« The Scorpion (G.O.P.) and the Turtle (Democrats) | RedSoxIn2009Baby!'s Blog | Virg Bernero (Lansing Mayor): Washington and Wall Street have sold out the American worker »

Credit Cards = Risk Transferring Device / Risk Delivery System


A few days ago, Arianna Huffington posted a piece about how:

"Hot on the heels of the banking crisis, the employment crisis, and the mortgage/foreclosure crisis, the country is on the verge of experiencing a credit card crisis."

Defaults will rise in the next 2 years, and the pooled receivables packaged into securitized assets will damage pension and mutual funds portfolios, etc. just like the mortgage-back securities and CDOs. I don't doubt that this is true. Individuals and families already on the brink -- have mistakenly been lead to believe that some Credit Card Debt is "good debt" -- were sold crushing debt, that was then packaged into big asset pools and sold off to investors. Dave Ramsey says that debt has been the most heavily marketing product of the last 3 decades. The public has been securitized; indentured and now finds itself forced to work in order to pay upstream for the rest of their lives to cover their debts.

Since 1980, the middle class has been under attack. I'm no Dean Baker, but I'm pretty sure the real wage has stagnated. In order to prevent themselves from dropping out of the middle-class, families and individuals have sort of "papered over" their lack of rising wages with Credit Card debt. Thus becoming ensnared in the bear trap that Credit Card companies set for us across the country - at Malls, at Baseball games, and most insidiously, on college campuses. 

-----

Remember when Big Tobacco was finally nailed dead to rights? There was a memo stating that they viewed cigarettes as a nicotine delivery system:

"Cigarettes are a "nicotine delivery system"; the main reason people smoke is to get nicotine into their bodies; and nicotine is chemically "similar" to such drugs as cocaine."

They admitted that their product was addictive, and they hoped people (and kids) got addicted to it. They were found liable in court for their devious marketing to children.

Similarly, I see Credit Cards as a "Risk Transferring Device" or a "Risk Delivery System". When we use a Credit Card to pay hospital bills or vet bills or car repair bills we immediately transfer the risk of non-payment that the business used to assume in the ordinary course of business, directly upon ourselves. In the past, a business or hospital ran a risk that their customers may not be able to pay. If we knew the car repair shop owner, this wasn't a big deal. We'd pay eventually; we were good for it. But since Midas and Wal-Mart runs every shop across the country now, they don't care who we are. Pay now; accept the risk with your Credit Card immediately or walk to work.

So now we have the horror stories of hospitals turning us away if we can't produce a Credit Card (I know, because I don't have a card). If you use a credit card to pay them, then all risk is immediately transferred to you. Credit Cards are a convenient "Risk Delivery System" favored by big business.

My questions:

1. When will the whistleblower at CapitalOne or MBNA step forward with the damning Memo that implicates Credit Card companies for aggressively selling debt that they know their customers can never pay back? That memo exists. Please set it free. I know there's at least one 25 year old Credit Analyst with a conscience embedded at Discover right now.

2. I strongly believe that the lack of citizenship in the past 20-30 years is a direct result of this kind of financial dominance. Despite all the bailouts, we still haven't taken to the streets like other country's populaces. Even Joe Stiglitz wonders Why? I say it's because we're scared and ensnared. If we act up against BofA, we might all of a sudden have a bad "credit score" or no access to an "emergency fund" credit card.  This crisis has shown that we've all been living on the brink for too long, and completely at the mercy of lines of credit.

Before I get slammed for not respecting the role that personal responsibility plays in all this, let me say that the average credit card debt is Over $4,200 Per Adult, and Over $8,100 Per Household.  That's a lot of people suffering.  As Barack would say:  That matters to me.

It's time to kick all Credit Cards to the curb, and protest loudly until we end their many, many abuses and crass exertion of power.

Please feel free to Recommend.  Would love a robust discussion...


41 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

interesting point of view. Yet the age of wealth concentration and debt distribution continues.

user-pic

tpmgary: I don't disagree; it's not over, but it's slipping a bit (hopefully). I know of no other business that treats it's customers as poorly as CC Companies do its borrowers. If Sony made flatscreens that blew up and burned our houses down, we'd stop buying those products.

There's a psychology at play here when it comes to money. (ie, I need the credit to buy my son the "GI Joe with the Kung Fu Grip") I wonder why else we would allow ourselves to be so mistreated?

user-pic

18? In college? Great how about a 10,000$ limit?
Here you go...

