<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>UrbanAsh&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/urbanash/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/urbanash/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/urbanash//3958</id>
   <updated>2008-09-27T00:31:55Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>Live Debate Commenting Post</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/live-debate-commenting-post.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.220179</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-27T00:31:55Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-27T00:31:55Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Nervous? Anxious? Excited? Obama or McCain coming out on top?Discuss! I don&apos;t know why, it&apos;s not like I&apos;ve got to do anything, but I&apos;m quite nervous. Hopefully O holds his own!...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>UrbanAsh</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/urbanash/">
      <![CDATA[Nervous? Anxious? Excited? Obama or McCain coming out on top?<br />Discuss! <br />I don't know why, it's not like I've got to do anything, but I'm quite nervous. Hopefully O holds his own!]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Should Obama Vote &quot;Aye&quot; or &quot;Nay&quot; On Bailout?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/should-obama-vote-aye-or-nay-o.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.219786</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-25T21:24:58Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-25T21:24:58Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I just read Arianna Huffington&apos;s answer on this, was curious where you guys are on this question.Discuss!...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>UrbanAsh</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/urbanash/">
      <![CDATA[I just read <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/arianna-huffington/bailout-bill-obama-needs_b_129374.html">Arianna Huffington</a>'s answer on this, was curious where you guys are on this question.<br />Discuss!]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Quick Question on Repub. Crossovers</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/quick-question-on-repub-crosso.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.218172</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-19T17:09:14Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-19T17:09:14Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I know a lot has been made about how the Palin pick galvanized the republican party, and I think us liberal-minded people tend to lump republics into the neoconservative column,but surely there has to be some sane republicans out there...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>UrbanAsh</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/urbanash/">
      <![CDATA[I know a lot has been made about how the Palin pick galvanized the republican party, and I think us liberal-minded people tend to lump republics into the neoconservative column,but surely there has to be some sane republicans out there that find the Palin pick appalling. <br />Does anyone know of any polls that measure republican discomfort, or are considering voting for Obama? I'd be interested to see how many follow Hagels thinking. There's a lot of talk of democrat disunity, but how are the republicans doing on this front?]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>If You&apos;re A Dem? Sinner. If You&apos;re A Repub.? Saint</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/if-youre-a-dem-sinner-if-youre.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.214458</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-07T22:56:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-07T22:56:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>From That Minority ThingIf you’re a minority and you’re selected for a job over more qualified candidates you’re a “token hire.”If you’re a conservative and you’re selected for a job over more qualified candidates you’re a “game changer.” If you live...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>UrbanAsh</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/urbanash/">
      <![CDATA[From<a href="http://www.thatminoritything.com/?p=53193"> That Minority Thing</a><br /><p>If you’re a minority and you’re selected for a job over more qualified candidates you’re a “token hire.”</p><p>If you’re a conservative and you’re selected for a job over more qualified candidates you’re a “game changer.”</p><p> </p><p>If you live in an Urban area and you get a girl pregnant you’re a “baby daddy.”</p><p>If you’re the same in Alaska you’re a “teen father.” (Actually, according to your own MySpace page you’re an F’n redneck that don’t want any kids, but that’s too long a phrase for the evil liberal media to take out of context and flog morning noon and night).</p><p> </p>Black teen pregnancies? A “crisis” in black America.<br />White teen pregnancies? A “blessed event.”<p> </p><p>If you grow up in Hawaii you’re “exotic.”</p><p>Grow up in Alaska eating mooseburgers, you’re the quintessential “American story.”</p><p> </p><p>Similarly, if you name you kid Barack you’re “unpatriotic.”</p><p>Name your kid Track, you’re “colorful.”</p><p> </p><p>If you’re a Democrat and you make a VP pick without fulling vetting the individual you’re “reckless.”</p><p>A Republican who doesn’t fully vet is a “maverick.”</p><p> </p><p>If you say that for the “first time in my adult lifetime I’m really proud of my country” it makes you “unfit” to be First Lady.</p><p>If you are a registered member of a fringe political group that advocates secession that makes you “First Dude.”</p><p> </p><p>A DUI from twenty years ago is “old news.”</p><p>A speech given without proper citation from twenty years ago is “relevant information.”</p><p> </p><p>And, finally, if you’re a man and you decide to run for office despite your wife’s reoccurrence of cancer you’re a “questionable spouse.”</p><p>If you’re a woman and you decide to run for office despite having five kids including a newborn with Downs Syndrome…  Well, we don’t know what that is ‘cause THAT’S NOT A FAIR QUESTION TO ASK!</p><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Community Organizers Respond.</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/community-organizers-respond-1.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.213624</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-04T23:09:12Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-04T23:09:12Z</updated>
   
