The Last Gasp?
I had this whole other post I'd been working on for a few days about how much I have come to dread judicial confirmations and how the increasing toxic dysfunctionality of the had become instituitonalized. The well-heeled wingnuts have set up all these little P.R. campaigns disguised as think tanks with benignly deceptive names--"Center for Justice," "Judicial Confirmation Goodness Association," "Totally Not Some Rabid Oppo Weasels and One Loutish Flack Pretending to be a Serious Think Tank" whose sole purpose is to pump poison into our discourse, with the eager cooperation of the cable nets.
For a while, everything was going as I, and they, had expected. Pre-announcment message coordination conference calls ensured that everyone blasted out the same talking points. The short list dossiers were dusted off and fine tuned while the front people yakked up the generic denunciations and then an agreed upon attack specific to the nominee was launched based on positively Orwellian misrepresentions of the nominees opinions, the role of the courts, and the characterization of straghtforward applications of precedent to facts as "judicial activism." And, of course, the mass mailing of fund raising letters threatening the imminent end of all that is good and decent unless the recipient digs in to their pocket right now--which are, of course, the whole point of the carefully choreographed danse macabre that Supreme Court confirmations have degenerated into--went out right on schedule.
And then, right before our bemused eyes, the weirdest thing happened. Almost every man in their ensesmble cast went off scipt and started ad libbing an entirely different performance than the one they had planned.
Initially, they had all seemingly agreed that Obama's choice of Sotomayor was politically brilliant because it put the Republicans in a position where they had to tread very carefully on questions of ethnicity and gender. But by the end of the week, that was all they could talk about and they could only talk about it in the most loutish, inflammatory, fashion possible.
It started with a weird remark here and there there, oddly little discordant deviations the agreed upon attack on "Obama's lawless empathy standard" which was supposed to oh-so-subtly and covertly whip up the incipient Bubba-fear that is the right's new financial mainstay. But it was like they couldn't help themselves. Suddenly, it looked very much like that the white men who were supposed to be cynically stoking a silly fear among less well educated and socially advanced white males were themselves gripped by that fear. It was as if the image of our African-American president appointing a woman of Puerto Rican discent to the nation's highest court had lanced some carbuncle of hysterical fear deep in their souls and the festering pus came exploding out of them and onto the T.V. screens.
















The viciousness of the attacks on Sotomayor coming from the extreme right are indeed difficult to understand. Some ideas:
1. They are now in the "anger" stage of their grieving over their loss of power.
2. They are projecting their own racism and extremism onto Sotomayor. They are therefore scared to allow power to a woman who might think of them in the same way that they think of her.
3. They are angered by her pride in her sex and her Hispanic heritage. How dare she not yearn to be like them!
May 30, 2009 1:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes!!! Yes!!! I see it, too. Maybe every cynical rabblerouser has a bit of rabble in him.
May 30, 2009 2:39 PM | Reply | Permalink
To paraphrase every women I've known ewww, that's why I don't spend much time watching the cablenets. I don't want to get puss on me.
May 30, 2009 6:17 PM | Reply | Permalink
Gasping, but not likely the last. This brand of defensiveness is a deep feature of some folks, and we seem to always have some of them around. (See, John Dean, conservatives, conscience, lack of.)
But yes, weird and awful, and we can't look away.
May 30, 2009 6:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
After reading thousands of US Supreme Court decisions as well as state supreme court decisions, I know one thing. To explain the process in 90 seconds on cable is like trying to explain evolution in half an hour at Oral Roberts University.
PEOPLE HAVE NO IDEA.
May 30, 2009 6:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
Just before Obama took office my brother told me - Watch, cause it is going to get funny (in both senses of the word). When I ask what he was talking about he said the white men in control are getting nervous because they are about to lose it.
May 30, 2009 8:40 PM | Reply | Permalink
We make a mistake if we think the mass media are in the business of somehow informing us. This is public theater, friends. They need a readers and viewers so they entertain us with lunatics. We're talking an audience of H. L. Mencken's American booboisie here. Fox Television is a kind of freak show, with passionate morons replacing the woman with a beard, lizard boy and the rest. Rush Limbaugh is a clown. They don't give a damn if some charge is inaccurate or stated with a logic so bizarre that it would puzzle a chimpanzee. If you made a law prohibiting them from using the words might, could, or may, most of them would go out of business overnight.
May 30, 2009 9:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Never an emergency when their sirens go off. They are the quintessential false alarms.
May 30, 2009 10:52 PM | Reply | Permalink
Quick version of Sotomayor 'high road' opposition to date, from the viewpoint of the average layman on the street:
(1)Two informal comments pulled from context (ie, "...policy...", and "...wise Latina...").
(2)Something or other about a technical ruling that some New England white firefighters didn't like.
Is that all there is? It seems to me if these are your BEST arguments for opposing a 54-years-of-age public figure with 17 years on the bench, it's a foregone conclusion she'll be easily confirmed.
May 31, 2009 9:46 AM | Reply | Permalink
George Lakoff concisely answered some questions that have been haunting me about the efficacy of right-wing v. progressive messaging in a post today on HuffPo. He makes a compelling case. I will re-read this many times and encourage others who have been flummoxed as to how right-wing messages gain traction to do the same. Hopefully the link will work. Here goes:
May 31, 2009 10:08 AM | Reply | Permalink
Well, no link. Maybe cut and paste?
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/george-lakoff/empathy-sotomayor-and-dem_b_209406.html
May 31, 2009 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
Excellent article. Thanks for sharing.
Yes, I'm a Bleeding Heart and yes, I get taken in by wanting to believe that people aren't as bad as they seem, and yes, I tend to look for motives that aren't there. . .
. . .and yes, the other side takes advantage of my very nature.
But here we are, and there they are. Lakoff is telling me how to keep it that way. Good for him. Now if only I can set my emotions aside and be the good soldier I need to be in order to win this battle.
May 31, 2009 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink