts, the hubris of his racist mindset has caused him to underestimate the intelligence of the Black community. He actually thought he could ingratiate himself with Black writers through flattery. He would never try such a ploy with a White journalist. Essentially, he came to me and said, he felt the need to approach me because of my exceptional insight. He was sure that with my keen intelligence I would be able to relay his message to those in the community who weren't bright enough to see the big picture. In other words, I'm a credit to my race.
I had long since researched the Rabbi, so I was fully aware that he was a rabid ultra-conservative who had been a strong supporter of Pat Buchanan, and had been all but banished from the Jewish community. But one should never try to out scream a fool. You listen to them carefully - very carefully. And this is what I heard:
He said, "There is nothing more corrosive to the fabric of our city than hatred based on race. But let's get real. We don't then overcompensate by hiring LAPD officers that are 4 feet, 10 inches tall! We don't go and hire officers that have rap sheets, or are otherwise unqualified. The racisim here is absolutely overt! The thinking goes like this: let's just get ANYBODY in there, as long as they're a CERTAIN skincolor..."
"Eric, I reached the boiling point when I was stopped by a woman officer that was shorter than her 9mm. I attended a Neighborhood Council meeting in W. LA in which the "captain" , a female officer, addressed the group. I looked at another officer present and remarked how this 5'6'', 150 lb woman could be the captain. He told me that many male candidates had been passed over for the position."
When I asked him to substantiate his claim he responded with opinions and anecdotes. I then pointed out to him that while diminutive female officers are not what those of our generation have come to expect, I can think of very few instances where these young women have been overpowered by thugs. On the other hand, I can think of a number of instances where physically oversized, but intellectually diminutive, thug police officers have assaulted and in some cases killed innocent citizens. So I'd rather see brains over brawn any day.
And with regard to the question that he asked the officer at the neighborhood council meeting regarding how this 5'6'', 150 lb woman could be the captain." I pointed out to him that his question alone betrayed a mindset that I found quite troubling. I then asked, how did he know the female captain wasn't twice as qualified as all of the male candidates that she competed against, to which, I never got a response. I also pointed out that he had based his assessment of the captain on purely his own opinion of what SHOULD AND SHOULD NOT BE. Thus, he'd betrayed a tendency to base his conclusions on less than informed and highly subjective opinions - the very same kind of opinions that caused many to conclude that Blacks should never be placed in positions of responsibility, or that Jews should never be trusted.
But here's where I lost patience with him. He said the following:
"But who in the corrupted Black leadership will call for a moment of silence for those African Americans murdered in racially charged ethnic cleansing by radical Hispanic gangs? Now that we need to discuss "racism" in America by those that want to Marginalize African American citizens, where is Attorney General Eric Holder? Will he step up and do his job? Or is he also in bed with the Reconquista crowd, paralyzed by political correctness."
The above statement pointed out his true colors. It was a thinly veiled use of the murder of Stephen Tyrone Johns at the Holocaust Museum to promote the Rabbi's political agenda. Black people are also being killed by Black gangs, but he wasn't concerned about that. His only intent was to slander the Obama administration, and cause a division within the Black and Hispanic coalition that's making it impossible for Republicans to be elected.
How much does Shifren really care about Black people? Listen to the poison that he's feeding the young people in a speech before the Silicon Valley Young Republican Federation: "Multi-culturalism will be the nail in the coffin for our country . . . There are a substantial number of Black and Latino educators and administrators who will stop at nothing until they have seen 'the last gasp of White America.'"
Spoken like a true jihadist.
Eric L. Wattree
If you really want to be hip, hop into a book.













The world multiplies. Republicans divide.
June 16, 2009 1:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Like the jihadist in the Middle East, Republican wing-nuts claim to be acting on a mission from God. Also like their counterparts in the Middle East, these GOP leaders believe that the end justifies the means, which leaves them free to lie, cheat, steal, torture, and kill innocent people. Their primary method of operation is to take a germ of truth, then infuse it with false conclusions and lies to poison and inflame the minds of the people to act against their own interest. Just like the jihadist, they specialize in using the people's own ignorance against them in order to divide and conquer." -- Wattree
"The world multiplies. Republicans divide." - TPMGary
Well said, Wattree and Gary.
June 16, 2009 2:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ditto.
For some reason what came to mind as I read this is that we really want to keep in mind what is important and of value in the underlying arguments that 'some' republicans make (I have to say 'some' because there have been enough that seemed to contain no value whatsoever).
For example, making sure that we do include fiscal and personal responsibility but demonstrate the 'contexts' through which they are 'better served' i.e. reasonable regulation of financial institutions and such. We have been so used to letting them define the 'contexts' and then we appear to react to them... so that it appears that we are pushing against personal/and or fiscal responsibility. President Obama knows how to point this out and redefine the contexts.
June 16, 2009 3:33 PM | Reply | Permalink
Can't add much here - just co-sign.
June 16, 2009 4:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ditto,
You hit it right on the head. We have to stop allowing the GOP to define the issues.