   <summary>From Thinkprogress.org&quot;Today, the nation’s leading organization’s responded to Palin’s attack:– Center for Community Change: When Sarah Palin demeaned community organizing, she didn’t attack another candidate. She attacked an American tradition — one that has helped everyday Americans engage with the political process and make a...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>UrbanAsh</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/urbanash/">
      <![CDATA[From Thinkprogress.org<br />"Today, the nation’s leading organization’s <a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/jstreet/354404">responded</a> to Palin’s attack:<blockquote><p>– <a href="http://www.communitychange.org/blog/defending-community-organizing/view">Center for Community Change</a>: <strong>When Sarah Palin demeaned community organizing, she didn’t attack another candidate. She attacked an American tradition</strong> — one that has helped everyday Americans engage with the political process and make a difference in their lives and the lives of their neighbors.</p><p>– <a href="http://www.acorn.org/">Assn. of Community Organizations for Reform Now</a>: ACORN members, leaders and staff are extremely disappointed that Republican leaders would make such condescending remarks on the great work community organizers accomplish in cities throughout this country. <strong>The fact that they marginalize our success in empowering low- and moderate-income people to improve their communities further illustrates their lack of touch with ordinary people.</strong></p><p>– <a href="http://www.usaction.org/">USAction</a>: These groups, and the millions of individuals they represent, are dismayed by the recent dismissal of their efforts in the form of political attacks. <strong>Community organizations have been at the heart of every major reform in modern history – from the Boston Tea Party to the civil rights movement for example, the quest for civil rights began when community organizers mobilized the disenfranchised</strong>.</p><p>– <a href="http://organizersfightback.wordpress.com/">Community Organizers of America</a>: The last thing we need is for Republican officials to mock us on television when we’re trying to rebuild the neighborhoods they have destroyed. <strong>Maybe if everyone had more houses than they can count, we wouldn’t need community organizers</strong>. But I work with people who are getting evicted from their only home. If John McCain and the Republicans understood that, maybe they wouldn’t be so quick to make fun of community organizers like me.</p></blockquote><p>Faith In Public Life has <a href="http://blog.faithinpubliclife.org/2008/09/post_38.html">more responses </a>from leading community organizers."</p><p><br /></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>USAToday/Gallup poll</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/09/usatodaygallup-poll-1.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.212285</id>
   
   <published>2008-09-02T02:16:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-09-02T02:16:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I haven&apos;t seen these here yet, hopefully I&apos;m not reposting them.In the head-to-head race between the candidates, Obama now leads McCain by 50% to 43%. Last week, the Gallup poll had them tied at 44% to 43%.On personal characteristics, Obama eliminated...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>UrbanAsh</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/urbanash/">
      <![CDATA[I haven't seen these here yet, hopefully I'm not reposting them.<br /><p><strong>In the head-to-head race between the candidates, Obama now leads McCain by 50% to 43%.</strong> Last week, the Gallup poll had them tied at 44% to 43%.</p><p>O<strong>n personal characteristics, Obama eliminated McCain’s advantage as “strong and decisive leader”, with a slight majority who now say this characteristic applies more to Obama: 46% to 44%. </strong>Before the convention, McCain held an 8-point advantage.</p><p><strong>Obama now has a 13-point advantage with voters who see him as “someone who shares your values” over McCain. Before the convention, only a 6-point advantage.<br /></strong></p><p>Obama is also viewed as the more trustworthy of the two, with an 8-point advantage over McCain. Before the convention, the two were tied.<br /><strong></strong></p><strong></strong><p><strong>He has also eliminated McCain’s advantage on “handling Iraq”, with 47% now preferring Obama, and 46% McCain. Before the convention, McCain had a 9-point advantage.</strong></p>]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>My First TPM Post! Obama Finally Shows That He Gets It</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/08/my-first-tpm-post-obama-finall.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.211707</id>
   
   <published>2008-08-30T22:00:18Z</published>
   <updated>2008-08-30T22:00:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary> As the title suggests, this is my first post.  And before I get into what I want to mention about this election, I feel it necessary to point out, in full disclosure, that I’m not from the U.S. I...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>UrbanAsh</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/urbanash/">
      <![CDATA[

