« Answering Tom Wright | truthseeker77's Blog | Most Americans Back Idea of Clinton as Secretary of State (Gallup) »

Media diagnosed with CDS (Clinton Derangement Syndrome)


Based on careful examination of media reaction to the news of Barack Obama's interest in Hillary Clinton as his possible Secretary of State, with focus on Maureen Dowd's latest piece, Media Matters' executive vice-president Jamison Foser and progressive media critic Eric Boehlert have diagnosed the hack (and other pundits) with "Clinton Derangement Syndrome" (CDS).

In a Sunday post entitled Why can't MoDo quit the Clintons?, the renowned watchdogs noted:

Some in the press are furious that Obama's non-existent promise has been broken. They're furious that Obama has made clear, yet again, that he respects and admires Hillary Clinton. They're beside themselves that Clinton may soon be viewed as a very important player on the national and international stage. They can't stand the idea of her succeeding.

And that is the working definition of Clinton Derangement Syndrome.

Then, they catch the misogynist lying:

Here, for me, is the key Dowd passage. Once you get past the stunning misogyny at the top of the column (i.e. Clinton felt "entitled" to run for U.S. Senate and for president because her husband cheated on her), you come to the source of Dowd's complaint:

There are Obama aides and supporters who are upset that The One who won on change has ushered in déjà vu all over again. The man who vowed to deliver us from 28 years of Bushes and Clintons has been stocking up on Clintonites.

Think back to the campaign and try to recall a single instance during his 20-plus months on the trail when Barack Obama ever promised to rid the country of the Clintons. I remember plenty of references from Obama about doing away with the failures of Bush. But Clinton? I can't recall a single example and my guess is that's because that's not how Obama felt. I never got the sense that his candidacy was driven by animosity towards the Clintons. (Indeed, he's been tapping scores of former Clinton aides for jobs in his new administration.)

Dowd's obsession is shared by others pundits from CNN, Fox, MSNBC, etc, who as Media Matters noted last week, have been portraying Hillary Clinton as a diva who would pursue her own agenda if she lands the job of Secretary of State.

One of these characterizations came from MSNBC contributor Michelle Bernard, who predicted on Hardball last Friday that " Clinton "will run a parallel government" as secretary of state and "could give him [Obama] some cover, and she could also walk -- go around the world acting as if she is not the secretary of state but the United States -- the president of the United States."

But let's see how Bernard's predictions have turned out in the past (courtesy of the Daily Howler): The night before Hillary's DC concession speech in which she endorsed Barack Obama, Bernard told Chris Matthews:


I think we will see something very similar to what we saw when she gave an interview and she said, I don't have reason to believe that Barack Obama is Muslim, something to that effect. I don't think she's going to give a sort of concession speech. I just don't see it happening.

I think she's going to suspend her campaign and she's going to wait and hope and see what happens at the convention in August. Maybe behind the scenes--

MATTHEWS: You believe she will withhold an outright endorsement?

BERNARD: I do. I do. I do.


I should add that Dowd was already rebuked earlier this year by none other than the New York Times' public editor Clark Hoyt, who concluded in June that "by assailing Clinton in gender-heavy terms in column after column, [Dowd] went over the top this election season."





53 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

TS, I just want you to know I hit the recommend button. The generally vacuous punditocracy is tiresome.

user-pic

Thanks.

user-pic

It has been said that you can judge people by the character of their enemies. If that is true, the Clintons can fairly be called models of restrained civility.

If I might generalize, Clinton enemies tend to be highly melodramatic people who fantasize a conpirator behind every tree. I recall reading a novel once where an intensely inconsequential, mildly-comic character was described as, "...flattering himself with the delusion that the authorities viewed him as a dangerous man...".

This seems to me a reasonable characterization of the heart and soul of the Clinton Critique industry: Furiously, futilely, endlessly, impotently writing and talking to no apparent effect. Meanwhile, the bemused targets go relentlessly about their business, actually "DOING THINGS", oblivious.

user-pic

With the voluminous and constant hyperventilating melodramatizing against the Clintons, which has continued near-non-stop since shortly before Clinton took office for his first tterm, it is refreshing to read sober and civil -- and accurate -- comments about them and their contributions.

I think I'd prefer Hillary stay in the Senate -- she'd both be gaining senority and would be a good and solid ally for Obama -- she is unquestionably competent to be Sec. of State, as she was (is) competent to be President.

Some people have lives. Some are assholes. Some have agendae/axes to grind. Some are simply honest and direct about the facts.

user-pic

Dowd is totally obsessed with the Clintons. Just because you are a woman doesn't mean you aren't sexist, and just because your black doesn't mean you aren't racist towards African Americans. Pundits think this shit is a James Bond movie or something, she will be selected for a job and she will do it to the best of her abilities, period.

user-pic

The comment about racism is gratuitous nonsense.

