« Could failure in Iraq be a good thing? | Jamelle's Blog

I mean, who would assassinate a black president?


It's simply a fact that anyone occupying a sufficiently powerful office will occasionally be targeted with death threats.  And, as I'm sure you know, that's especially the case for the presidency.  Indeed, it's doubly the case for a controversial president, and orders of magnitude the case for a black president.  And with Barack Obama's inauguration only two days away, law enforcement officials are paying special attention to white supremacist groups around the country (CNN.com):

The inauguration of the nation's first minority president increases any potential threat, "particularly stemming from individuals on the extremist fringe of the white supremacist movement," said a recent intelligence assessment by the Department of Homeland Security and the FBI.

But law enforcement has the appropriate resources to respond if needed, Persichini said.

"We have seen a lot of chatter," Persichini said. "We have seen a lot of discussions. We have seen some information via the Internet. But those are discussions. We look at the vulnerabilities and whether or not the groups are taking action.

[...]

Anger, violence and interest in racist ideology did increase in the hours and days after Obama was elected president in November, hate groups experts said.

Three New York men were indicted on charges of conspiracy to interfere with voting rights -- accused of targeting and attacking African-Americans in a brutal crime spree soon after Obama was declared the winner on November 4.

And interest in racist ideology was so high right after the election that computer servers for two White supremacist Web sites crashed, according to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which tracks hate groups.

Predictably, spittle-flecked Confederate apologist conservative Robert Stacy McCain has a problem with monitoring unreconstructed racists and assorted other cranks:

Notice, however, that CNN and the "experts" they consult seem completely oblivious to the scenario of an al-Qaeda terrorist attack on the president of the Great Satan. That's because al-Qaeda is Muslim, and fostering fearfulness of Muslims is "hate." The media want you to worry about a relative handful of tinfoil hat kooks, rather than about the bloodthirsty terrorist enemies who want to kill us all.

The simple fact of course, is that "the media" wants you to worry about "a relative handful of tinfoil hat kooks" because that handful was - prior to the 9/11 attacks - responsible for the most deadly terrorist attack in American history.  What's more, those kooks (who only five decades ago were a solid majority of the American public) were responsible for killing another remarkable young black man, and prior to that, routinely terrorized and murdered - in gruesome, terrible ways - black citizens around the country.  You wouldn't know it from reading McCain, but white supremacists have killed more Americans than our "bloodthirsty terrorist enemies" could ever dream of.  In short, our history suggests that when it comes to domestic terrorism and prominent black people, we have a lot more to fear from our own homegrown "tinfoil hat kooks" than we do from anyone abroad.

I guess I shouldn't be too surprised by McCain's complaints, after all, this is someone who once argued that Emmett Till (a 14-year old boy killed by a bloodthirsty racist mob in 1955) had it coming.

cross-posted at my blog


24 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

In the spirit of your blog, I'm posting a link to the blog I wrote about Obama nearly a year ago. A blog where one commenter was disturbed by my concern that he could be assassinated and wanted me to remove that reference (which was the whole point of the blog!)

You point out so well that terrorism against our own citizens, or the limitation of civil rights for any or all of us, is a worse danger than that from outside.

My blog from a year ago stands as a tribute to Obama as well as for my concerns that he live long and give us the best that he has while asking from us the best that we have:

http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/therap/2008/01/young-at-heart-for-obama.php

Peace be with you and thanks for your blog.

P.S. Sorry about misspelling his first name in that early blog.

user-pic

Talk about vigilance. I am an agnostic sometimes. I am a deist other times.

May God protect our new President.

May the Secret Service protect our President.

Good post by the way.

user-pic

I fear President Barrak Obama will become an assassination target, but certainly not for the reasons stated here. Any racist group, or racist acting singly would have their cause permanently destroyed if they're even tangently connected with an assassination or assassination attempt.

Who Obama, and hopefully the secret service, have to worry about is the radical part of Obama's support base. James Earl Ray's interview with MLK's son proved to me he didn't kill MLK. Proved it to MLK's son too. If you're looking at an imminent death as Ray was, and with absolutely no possibility of release, you simply don't lie when giving out with your last words.

MLK's death marked the end of the segregationist movement. He was worth much more to his cause dead than alive. My fear is if Obama begins becoming too unpopular, his most zealous supporters may see the value of his assassination and choose to cash in on it. The big problem is, they will have the closest access to him.

user-pic

With this, your comments have reached the point of out and out stupidity. I now look forward to your being banned from the site.

user-pic

Oleeb, we may need to hire him to give funeral orations for those we do not like.

I think he would be able to do the job without even knowing it.

Perhaps I just ignored it at the time, but I do not think I ever actually heard someone say we are and were better of with MLK dead than alive 24 hours from his national holiday.

user-pic

Nah, no one is that stupid. This is wide-eye malevolence.

Disgraceful.

user-pic

I look forward to you kissing my ass.

user-pic

.

Kissing your ass?

Mark a spot. From the twaddle that's spewed from your piehole within threads throughout the site you've proven beyond a doubt that you're all ass.

~OGD~

user-pic

I truly believe that the majority of people who comment here add substance to the discussion, even when I strongly disagree with their positions or their dispositions.

You are coming across as vile. Is that your intention?

user-pic

Vile? How could you possibly ever construe anything in what I posted above as vile? Or even negative?

