« Survey: Olbermann Democrats' favorite election news reporter; O'reilly least favorite (that explains the hysteria!) | truthseeker77's Blog | Media diagnosed with CDS (Clinton Derangement Syndrome) »
Answering Tom Wright
There would be no way to escape "dogged" debaters in right-wing blogs, either. Doesn't mean they are effective. Replying to a thread from someone not in the tank for your candidate is easy and even natural. Debunking the allegations made in it i what is hard, and in the case of TPM readers, impossible.
.
.
Advertisement
If you're going to write unadulterated crap, can't you at least proof-read it? Jeez.
November 17, 2008 8:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not clear on the point here, unless you are trying to persuade us that we failed to debunk your position. I'll agree we seem to have failed to persuade you to our view. But the last round was over some kinda squishy rhetorical stuff. Not exactly crucial, just fun to bicker over.
Glad you're willing to be part of the fun. David is just being a spoilsport.
November 17, 2008 9:45 AM | Reply | Permalink
And of course it's a cheap move to title your post about me. I always take comments, and I'm not anonymous.
November 17, 2008 9:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Glad to see you've rejoined the community, truthseeker77.
November 17, 2008 10:50 AM | Reply | Permalink
Bullseeker strikes again. Another post unassailable in its logic and replete with arguments, evidence, and links. How will we ever stand up against this intellectual juggernaut?
November 17, 2008 8:21 PM | Reply | Permalink