Tits on Trial
If it were torture, the powers that be could simply look the other way (why focus on the distant past?), but since tits are involved, it's apparently a national crises requiring yet another round of SUPREME COURT activity.
Enjoy.
Enjoy.
Advertisement
I cannot believe you are BOOB enough to bring up this topic! I mean, I want to NIP this in the bud! Who nominated you to be the TITular head of this website to bring this up?
My GIRLS are keeping ABREAST of all information coming from the Supreme Court, and there is a simple solution:
A BRA ka da BRA! Problem solved!
May 4, 2009 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, that, and some of those guys on the Supreme Court are real dicks for sure.
Enjoy.
May 4, 2009 10:51 PM | Reply | Permalink
In fact, they are Double D's!
May 5, 2009 7:13 AM | Reply | Permalink
Mmmff. Mmm. Sorry. Just trying to finish a post about the Miss California kerfluffle and... mmm... finish up my synthetic milkshake. Ooo. That's lip-smackin' good. Mmm.
Actually, the court has some history in this areola... AREA! In a 1943 case, New York v. G. Rose Lee, et al., the court held, caressingly, that pasties had no visible means of support, and could be classified "indigent".
So there...
May 5, 2009 12:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Which is worse? A nipple or Sean Hannity? Which is more pornographic.
May 5, 2009 1:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Argh.
Hannity is nausea inducing enough without me visualizing him co-starring in a Made-For-Palin production with Ron Jeremy.
Enjoy.
May 5, 2009 5:05 PM | Reply | Permalink