« News Junkies | thomasjasen's Blog | NAACP »

Judge Sotomayor


Republicans just don't get it. Because an inexperienced Puerto Rican male voted as a conservative judge, the southern senator expected Soto to follow her cultural patriarch. A kowtowing Justice Clarence Thomas she is not. [ By the way, has anyone read his briefs lately...}But her strength of character is reminiscence of Anita Hill.

Its the same southern aristocratic philosophy, that a Raygun Ron Reagan would use to instill fear in voters that a black president would create a nation catering to black needs and concerns. Its the same historical prejudice that believes all blacks know each other and given the opportunity will collaborate to rob and dismember white victims. One PR newscaster noted how stereotypical beliefs reminds him of when people thought anyone of Hispanic origin ate tacos and took afternoon siestas (you could see the hurt in his eyes as he reflected.)

Maybe Southern senators expect all Puerto Ricans to forgivingly embrace the conservative hypocrites who deny the colony statehood rights. Like U.S. Virgin Islands, the colonies of different races have no  political representation in the marble white halls of the 90 member senate.

Race was a topical accusation brought up so many times, I forgot she was being interviewed to be a judge. I thought I was witnessing a Wisconsin senator accusing innocent citizens of being a communist. Gender was mentioned so much as a threat to the sanctity of white men, I started smelling burning flesh from the Salem Witch Trials. But this time the culprit in the defendants chair is a racist, according to the society of elite white men. Men living for an anti-bellum century obtusely thought inherent prejudices  would help inspire the improper cat calls from anti-Soto audience members. All of these people are afraid of losing their superior status if a commie racist becomes a member of the Supreme Court. After all, capitalist pigs in positions of power never reflect the opinion of their rich constituents.  Still, no matter how they slung their southern grits and pig lips, their comments did not stick to the hallowed chamber wall of reason and logic.

What did stick was how those judicial republicans expressed fear and finally acknowledgment that they are losing power with the racist ideology that begun with Nixon. What they realize that as more people from the rest of the nation repopulate the South; these new immigrants do not necessarily share the same pompous views of anti-bellum Confederate agitators.   

When the director of Gone With the Wind predicted the South would rise again with blacks again as second class citizens; he would be dumbfounded to find out liberals, blacks, and Hispanics and Asians have come out of the ashes of Atlanta's nefarious hellfire. 


6 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I actually watched a good deal of these proceedings, and I was struck in a rather non-partisan way by the abounding silly foolishness of so much of it: Judge Sotomayor is not only obviously highly qualified, it is equally obvious that most of her questioners are completely out of their depth. What one strains to call a Republican 'attack' gives every impression of the time-honored movie cliche' in which the fleeing bad-guy tips a chair over in a futile attempt to evade justice. This has deserved 70-plus confirmation written all over it, and any more of this mail-it-in shadow boxing is a waste of the public's time.

user-pic

Closer to 90 than 70.

user-pic

What was the point of Sotomayor pretending to be an arch-conservative and backing off from everything Obama said he was looking for in a judge? Empathy and all those cute words?

Given filibuster-proof majority who's going to confirm her no matter what, she was such a chameleon I'm left wondering why she felt the need to pretend to be someone she's not and jump through the hoops.

Intellectually honest? Unlikely.

user-pic

Obama is so allergic to intellectual honesty himself that perhaps her very obvious dishonesty and desire for advancement-through-any-hoops-necessary was precisely what attracted him.

Of course, as a moderate myself, I like judges and politicians like that, because they so seldom do anything flamboyantly stupid. So I think she should be confirmed as well (in my view, Senate confirmation should be a rubber stamp anyway, in the absence of some misconduct or back-rubbing in the nomination process).

user-pic

A point that Judge Sotomayor seemed to make repeatedly in a variety of contexts in these hearings, is that the particular facts of a specific case MUST contribute the primary weight of a judge's ultimate decision. As such, it's not only unwise, it's actually impossible to signal in the absence of those specifics which way one might 'lean' ahead of time in the abstract. This seems to me an imminently pragmatic and entirely reasonable approach, and one that best describes the concept of 'judicial temperament'. I would hope that this precept governs the behavior of ALL the Supreme Court judges, although I have to confess doubt that it is actually given that weight by all of them in all cases.

user-pic

Excellent retort!

Leave a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address