« Can Americans be happy with less? | TheraP's Blog | Has it really come to this? »

A Twice Told Tale


[Dedicated to Ravenwind from whose vision this story evolved]

Once upon a time there was a boy king, who captured a few prisoners and placed them on a deserted island.  He was desirous of a magnificent robe, the likes of which would frighten his enemies and make him appear all powerful.  Alas, on the deserted island there were only a few pitiful sheep.  Mired in their own offal, their wool became awful with stench.  From this wool, however, the prisoners were forced to spin thread and weave cloth, which was made into a robe for the wearing of the boy king.  "Mission Accomplished," said he!  And pranced around in the ugly, befouled robe with its matching, odious knitted scarf.

Indeed, the awful, offal smell of the wretched robe did put off his enemies, who fled from the scent, whenever the boy king wore the robe.  And the unsuspecting one said:  "Mission Accomplished!"  Again.

Long, dreary years passed and the deathly, greedy, destructive yearnings within the yarn, and born of his evil deeds, worked their way ever into the heart and soul of the boy king's policies, as the people saw more and more clearly his own black deeds - and nothing else - covered the naked body of the perverse adolescent regent.

It seemed that nothing would ever save the populace from this terrible situation.  Until one day there came a tall young man into the kingdom.  This man, ridiculed by the courtiers as "black" and "dangerous," nevertheless won the hearts of the people.  And in spite of all the evil tricks tried by the courtiers, the tall, thin, plainspoken man, who lifted the people's hopes and encouraged them to dare to raise their voices in the pursuit of freedom and justice, overthrew the boy king in a single day - in spite of the supposedly powerful robe, which was made to frighten and subdue all enemies.

The day came when the new guy took over.  And all the people cheered as the boy king stepped down from the throne.  However, by custom, the deposed one was obliged to sit through a speech before he could leave.  A speech from the tall, thin plainspoken guy.  The speech was of such power that people hung on every word.  And right away, word by word, that speech pulled on a loose end of the deathly, greedy destructive yarn with its foul stench.  It left a gaping hole in the robe.  And people could see there was really nothing there - except the odious boy king's nakedness, as he fled from the robe and the scarf and the booing people, who loudly cheered their liberation.

You'd think this was the end of the story.  But no.  What began as a thread unraveling continued day by day, as every day yielded new unraveling of the grotesque robe and its wretched matching scarf.   The fetid yarn was gathered up daily.  And it seemed to multiply, as if it had a life of its own.  As the people demanded more and more of the truth.  And Justice cried out to be served.   Some people called for a huge bonfire to burn the wool and eliminate the stench, which grew by the day as the tortuous yarn unraveled.  Others insisted, that no matter how foul, how awful the offal stench, how wretched and deathly its appearance, of necessity the people should face - without flinching - what previously they had feared and loathed.   That facing that, they would grow stronger.  And justice could be served.

To be continued......  as issues warrant.  Or ... as warrants issue.


19 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Some will wonder how the boy king could bear the stench, when others could not.

So as not to interrupt the flow of comments, the evidence suggests that youthful indiscretions, involving forbidden substances ruined the odious regent's olfactory passages. And no one dared tell him the truth.

user-pic

The fetid yarn was gathered up daily. And it seemed to multiply, as if it had a life of its own...

One of our own commented yesterday that w's history sounded more like fiction than fact. I replied that fiction is very much alive and being propounded by right wing pundits, attempting to twist history into a great lump of propaganda.

Your piece begins a narrative much more flowing than Maureen Dowd's. The child king smashing his father's vehicle into a wall.

And the stench. Oh, we must look a head and not behind they say. ROT, just plain rot.

That stench will not go away until the underlying garbage is cleaned; off the floor, off the walls,
and off of the furniture.

Fine metaphor. Fine prose.

Proceed fair maiden, proceed, I say!!!!

user-pic

Your humble servant, with graceful low, gentlewomanly bow, deeply appreciates the esteemed comments of the Venerable Bard of Beede and the 50 Books. Perhap fair fortune may yet issue events, upon which the wretched deposed lad and his retinue, may still become the subject of a further tale.

user-pic

Wot's with these Beedle the Bard references? Everyone into Harry Potter?

It's Bede!

SAINT Bede!

Oy!

user-pic

Sorry, bwak, I was misspelling it. But the Venerable Bede is indeed what I meant. And of course I was crossing it with the "bard" telling a tale. That goes back several chapters in the comments. Nevertheless, so as not to ruffle feathers, I will endeavor, hereafter, to address dd as The Venerable Bede (of Bard and the 50 Books). Will that suffice?

user-pic

On the other hand, doncha think calling him the Bard of Bede avoids pinning the saintly title on dd?

user-pic

hum. Depends on how old one is, unfortunately.

=D

user-pic

Yez, and you weren't the only one.

=D

I just thought it would be good to be clear as to avoid confusion.

user-pic

I own a copy. I have read all 7 of the Harry books as well. I was really "playing" with all of it!

What do you suggest, oh bwak? I will follow your guidance, lest I be pecked to death. :)

user-pic

Ack! I was thinking those of us that read them to our kids, (and secretly read ahead a few times), and maybe those young adults that grew up reading it.

It's funny, but I don't know which one of us were most excited about getting volume seven bright and early in the morning from Amazon.com I suspect it was me...


user-pic

I meant, might get confused. I barely remember ol Bede meself, I learned about him twice! in history and religion class.

It's probably silly. I must think everyone is as easily confused as I can be.

user-pic

I took a course that involved him a couple years back. So don't blame yourself, dear bwak!

(how's that for a little verse?)

user-pic

You gals have me laughing. This is supposed to be a blog about stench and w and the rightious hand of God striking down the money changers.

hahahahhahahahahahhahhahahah

Bede 8th century. I only read him because he republished Gildas, 6th century. Many feel that one of Gildas' letter was directly to Arthur, although only per inference.

Have I boared you enough!!!!

hahahahaahahahahahah

user-pic

Great comment, dd! A friend of mine came to this thread and was a little flummoxed by what occurred between bwak and myself... not knowing the context from another thread.

Context is so important! When it is overlooked, big problems can be the result.

I love you, dd! :)

user-pic

We can only hope the cry of justice is answered.

user-pic

True, oleeb. That's one reason I've been writing this up in every possible literary form. To keep this alive.

user-pic

Anyone whose favorite cat has eaten a string of tinsel off the Christmas tree knows the nature of what unhappy task awaits us all.

“The play’s the thing in which I’ll catch the conscience of the king.” Perhaps Public Television can arrange to have some of those competent British actors produce a series modeled on Fox’s “24” wherein each episode the hero uses every means to undo one of the horrors of the past administration. At some point the larger message might become apparent. We could borrow Rachel Maddow’s tagline for the series title “Scrub. Rinse. Repeat.”

user-pic

Mr. Hinds, once again you address the nub of the issue here. That line from Hamlet is perfect! And your image of the cat. Public TV has a better chance to do as you suggest now that the players can no longer "control" (or curtail) the play. Your comments are most helpful and insightful. Yes, most ideas are best conveyed in story form or image - unless the audience is willing to take time and effort to read and study.

I remain the grateful recipient of your comments to these blogs. :)

user-pic

P.S. Larry! I am thrilled to find you again! Just thrilled! Thanks for identifying yourself. That's twice you've come in different forms... and both times you've blown me away! :)

Leave a comment

Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address