Now I'm pissed. Why do we still have ballots being counted on Diebold machines? Why do we have to see large discrepancies between the tallies shown in hand-counted precincts and those counted on Diebold optical-scan machines?

And it really annoys me that every poll expectation was met except Clinton/Obama, and that the hand-counted precincts also met poll expectations for that pair. 

Check BradBlog and puissant's comment on LJ's complaint post about the media.

I heard Brad Friedman on Mike Malloy talking about this. We seem to have a 7-point swing between the machine and hand-counted results.