« DAILY SCIENCE FIX - PHILOSOPHY - "The Future" - Fact or Fiction? | yug doog's Blog | DAILY SCIENCE FIX - SUPERCONDUCTORS - Whats going on? »

DAILY SCIENCE FIX - WATER SUPPLIES - Water, Water, Everywhere?


Water, water everywhere and not a drop to drink?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

We have a serious water supply problem

  • Inadequate access to safe drinking water for about 884 million people[7]
  • Inadequate access to water for sanitation and waste disposal for 2.5 billion people[8]

...According to the World Bank, 88 percent of all diseases are caused by unsafe drinking water, inadequate sanitation and poor hygiene.[11]

Water itself is literally everywhere.

...where there are no lakes, rivers or groundwater, considerable quantities of water are stored in the air. In the Negev desert in Israel, for example, annual average relative air humidity is 64 percent - in every cubic meter of air there are 11.5 milliliters of water.

The problem is merely one of usuable water.  But there's a lot of progress being made on this front...lets check in with a few.  First up, a new technology - removing water literally from thin air.

"The process we have developed is based exclusively on renewable energy sources such as thermal solar collectors and photovoltaic cells, which makes this method completely energy-autonomous. It will therefore function in regions where there is no electrical infrastructure," says Siegfried Egner, head of department at the IGB. The principle of the process is as follows: hygroscopic brine - saline solution which absorbs moisture - runs down a tower-shaped unit and absorbs water from the air. It is then sucked into a tank a few meters off the ground in which a vacuum prevails. Energy from solar collectors heats up the brine, which is diluted by the water it has absorbed.

Because of the vacuum, the boiling point of the liquid is lower than it would be under normal atmospheric pressure. This effect is known from the mountains: as the atmospheric pressure there is lower than in the valley, water boils at temperatures distinctly below 100 degrees Celsius. The evaporated, non-saline water is condensed and runs down through a completely filled tube in a controlled manner. The gravity of this water column continuously produces the vacuum and so a vacuum pump is not needed. The reconcentrated brine runs down the tower surface again to absorb moisture from the air.

I wonder if its cost effective.  How about water from Sewage?  I like recycling. 

Earlier in January, for instance, California approved operation of the Advanced Water Purification Facility (AWPF), the largest water reclamation plant in the nation. It will yield 70 million gallons per day of drinkable water from sewage. That's about 10 percent of the district's daily water demand for its 2.3 million residents. Although AWPF's purification process is complex, it produces clean, pure water that meets or exceeds all drinking water standards, the article notes.

Of course theres plenty of water in the Sea, right?

"Desalinating the sea is an expensive, energy-intensive and greenhouse gas emitting way to get water," says Jamie Pittock, Director of WWF's Global Freshwater Programme.

"It may have a place in the world's future freshwater supplies but regions still have cheaper, better and complementary ways to supply water that are less risky to the environment."

Ok, we'll keep working on that one.  How about giving the salt water to the plants?

"We are looking at ways to grow plants on very salty water without damaging soil," Professor Leslie said.  "We're incorporating a reverse osmosis membrane into a sub-surface drip irrigation system."

Lets not forget about making water safe to drink:

Bacteria often get bad press, with those found in water often linked to illness and disease. But researchers at The University of Nottingham are using these tiny organisms alongside the very latest membrane filtration techniques to improve and refine water cleaning technology.

 

These one-celled organisms eat the contaminants present in water -- whether it is being treated prior to industrial use or even for drinking -- in a process called bioremediation.

 

The water is then filtered through porous membranes, which function like a sieve. However, the holes in these sieves are microscopic, and some are so small they can only be seen at the nanoscale. Pore size in these filters can range from ten microns -- ten thousandths of a millimetre -- to one nanometre -- a millionth of a millimetre.

Anyway, the point I'm trying to make is like our energy problems, our water problems are solvable.  Water and energy are everywhere.  It will take time, technology, effort and missteps but the water crisis is solvable.  We are in fact making progress:

2 billion people have gained access to a safe water source since 1990. [4] The proportion of people in developing countries with access to safe water is calculated to have improved from 30 percent in 1970[5] to 71 percent in 1990, 79 percent in 2000 and 84 percent in 2004, parallel with rising population. This trend is projected to continue. [5]

Of course, those advances mean that existing water supplies will get more and more stressed.  Now, we just need to remember not to piss in our pot.

Stay Tuned...