I know a lot of kids who were given cards like that. Morally reprehensible.

user-pic

So is charging 20% and 30% interest. But we can't talk about that. It's considered whining.

user-pic

It is markedly the equivalent of providing mortgages to people who have insufficient credit. Again, the game was to make the loan and then sell it before the ink dried. These lenders thought, "Hey! It's not MY problem now!"

Well,now it is their problem. This problem now belongs to all of us. Thank you, Republicans, for insisting our financial institutions did not need a police force. Who would have thought a concentration of money would attract thieves?!?

user-pic

Just so.

Boggles the mind..........

user-pic

I like the idea of a strict limit. $5-10,000 seems to make sense. (I knew people in the 1990's that had $56,000 in credit card debt, and no job.)

user-pic

We need to relearn the real value of a dollar.

Maybe we should change the relationship between credit cards and the products we buy with those credit cards.

Let's say you buy a flatscreen tv with a credit card.

It doesn't start working until you make a payment on that credit card.

If your first payment represents 15% of the purchase price of the flat screen tv, then only 15% of the flat screen tv would work.

Continue payments and eventually you'll get 100% of the picture.


user-pic

How about returning to a cash society?

How about returning to "credit" that is connected to a neighborhood merchant with whom you have a personal relationship instead of a behemoth, anonymous, impersonal financial institution?

How about the end of worthless investment schemes like junk bonds and credit default swaps and mortgage backed securities, other ill-defined, recursive investments?

How about unlinking credit extended by one source from all other sources so that you are not at the mercy (which is few and far between) of the credit card company as to whether they jack the hell out of your interest rate to some exorbitant rate where you'd get a better deal all around from a loan shark?

Oh lord, I feel a rant coming on....

user-pic

Coming on? You're there, and it needs saying!

Can you jus tenvision the future where that flat screen TV requies 10% down before a purchase can be made? Or, finding lenders who will loan the down payment at 25%, and then the remainder at only 7%? They did that with houses. It was one of those exotic loans they discuss.

The real question should be, "Why does anyone NEED a flat screen TV?"

user-pic

Coming on? You're there, and it needs saying!

Can you just envision the future where that flat screen TV requires 10% down before a purchase can be made? Or, finding lenders who will loan the down payment at 25%, and then the remainder at only 7%? They did that with houses. It was one of those exotic loans they discuss.

The real question should be, "Why does anyone NEED a flat screen TV?"

user-pic
In order to prevent themselves from dropping out of the middle-class, families and individuals have sort of "papered over" their lack of rising wages with Credit Card debt.

Yes, groceries, health insurance, heating oil, lifes little emergencies. Thing is, those "emergencies" seem to have increased in price by 200-400%. Of course, our increased productivity means that we are working longer and harder for less and less. People are tired, and don't think as clearly in those circumstances, they just know that the kid needs new shoes, because the little angels are too small and have holes besides... (poor quality chinese shoes, too bad)

How did we get here?


user-pic

"My god, what have I done?"

My friend pointed me to Niall Fergusen's interview in Canada from a few days ago entitled "There Will Be Blood: Harvard economic historian Niall Ferguson predicts prolonged financial hardship, even civil war, before the ‘Great Recession' ends." [Link below]

Ugh... The only thing keeping us afloat is the grace of the Chinese. They really have us by the short hairs.

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20090223.wferguson0223/BNStory/crashandrecovery/home/?pageRequested=all

user-pic

Thanks for that link, Bwakfat. Very entertaining and apropos.

user-pic

Man you have hit a real sore point with me on this one. I don't own any credit cards and haven't for years. Do to the nature of my interests (electronics and photography) I do a great deal of purchasing over the NET. But if a merchant will only accept a CC for payment, he has forever lost my business...regardless of his prices.

I will NOT use a credit card...period.

C

user-pic

cmaukonen: Spread the word my friend! Let's help save our fellow Americans... :)

user-pic

Great blog, Wade. Rec'd.

I find I'm torn up about this stuff. I agree 100% that the whole financial monster has grown out of control, and that those most responsible - who entered into that industry and held positions at various higher levels and KNEW and justified to themselves this kind of immoral and often ILLEGAL activity - should be prosecuted, and their ill-gotten personal stashes confiscated.

But there's more levels of this story to come. I've had the pleasure of delving fairly deeply into a series of industries - electricity, oil & gas, waste management, automaking, forestry, housing, "agribusiness," etc. And what did I see? The same kind of rot. Immoral, and often directly deceptive, even illegal practices.

e.g. The ferocious lying the forestry companies did about their clearcutting practices. Nuclear & coal. Oil & gas. The automakers lobbied like furies against CAFE standards, lied like hell, because they wanted to sell more tin and chrome to people in SUVs, so they'd make more profit. In housing, from land developers through getting zoning approvals to purchasing materials to onsite construction practices right through sales (and then finance) - immorality and illegality was rife. So you have, at the base of every primary/extractive and manufacturing industry, not just the occasional lie, but systemic deception.

