When Geraldine Ferraro was commenting something about race on Obama, Olberman did not waste another day attacking not Geraldine but Hillary Clinton. Days after the video on Wright spreads like "anthrax" (complement from Hannity and Colmes show), Keith was silent about it. Comparing the gravity of both comments, Ferraro's comments were nothing compared to the bone wrenching lines of Jeremiah Wright attcking the USA as a nation, Hillary and Bill Clinton. Yet, Keith said nothing about Obama. Instead, as I watched Olberman the day after the video was played again and again by other networks, his demeanor was that of sad that his idol is about to go down freefalling like a parachute as a result of this unbelievable sermons on videos. Olberman instead invited Obama for a reaction and there you here how Obama made his effort to deny he never heard it while he was in the church. Can you believe he was not in the Church on December 25, 2007 when one one of those sermons were delivered? Then yesterday on his speech, Obama tried to recant his claims he was not there by indirectly saying he might have been there at the church and heard it. This is just clearly political positioning in order to accomplish his ambition to become president of this country that his pastor despised so much. So now I am calling Keith to say something. I am aware and I think most of America, know that MSNBC is left leaning liberal but at least they should be balanced with regards to the two Democratic nominees. They have really "darlinged" Obama and the company bosses should do something about this. I believe MSNBC is now feeling the heat becuase I am sure that as Obama goes down the sink MSMBC comes with him. By Keith.

I am a fan of Fineman but as a contributor of MSNBC, he is just like Olberman, Matthews and the rest of this cable's attack machine against Hillary courtesy of the Obama campaign. I watched MSNBC before but now just part of my browsing because there mouth are all Obama praises and all Clinton bashes. They criticize FOX News for being bias but they are the ones eating their words now. When the news broke out in Chicago about Rezko and Exelon there never was a discussion about it. But when the news about Bill Clinton on the money he got from what Slovenia?, the network was very busy discussing it even if Bill Clinton was not the candidate.  Anyway, I will never count Hillary out. She will win in OH, TX, PA and more states. By that time there will be no clear frontrunner and the role of the superdelegates will come in. They still have to decide on what to do with FL and MI. Obama's campaign claimed that there should be a redo because they did not campaign there. However they were actively emailing and campaigning to vote uncommited but Hillary still won convincingly. They chose to remove their names in MI, Hillary kept hers. Smart move. In FL's case all their names were there in fact Obama ran advertisement in Cable Stations specifically MSNBC and CNN. Hillary did not and she still won overwhelmingly. And did you forget that the Florida primary happened after South Carolina momentum so they say? and Obama still lose. I think at this point of the game the superdelegates will not look at who has the most state won as Barack suggested but will look on who can go toe to toe with McCain in terms of experience specially in foreign policy and national security. Why? Because of the 21 states and territories that Obama won half of them has never voted for a Democratic presidential candidate for 4 cycles, almost half of them are caucuses where only the liberal activists can spend their time to stay for hours, all subject to pressure to vote for the candidates they promised to support. Not very democratic. You remember the caucus states where he won ID, ND, UT, NE, KS, AK, CO and SC and the primaries GA, AL, VA. When was the last time these states voted for a Democrat? He did not win in big Democratic bailiwicks like CA, NY, NJ, MA, MI. Hillary won in swing states like FL, AZ, NM, NH. She won 110 of the 115 districts in MO and AR can be a democrat get. Although he won in WA, ME and MN, these are caucuses, not reflective of the true picture of the electorate because as I've said only the antiwar radicals come to rumble. So with all these facts presented to these superdelegates, they will come into a decision of who can keep the Democrat strongholds and can pick up swing states. As a woman, between McCain and she, in the final decision women will come home and vote for her. And women comprise over 50% of the electorate. As shown in all exit polls from IA  to MD, late deciders chose Hillary, those who chose experience as their priority, majority voted for her. After the LA primary, CNN's exit poll said that among the white voters 2/3 voted for Hillary and that when asked if they will vote for Obama if  hewill be the nominee 2/3 said No. Is that not troubling for Obama? VA, DC and MD wins are given to Obama. This is the seat of the Clinton haters. No surprise. Their constant attacts of Hillary and Bill worked big and to their joy. I was watching MSNBC tonigh their eyes glee with happiness and they were making it as a big surprise, like an upset. It was not because we knew she will lose. She is not only fighting Obama she is fighting the entire US media, from print to cable, to internet to radio. That's World War Three she's facing but she is still there. She will survive and she will prevail. Obama's comment about the superdelegates is just inciting chaos. If he is for change don't change the rule of the game in the middle of the third quarter. Either he will agree to seat delegates for FL and MI or superdelegates will go away. That should be the fair solution.