20 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Low tech desalinization could be almost passive given good insolation (sunlight levels).

A little seawater on a black background warms up, the vapor condenses on a cooler surface and is collected separately by gravity feed. The cooler surface can be cooled by seawater.

user-pic

Got links?

user-pic

No, just thinking out loud based on some emergency methods I've heard about. It might require a lot of square meters per gallon per hour.

Heating the water drives up the vapor pressure making the trapped airspace high humidity. A cooler opposing (clear and/or cooled by seawater) surface will condense the vapor. So the sun drives brackish or salty liquid to vapor which then condenses back to unsalty water and is collected.

At noon with a good solar angle you get about 1 kilowatt/sq.meter equivalent insolation, as a pump energy source to drive the vaporization. 1kW = 1kJ/sec = 250cal/sec. Heat of vaporization and heat capacity of liquid water (about 1cal/gm) to heat the water up 20-30 degrees Celsius can be found in books for reasonable working temperatures. If you get 1gm (1ml) per sec, that's 3.6 liters per hour per sq. meter, and you might well do a lot better (guess: 10x that).

Run a solar panel to drive a small pump pair...

user-pic

He's describing a basic solar still. It works, in principle, though I question its cost-effectiveness when measured in terms of the amount of water needed for more than a few people at a time.

user-pic

Well, cost is not the only concern here and operating costs could be very low even if capital costs are moderate. Solar panels are sold this way, very low opeating cost, very high capital cost.

The main cost might be rent, land (or water surface) use cost. In low rent areas, that wouldn't be a problem.

user-pic

Note, eds, that I did not say cost, I said cost-effectiveness. Does it put out useful quantities of water - sufficient to justify installation and operation?

user-pic

Well ... I outlined the cost-effectiveness parameters (capital, rent, ...), grouch. If you want to submit an RFQ, please be specific and detailed! I'm sure the capital cost is a lot less than a good quality photovoltaic array of the same size.

user-pic

I am completely ignorant in this area in part because I live in Boulder CO where many more intelligent people pay attention to such things but I know it needs attention. We've had some draught issues and during the election the subject that other states wanted more water from CO was 'fightin' words.

I am thinking we are fortunate to have a president who will have in his mind the facts of population, food supply, water supply, energ supply and how all of these things effect national security. I hope that people like you and Eds will find some answers because that is certainly not my territory. Glad you are having a dialogue about it. I cheer you on!

user-pic

Living in New Mexico, I'm curious if it was us who were causing all of the fuss?

This state is more dependent upon one river than is logical. Without the Rio Grande, we'd not be able to live here. Problem is, that it's not really a 'grande' river at all. Some parts of the year, you can wade across it....

user-pic

A lady I once knew told me there is no such thing as not having water to drink because the 'oceans are full of it'! Of course I tried to explain the desalination dilemma, the cost, and the imbalance in ecosystems that would result, but she stated that she was still an advocate of turning ocean water into drinking water regardless of the costs.

"Yahbut," I said, knowing she was a total germophobe, "Whales poop in the ocean. Do you really want to drink water that whales used for a toilet?"

I lose so many friends that way. *Sigh*

user-pic

LOL

user-pic

ROTFLMAO! :)

user-pic

W.C. Fields was asked why he drank his whiskey neat.

He said "I don't drink water; fish f**k in it."

user-pic

Welcome Tom. Funny stuff. Cute limericks post too.

user-pic

Honest questions: How does the projected near-50% increase in world population between now and 2050 factor into this demand for water? Where are most of them going to be living? What resources for water recovery, desalination, or capture will they have?

I'm not a demographer, hydrologist, or anything of the sort, but even as a civilian the trend lines look very bad.

user-pic

OG - Water, food, resources, waste...thats a lotta people to plan for. I dont know how we do as much as we do now. There surely a way to handle it, but we should be concerned about rapid population growth. It is not healthy.

user-pic

See, those are the questions people are not asking.

user-pic

another interesting post, yug. Thanks.

Water is so fundamental to life you'd think we'd treat it with more respect.


user-pic

Yug, gooooood post.

There will be many wars fought over this issue.

user-pic

Lets hope not, DD. It doesnt have to be that way.

Leave a comment

yug doog

user-pic

Following: 9
Followers: 17

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs TPM

Bio

I think that progressives, being logical creatures, need to study and understand the universe so that we can bring more order to the local reality based community.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address