Otherwise, Dowd tends to be "obsessed" with whoever is in the White House. Bushit isn't a blip on the radar screen, and Obama has yet to take the oath, so Dowd is focusing for now on one of the most high-profile of current actors.

Dowd is a skilled satirist, but she tends to focus -- or aim -- too low. If Obama were to nuke the world, would Dowd be focused on the Obama daughters' dog?

user-pic

Recommended, especially because of all the linked references, but I must say I feel it isn't quite right to put the blame squarely or wholly on the media.

I came to your post right after reading this Politico piece linked to on the front page of TPM, and that reminded me of how much tactics practiced by part of Obama's campaign are also responsible, as are many "grassroots" followers in the blogosphere and elsewhere who picked up and played with those memes. Remember, for example, the brouhaha over the "she's a monster" thing? Now Obama chastised for that, but the attitude was obviously part of some of the people associated with his campaign, and it was a clear hit with many "followers" of Obama in the blogosphere.

I am always hesitant to blame "the media" for starting viral memes, especially since I have follow "the blogosphere." I have seen for myself how these things come out of people's prejudices, likes and dislikes, as surely as fashion trends spring bottom up from the street rather being forced top down from corporations. The corporations, looking for profit, tries very hard to create what the street likes and wants. I think someone like Dowd is where she is because she recognizes what other people are thinking, she's astute at seeing trends, senses things people want to believe. Our "media" mostly runs on ratings, we are our media, our media is what the majority is willing to consume as media, and the blogosphere is no different. For example, there was far more buzz created on the whole "she's a monster" thing in the blogosphere than anywhere.

You can't blame it on "the media," they are just giving political junkies the coverage they want. Even Josh Marshall thinks covering issues during a campaign is like force feeding spinach. I wish that the political junkie internet audience had more discerning taste in what they want to see covered, but the reality is, they don't, they will click on the smear stories and political ops stories and on the personality and character stories and not on the issues stories. And the rest of us are a minority and will not get that sort of coverage without rigorous editing procedures and therefore being labeled elitist snobs.

(Deep thought for the day: PBS was once formed as a station where content was "edited" by elites and where discussions were "moderated" to polite discourse by people informed on their topics, so as not to pander to "vox populi" of ratings and things like "the people's" desire for vituperative inflammatory debate of p.r. talking points v p.r. talking points. This earned them the labels of snobby and boring.)

user-pic

I wish I could recommend this comment!

user-pic

Thank you for the compliment.

user-pic

A reminder of how much Hillary hating hysteria there was on this very site at one time; the manager of TPMCafe at the time posted this:

Seriously folks, you can stop writing about how angry Hillary makes you now. Andrew Golis

May 28, 2008, 3:29PM

Bashing Hillary, fairly or unfairly, is both unnecessary and increasingly beside the point.

I think most of us are well aware by now that you and other members of the community think she's disingenuous and cynical and that she should drop out. I'm not disagreeing with any of those things, but can't we come up with other things to talk about?

Just sayin'.


print share PERMALINK | COMMENTS (254)

I just don't buy that "the media" or Maureen Dowd made all those people write all those posts that Andrew was complaining about, a constant flow of Hillary hate, day after day, 24/7, with other topics a very small minority. In a way, I would call "the media" stupid if they did not report in a manner that recognized such a phenonmenon. Those posters were all political junkies, the major audience for political media of all kinds, and more Hillary hate is what plenty of them were clearly asking for. You give your most impassioned audience what they want, that's the way it works in for-profit media. You don't like it, stop showing interest in it, and they'll stop too.

user-pic

THIS is exactly what I've been thinking lately. I have read many articles and posts...ahem TPM giving reasons why Clinton should not be SoS and one of the most listed reasons is that the Clintons are all drama. Well, I've come to believe that the media creates the drama. We saw it in the run up to the convention, we heard it during the VP nomination, we heard it when she was tapped to go on the campaign trail, and we are hearing it now that Obama's selecting his cabinet. All of this speculation about what evil scheme she has going when Clinton has barely said a word. This article should be read by everyone hear on TPM. Like her or not, she is on Obama's shortlist for a reason. And the bit about Obama breaking a promise he did not make - SO TRUE!

user-pic

More molehills---guess not much is happening right now. I'll stipulate media can be nuts. That's why I don't watch TV. Dowd is fun, but I enjoy Gail Collins more these days.

But why are we looking at such mild kvetching as this when Rush Limbaugh is making this look like the most genteel tea conversation, or Michael Savage?

"If you're insane, hate the family ... hate your mother and father, hate the Bible, hate the church, and hate the synagogue," you oppose CA gay marriage ban"

Or Gingrich?

