A Tale of Two Rookies
I want to tell you about a man who came from modest, even humble beginnings, a man who chased the American dream and caught it and wanted everyone to have an equal chance to catch it, too. A man who bore an unjust social stigma because of his minority and immigrant parentage. A man who experienced the sting of bigotry, but channeled those hurts into a personal quest for justice for other victims of injustice. A man of intelligence who excelled as an academic and professor. A man who got his start in politics as a community organizer, helping the underprivileged and disenfranchised find a voice, and rose through the ranks of government to achieve a seat in the U.S. Senate. Though many pundits and advisers told him he had little chance of winning, he contemplated a run for the White House as his ultimate opportunity to bring about progressive change and fundamental fairness to government and public policy. I'm referring, of course, to the late Senator Paul Wellstone.
Sen. Wellstone never made the run for the Oval Office he once considered, but he did share other similarities with President Obama. The most unsettling of them, sadly, has been a propensity to make rookie mistakes. For Wellstone, the first rookie mistake was breaching the protocol of George Herbert Walker Bush by having the audacity, as a newly minted freshman Senator, to expose his liberal agenda in a White House reception line. That was the famous encounter that led President George H.W. Bush, then the titular leader of the free world, to inquire of his neighbor in the reception line, "Who was that chickenshit?"
Never one to hide his liberal activist light under a basket, Wellstone next drew the ire of veterans early in his first term by holding an anti-Persian Gulf War press conference in front of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. Republicans (and many conservative Democrats) were outraged and attacked Wellstone as if he were a stray dog that had lifted his leg on motherhood, apple pie, the flag and Lady Liberty. It was a dumb move, another rookie mistake, but one he took to heart and used as a learning experience. The backlash from his ill advised choice of press conference location ignited his interest in veterans' affairs, and Wellstone went on to become one of the most passionate and respected veterans' advocates in Congress, even earning the praise of Senator John McCain.
Fast forward nearly two decades and President Obama, now the leading voice for progressive change in Washington, finds himself embroiled in a series of controversies (some real, some manufactured) that in perspective are little more than rookie mistakes, the kind to be expected of any person in a new, unfamiliar position. But in today's highly charged partisan environment (and ironically right when quick action would be really helpful in overcoming an international economic crisis) very little is kept in perspective, and every step the president and his administration take becomes a tedious, agonizing walk through a political minefield, where every misstep is magnified and repeated ad infinitum through the media echo chamber.
Today the GOP faithful, eager deniers of health care to disabled and disadvantaged children, are hurling invective over President Obama's appearance on The Tonight Show in general and his unfortunate Special Olympics gaffe in particular. For good measure, they are throwing in that he should be dealing with the economy to the exclusion of everything else, especially college basketball prognostication. They have apparently forgotten what it is like to have a president who can walk and chew gum simultaneously. But all of today's bluster is almost a welcome relief after a full week of the hyped up drama that is the AIG bonus snafu. While President Obama's administration has accomplished much in the infancy of its first two months, it has also racked up its share of rookie mistakes.
When Paul Wellstone first arrived in Washington following his 1990 Senate win, he made a key rookie mistake that seriously handicapped his initial effectiveness in the Senate - he eschewed hiring Beltway insiders for his staff in favor of those campaign workers who helped win his Senate seat. But his loyalty to those campaigners, who were brilliant grassroots organizers, had unfortunate and unforeseen consequences. It seems grassroots organizing is a skill of meager utility inside the Washington bubble, and his staff's lack of insider connections essentially isolated Wellstone from the Washington web of influence. Wellstone eventually replaced many of his campaigners with more seasoned and better connected Congressional staffers, at no small political cost in his home state of Minnesota, where the move was criticized as disloyal and cynical. We Minnesotans are funny that way, though.
Fortunately, President Obama does not appear to be repeating this particular mistake. While he has pulled key people from his campaign into his administration, he's also incorporating a sizable share of veterans, people who know Washington and how it works and how to get things done - including former political rivals - and he's assembled an economic advisory team of financial wizards both macro and micro. In a relatively short time they have managed to begin laying the policy groundwork for President Obama's broader agenda for education, energy, health care, and diplomacy, what I like to think of as the American Restoration.