Now move another notch, to that great growth industry - communications, marketing, advertising. Each of those firms worked to tart the shit produced into fancy packages. And the people involved very often KNEW what the game/lie was, because the ads were often spun to defend against groups attacking them, or to soothe consumer qualms. Same with retail. Rot from products sourced overseas to labor standards to deceptive pricing to getting permission to build.

Then government. Not just the financial regulators, but food... drugs... safety... labor standards... environment. Plus all those industry analysts. And all the admin-types and tax people, who accepted hundreds and hundreds of dirty deals.

And the politicians knew.

And all of these people talked to the media.

This is without once putting any responsibility on consumers (SOME at least of whom knew they shouldn't be such greedheads, as they bought their 4rd car or various of those fabulous luxury items we've been inundated with these past decades.) And then, the voters. Politicians who voted against tax cuts - or spoke against them, like Mondale - whatever happened to them? And our media watching habits? We knew the news and the media lied, and we watched their channels anyway.

What I'm saying is that YES, some people were more responsible. And some big chunk of that group SHOULD be prosecuted.

But. Be Obama for a minute. Think about how he's handling this, and HAS to handle this. He knows this economic storm is gonna take out millions of jobs, dozens and dozens of major firms. He's got those numbers. He also knows damn well that a lot of them are going to turn out to have been run by lying, thieving, morons. As in automaking. But since he knows the rot ran right across our economic lives... through finance to production and consumption and bleeding right into our culture, our media and our democratic practices... what should he do?

What I hear him saying is that the worst excesses and most responsibility lay at the top... and must be brought to justice or reined in or whatever. But also, each time he tells us that too many of US bought in, in too many ways.

And he's NOT just doing this for political reasons. He's doing this because, as these jobs and firms and sectors things fall, we have to very quickly find ways to rebuild, restructure, root out the worst and get going on the good. We could very easily be in for a decade where consumption could be down by 10%-20%.

People think it's about "economic growth" and "rising GDP." But this hides some real problems. Even if that reverses itself, we are gonna have to take at least 5% of out income that we were formerly spending, and turn it into savings. PLUS another 5% of GDP that we'll have to produce, but can no longer consume, but must send overseas to balance our trade deficit out. PLUS X% to start paying down the deficits we're gonna have to run.

So he not only needs to right the economic ship... stop and reverse the money virus that ran amuk... prosecute the guilty... refound each of these industries... BUT DO THIS WHILE TELLING HIS ENTIRE NATION that they all cut consumption by 10%-20% to pay down their own debt, taxes, and the trade balance. with no more papering over things with crappy lying debt and credit cards or home equity withdrawals or quick kills on the stock market.

If credit was a con - and it was - and only provided an addict's fix to deeper problems of income distribution and such... then the problem isn't just jailing the conmen... it's how to live with the addiction removed.

user-pic

Wages.

Easy.

user-pic

If you mean "living within our wages" Bwak, then yeah, it should be easy for 60% of the population. A hell of a lot tougher for those on lower wages or none at all. And the bloody way we Anglo-American economies prefer to distribute economic decline is by dumping people direct on the unemployment lines, or by squeezing the wages of the lowest paid. With the nightmarish consequence that EVERYONE feels frightened for their job, so - since no one feels secure - even those who are relatively safe and well off tend to tighten up.

Which means we're gonna need some serious unemployment/welfare support... or bad-ass multi-million person public sector job creation.... or major league income redistribution.... or worksharing. I'd prefer the latter two (especially since North Americans work longer than most any other region), but there's a big swath of people out there in the 'burbs, living in 3 car, 5 bathroom McMansions who are gonna fight against any of those options. Why, they can barely make ends meet on $180k. Ack.

user-pic

As Rotwang demonstrated, the $180K families make up a somewhat small slice of the population.

No. I meant raise wages. For 75% of the population. The ones that don't want McMansions, the ones that make the wealthy, wealthy.

If you meant that the 25% with limitless means should learn to limit their greed so the rest can live within their means because they have enough, I'm with ya, Q.

user-pic

Yup, I'm totally in favor of raising the wages of the lowest 40%. It's one hell of a sticky process during a downturn though. Once you've got whole businesses - even sectors - built around low wages, the risk is you throw a lot of people out of work. Easier to do during an upturn. And politically, a business which was going bankrupt anyway will always find the latest thing the government has done, and blame THAT action for "forcing it out of business." Argh.

