« January 11, 2009 - January 17, 2009 | Home | January 25, 2009 - January 31, 2009 »

Week of January 18, 2009 - January 24, 2009

Take note, Maureen Dowd: A new juicy sexual-political rumor has gone mainstream


I personally dislike gossip, but a juicy rumor of the type Maureen Dowd loves the most (sexually related and concerning a female Democratic New York figure) just went mainstream, prompting me to e-mail Maureen Dowd, as she may consider it potential material for her column.

The New York Post noted today that rumor has it that Caroline Kennedy, who has had a rocky relationship with her husband for a long time, has been "linked" to New York Times' publisher Arthur Sulzberger. The reference to the rumor appeared earlier this afternoon in the New York Post, but has now been deleted from the most recent update of the article; however, NBC in New York picked it up:

A source told the Daily News that "she was facing some potentially embarrassing personal issues"  regarding her tax history and employment of a nanny. Another potential problem involved her marriage to Edward Schlossberg, who decided he didn't want her to move to Washington, according to a source quoted by the News.

"He basically said it would destroy the marriage if she moved to D.C.," said the source.

The New York Post also raised the marriage issue, saying that gossip columns have reported for more than a year that Kennedy's marriage to Schlossberg was essentially over. The Post also pointed out that the gossip site Gawker.com has reported rumors linking her to New York Times publisher Arthur Sulzberger.

Can't wait to read more details in Dowd's next column.





I'm having this sense of Déjà vu


Déjà vu: a feeling that one has seen or heard something before

Today's inauguration prompted me to read inaugural speeches by several past Presidents, when I suddenly ran into this bit by Gerald Ford, in reference to Watergate:


"We cannot stand still or slip backwards. We must go forward now together," 


Then he pardoned Nixon.

I cannot quite recall who used similar words recently, also playing down the importance of punishing big criminals. Can you please help?

Americans don't like expensive inaugurations


In 2005, a Washington Post/ABC News poll asked Americans, in the context of Bush's $40 million inauguration, to state their preference between a "smaller, more subdued inauguration" and continuing the "tradition of large inaugural celebrations." These were the results:

Better to have smaller, more subdued inauguration: 66%
Continue tradition of large inaugural celebrations:  32%

The figure includes 86% of Democrats, 46% of Republicans and 68% of Independents.

It will be interesting to find out the true cost of Obama's inauguration, at a time that we are not only at war, like in '05, but we are also in a very precarious economic situation. It will likely not be $160 million, a figure being floated without evidence by the media; but how much will it be? Let's suspend our judgment until we have a concrete answer.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/polls/2005012/q21/party/index.html

 
« January 11, 2009 - January 17, 2009 | Home | January 25, 2009 - January 31, 2009 »

truthseeker77

user-pic

Following: 2
Followers: 13

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address