June 16, 2009 4:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
The GOP isn't defining the issues. I don't see how a party in the minority can define the issues.
June 16, 2009 9:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bill you said,
"I don't see how a party in the minority can define the issues."
All you need is a big mouth, no class, and thus, the ability to lie, cheat, and steal with a straight face.
June 16, 2009 10:57 PM | Reply | Permalink
The Repubs seem to have a kind of tempo. In the contest Obama is fighting with them he seems to be on the reacting side more than he should be. I hope that he has a plan working that I am just not seeing.
June 16, 2009 11:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Adel,
I've been considering that very issue. I think there is a method to his madness. It has to do with not making the same mistake as Bill Clinton. Clinton allowed all of the various "issue constituencies" to come together at once. I plan to discuss it in more detail soon.
June 19, 2009 10:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I wonder about a plan that may be working too. But it seems that the tempo of the argument is in the hands of the Cheneys and other Republicans. Perhaps it is simplistic to expect more rapid changes. Things like surveillance and torture worry me immensely though.
June 19, 2009 11:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
You should describe Barney Frank and Chris Dodd in such unflattering terms.
June 17, 2009 5:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bill,
I'm not in the business of including or excluding any politician from anything I discuss - I view them all as a part of an emerging class that the American people need to drag back in its place. But that said, I must admit, that at this point the Republican Party seems to all but corner the market on demagogic hypocrisy.
The GOP is actively working against the best interest of the United States for their own personal interest. It made me want to throw up watching Republicans feign shock when Leon Paneta, and later, Ed Shultz indicated that Dick Cheney would love to see another attack on the U.S. Of course he would - and so would the rest of the Republican wing-nuts.
If there was a terrorist attack on the U.S. this afternoon, they'd have to divert first responders to FOX News to untangle the Republican politicians trying to get through the door.
June 17, 2009 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
That's pretty disgusting of you to insinuate that any citizen of this country would want to see another attack on the US. The fact that they would blame the attack on Obama & Friends is completely separate from actually wanting an attack to occur.
June 17, 2009 4:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bill,
Listen to you. It's time to throw up again. Don't be so naive. It's that very same head-in-the-sand that has allowed 4000 American troops to die for Halliburton.
You're suffering from the same blind mentality that allowed Americans to sing about "the land of the free" while people were being lynched and enslaved; the mentality that forced Black war heroes to surrender their seats on the train to Nazi prisoners of war while travelling through the South; a mentality that allows us to continue to condemn terrorism after casually murdering hundreds of thousands of innocent Iraqi men, women, and children.
Wake up, man! What's disgusting is the fact that we fail to recognize how disgusting we are.
June 17, 2009 6:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
I don't think so. It's incomprehensible that you think that somebody wants the US to be attacked.
I will stop trying to discuss points with you if that's the path you're going to take.
June 17, 2009 8:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
Suit yourself, Bill.
But the ability to comprehend the incomprehensible is called cognition. It was incomprehensible to the American people that any president would lie America into an unnecessary and senseless war that placed us in the position that we now find ourselves.
That was actly my point when I said that jihadists use the people's own ignorance against them. So again, I urge you - wake up.
June 18, 2009 10:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
One other thing, Bill. Dick Cheney, Rush Limbaugh, Donald Rumsfeld, and many others have built their careers on the proposition that demagoguery will be incomprehensible to a large segment of the American people.
June 18, 2009 11:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry - I forgot to include Charlie Rangel in that list - can't imagine how I left him out.
June 17, 2009 5:59 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is much of value in conservative thought. For that reason I use the word "conservative" only one time in this piece, and even then I placed the prefix "ultra" before it.
I learned, and pledged, on this very site to always make a distinction between true concervatives and Republican wing-nuts. So for the terms "GOP" and "Republican" are shorthand to distinguish between conservatives and wing-nuts. True conservatives don't deserve to be lumped in with this group.
June 17, 2009 4:41 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Multi-culturalism will be the nail in the coffin for our country . . ."
Translation: being a nation of immigrants -- a polyglot -- will be the nail in the coffin of "our" country.
The jerk isn't only racist; he's also ignorant (which is the basis of the racism) of history:
Only two peoples are on this continent without choosing to be: Amerindians, and those dragged from Africa into slavery. And he has the gall not only to suggest that blacks don't belong here -- as if they chose to be -- but also to be a racist member of a people that has whined for thousands of years about having been slaves, and being subjected to racism.
(That is not such a unique reality. I have in my "heritage" a great- or great-great-grandfather who was Jewish -- and a slave-overseer in Sparta, GA. Shouldn't those who have been slaves know better?)
When will such "biblists" learn the meaning of, "Do unto others as you would have them do unto you"? Well, he is Republican, so expert at exempting himself from the rules he preaches be imposed on everyone else.
June 16, 2009 7:42 PM | Reply | Permalink
J,
I ask that question of Black racists all the time. How can one embrace the very philosophy that they claim to hate? They've allowed themselves to become the philosophical brothers of those who enslaved them.
June 16, 2009 11:04 PM | Reply | Permalink