Does Obama campaign have plan for Rove's voter suppression tactics?
How the Obama campaign addresses this issue is as important, if not more important, than any other aspect of the election.
Anyone have info on this?
Anyone have info on this?
Week of September 7, 2008 - September 13, 2008
The double talk express rides again.
Who has the guts to stand up to Palin's earmarks? John McCain. This commercial says it all.
(Yes, I know it's been posted already but it's worth repeating.)
(Yes, I know it's been posted already but it's worth repeating.)
Advertisement
How to end multiple posts once and for all.
Whatever the technical reason for the multiple posts, until it's fixed, Josh should put a message on the home page, right above the reader posts, that explains to wait at least fifteen minutes for your post to appear. No need to re-submit any post.
I know it says something like that already somewhere but it's not prominent enough--
I know it says something like that already somewhere but it's not prominent enough--
for the love of god, people, stop talking about palin
Obama wins this election if it's about Bush/Cheney/McCain. If it's not, it could go either way.
How do we get the MSM to stop covering Palin? We don't. If the MSM wants 24 hour coverage of Palin, and doesn't care about being submissive to the McCain campaign's every narrative, there's nothing we can do about it. They'll have to deal with the long term consequences of having regressed to 24 hour gossip networks.
How do we get the MSM to stop covering Palin? We don't. If the MSM wants 24 hour coverage of Palin, and doesn't care about being submissive to the McCain campaign's every narrative, there's nothing we can do about it. They'll have to deal with the long term consequences of having regressed to 24 hour gossip networks.
Potential Biden Gaffe--what he should have said.
Joe Biden was asked whether or not Sarah Palin would be a step forward for women, should she become VP.
I'm paraphrasing, but he basically said it depends on what she thinks, what she stands for, and if she stands with McCain on all the issues, it would be "a backward step for women".
He might have been better off not taking the bait and instead just say, "it's not a matter of gender. Based on where she stands on the issues, it's "a step backwards for Americans".
Here's the link to his initial response.
I'm paraphrasing, but he basically said it depends on what she thinks, what she stands for, and if she stands with McCain on all the issues, it would be "a backward step for women".
He might have been better off not taking the bait and instead just say, "it's not a matter of gender. Based on where she stands on the issues, it's "a step backwards for Americans".
Here's the link to his initial response.
Advertisement
Thanks, but no thanks. The Director's cut.
Clean renewable energy? Thanks, but no thanks.
Climate Change initiatives? Thanks, but no thanks.
Tax cuts for 90% of Americans? Thanks, but no thanks.
Health care for everyone? Thanks but no thanks.
Protect a woman's right to choose? Thanks, but no thanks.
Funding for kids with special needs? Thanks, but no thanks.
Funding for sex education? Thanks, but no thanks.
McCain/Palin. Thanks, but no thanks.
McCain/Palin? Thanks, but no thanks.
Climate Change initiatives? Thanks, but no thanks.
Tax cuts for 90% of Americans? Thanks, but no thanks.
Health care for everyone? Thanks but no thanks.
Protect a woman's right to choose? Thanks, but no thanks.
Funding for kids with special needs? Thanks, but no thanks.
Funding for sex education? Thanks, but no thanks.
McCain/Palin. Thanks, but no thanks.
McCain/Palin? Thanks, but no thanks.