And then there's that % of the working class population that has bought this nonsense about how somehow they're gonna get rich. Nothing makes me nuttier than seeing 45 year old guys (yep, it's largely guys) who somehow believe they're gonna get their foot on the golden ladder, so they don't want to tarnish the dream/mirage of the easy life at the top. That "wannabe" class that fed on Republican bullshit promises/dreams, all I can do is hope they've started to wake up, and see life might not be so bad on a solid, not "rich" income.

Nonetheless, if we're gonna have go through a period of years when the state has to own or fund or otherwise restructure whole industries... then for God's sake, let's make sure they put in sensible wage structures, limited working hours/weeks/years, solid benefits and limited top-to-bottom pay ratios. I'm so sick of having had to listen to assholes shout every time we pushed to raise the minimum wage, even when unemployment was down to effectively nothing.... but then somehow raising the top end pay seemed an issue of national security.

user-pic

Dave Ramsey's got bumper stickers: "ACT YOUR WAGE"

user-pic

it's how to live with the addiction removed.

Oh, there it is, really. The "I want it NOW" attitude, and the "I want it ALL" attitude is where we lost our way. It is time to simply laugh at the fools who make those declarations and have nothing to get it. We've too often promoted people for making these boasts and then we move on as they crash and burn. How many lottery winners and one-hit wonders are there that did "have-it-all" but could not keep it?

The real winners, if they are winners, are those janitors who eaves-dropped on the economics classes, bought shares, and left the university millions. There are many little guys who kept their head and amassed wealth by living within their means. They wore decent clothes, but washed them a few times before they threw them away. They wore nice shoes, but did not feel the need to have twenty pairs, because five was plenty. They owned their own homes, but cut their own grass rather then getting a lawn service.

We have to work for ourselves when we are not working. We have been working too much for too long for others and then, because we have only a short time for ourselves, we grab the quick fixes. These purchases are symptoms of the problem, not the problem, which is not to say quick fixes are not a problem. It only means we would not need them if we had more time for ourselves and our families.

user-pic

Quinn, you're getting at exactly where I'm going with my own thinking right now. Exactly! I'm going to reference your comment here and bwak's blog. But it's even bigger. Systemic Deception is the word. I'm going to borrow it from you!

And in my view, yes, it is all carried on the "back" of advertising. Everything being packaged as a "commodity" to be sold. It's everywhere in our society. To a sickening degree! I keep trying to formulate a blog but it's like follow a monster that grows bigger the more I track it!

user-pic

Commoditized health care and securitized people (via Credit Cards) are the one that makes me the saddest...

Advertising and the psychology of consumption play a central role in this. I don't have any formed thoughts on it, but you're on to something TheraP. Looking forward to the Systemic Deception blog post...

user-pic

People have been pointing out how wonderful life is in Sweden and Germany, on other threads.

user-pic

I have two credit cards, each of which I pay off each month. They give me points and I use them for a few airplane tickets and motel stays every once in awhile. I used to get 20 or 30 new credit card offers every month. Now, I get very few. Evidently, they are tightening their reins. One of them sent me a notice that they were raising all their fees and interest costs if I don't pay them on time. The other one lowered my limit, from $25,000 to $22,500. Not sure why they gave me that big a limit in the first place, my bill is only a few hundred a month.

I hope the credit card companies all go broke. I hope the insurance companies and banks follow them to the bankruptcy court. Now, that will hurt the stock market and the pension plans. Personally, I don't care, I don't own any stock, and won't ever get a pension.

Part of the problem, I think, is that the money changers hooked a large percentage of the people in their scheme. They sold part of the action to the pension plans so many are counting on.

user-pic

They've gone further than slowing the deluge of offers to a trickle.
In the last month I've had 3 cards cancelled/closed by JPMorgan Chase.
No balance due on either card, and never a late payment on either - I just hadn't used them in roughly a year. One of them had a $10.00 surplus for which they included a check. Total credit on the cards was roughly $28,000.00.
My credit score(LOL) was almost perfect - I'm a low-risk borrower.
Now, my credit rating is going to take a hit because those accounts were closed.

What's up with that?
Are they afraid I'm going to start using them again? And they can't afford to have that money out of their reserves?

user-pic

In the past, a business or hospital ran a risk that their customers may not be able to pay. If we knew the car repair shop owner, this wasn't a big deal. We'd pay eventually; we were good for it.

