« Necessary Luxuries | Tom Wright's Blog | AMA: Please Don't Touch Our Business Income »

Value Beyond Price


The United States has produced the Marshall Plan, but also Hiroshima. It defeated fascism but also had to defeat racism at home, an ongoing project. It has produced both Duke Ellington and Aaron Copland, and if we didn't create the Beatles we sure as heck created ragtime, jazz, and rock and roll.

And we lofted the first Great Observatory into space, Hubble.

This has been our gift to the world's populations, pictures and science for all. Researchers have proprietary privileges for one year, and after that all data is public domain, not needing subscription to journals and so on. Anyone can download the amazing images, print them, and sell them as posters, with only a notice of credit for the image being asked. This may be the most generous gift we have offered to the world, since there are exactly zero strings on it.

Mapping and measuring the stars began as an aid to astrologers, who were making predictions for kings, and it continued to be essential in surveying and navigation. Naval officers are trained in celestial navigation, and I don't mean Capt. Kirk, but finding out where you are after all power is lost and you are floating without engines in hostile waters, or blown to hell and gone by a typhoon.

Astronomy has moved into hard science, used to test theory, and also to assay asteroids for their mineral value. It has become the venue for the most ambitious Unification Theories, with string theorists, standard-model disciples, and loop quantum gravity rebels all hoping for vindication from the cosmic microwave background, or calculated expansion rates, or element-abundance measurements. It has even joined the team of homeland defenders, searching for threatening asteroids.

But the ascent of Hubble was revolutionary. It extended our telescopic reach exponentially, increasing our view of the Universe by such a huge amount that even the unimaginable advance from Galileo's little spyglass to Palomar's 200-inch mirror was a smaller jump.  And this jewel is not pointed down, like its sister spy satellites, is never used for military or intelligence work; it used to look outward, so that we may know our place.

And for those who find manned spaceflight an extravagance, think about the likely result of having stayed at home either before or after the Moon: no Hubble. My father worked on the first orbiting astronomical observatories, OAO 1 and 2. The first died after three days, the second did OK, but was so modest in scale that the big earthbound glass could make these first efforts seem like only practice. But with the confidence of being able to repair and upgrade, (thank you KH-11s) we not only orbited a telescope that is almost as big as Palomar, we fixed it when it was discovered to be the wrong specification. And we fixed it again. And we fixed it again.

When it looked like it would die again, and we had lost confidence in the shuttle, NASA announced its retirement. The howl of protest quickly altered that plan. Now it is not only being fixed yet again, but upgraded yet farther to new capability, and getting custom repairs it was never expected to enjoy. Is this not something the planet can take pride in?

Yes, people starve, they die of disease, they are enslaved, tortured, befuddled by propaganda, exploited, and live in squalor. But would the world be a better place without Hubble orbiting serenely above it all? People would still fight and face famine. And we would not know the beauty that is our Universe.

The new telescopes just launched, our own recent ones, and the planned James Webb, will all be sent to locations too distant to service, in trailing solar orbit. But the experience in design and materials, the knowledge of system lifetimes, will make those much more likely to be successes instead of embarrassing failures. Hubble was giant whose shoulders will support those new telescopes.


18 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

what a great post, Tom.

user-pic

Ditto! And thanks.

user-pic

It is getting to be twice a month lately instead of once a week, but I love to get lost in National Geo and check out the latest pictures.

We must look up at the stars from time to time--the practice makes us higher beings.

Great post Tom.

user-pic

By looking at our past we can change our future... even if it is an astronomical task.

user-pic

An absolute pleasure to read.

user-pic

Womankind and mankind have moved beyond observing the skies to discern the will of the gods to studying the heavens and distant solar systems to know whether we are alone in creation and to look into the past at creation itself. Hubble shed light on so many ultimate mysteries, it is a reminder to all that science is all but dispassionate.

user-pic

My wallpaper on my laptop is Hubblesite.org's 'Star forming region of the Carina Nebula'. Wonderful!

user-pic

BEATIFUL Miguel. I love this stuff!!!

user-pic

Remember when it was nicknamed the "Hubble Rubble"? I thought that was kinda mean. Then they fixed it. And fixed it again. :o) Now it's a respected old man sky sailor.

user-pic

When my kid was in Middle School, she had a science project: to explain stars. We found this great interview from a scientist at NASA explaining just what stars were (no doubt aimed at just her age group) that had brilliant footage of distant stars in all their stages. We chopped it apart and wrote a script so it looked like she was interviewing him, as well as used the plentiful and incredible pictures from the Hubble to illustrate it.