Beings you seem to be one of the saner posters on this thread, I'd like to ask you how often you think the scenario I've described has played out down through history? It's a lot more common than you may think. I fear some of the intrigue necessary for it to occur may be in place here.

What I've placed before you is a very valid concern, and one in which I hope the Secret Service is placing sufficient attention.

user-pic

spric...I don't know that I am referring to just this post, but rather as your persona on TPM in general, this post included. I cannot say I have read EVERY comment you have ever made, but I read through the majority of blogs and comments, and I can pretty much predict when I see your name that my feathers are going to get ruffled (sorry BWAK) and I have that reaction to very few people here.

The archives don't go back far enough to see when you 1st started posting, but I think it is pretty recent. I'm good at giving people a chance to find their voice and make a place for themselves here at TPM before I start criticizing them, so for me to be reacting to you like this means you've gone over the top more and earlier than most...

This is not an echo chamber. Most voices are appreciated. I'm assuming you want to be taken seriously, so I'm telling you how you are coming across. Modify your tone, or you won't be taken seriously.

I'm just sayin'.

user-pic

stillidealistic,
I have to congratulate you as far as your tone is concerned as it is entirely genteel, reasonable, and conciliatory at face.

But feeling myself to be a conscientious participant in this forum, and forced to parrot the cliche you've used above, I can't allow myself to be concerned about how your feathers are ruffled. I honestly feel you simply disagree with my take on things, and you feel my opinions are extreme and out of place here.

The center ground in any argument is always in dispute. Every participant feels their argument occupies the center ground.

To be truthful, I've being artificially extreme in most instances here. But I earnestly feel my take on things is equidistant from the center ground to prevailing sentiments here.

user-pic

Does talking about the unthinkable possibility in the media make things worse? I don't know the answer to that question but I do feel strongly that it doesn't do anything helpful. Having been coming to awareness in 1963 and having full awareness in 1968, the possibility is so horrific I just try not to think of it. We can now only pray that those repsonsible for the safety of our President do their job with utmost vigilance and skill. It may well be that those charged with his protection have the heaviest reponsibility in the world. Godspeed to them.

user-pic

Godspeed to his protectors. I agree. Amen.

user-pic

Yeah, if they fail, our country will sink into unthinkable chaos.

user-pic

Say hi to your BFF Beelzebub for me will ya pric?

user-pic

oleeb... you're approaching some type of summa cum laude level here!

user-pic

Spric: How old are you? You do not seem to have the sensibility born of being a witness to tragedy.

user-pic

I'm old enough to remember the JFK assassination. In retrospect, the mood was much the same as if everyone's favorite uncle had been horribly murdered in the same instant. His most strident critics felt the same loss as those who loved him. To say it was a profound national shock is pure understatement.

The uncertainty and fear in the few weeks afterward was palpable. And it wasn't like recovering from individual grief where you're shortly around people who don't share your loss. Everyone was down so it just lasted and lasted.

I fear if anything happened to Obama, it would be much worse because as a nation, we seem to have far less in common now than we had then.

user-pic

That's only the less than 20% who seem untouched by hope in an Obama administration. Yes, it must be lonely. For the rest of us, the huge, vast majority of the country and the world, it feels very, very united.

user-pic

I'm afraid you'd find yourself truly lonely if you had a honest, valid sense of self evaluation.

If you ever have the misfortune to see yourself as others see you, it would truly be a crushing disappointment. I'm too charitable to wish that on you.

user-pic

Prattle, prattle little spric
Why do you act like such a prick?
So brilliant in your own mind's eye
Yet like a cat turd in a pie -
Prattle, prattle little spric
Why must you be such a dick?

user-pic

Here's something you'll appreciate!! If you heard that poet in today's inauguration, what an idiot!! None of it even rhymed!! Much less made any sense. Of course most of the crowd had left before the pathetic inauguration speech was completed. Only the KoolAid drinkers were left to listen to the 'poet'.

But there might be a job opening for you here. Just send a resume with some samples of your work to the White House. No doubt after today, at least some of the palefaces in the administration are casting about for a replacement poet!!! Good luck!!!

user-pic

The possibility of any potential threat must be taken into account, but I can't see eminent danger from radically racist groups. They number, each, in dozens to hundreds of members, and in toto in the thousands; in a country of 300 million, that's nothing. These groups have no political power, little money and lack the social alchemy to make their ugly ideas attractive to anyone with even half a brain. They are ostracized from civil society and barely tolerated in open forums; their vision has been discredited and abandoned by the balance of the country.

That repellent fringe groups exist is not a crisis. Any group has power only to the extent its ideas have currency among a sizable portion of a population. Regardless of how many guns they have, or bombs they can manufacture, no group enjoys power without persuasive ideas. These domestic racist groups have none.

What is most troubling about this issue is how the mere existence of such groups is conflated into a dire emergency that can be checked only with draconian limitations on the rights of the rest of us. Constant demands to overreact to strawman perils is the real crisis. Groups like the ADL and the SPCA justify their existence - and hugely lucrative donor appeals - drumming these phantom dangers called up from our dark past. They have become less advocates of social justice, and more enemies of the free and open exchange of ideas.

Leave a comment

Jamelle

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Charlottesville, VA

Favorites

Bio

Nothing terribly remarkable, I'm a fourth-year college student at a reputable university on the East Coast. I mostly write about things that interest me - politics, religion and music - and occasionally I have something insightful to say.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address