In the past, businesses required retail customers to pay in cash or by check. They might extend credit to business customers, but had to be really careful. Businesses failed when they had to write off too many uncollectable receivables.

user-pic
In the past, businesses required retail customers to pay in cash or by check. They might extend credit to business customers, but had to be really careful. Businesses failed when they had to write off too many uncollectable receivables.

This is so true. I worked for a place back in the 60s that got into this very sort of trouble. And with very well to do (read rich, rich, rich) clients. These people are the hardest to get money from. The owner nearly lost the business.

C

user-pic

True that. I have witnessed personally many business borrowers who took the money and then took a lifetime to return the money. With these folks, they laugh because you gave them credit and then they clenched their fists and taunted the lenders with the shout, "Yeah, you try and take my money!" Even though it was a loan, they considered that money theirs, not the lenders.

user-pic

I agree. Didn't mean to make light of the difficulty in collecting (I collect for my Dad's business, and it's impossible. Especially from the rich ones).

But since we're on the topic of personal relationships at the point of purchase, it's important to note that Credit Cards make it impersonal, and more abstract. People don't negotiate prices downward anymore, and to me, I'm witnessing prices climb out of control as a result.

Similarly, I don;t think this was a housing bubble, as much as a DEBT bubble. If the debt instruments that allowed for $600,000 homes were never concocted, we wouldn't have had those crazy purchases. Rational pricing became untethered during this debting economy.

user-pic

I concur whole heartedly. The easy and impersonal credit allowed for this mess to happen. I remember (am I dating my self here ?) when to get a mortgage or any kind of loan really, one would eventually have to meat with the president and/or manager of the bank. And you had two avenues for car loans...banks or through the manufacturer (GMAC...etc).

Credit cards where for the more well off. American Express, Carte Blanche, Diners Club. Oh and gas cards. That was pretty much it. All else was cash.

C

user-pic

Those days may be coming back. In Chase's investor day presentations last week, their presentation said that for new mortgages they want 20 or preferably 30% down payment, FICO > 700, and full documentation on mortgage, which they now only originate through their own branches and branch staff. They would also prefer that you have been a customer of the branch for other services as well.

No more wholesale channel for independent brokers. They want to know who their customers are.

They also prefer to issue credit cards through their own branches, rather than to people that they don't have other relations with.

user-pic

I have never met a person who was forced to take a credit card against their will. Maybe I don't know the right people.

Oh, I forgot how everyone here was complaining during the primaries how stupid Americans are.

It all makes sense now.

user-pic

Lalo35adm: Good to see you. Yeah, same goes with Cocaine, and Heroin and Crystal Meth, but I'm not in any hurry to hide behind that as a defense for its devastation to our young people and economy.

user-pic

Kick your credit cards to the curb: pay them off.

user-pic

Speaking of, if anyone out there owes any amount, you can definitely pay them off at pennies on the dollar right now. They're desperate.

Tell them you're in distress, and offer to pay 1/3rd. If they don't accept it, they'll end up accepting HALF. Don't feel bad about it. 1) They want the money, and 2) F#ck 'em.

:)

user-pic

So, WaMu, Countrywide, etc., are as bad as a cigarette company that knowingly pushed toxic, addictive poisons to our children?

This goes too far for me.

You passingly mention "personal responsiblity", and that's a shame.

As the old saying goes, you can lead a horse to water.....

user-pic

Dorn76: I understand where you're coming from.

If 30% interest rates can't be equated with nicotine, maybe you'd prefer Loan Sharking and/or The Mob's illegal gambling rackets?

The fact is before 1974 (or thereabouts) companies were barred from charging usurious rates. We seemed to get along just fine without, right? No Depression 2.0 from 1945 to 1974, from what I recall, and we had a stable middle class.

My history may be off a bit, but around '74 the Supreme Court allowed for interstate interest charges that weren't capped at a reasonable rate (like 10%). So now we have 30% interest rates on a LOT of cards. Not just the horrible "bad risk people" that no one claims to know personally (I know plenty of 'em. They're all of us.).

Read the Home Depot card contract the next time you're in line. It's like 26%. And I haven't even gotten to the PayDay Loan shops that charge annualized interest rate in the 700% plus range. Yes, these companies have been allowed to charge that much. Yes, it should be illegal. IMHO, if they want to save capitalism and our consumer engine, they'll end this usury (Bernie Sanders ios working on legislation.).

Anyway, I respect where you're coming from. But we can definitely have a ferocious capitalism without usury and peonage.

Leave a comment

"Ruthless Pragmatism" Sucks

user-pic

Following: 2
Followers: 11

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address