« GOP Underestimates Conservative America | Wattree's Blog | Carrie Prejean: Are Progressives Becoming as Intolerant as Conservatives? »

Accountability: America's Moral Responsibility to Humanity


BENEATH THE SPIN • ERIC L. WATTREE

Accountability: America's Moral Responsibility to Humanity

 Eight years of Republican "leadership" has left America both economically devastated, and globally humiliated. Yet, far from apologizing for the damage that they've done to the stability and image of this great nation, instead, they've circled their wagons and gone into damage control mode-not to control the damage that they've done to the nation, but in an attempt to rewrite history in order to control the damage that they've done to themselves.

So now, as President Obama goes about the business of desperately trying to return America to its former position of economic stability at home, and respect, admiration, and moral authority abroad, the GOP leadership seems to be completely oblivious to the nation's desperate and immediate need for a concerted effort in that regard. They're like clueless children who find it impossible to see the big picture. Thus, at this point it has become abundantly clear that their primary concern is not with restoring America to a sound footing in the world, but rather, simply restoring themselves to power at any cost.

This situation points out the wisdom of always seeking to draw something of value from every adversity, and in this case, we should seek enlightenment. In spite of the fact that virtually everyone in the Bush administration managed to avoid serving this nation in uniform (Bush went AWOL, and Cheney obtained five (5) deferments), the GOP has somehow managed to pre-empt and wrap themselves in the glorious vestments of patriotism. But this current situation should teach us a valuable lesson in that regard-never go by what people say; always go by what they do. And what are they doing--while the American people are experiencing the kind of suffering that this country hasn't seen since the Great Depression, and the United States has become the "Dick Cheney" of the world, the GOP's one and only concern is how they can regain power. Is that patriotism? I don't think so.

There's only one word to describe this current batch of Republican wingnuts--and you have to go outside the English language to find it--hutzpah. They've left this nation's global standing at its lowest ebb ever, and they've also left us much less safe. But in spite of that, Sean Hannity and FOX news have seen fit to trot out Dick Cheney to lecture President Obama on national governance and world affairs. What Makes these people think that anyone is interested in listening to anything this guy has to say? The vice president of the Crips has a higher approval rating than Dick Cheney, so they can have but one motive--to create division and disseminate propaganda. But Hannity's time would have been better spent holding a seance, then conjuring up the spirit of John Wayne Gacy to give us a lecture on child rearing. It couldn't have been any less productive, but at least there would have been an entertainment factor involved.

Then you have Carl Rove trying to imply that President Obama is turning America into a banana republic. When I first heard him, the word "stupid" immediately came to mind. Either Rove is stupid, or he thinks the American people are complete fools. Now, think about it. Wasn't Carl Rove a major part of the very administration that lied us into war, illegally invaded a sovereign state, sent our troops off to war without the proper equipment to keep themselves alive, then made them pay for their own meals while lying wounded in the hospital, then looted the nation's treasury and resources, setup no-bid contracts to enrich their cronies, spied on their own citizens, and as we speak, are now trying to convince America that torture and all of the things listed above are ok, so that Bush, Cheney-and their entire crowd-- won't be prosecuted for war crimes, defrauding the American people, and the senseless waste of human life for personal gain? If I'm not mistaken, I think Carl Rove was indeed a major part of all that. So who looks, sounds, and behaves more like tinhorn dictators? Thus, before Rove starts pointing his finger at President Obama, he needs to smell it first.

As a direct result of the greed, poor judgment, and self-service of these people, instead of focusing our efforts on the Pakistan/Afghanistan border where Osama Bin Laden and the others who planned and executed the Nine-Eleven attack on America were in hiding, they went to Iraq and began to tortured innocent detainees-not to protect America, but in an attempt to justify the lies they were telling the American people in order to steal Iraqi oil, enrich themselves, and loot this nation of the necessary resources to fund the New Deal programs that they couldn't attack legislatively. Now, as a direct result of that flawed judgment, we have the Taliban a mere sixty miles away from a nuclear armed Pakistan. So I don't know about the rest of America, but to me, Dick Cheney and Carl Rove's claim of keeping us safe is sounding pretty ridiculous about now.