The good beginning is now in jeopardy of being irreparably overshadowed by the rookie mistakes, and the considerable political capital he now holds may begin slipping away unless President Obama is able to make the right adjustments. As dire as the economic situation remains, and as hell-bent on opposition and obstruction as the GOP is, and as adamant about business as usual as Wall Street is, President Obama's staff and Cabinet, indeed the collective resources of the executive branch, may not be enough to overcome the challenges we now face. For that President Obama needs more help than he can find in Chicago or Washington, D.C. For that he needs the people, from sea to shining sea. For that he needs a movement of involved, concerned citizens, the kind that got him into the White House in the first place, and the kind Senator Wellstone praised with these words at Iowa State University more than a decade ago, words that could have come as easily from an Obama stump speech:
" I do not believe the future will belong to those who are content with the present, I do not believe the future will belong to the cynics, or to those who stand on the sideline. The future will belong to those who have passion, and to those grassroots heroes who are willing to make the personal commitment to make our country better. The future will belong to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams. And if together we believe, we can create a movement like that which seized for women the right to vote, like the one that launched the New Deal, like the one that fought the War on Poverty."












Excellent! Recommending and hoping more people will read it.
March 21, 2009 10:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you. I've been a reader here for almost a year now, but this is my first blog post. I appreciate your comment and recommendation.
March 21, 2009 11:06 AM | Reply | Permalink
Good first shot, twayn. Write some more!
March 21, 2009 11:38 AM | Reply | Permalink
Wow, for your first post, you've hit a home run!
Kudos! More please! :)
March 21, 2009 1:19 PM | Reply | Permalink
Very good, Twayn. The media reaction to the Leno clip was disgusting and frightening. It just shows what he's up against...
March 21, 2009 11:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
This is easily the best writing I've seen in my brief time at TPM. Thank you very much.
March 21, 2009 12:05 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thank you.
March 21, 2009 12:49 PM | Reply | Permalink
But Obama is far far from a rookie at P.R., as he spent two years running for president. (Not to mention years before that as a politician selling himself and an author selling books about himself.)
I think you're being a bit naive on that point. You should be judging whether he and his team got the image buffering with the general public that they intended by having him go on the Tonight Show and prognosticate on college basketball, or whether they weren't successful at what they were attempting to do. No one forced them to do it. And I don't buy that he was doing it for relaxation purposes, I'd hazard a guess that for that he would have rather been at home with his kids.
March 21, 2009 12:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
P.S. I am noticing this curious new trend in the blogosphere that tends to defend Obama as a hapless innocent victim of forces beyond him. I think doing that can only hurt him, as impotency is not at all a helpful image for a president of the U.S.
And if anyone is not a victim, it is him, as he's the most powerful elected leader in the world, he probably has more power than any other human being. His failures and successes will certainly be more of his own making than any other other human's failures and successes. It is an awesome job, but to seek it is to know that.
March 21, 2009 12:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
AA - I don't see this trend at all. I see, and am perhaps part of, a trend that sees a great deal of media bias/dysfunctionalism that needs to be counteracted. I think the Leno appearance was an attempt to 'go over their heads' as Carol Gee would say, to talk directly to the American people. I also think that has probably failed, due to the gaffe dominating coverage. And I don't think the media hammering the gaffe is innocent in nature...
March 21, 2009 12:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
That appearance was not a fail. Many people watched Leno before the media got to them the next morning plus there are his town halls.
We have to stop using the media reaction to guage how Obama is doing. His administration has been under the fire the whole week, yet when you watch at the town halls - people are chanting his name like they were back in the primaries.
The media will always do what it does the best: miss the real message.
March 21, 2009 2:10 PM | Reply | Permalink
I do hope you are right, Viva.
March 21, 2009 2:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
During the primary Obama had the media eating out of his hands so much that you had skits parodying that on Saturday Night Live. I don't think he is an innocent about how one accomplishes positive P.R., and what gets negative P.R. He even built his political career spinning biographical tales, building from good book reviews on up. (He also instinctively understands marketing very well overall, he gerrymandered his own district in Chicago in order to get himself less poor neighborhood and more upper middle class neighborhood, because his educated elite image sold better there.)
I want to make it clear that I'm not necessarily criticizing it, as I think it can be used or good or ill. I'm not even guessing yet if the recent "outreach to the public" programs were smart or dumb moves at this point in time in a "crisis," it's too soon to know. I do know it's taking away from "real" work, and I wonder if and how it's going to pay off.
March 21, 2009 3:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
True, Obama is no PR rookie, and he's not completely new to Washington politics, so my comparison suffers a bit there. But as president, he's having to deal with things he's never run up against before, like having the GOP bulls eye on his back every moment of every day. Plus, it's not Obama himself making all of the mistakes (cough, cough, Geithner), but when you are president, the mistakes of your cabinet and staff are ultimately your mistakes. Going on The Tonight Show gave Obama the chance to get his message out directly to the public without having it warped, spun, folded, and mutilated by the mainstream media, and especially the Washington press corps. Phase two comes tomorrow on 60 Minutes.
