DAILY SCIENCE FIX - LIFE INTO MACHINES - Is this what you want DickDay?
Part One - Life into Machines.
Part Two tomorrow - Machines into Life.
The field of DNA nanotechnology has literally gained another dimension.
Using pieces of DNA like so many Legos, researchers made a series of complex, three-dimensional structures. The technique could eventually be used to design custom-shaped, nano-scale drug-delivery systems and diagnostic devices.
"Imagine that you could encode different charge patterns on your Lego bricks, so that they only fit together in a very specific manner," said molecular biologist William Shih of Harvard Medical School, co-author of a study Wednesday in Nature. "We make linear sequences of DNA, throw them into a pot, and let them find each other."
"We'd like to build larger and larger structures," he said. "It's like the evolution of integrated circuit microprocessors. We've been able, over time, to increase the number of transistors on each circuit. We'd like to follow the same trajectory with molecularly engineered objects."
In an essential step toward programming cells as precisely as computers, synthetic biologists have finally learned to count.
By linking a series of protein switches, researchers made prototype cell-level counters that could eventually be used to coordinate complex sets of genetic instructions running on biomolecular machines, from disease-hunting cells to intracellular computing networks. In the electronic world, basic counting functions underlie even the most powerful supercomputers.
"What we've done is to impose some of the controls we've imposed in electrical engineering onto the biological cell," said synthetic biologist Timothy Lu at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. "We hope to be able to control the cell more reliably, and have it perform more defined functions. This forms the fundamental basis for building more complicated circuits."
A team of biologists and chemists is closing in on bringing non-living matter to life.
It's not as Frankensteinian as it sounds. Instead, a lab led by Jack Szostak, a molecular biologist at Harvard Medical School, is building simple cell models that can almost be called life.
Szostak's protocells are built from fatty molecules that can trap bits of nucleic acids that contain the source code for replication. Combined with a process that harnesses external energy from the sun or chemical reactions, they could form a self-replicating, evolving system that satisfies the conditions of life, but isn't anything like life on earth now, but might represent life as it began or could exist elsewhere in the universe.
One wonders if our hubris will destroy us someday soon.
Stay Tuned...

















"We'd like to build larger and larger structures," he said. "It's like the evolution of integrated circuit microprocessors. We've been able, over time, to increase the number of transistors on each circuit. We'd like to follow the same trajectory with molecularly engineered objects."
I am fascinated by 'progress'. I mean how do we know what progress is as opposed to regress?
It does not matter to me. I am toooo taken by it all
When I saw people talking to computers with their minds...
I mean I was taken.
And glowing frogs...glowing cats....
I really like this stuff.
Great post Yug. I will always check your blogs before I go off into some comedic rant.
June 4, 2009 12:17 AM | Reply | Permalink
You have free license here sir. I dont have a license on anything. I was mostly joking.
June 4, 2009 12:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is a fine line between hubris and science, or between hubris and faith, for that matter.
But your point is well taken, yug. Our search for ultimate knowledge may very well be our own undoing.
June 4, 2009 12:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Insofar as facts represent truth, science is the one place where it is possible to know truth.
Since we humans practice science, and we are fallible, we often corrupt and obscure the truth.
Truth is a kind of power and thus the combination of the ability to know truth with human fallibility creates situations of enormous hazard. A sword in the hands of a child.
June 4, 2009 1:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
You know, advancement always comes with risk...but so does the status quo. The issue here is hubris. Im not about to crawl back into a cave but at the same time I wish some of our scientific community would realize how arrogant and blind they are to the implications of their actions. AND BE FUCKING CAREFUL!
June 4, 2009 10:48 AM | Reply | Permalink
Of course and every advance can be used for an evil purpose so it is possible that our advancing tool skills will lead to our end as a species. Many of these techniques have become so inexpensive that practically anyone who has a little money and can read could really create some dangerous situations. Thus we are left in the position of relying on the milk of human kindness, thin ice at best.
June 4, 2009 12:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
There goes the neighborhood!
(I wanted to post this all day but I had to find the link!)
June 4, 2009 9:14 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your comment makes me think about global warming and the idea that we can do something about it... could we go too far or create other 'issues' while trying to make things 'better'. I remember John Stewart asking the head of EPA about this.
My father has always been fascinated by science fiction and the notion that if we can imagine things we can eventually figure out ways to bring them into reality.
Fortunately and unfortunately there seem to be some mysterious laws of co-creation that limit our capacity to do this. It is a tricky thing to take risks and not create absolute doom and destruction with some of these possibilities.
June 4, 2009 2:27 PM | Reply | Permalink
.
A sword in the hands of a child?
How'd this thread digress to Bush?
