« February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007 | Home | March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007 »

Week of February 25, 2007 - March 3, 2007

Vermont Puts Impeachment on the Table


John Nichols reports in The Nation today that he and Cindy Sheehan are in Vermont this weekend, speaking in nearly a dozen towns about why they think the president and vice president should be impeached -- and the essential role that Vermonters are playing in the process.

It was Thomas Jefferson who observed more than two hundred years ago that, "Yes, we did produce a near-perfect republic."
It was Jefferson, as well, who asked of those who would inherit that republic: "But will they keep it?"

The answer to that question, for this particular moment in history, will come from the Vermont town meetings that debate calls for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Cheney next Tuesday. Last year, seven towns voted to impeach. This year, the numbers will multiply dramatically -- and town meetings in the neighboring states of New Hampshire and Massachusetts are taking it up, as well, this spring.

But, as Americans in towns and cities across this great country despair at the determination of their president to surge the country deeper into the quagmire that is Iraq, and react with horror at courtroom revelations about the manner in which their vice president has used his office to manage attacks on the reputations and livelihoods of an administration critic and his spouse, Vermont can signal to the nation that there is an appropriate response to the crisis.

The Constitution does not belong to the politicians. It belongs to all of us. And the medicines it prescribes for the ailments of the body politic are ours to administer.

Jefferson argued that all power must ultimately rest with the people, believing that citizens at the grassroots would always be better suited than politicians in Washington to recognize the point at which friends of the republic must defend its democratic aspirations and the rule of law that underpins them. "It behooves our citizens to be on their guard, to be firm in their principles, and full of confidence in themselves," the author of the Declaration of Independence explained. "We are able to preserve our self-government if we will but think so."

If the Vermont legislature responds to the message from the voters by conveying to Congress articles of impeachment, as several legislators have suggested it should, the struggle to hold the president and vice president to account will have been advanced. If Vermont's representative in the U.S. House, Peter Welch (news, bio, voting record), chooses to so respond, he can introduce articles of impeachment incorporating language from the resolutions adopted at Vermont's town meetings.
No less an American than James Madison said, after assuring that the Constitution would include a broad authority to sanction members of the executive branch, observed that "... it may, perhaps, on some occasion, be found necessary to impeach the President himself..."

That occasion, according to John Nichols, is now.

March Impeachment Watch, updated 3/3/07, may be found here.

More soon,

Ticia

Grassroots Impeachment Movement Rapidly Expands


At this writing, President War Mouth's current approval rating is about 30%, but even the hard core conservative base is apparently quite "uneasy" about his capabilities and inclinations. Though there appears to be little initiative in the House to fire up impeachment proceedings, the grassroots movement is growing rapidly. Dr. John Moffett, active research neuroscientist in the D.C. area, starkly contrasts the current grassroots impeachment efforts with the former authoritarian push to impeach President Clinton in his article: Top Down versus Bottom-Up Impeachment:

There is currently no talk of impeaching President Bush or Vice President Cheney in the U.S. House of Representatives, but there are measures moving through the state legislatures in at least three states, Washington, Vermont and New Mexico. Hopefully more states will take up similar legislation.

Dr. Moffett sees the current American grassroots movement to bring law and order back to the executive branch as exactly the opposite type of proceeding from the impeachment of President Bill Clinton:

President Clinton's impeachment was initiated at the top levels of the Republican elite hierarchy, and pushed through the House by rich, white, ultra-conservatives without significant public support. By the time those proceedings were done, President Clinton had an approximately 70% approval rating with the public.

If enough states pass joint resolutions to initiate impeachment proceedings, it may force Nancy Pelosi and the Democrats to take up impeachment hearings in a serious way.

It will be a wonderful expression of our democratic society if the impeachment of Bush and Cheney are brought about by the actions of hundreds of thousands of patriotic Americans who want to reclaim their country from the corporate, Republican elite.

After two months of collecting impeachment perspectives, some convergence in the talking points seems apparent to me. Significant now are the various awakenings occurring within disparate social strata in cities and states throughout the country, as February, 2007, nears its end. The moral imperative toward the impeachment of corrupt American war leaders is an imperative which might not only arouse the public will, but also ignite a future president.  Who knows? Remember "What Would Lincoln Do?" Such phenomena are not entirely without historical precedent.

More soon,

Ticia

My Impeachment Watch, updated 2/24/07, provides websites, articles, and resources on impeachment. Stop by to browse when you have a few moments. 

« February 18, 2007 - February 24, 2007 | Home | March 4, 2007 - March 10, 2007 »

Ticia

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 3

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address