March 21, 2009 12:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well done twayn. Drawing the loop back to the electorate is the way forward for the Obama administration. Without the support of the people he'll come off as just another pol. I hope he doesn't develop the tone-deafness I usually associate with our latter day chief execs who live their lives shielded from the electorate by a palace guard of sycophants.
March 21, 2009 12:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Being the President of all of the United States is an interesting job.
First you have to win over a majority of voters, which, in this age of polarization, split almost down the middle, is no easy feat in itself.
Then, unless you are willing to piss off almost half of the voters all of the time, you have to build support for your programs from a bunch of people who didn't vote for you, or didn't vote, period.
President Obama got a lot of flack during the election for being "elite" and "out of touch with the common man." I think his participation in the college basketball prognostications, his attempt to improve his bowling game and his appearance on Jay Leno were designed to allow the "common man" who may not pay a lot of attention to anything political (unless there is an election in the next few weeks) to get to know him better. In order to reach people, you have to go to where they are. Many of the people who listened to his explanation of the financial crisis on Leno, were hearing it for the 1st time, in words they could almost understand.
One of the things I like best about the President is that in spite of his power, he seems to know who we are and what we care about. He doesn't appear to consider himself better than us. He is still a little awed by all the trappings of his office, still a little embarassed by the adoration. He isn't all full of himself. At least not yet. He makes mistakes, he apologizes. He reminds me a little of a parent who knows he is in charge, and accepts that responsibility, while being wise enough to admit to his children that he isn't perfect and can still learn from them. (and yes, I KNOW he isn't our Daddy! It's just an analogy!) I find it incredibly refreshing, and because I trust that he really does care about us little guys, I am willing to give him a lot of leeway in figuring out how best to get us where we want to go.
March 21, 2009 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
Ditto Still.
And very good post Twayn. Please keep 'em comin'.
March 21, 2009 1:15 PM | Reply | Permalink
I ditto Aunt Sam's ditto.
You know what concerns me though Still. He has more faith in us than we have in ourselves. I will admit, that faith helped to get him elected, I hope it continues to help him get things done.
March 21, 2009 2:08 PM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks...I have nick names for most of my peeps here, but haven't figured out what to call you yet...your handle doesn't lend itself well to shortening!
Welcome to TPM...I like what I've read from you so far!
March 21, 2009 5:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I knew I was going to like your posts. With an avatar signifying Hunter S. Thompson and Doonsbury and the pen name of my favorite author, how could I go wrong.
I am a Minnesotan. Hubert Humphrey, Gene McCarthy, Don Frazier and Paul Wellstone.
Senator Coleman. What a joke. He could have followed the path of HST in his committee position and exposed and thwarted the Halliburtons, KBRs.....
I was so happy to see Senator Klobachar and I am looking forward to Senator Al Franken.
We shall see how many dragons President Obama can slay.
March 21, 2009 2:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
I might have missed it, but did W ever apologize to the United States' citizens and those who defend it for telling us that we needed to go to war because Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction?
I think; I could be wrong on this, but I think he just changed the reason for war and looked at everyone like they had two heads when they said, "No. That isn't why you took us to war."
Rooky -- Seasoned War Criminal -- Rooky -- Experienced Liar -- Rooky -- Professional Fuck-Up ....
I guess I'll take the Rooky!
March 21, 2009 2:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
In Howard Hugh’s movie, The Outlaw, he famously framed the camera on Jane Russell’s ample bosom, even designing a “wonder-bra” for maximum cleavage, throughout the film (I’m surprised he didn’t try 3d). George S. Kaufman came upon a billboard for the film (a 15-foot tall image of Ms. Russell’s leading part, so to speak) and scoffed, “I’ve seen this before; it’s “A Sale of Two Titties!”
Anyway, good post, but your title reminded me of that. “A Sale of Two Titties” seems a good label for beltway politics, too. Power interests in DC have a choice between a Republican and a Democratic teat, but both are for sale. I think Obama’s main mistake is not any rookie gaffe but hiring those seasoned veterans, “financial wizards,” like Geithner and Summers who are part of that insider establishment and only seem to know how to breastfeed the failed Wall St. power interests and the monster they helped create.
Like Wellstone, Obama talks a good game about change. But Wellstone really did push a progressive agenda. Obama has been excoriating that Wall St. elite lately, but it seems out of sync with his team’s actions regarding economic recovery. Either the people he has working for him are doing his bidding, or he’s not in control of his own administration. I don’t think it’s too late for him to turn things around, and he has pushed a (compromised) liberal agenda in some areas, but early signs aren’t encouraging to me.
March 21, 2009 3:05 PM | Reply | Permalink