« May 24, 2009 - May 30, 2009 | Home | June 14, 2009 - June 20, 2009 »

Week of June 7, 2009 - June 13, 2009

Did Sarah Palin really call David Letterman "pathetic"?


"for him to pick up on such as thing..a distortion...that..again..it's based on a slow news day..not having anything else to talk about...that's pretty pathetic, good old David Letterman!"
Sarah Palin, Tuesday, June 9, 2009 (audio, beginning at 5:48 spot)


From the news reports in sensationalist websites Politico and Huffington Post, I fail to see that Sarah Palin called David Letterman "pathetic,"  as these outlets claim.

What I understand by listening to Palin's words is that she referred to Letterman's Monday  joke (that she looks like a "slutty flight attendant") as pathetic; not to the comedian as a person. 

Is it not difficult to see that "that" means "his joke"?

I am not a woman, but I am going to go out on a limb and guess that they don't like to be portrayed as slutty, even by comedians.

Plus bear in mind, that Politico has gone as far as claiming that President Obama's job rating is down (when in fact it had gone up), with the intent to "shock" the reader into believing false, outrageous statements. "Palin vs. Letterman" is, after all, a more juicy storyline than "Palin vs. one joke that Letterman made."

Why is this important? Because we are being told that Sarah Palin is judging David Letterman's whole character on the basis of one botched joke. This would give the impression that Palin is over-reacting. If, on the other hand, we knew that Palin was simply upset at that one particular offensive joke, then the situation becomes much less controversial.

Also bear in mind that the Huffington Post is the Drudge of the left, in that it loves big bold misleading headlines, because it attracts many readers. In fact, the Huffington Post CHANGED THE WORDER OF THE WORDS uttered by Palin. They wrote:

"Pretty pathetic, good old David Letterman, that old David Letterman, what a commentary there ... very sad to not recognize what this trip was all about," she said.

No. Sarah Palin did not say that, and you can confirm this by listening to the audio. Of course, this arrangement of words may lead you to believe that Palin called Letterman pathetic, but that's the HuffPo's goal, as I stated above: To shock the reader into believing their crap.

We need to start taking everything the media tells us with a grain of salt. The journalism profession is rotten to the core.


Obama's job rating goes up; Politico says down


Politico posted an article today with regard to a new USA Today/Gallup poll in which Barack Obama receives a 61% job approval and a 35% job disapproval. This is an improvement of 3% in the approval department (it was 58% in the next most recent USA Today/Gallup poll) and a 1% improvement in the disapproval department (it was 35% back then, 34% now).
Source: Pollingreport.com

Yet the headline chosen by Politico reads:

POTUS JOB RATING DOWN

Granted, the approval of the President handling of the economy went down by 4%, but the job of a President also includes foreign policy, social issues, etc, in addition to the economy, which is obviously a very important issue, but does not by itself represent Obama's job.

The headline falsely gives the impression that Obama's overall job has suffered in this poll. That's false, and Politico's reputation will suffer as a consequence. 

By contrast, here's a much better headline by CQpolitics covering the same poll in question:

Obama's job approval steady, except on the deficit and spending

The Politico gives its readers neither an email address nor a feeback page to contact Carol E. Lee, the author responsible for this piece.


« May 24, 2009 - May 30, 2009 | Home | June 14, 2009 - June 20, 2009 »

truthseeker77

user-pic

Following: 2
Followers: 13

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address