"[T]here is a gay and secular fascism in this country that wants to impose its will on the rest of us"

These are noteworthy distortions, and hateful speech. Dowd is just silly.

user-pic

Thanks for an excellent column.

user-pic

Excellent. It was nice to see Bill Mahr smackdown Arrianna Huffington last night on the Rachel Maddow show. Arrianna was going on about the psychodrama HRC and Bill would bring to the Obama administration. Mahr simply said the only psychodrama is projected upon them by people like Huffington who hate the Clintons so much and it is a fact that they are two of the best policy wonks in recent American history.
Arrianna quickly went to another topic.

user-pic

...it is a fact that they are two of the best policy wonks in recent American history.

Exactly.

user-pic

Mahrer was wrong. There is plenty of evidence that there was psychodrama in the Hillary campaign (now especially since the campaign is over)... and also the Clinton White House. It wasn't from Monica, it was how they run their house. A simple comparison with Obama's team of advisers shows the clear difference. You can have disagreement without disharmony.

user-pic

I didn't watch it. I'm surprised Bill Maher stood up for Clinton( I've never heard his opinion of Clinton), but this is why I love this guy.

user-pic

I've gone on record as saying I hope Hillary stays in the Senate to work - there's plenty of good work for her left to do there. But I have to say I am now wanting her to take Secretary of State just to torment thouse afflicted with CDS :).

user-pic

Shame on you dijamo! :)

user-pic

I really think the best position for Sr. Clinton is a life-time appointment to the Supreme Court, and not only to torment those within the multi-billion dollar Clinton hate industry.

I think she has the intellect and instincts to be a great SC justice, and an appointment would enable her to shed any need to politically calculate.

user-pic

In that case she should be embalmed like Lenin on the Mall, and to the enter the Capitol building you'd be forced to walk by her casket and pay obeisances.

user-pic

I think she would be a wonderful Supreme Court Justice. I would love to see her in that role. She is smart, AND savvy; she is fair-minded; and she also could bring an empathy into that chamber that is sorely lacking. Most of the people in the Supreme Court have been hiding out all their lives and know little of the real world. Hillary would bring a human voice. I don't think she wants it, but I think she would be great at it.

user-pic

Hillary for the Supreme Court? I think she'd do a good job of it and be a good influence for all the reasons you give here. I think she would surprise a lot of people. And being able to watch the reactions of Limbaugh and O'Reilly and wingnuts in general would be a nice bonus.

user-pic

Hillary for Yahweh III - that'd show 'em.

user-pic

Please. Yehwah--not Yahweh. Yehwah. Jehwah. Jehovah. Jeshua. Get it?

user-pic

Never mind. I just spoke the unspeakable a whole bunch of times in a row. Now I'm totally going to hell.

user-pic

No Hell in Judaism, is there?

user-pic

Left out John Wesley Harding.

user-pic

Others have mentioned Hillary for the SC, but how qualified is she? She failed the D.C. bar exam. Does that say anything about her ability to be a Justice? And she has no experience on the Bench at all that I'm aware of, but that's not a requirement nor is passing the bar exam. I'm really curious to know why people think she would make a good justice as opposed to Senator, or SoS.

user-pic

Earl Warren had no experience on the bench before his appointment as Chief Justice and is widely considered to have been a great Chief Justice.

I posted above the reasons I think she'd be a good justice.

user-pic

You may yet get your original hope fulfilled:

"Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) designated Clinton to head a task force to develop a Senate Democratic proposal to expand health insurance coverage as part of his larger push to move a major overhaul of the U.S. healthcare system next year."

snip]

“Our committee is fortunate to have the services of major leaders who are committed to improving healthcare for the American people. Sen. Harkin, Sen. Mikulski and Sen. Clinton have generously offered to step forward and assume an expanded role on critical aspects of health reform,” Kennedy said in a statement."
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/kennedy-taps-clinton-for-big-health-reform-job-2008-11-18.html

user-pic

Excellent news, Lally. I'd much rather her leading the healthcare task force than Secretary of State. But it's nice for her to have options. She's earned that right.

user-pic

No one without the prerequisite relevent experience is "owed" a high-level post in any administration, including Hillary Clinton.

