« Obama will prosecute torturers! (On or after 2012, if he wins again) | truthseeker77's Blog | Keith Olbermann and the straw man fallacy »
Lone nuts still on denial: Discovery channel claims to have debunked JFK Assassination conspiracy theories
I call bullshit. We already know there were two brains examined during the days following Kennedy's autopsy: The real one on November 25th, and the fake one between November 29th and December 2, 1963. The existence of a cover-up to blame Oswald for the death of Kennedy is indisputable.
This new analysis pretends to recreate John F. Kennedy wounds to determine through blood splatter analysis where he was shot from, but the Parkland doctors and military Bethesda doctors have wildly disagreed as to the nature of the throat wound, for example, and many witnesses have said to have seen a wide wound to the rear of Kennedy's back, as opposed to the front, which is the official story.
I can't even find a damn "contact us" link or any contact form in their website.
This new analysis pretends to recreate John F. Kennedy wounds to determine through blood splatter analysis where he was shot from, but the Parkland doctors and military Bethesda doctors have wildly disagreed as to the nature of the throat wound, for example, and many witnesses have said to have seen a wide wound to the rear of Kennedy's back, as opposed to the front, which is the official story.
I can't even find a damn "contact us" link or any contact form in their website.
Advertisement
Two of the biggest problems with the 'loner with a gun' theory on the JFK murder are:
(1) Before he was dispatched ('dead men don't talk' an old mob rule) Oswald vehemently denied the crime. Blaming a crime on a dead guy is often convenient and has a finality to it (anthrax anyone?).
(2) Seymour Weitzman, a reserve cop on duty for the JFK visit and with the first cops to go into the Dallas 6th floor sniper nest,(with a graduate degree in engineering and a businessman who had bought and sold guns) signed an affidavit identifying the weapon in the book depository as a 7.65 mm Mauser.
Weitzman was oddly not shown purported murder weapon,the Mannlicher, when he testified in DC to the WC. His day after sworn affidavit is at:
http://jfk.ci.dallas.tx.us/04/0433-001.gif
November 14, 2008 10:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
1. Did Weitzman pick up and handle the gun, thus messing with whatever fingerprints might have been on it? Or did he only see the gun, without handling it, and therefore potentially mis-identify it?
2. Where is the EVIDENCE that he was qualified, beyond merely being a "reserve officer," to identify guns?
3. Same question of the UNIDENTIFIED "businessman".
4. What in hell relevance has a "graduate degree in engineering" to the issue? IF such a person and degree existed?
99 per cent of the conspirabunk generated since 11/22/63 is the equivalent of FOX's, "Many people say!"
November 14, 2008 11:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I call bullshit.
_____
You're an expert at calling it. And perhap even at identifying it, being as you are a troll/bullshitter.
_____
We already know there were two brains examined during the days following Kennedy's autopsy: The real one on November 25th, and the fake one between November 29th and December 2, 1963.
_____
According to whom? Countless cottage-industry denizens who WEREN'T THERE?
_____
The existence of a cover-up to blame Oswald for the death of Kennedy is indisputable.
_____
If it were "indisputable" it wouldn't be in dispute. Back at reality: it is not only in dispute, but every time "suppressed evidence that proves conspiracy" is released it refutes the ginmned-up conspirabunk that filled in for the "suppressed evidence".
_____
This new analysis pretends to recreate John F. Kennedy wounds to determine through blood splatter analysis where he was shot from,
_____
The analysis is based in large part upon the EVIDENCE of how the blood splatter IN DALLAS on 11/22/63.
_____
but the Parkland doctors and military Bethesda doctors have wildly disagreed as to the nature of the throat wound, for example,
_____
And the Parkland hospital attending medical personnel explained it: the wound was widened by them in the effort to save JFK's life.
There isn't any mystery about it UNLESS one ignores the testimony of those who were actually there in preference for this or that ALLEGED witness testimony made up by denizens of the cottage industry.
_____
and many witnesses have said to have seen a wide wound to the rear of Kennedy's back, as opposed to the front, which is the official story.
_____
So far, we have the EVIDENCE of the official story, in contrast to which we only have SPECULATION -- i.e., CONSPIRABUNK ffrom amatuers with innumerable axes to grind, beginning with Mark Lane.
November 14, 2008 11:29 AM | Reply | Permalink
According to the chief analyst of the Assassination Records Review Board set up during the 90's: Doug Home:
http://www.history-matters.com/archive/jfk/arrb/staff_memos/DH_BrainExams/html/d130_0002a.htm
November 16, 2008 12:12 AM | Reply | Permalink
Yet again -- on his "Straw Man"/Olbermann post -- "truthseeker" blocks responses to and critiques of his assertions in that post.
Because "truthseeker" is a truth seeker? Not so much. In fact, not at all: Want to attack Olbermann, "truthseeker"/troll? Then take it to Olbermann's website where he is likely to actually read it.
Oh, right: You wouldn't be able to prevent communication, DIalogue there, so wouldn't be able to prevent -- SUPPRESS -- responses and critiques and refutations of your transparently self-serving deceits.
Pay attention, "truthseeker": YOU FOOL NO ONE.
November 15, 2008 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
Care to talk about the Kennedy assassination, JNagaraya?
November 16, 2008 12:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Actually, the evidence for conspiracy is overwhelming. And the medical 'evidence' is perhaps the most flimsy in the evidence chain, as BEST EVIDENCE and several other books clearly establish.
We will likely never know who pulled the trigger - but it was definitely more than one gunman. And I have grave doubts that Lee Harvey Oswald killed anyone that day - except PERHAPS Officer Tippet - and even that killing is laced with evidentiary problems.
November 16, 2008 5:53 AM | Reply | Permalink