~OGD~
June 4, 2009 5:11 AM | Reply | Permalink
Creating life from non-life is a very interesting notion. I suppose, it could be argued that all life is composed of non-life. All life is composed of cells, which are composed of chemical compounds, which are composed of basic elements, most particularly, carbon. Is carbon alive? If it is not, at what instant does an assemblage of carbon and other elements become alive? Is it merely the complexity with which those elements are assembled that confers life, or is there some other non-seen factor required, such as a spirit?
June 4, 2009 10:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
I asked those same questions in this post
Creating Life in the Lab
And the philosophy behind those questions in this one
Ultimately its a question of your take on emergent properties. Do we get something from nothing and if so then where'd it come from?
June 4, 2009 10:44 AM | Reply | Permalink
I had missed that particular post, good guy (I'd prefer not to adress you by your anagram handle, if that's okay?). You very well presented the subject therein.
June 4, 2009 12:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Call me whatever you like. Thanks for your kind words and your thoughtful comments.
June 4, 2009 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
If so, it would bring an early end to the Holocene Extinction Event, and thereby improve the prospects of hundred of thousands of other species.
June 4, 2009 10:14 AM | Reply | Permalink
Merill you predict our extinction with far too much detachment!
June 4, 2009 10:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was just trying to look on the bright side.
Although, based on our track record of causing the extinction of other species, it seems plausible that we would cause our own extinction. Also note that the extinctions of other species have been accomplished without genetic engineering or creating artificial life. It seems possible that we could also extinguish ourselves one of the old-fashioned ways. It's a safe bet that more people have been killed in the last year by blades - knives, machetes, spears, swords - than by laser-guided rockets and bombs.
And there was a tantalizing story some years ago, that after years of research, the Australians had finally figured out how to kill all the rabbits.
June 4, 2009 12:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
It is ignorance that kills people, yug, not knowledge.
June 4, 2009 12:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
In many cases that is correct. Ignorance can kill us.
(Genesis 2:9) . . .God made to grow out of the ground every tree desirable to one’s sight and good for food and also the tree of life in the middle of the garden and the tree of the knowledge of good and bad.
(Genesis 3:3-5) . . .But as for [eating] of the fruit of the tree that is in the middle of the garden, God has said, ‘YOU must not eat from it, no, YOU must not touch it that YOU do not die.’” 4 At this the serpent said to the woman: “YOU positively will not die. 5 For God knows that in the very day of YOUR eating from it YOUR eyes are bound to be opened and YOU are bound to be like God, KNOWING good and bad.
When MAN thought he could be like God. We found out, knowledge without understanding, knowledge without wisdom, is of very little use.
I am afraid, many of the Earths inhabitants are UN - reasonable, ACTING, like powerful Gods.
We can split the atom, but what do we do with the waste? We can change living things genetically, but what are the ramifications?
Be careful, your "Servant doesn’t become your master."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BRoUpDON0_0
(Jeremiah 4:22) . . .For my people is foolish. Of me they have not taken note. They are unwise sons; and they are not those having understanding. Wise they are for doing bad, but for doing good they actually have no knowledge.
KNOWLEDGE BEING GOOD, BUT NOT GOOD ENOUGH
June 4, 2009 1:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
Resistance - I love the Genesis story as an analogy of the problem with knowledge...and maybe judgment day will be at our own hands.
June 4, 2009 6:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
.
Don't get too excited . . .
. . . about the Genesis as analogy of the problem with knowledge.
See my comment to Resistance directly below.
~OGD~
June 4, 2009 7:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yug wrote: and maybe judgment day will be at our own hands.
I have given attention to that thought for a long time.
Some speak of a God who at Armageddon will destroy mankind as something vile.
Looking at it from GODS perspective.
If the ungodly that wanted to exercise their freewill, had done it in a way that would not have made people suffer, especially those seeking Godly devotion, God may not have intervened in Earths affairs.
Seeing maybe? "judgment day may come at our own hands." Why wouldn't a GOD who cares for those that look to him for salvation, in order to survive the coming devastation at man's hand Stand up and defend the people and our planet?
Only to hear from those out of control, rejecting the counsel that ensures peace and happiness for all of Earths inhabitants.
These out of control Ungodly, with weapons of mass destruction, crying that a GOD who cares, has no right to intervene to save not only mankind’s home. (EARTH) but saving those, willing to learn, how to live in Peace and Harmony.
When these ungodly men, come looking for the blood of His servants, they’ll find an extremely powerful protector, standing up for his people.
Having forewarned the Nations to be careful, we are today as close to an intervention as we have ever been.
Mass Destruction by man himself, on such a large scale is not a myth, it is where we are, today. Denial is not a safeguard.
June 4, 2009 9:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
.
Well . . .