If Hillary really wants to be involved in international goings on, she can do a residency as US envoy to the UN. Not only is that damn place a blown-up funhouse version of the Senate, it's also a place that suits her talents for policy and coalition building. Most importantly, she could have a huge impact on areas/issues that she has long championed.

user-pic

Hillary should be Senate Majority Leader. And who cares anymore what washed up Clinton haters think?

user-pic

I like Rich better than Dowd, because he concentrates his efforts almost exclusively on Republican misbehavior, and he's grown up a lot since he trashed Gore back in the days.

user-pic

Personally, I would like to see her as Atty General. Wouldn't that be the ultimate? She could go after the Bush admin with the same zeal that the GOP went after them in the 90's. Revenge...sweet.

user-pic

That is fatastically devious. I love it! Hillary is the real deal when it comes to attack dog. Let her harness that energy and put it toward expunging and exposing the Zom-Bushes that have desecrated freedom in the name of unbridled profits/extortion.

user-pic

I'm opposed to Clinton as SoS, but I could get completely behind her as AG. Hawkishness, or it's domestic equivalent, is good in an AG, not so much in an SoS, imho.

user-pic

Oh, how I ranted in the primary about "progressives" united with corporate media to attack the Clintons. This unity is pathetic.

Will they stab the Obamas in the back like the Clintons?

user-pic

some have threatened to.

user-pic

Thanks for your interesting (and well-researched) angle on this, ts77. Recommended.

user-pic

Thanks.

Boehlert and Foser are must-reads.

user-pic

Reasonable. Well-researched. Interesting. Comments enabled. And defending Hillary instead of defending O'Reilly?

Who are you and what have you done with the real TS? Actually, never mind. Just take his place.

Recommended!

user-pic

You beat me to that one...my thought exactly...who are you and what have you done with the real TS?

Thanks, TS...enjoyed the post, appreciated having the comments enabled.

user-pic

Very interesting "compliments". Thanks, I guess.

user-pic

Very interesting "compliments". Thanks, I guess.

Intended as a compliment, in the hope of encouraging more articles like this one.

user-pic

Will the media never cease to rip off my brilliant ideas? I diagnosed this syndrome last April. It's a virus, actually.

user-pic

Its one big meme blender in the blogosphere. No royalties, no recognition, everyone quoting without attribution, picking up ideas, carrying them to other forums.. World's biggest thinktank and idea-piracy hunting grounds.

user-pic

Maureen Down is certifiable when it comes to the Clintons. Personally, I think she made a failed pass at Bill. Does anything else explain her years of obsession? Coinsider this:

1) Her hatred is personal, not political.
2) It's an obsession that continues despite a public rebuke from her employer's public editor.
3) She hates Hillary more than Bill.
4) It never ends after well over a decade it burns hot as ever.
5) No complaint is too minor or too petty.
6) Even columns about other people contain gratuitous swipes at Hillary.

No, Dowd's hatred is based in the personal, not the political and given how hot she think she is, the most likely explanation for someone going so completely freaking nuts for so long is that she made very obvious pass and was rejected...and then Bill did accept the pass of someone Dowd would consider her inferior in every way. That explains her obsession and the pettiness of it all more than anything political or policy-based.

IT cannot be the morality of his affair. She is unbothered by the affairs of other public figures. No, this is personal

user-pic

stop the wishing, she is going to be SOS....i agree with those who think she is best suited for senate majority when the time is right (i get a tickle just thinking about it)...i even see her as Sof the House...but i would have loved to see her appointed to the Supreme Court....

like i said before, I dont think she would be terrible at SOS, but choosing her for that spot says more about obama than it does about hillary c and that is not meant as a compliment....he caved and now he is currying favors like any other politician....best man for the job my big toe!!! obama needs to purchase his weapon of choice and hand-deliver it to each of his ardent rivals in washington and then tell them where to meet him at sundown....oh, obama will be unarmed!!! geesh!

user-pic

Not to put them all in the same qualitative category, but MoDo suffers from Safirism, much as does Peggy Noonan. A drinking game a friend and I had for years was 'How many sentences (in any column) before Safire defends Nixon?' Noonan does the same with Reagan, who, like Nixon, needs all the defenders he can get.

I suppose MoDo's variant is 'How far into any column, on any subject, will she write before she condemns a Clinton?' And the real question is, when will she turn her hatred/envy/jealosy on Chelsea?

I nominate her for the Judy Miller 'Self-Justified Blinkeredness' Award, and predict she'll also be parked at a conservative junk tank, like steno-pool Judy at Manhattan Instinktute, before the re-election of Obama.

user-pic

15 year later, Dowd still goes around wishing that someone someday will find Bill guilty of anything in that Whitewater "scandal". She said in her Sunday column:

"Even if Bill scurries past the questions on sexual harassment claims, conflicts of interest, civil suits, real estate holdings, federal investigations, diaries, gifts worth more than $50 and Internet aliases, the Clintons will still have to grapple with No. 8: “Briefly describe the most controversial matters you have been involved with during the course of your career.” (It would take books, and it has.)"

Never mind that more than one investigation absolved Clinton of any wrong-doing related to Whitewater. This would be a truth too inconvenient for the stuck-in-the-90's writer to include.

user-pic

Maureen Dowd is a hack.

Leave a comment

truthseeker77

user-pic

Following: 1
Followers: 5

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address