She had a bit of fun with the editing over "flaming balls of gas" (which is rather sophomore humor, but rather appropriate, given the audience.

She got an A and we all learned a lot.

It is, really something! An incredible resource. They didn't have this stuff when I was a kid!

Thanks for this, Tom.

user-pic

My personal favorite Hubble shot is the mosaic of M51, the Whirlpool Galaxy. But its Orion composite is breathtaking, and makes good wallpaper. Drop by my web site for some other pretty pix.

user-pic

I love Orion...

And thanks for this post. I was just reminding myself about all of the wonderful and beautiful things in life. Thanks for pointing these out.

user-pic

Jeez.

And all this time I thought the Hubble Space Telescope was just your average old NASA public relations boondoggle.

Spend 100 times as much money and come out with worse results than ground based telescopes can produce.

user-pic

That technique is best applied to very bright subjects. Hubble's strength is that it can see objects lost in the constant airglow faced by ground-based viewing. And even the most advanced adaptive optics, that attempt to cancel turbulence in the viewing air column, can't equal Hubble's sharpness. See if you can find a ground-based image of Mars or Jupiter that comes close to Hubble

And try exposing one image for two weeks, as in the Deep Field images. Ground-based imaging is limited to a couple of hours or so. But the vast majority of objects out there are too faint to be seen from the ground, and need very long accumulation of photons to become signal above the noise.

Another limit to ground-based is the absorption of ultraviolet and infrared frequencies of interest. Some IR bands get through, nut most are absorbed in the atmosphere, thus greenhouse effects.

The advantages of ground-based are mainly that one can climb up to the prime focus, mount a new instrument, and get to work immediately. The queue for time is shorter, and if something isn't working it's there to fix. But every astronomer has faced the disappointment of their scheduled slot losing out to clouds. No location provides year-round cloudless skies; the best one, the high Atacama desert plateau in Chile, can only sort-of guarantee that from November to March, their summer.

Just to keep things in perspective, the only way to get better images than Hubble is to go there, as in probes like Galileo or Cassini. And the other stuff is going to remain distant viewing for a really long time.

user-pic

Forgot to comment on cost. A better comparison would be not 100 times but more like 50, and then reduce the number because of higher utilization (no clouds), dropping it by at least half, then reduce for daylight downtime for ground-based (Hubble can operate in dayight). It is really more like ten times, for otherwise impossible imaging.

Even without those discounts, the roughly $6 billion cost to date, spread across its lifetime and divided by American taxpayers, is around 2 cents per week per taxpayer. (According to Ed Weiler, the HST space science chief.)

user-pic

I get excited at the thought of any new telescope. The photos of the universe via space telescopes are some of the most beautiful images one could ever hope to see. To me a telescope is money well spent. It's a necessity now for them to be in space. My dad worked on guidance systems for missiles when I was a kid. I've seen a lot of them launch. I've seen them blow up too. I'd much rather they send telescopes into space, than people.

Wonderful post, Tom. :)

user-pic

I would add these here innertubes as a gift that keeps on giving. Station to station.

user-pic

I rarely use my refractor, but the reflector is so heavy to haul upstairs I have let too many night sky's pass me and my kids by.

Inspired by you Sir, I shall take said deep sky object device and use as soon as humanly possible.

I once lived in downtown St. Louis. I had a balcony 8th floor apartment, facing the river. At about 1:30 in the morning, when all you could hear was distant trains and cars blocks away, I would look for M31, wait for a clear shot of the Orion Nebula, or simply wait for a sattelite to pass in its strange fixed motion. I love that I ran across this post Tom; my Dad worked at McDonnell Douglas here, and one of my earliest memories was going to see the Prologue Room, where many lunar modules and such are displayed.

Thanks.

Leave a comment

Tom Wright

user-pic

Following: 25
Followers: 58

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Books "Freedom Evolves", Daniel Dennett
  • Favorite Quotes "One never knows, do one?"---Thomas Wright "Fats" Waller

Bio

Musician, Chicago Symphony; photographer, www.digitalskyllc.com

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address