This user has not started their blog yet!
- Talking to the FBI and to the media aren't mutually exclusive, of course.
- Ventura was elected with less than 40%, and Bachmann represents a gerrymandered wingnut congressional district. Neither represent Minnesotans generally.
- No.
- Since this case is being argued under the US, not the MN, constitution, the point is moot. The MN Supreme
- Am I the only person in the world that read the trial court's final order and memorandum? They DID deal
- 1) The supreme court's own opinion in Franken's earlier request for a certificate. 2) It's called a writ of mandamus,
- Franken's filing points out that the transcript has been available to the parties for some time already.
- "Within" 15 days is an outer limit, not a target. The Supreme Court would nave no problem ordering an inferior
- The record is already in the same building as the supreme court, so I can't see how it will take
- I love how the Strib puts the onus of speediness on the Minnesota Supreme Court. I'm sure if the decision
- That number was never certified and was proven unreliable by the hand recount, where every ballot cast was treated identically.
- Waiting for the phrase "statistically dubious" to be exported from MN. NY can have it.
- It might be consistent with the law, but not consistent with long standing judicial practice, to grant relief not requested
- Of course Pawlenty will drag his feet, if he knows Coleman intends to file for a TRO. He knows to
- A federal court could enjoin the issuance of the certificate if/when Coleman bring his collateral federal lawsuit. I'm not saying
