Cheney - The Anti-Porn
Watched just a wee bit (the new Star Trek rocks...) of the Cheney confession from Sunday TV. He's a kind of antiporn. The more you see of him, the less you want to see more of him. Creepy, and so not like porn.
Here's my take of what I heard......
Didn't realize that (many!)of our military trainees were being subjected to 11 days sleep deprivation, joint dislocations from hanging in stress positions, death from beatings, etc. Where are all the military guys who went through dozens (90-183?) of daily waterboardings? Weeks of sensory deprivation? Endless hours and days of loud music? Just asking. I'm aware our soldiers get a 'taste' of said in SERE, but for Cheney to make a comparison to what they actually did (to a lot of INNOCENT HUMANS) is extraordinarily craptacular. To see the self-identified "best of our media" let it slide? Illuminating.
Cheney didn't throw Bush under the bus. From what I heard, Bush could use this interview against Cheney in the war crimes trials. Cheney veered around the question of Bush's actual knowledge of what Cheney was doing in a way that makes me think that he played the simpleton Bush for the fool and incompetent that he is/was. Bush might honestly not have been aware of the worst of it at the time it was being done. Those early lies about the use of torture might have been honest from his perspective. Not saying he didn't think detainees were getting "roughed-up good Mr. Preznet" but early on, he might not have known?!?
In the beginning......Bush asked Cheney to find a vice presidential candidate to run with. Cheney picked himself as the best and Bush did his first (and last) 'decidering' when he agreed. Cheney was the pro. He worked with Nixon. I'm starting to think that Bush was not the "decider" so much as the "gullible rube".
For the gang of you torturing and torture supporting sons-a-bitches out there:
You're obviously not very bright so let me give you a clue. If you are guilty as hell of same, don't go on Sunday morning television and admit that you not only did it, but that you'd do it again. That's gonna raise your lawyers fee at the war crimes trial to an astronomical amount.
One Last Thing......
Can we arrest him now? Is public confession not sufficient 'probable
cause'? We don't have to invent any new laws or change any of our basic
morality, we just need to enforce the existing law and remind ourselves
that we debated on the inhumanity of these actions, under far worse
circumstances, long ago. Most confessions include some small bit of atonement, but not Cheney. He's begging to be held responsible. These repetitive public confessionals must be a subconscious attempt by his own psyche to punish him for the guilt that is pent up inside him.
You can't just decide that the Earth is again flat, even if you have the loud, fatman on the radio, along with the chicken-shit FauxTV crowd, endlessly exhorting the rustic nature of our beloved new flatlands.
Enjoy.
















This is a fine post Tim. Really fine, well thought out. I hereby award you The Dayly Line of the Day Award for this here TPMCafe site, given to all of you from all of me. For this especially:
He's a kind of antiporn. The more you see of him, the less you want to see more of him. Creepy, and so not like porn.
Good show!!!!
May 12, 2009 10:55 AM | Reply | Permalink
Thanks. Your kudos means a lot. I thoroughly enjoyed that bit of prose myself, and wondered if anybody else would take note.
Enjoy.
May 12, 2009 3:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
well said. One name that is curiously left out of this is David Addington. Sure, they want him in Spain, but why isn't he being implicated with more gusto right now? He's right in the middle of all this--Cheney's former chief of staff, chief legal counsel--
I mean if Libby went down for obstruction and perjury, how is it that Addington, seemingly involved in a conspiracy to commit war crimes, can just go quietly into the night without closer scrutiny?
May 12, 2009 1:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
I haven't forgotten about Addington. As a matter of fact, he'll be a founding member of my hall of shame when I get around to documenting the list of torturers. For the record, I registered americantorturemuseum.com well over a year ago for just the purpose. It is parked at the moment.
Enjoy.
May 12, 2009 3:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Cheney is declaring he did it and you cannot get him because he is a bully. He is taunting the American people to try and get him for his crimes. His heart will give out again here real soon and there is no White House medical team to revive him. We need to pursue the issue of torture to ensure we are America again and we do not torture, ever. In all probability, we will torture again, but we should never, in any moment of clarity, condone it.
May 12, 2009 1:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, he's like that kid on A Christmas Story in that he's "triple dog daring" the judiciary to try and stop him.
Enjoy.
May 12, 2009 3:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
Dick Cheney, in his emergence as Barack Obama’s fiercest and meanest critic, while acting as the most loyal defender of the Bush administration’s policies after the Sept. 11 False Flag attacks, is exhibiting signs of having been the de facto president of the United States during that entire time. The tenure of Richard Cheney as vice president of the United States is credited with having been perhaps the most powerful in U.S. history, and if this is really so then it immediately raises a few serious questions. If he was so ‘powerful’ why was he so ‘invisible’? It is because his vice presidency was actually a ‘shadow presidency’. Is it because Cheney was actually the leader of a shadow government and his present behavior is merely a continuation of his role as the ‘shadow president’.
You must understand that the cowardly, arrogant behavior Cheney pronounces today is but a mere reflection of the more belligerent and truculent posturing of the entire Bush administration regarding their justification of torture as a cover for a more sinister project – the False Flag 9/11 operation. This falsely stated emphasis on the rationalization of torture supports the notion of a global and domestic ‘War on Terror’, which is the direct result of the 9/11 conspiracy perpetrated by the US government.
Had the 9/11 events been real or actual in the manner stated by the government then the response would also have been real and actual, but that was not the case. The government’s response to 9/11 was extraordinarily bizarre, only because the event itself was not real – and unreal events call for unreal responses. It was false in its totality, hence the strange reaction to it. Our response to those events only makes sense if we view them as part of a grand conspiracy on the part of the US government.
What you are now witnessing in America today as a result of the False Flag attack called 9/11 is the full force and weight of the government of the United States of America as it turns completely from the principles of democracy to a full blown Fascist state, which of course, was the intended plan from the very beginning.
May 30, 2009 12:11 PM | Reply | Permalink