« February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007 | Home | March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007 »

Week of March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007

These Numbers Don't Lie


The only thing missing is an "enemies list"---67 Republicans vs. 298 Democrats, investigated by the Bush Justice Dept. (Now to be referred to as "Justice" Dept.)

From Krugman:

Donald Shields and John Cragan, two professors of communication, have compiled a database of investigations and/or indictments of candidates and elected officials by U.S. attorneys since the Bush administration came to power. Of the 375 cases they identified, 10 involved independents, 67 involved Republicans, and 298 involved Democrats.

Calling all statisticians--how far from random is this ratio? Unlike political control of government scientists, or indirect pressure on media, this is not open to interpretation. It's overtly political and shamelessly naked. I'd love to hear this ratio raised in Congress. I'm not interested in Gonzales' answer because it would not be credible, unless he admits it is political war.

This is precisely the kind of political power the 4th and 5th amendments were intended to prevent. Given the blunt politicization of the "Justice" Dept, I have even less confidence in the NSA program's asserted national-security intent.

These are fightin' numbers. Congressional Democrats had better not take them lying down.

Counting Heads in Florida


Before the election I proposed a parallel vote to allow for subsequent interviewing of voters in a contested election. The equivalent is happening in Florida (direct link: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=4220#more-4220), where voting-machine whistleblower Clint Curtis is contesting unexpected tallies in his congressional race.

In this case, his team is tracking down voters that indicated their party (public data from the tally) and asking how they voted. Right now he has a reported Dem/Independent vote percentage of 80%, as opposed to the official-tally 55% contribution from that segment. The interview asks, under (presumed hypothetical) penalty of perjury, how one voted.

As Curtis says, the counter-argument will consist of this: "Apparently these people are lying in court affidavits, but we’re getting the truth from machines that cannot be verified.” Not likely to succeed, one would think.

« February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007 | Home | March 11, 2007 - March 17, 2007 »

Tom Wright

user-pic

Following: 14
Followers: 29

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

  • Favorite Books "Freedom Evolves", Daniel Dennett
  • Favorite Quotes "One never knows, do one?"---Thomas Wright "Fats" Waller

Bio

Musician, Chicago Symphony; photographer, www.digitalskyllc.com

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address