<p>As the title suggests, this is my first post.  And before I get into what I want to
mention about this election, I feel it necessary to point out, in full
disclosure, that I’m not from the U.S. I realize that this fact may dull any
opinion I may have on the election. However, I’m a student of history and
philosophy, and believe that these faculties are borderless. In this sense, I
think its fair that I can at least say <i>something </i>when it comes to this election.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>It’s obvious that this is an important election for the
United States and the world for a number of reasons. The American economy is
not as great as it should be and people are really hurting, its national
security has never been a more important issue, and its addiction to oil can
only end in tragedy if the problem isn’t addressed. On a global scale, there
are two wars going on, crazy terrorists that want western ideals to perish have
never been more vocal, and the global climate is in a state of crisis. But, you
intelligent people know this already. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>Since the beginning of this campaign, I’ve believed that
there is something else at stake in this election that doesn’t get a lot of
airplay. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>Many of you know how your nation was formed and on what
ideals it was founded on, and that those ideals laid out a blue print for the
western world, or any willing nation, to follow suit. I truly believe that it
are these ideals that are at stake, and it has never been so clearly confirmed,
for me, than when John McCain chose Sarah Palin for VP that this is true. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>The notions of truth, justice, and freedom have existed long
before the U.S came into being. For the longest time, though, they were only
accessible to those with power and riches. It was until the likes of John
Locke, Jean Rousseau, and John Mill began to argue that every individual should
have access to them in the form of inalienable human rights. And it wasn’t
until a group of men, now known as the Founding Fathers, took these ideas and
implemented into an almost perfectly governed nation. <br />
<br />
</p>

<p>Over 200 years later and it still these ideas that give
America its power – not its culture, not its military, and not its economy. And
it is on these ideas that the western world is now founded on. We do not just
want freedom of the press, to privacy, of religion, or the right to due
process, the right to dissent, no, we demand and expect them. Without America,
this would not be the case. Because western societies and the U.S have become
such symbiotic nations, its difficult to imagine what happens to the Western way
of life if the American way of life is put in even more jeopardy.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>This is another reason why this moment in history demands
change. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>The last 8 years has been a constant “fuck you” to this
sentiment. This current administration seems to have no sense of this history
and seem to be proud of that. They’ve eviscerated Habeas Corpus, the right to
privacy is becoming a myth, “half-truths”, at best, have been used to justify
war, and separation of church and state has never been more blurred. This
administration believes that America is powerful, and it always has been, but
they put their belief in the wrong kind of power. Military and might are not
what makes America endure its influence. Doing what is politically expedient is
not what makes America the force that is. Using fear to retain that power is
what should eventually take that power away. Along time ago, there was a ruler
named Vlad who used fear, albeit much more extreme. How was he remembered? Bram
Stoker used him as inspiration for his infamous novel Dracula. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>But, you all know of these indiscretions. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>I once admired John McCain for most of the reasons he
acquired his “maverick” image. I hoped that, perhaps, if Barack Obama, McCain
would revert to that guy once he was president. Since May, though, it’s clear
that he never really was a ”maverick”. McCain’s view of American power is the
same as the current administration; that through the military America is
strong. And he intends to keep in line by doing what is political expedient;
this explains his views on oil drilling and why the Democrats should be
cautiously optimistic about his VP choice. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>He chose someone who is not different, when it comes to the
issues, from McCain and Bush. Some have worried that this choice can blunt any
criticism the Obama campaign may throw out. If she’s inexperienced, so is he!
He’s from outside Washington, so is she! This misses the point; Obama does not,
and never has, attacked these issues. He will attack the fact that McCain made
a bad judgment call, or that she does not believe humans cause global warming.
Most importantly, though, she is no different from those who’ve been running
Washington this past decade. In this choice, it’s abundantly clear that McCain
ambition is misdirected and he is intent on the presidency for the wrong
reasons. He has shown no interest in rebuilding what America is losing.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>Obama has talked a lot about change since this began; change
Washington, change the economy, change the way foreign policy is carried out,
change the status quo. This is great, and it is needed, but I’ve always felt
that saying he wanted to “change the status quo” was not quite a right
statement. In America, the status quo is not George Bush and his cronyism, not
even close. In the history of the United States, George Bush is a fucking
anomaly. The status quo is those ideals I mentioned above that every American
values, treasures, and holds dear. They do, and always have, embodied those
ideals. That is what makes them so infectious in countries where the majority
lives oppressed. It is the embodiment of these ideals that gives America its
power and its leverage in the world. </p>

<p> </p>

<p>This election is just as much about change as it should be
about a restoration.</p>

<p> </p>

<p>Like I said, this does not get much airplay, as I’ve looked
for someone, somewhere making this a legitimate campaign issue. I finally found
someone doing just on Thursday night. Barack Obama himself. What he has
demonstrated, which was highly amplified in his speech, is that he understands
that both change and a restoration are needed better than anyone in the U.S.
He’s able to articulate it in an accessible way; much like the Founding Fathers
were able to take such complicated theories and make them accessible to the
average citizen. Do not be mistaken; I am not comparing him to the Founding
Fathers. What I am saying is that he understands what they were trying to do,
that some of that has been lost recently, and will be even more so should
McCain succeed. His VP pick only backs up this point.</p>

<p> </p>




]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