Thus, to even consider "moving on" without prosecuting these people is out of the question. If we simply turned the page on this matter, we become accessories to their war crimes. In addition, we cannot allow them to just walk away from placing the survival of this nation-and indeed, the world--in serious jeopardy. And further, if we are fortunate enough to survive this unmitigated episode of irresponsibility, we need to send an unmistakably graphic message to the next group of budding demagogues, who they've undoubtedly planted throughout the government. If Nixon had gone to prison for Watergate, and Reagan had become his cellmate for selling arms to Iran, we wouldn't be going through what we're going through right now.

And finally, we have a moral responsibility to the world. A nation cannot just turn the page after its leaders have committed war crimes and are responsible for the slaughter and/or displacement of a million people. That page won't turn without the offending nation engaging in aggressive corrective action. If it were any other nation, the United States would demand accountability, so we can demand nothing less of ourselves.

I know--they're simply wingnut Republiclowns, but their behavior in office was much more than a meaningless prank. Just because we put up with them, doesn't mean that the world should have to. After all, we even carry a pooper scooper for our pets. Trying to walk away from the atrocities of the past seven years would be like defecating and then trying to walk away without cleaning ourselves. We'd have to walk wide-legged and very uncomfortably, throughout the rest of history.

Eric L. Wattree


 

wattree.blogspot.com

A moderate is one who embraces truth over ideology, and reason over conflict.

 


6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Bravo, Eric!! A hearty rec!!

user-pic

These are died in the wool authoritarians. They would shit in their hats and call it creme de menthe if the right person told them to.

user-pic

Eric, thank you. Your comments so eloquently state that which I hope all men of good conscience would espouse too.

(I post anew a comment I made a few days ago, muddled though it is.)

Backgrond: Following WWI and the defeat of Nazi Germany, the Nuremberg trials were established so as to prosecute 2 different catoragories of war criminals (a) Major War Criminals (22 of the most important captured leaders of Nazi Germany) were tried before the International Military Tribunal (IMT), and (b) lesser war criminals were tried under Control Council Law No. 10.

The reason for a class (b) of war criminal was that even if a person was under order to carry out a heinous act, that did not protect them from prosecution. They knew right from wrong.

The reason for a class (a) catoragory of war criminal is self explanatory.

The Nuremberg trials in no small part engendered the development of international criminal law. The Trials served the basis for:

- Genocide Convention, 1948.
- Universal Declaration of Human Rights, 1948.
- Nuremberg Principles, 1950.
- Convention on the Abolition of the Statute of Limitations on War Crimes and Crimes against Humanity, 1968.
- Geneva Convention on the Laws and Customs of War, 1949; its supplementary protocols, 1977.
- Principles of International Law Recognized in the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal and in the Judgement of the Tribunal (Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 1950, vol. II[31]).
- International Criminal Court (ICC), and an international criminal codes (International Law Commission.)

America, rightly so, was front and center in all the above actions. And yet it is not a signatory to the ICC.

Comment: This country has three branches of government, the executive, the legislative and the judiciary. They are SEPARATE. Under Bush, we suffered 8 years when that separation was blurred and the innate nobility of this country was tarnished. Bush acted as a despot and the other branches of government let him get away with it (even when the democrats took over for the last 2 years of Bush's reign.) And now President Obama is deciding who should and should not be prosecuted. We voted for change. Not for another 4 years of despotic rule.

Any and all persons involved in torture, in war crimes, must be prosecuted. They should be tried before a jury of their peers. They should be given access to lawyers. They should be granted every opportunity to defend themselves. They should be given justice, even though they denied all this and more to those they tortured, maimed, killed. And the trials in their entirity should be made and held in public.

If we as a nation do any less, then we are nothing more than hypocrites. We have a double standard. We demand of other nations to live by standards which we do not then apply to ourselves.

This is not just a legal issue, this is also a moral.

To quote from The Noble Quran, 4:85 “Whoever rallies to a good cause shall have a share in its blessings; and whoever rallies to an evil cause shall be answerable for his part in it.”

We look to history so as not to make the same mistakes. Those who participated in torture, in war crimes, must be held accountable.

user-pic

Ah, if we could rec the comments too....

user-pic

Co-sign

user-pic

Never let it go. Just keep pressing and never let anyone forget.

Leave a comment

Wattree

user-pic

Following: 8
Followers: 40

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

Bio

Eric L. Wattree is a writer, poet, and musician, born in Los Angeles. He’s a columnist for The Los Angeles Sentinel and The Black Star News. He’s also the author of A Message From the Hood, and a contributing writer to Your Black World, and The Huffington Post.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address