A little time steeping ones own self deeply into the Sumerian myths that predate the biblical writings would no doubt bring helpful context to how the stories that have evolved through cultural and religious manipulations of the tales.
Taken as a whole, the light of truth becomes much brighter on the subject of the "Tree of Life" ... Enki and the double-helix (see photo).
Your mileage may very ... and I'm sure it does.
~OGD~
June 4, 2009 6:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love all of that stuff. I dont have time enough to study everything but theres a lot to learn from the old myths.
June 4, 2009 10:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I believe that first symbol in your link derives it's significance from the days of Moses when the Nation rebelled and had to wander in the wilderness for 40 years.
The Nation ran into deadly serpents.
Moses had to erect a signal. On a stake with copper serpents, so that if any were bitten, they would gaze upon the Copper serpent and their faith kept them alive.
We still look to the one on the stake and through faith we are kept alive.
The other symbol or helix gives me hope that the creator of this coding of life, only has to remember the sequencing.
For GOD who knows all the stars by name, this code allows him to resurrect each individual because the numbering sequence is easily reproduced
June 4, 2009 11:09 PM | Reply | Permalink
Unfortunately, BevD... ignorance and knowledge can kill, and sometimes both combine. Knowledge of warfare and tactics, for example. Knowledge that led to the bomb. The promethean knowledge. Ignorance was required to facilitate their use, but knowledge of these things were required to bring them into being.
June 4, 2009 1:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
I thought this would be the response. Knowledge itself is neutral it is how we act upon it and use it that makes it dangerous. Knowledge of warfare doesn't cause war.
June 4, 2009 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
It should be of note that the development of nuclear technology was first used to destroy and then to serve mankind. We commonly get things backward before we get them right. A rather sad commentary on our species.
In light of all that history teaches us in this regard it is so odd that in almost every instance of a nation state, that is the normal progression taken by leaders. That fact should enlighten us immensely about how to formulate a government.
Yet we find ouselves in the midst of a situation where our government is taking more and more power and has chosen to disregard the regulatory scheme we had long ago recognized as absolutely necessary. This feels so much like raising children. You try and teach your kids ways of doing things that you learned are successful but they have to go their own way and inevitably screw up before they get it. Surely we are missing something we ought to be doing. I'm thinking maybe we need to be teaching our children a far more detailed and critical examination of history than we are doing now, with a heavy focus on all the ways to screw up. That is, teach them the things that are known to lead to failure as opposed to the other way around.
June 5, 2009 8:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bev - Maybe Zipp would be happier if you used the word wisdom. Anyway, theres far more ignorace than knowledge or wisdom floating around.
June 4, 2009 6:24 PM | Reply | Permalink
Charles Darwin
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge".
June 5, 2009 8:05 AM | Reply | Permalink
good post yug. We can advance our technology and construct physical matter and bio systems and actions and interactions.
But that's architecture. True we can make intelligent architecture or good or evil architecture--we can program architecture. We can build robots in our own image, but humans are not just parts.
Not just a collection of bio systems.
There is an unchartered ecosystem of consciousness or light--our souls, our spiritual life, that I think we rush past and ignore as we race to build mere physical manifestations.
We both know that even as some scientists explore quantum physics and explore questions of consciousness, most of the thinking on the "soul" remains in traditional constructs of religion--traditional notions of god, as depicted in bibles written 5000 or so years ago, edited and retold to, IMHO, (to some extent anyway) selfishly suit certain groups in pursuit of power.
Again, IMHO, the consequence of this is that technology is advancing at a dangerously faster pace than humanity.
We can do such good things with our technology and we have --but if history is any indication--we will swagger our way into a delicate and infinitely complex balance of life with the precision of a blunt instrument.
June 4, 2009 1:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I love your comments Gary. Always spot on!
I dont have much to add except that we can learn a lot from our ancestors about the spirit/soul/god/wisdom etc...since they were refreshingly free of the modern lifestyle. Knowledge can be blinding at times regarding such things.
Not saying I want to go back to ancient times, but they werent so dumb on matters of the soul.
June 4, 2009 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
lots to learn from our ancestors--lots to learn from eastern philosophy--space is not the final frontier. Don't get me wrong, shooting rockets up at the sky has its value. But that's just looking outward. The more prolific journey, I believe, is inward.
I know so little to really be certain about anything, but it's what I think, what can I tell you?
The exploration of that thing we refer to as consciousness is the next paradigm shifter. The sooner we embrace that as a valid science, not just a "religious experience", the better off we'll be.
June 4, 2009 10:38 PM | Reply | Permalink
The key to having knowledge be useful and put to good purpose is for everyone to have it. When governments, corporations or individuals work to control who has it and who doesn't then you know for sure they are up to no good.
June 4, 2009 3:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
No argument here TPC
June 4, 2009 9:00 PM | Reply | Permalink