Amazing Discoveries
I have made a series of absolutely astonishing discoveries since Tuesday.
Here's one. Turns out, I am a party to a contractual relationship whereby people expect me to do work, work for them, in exchange for the money they give me. It appears that I have a great deal of this work to do in this thing, this "job" as I am told it is called, if I am to keep drawing that pay. These people are not, it develops, the Obama campaign, but, rather are private parties who expect me to do work related to their own narrow pecuniary interests.
Here's another. It further appears that I have been a party to this so-called "job" thing for quite some time now, including the last two years. Further investigation has revealed that, somehow, by some strange autonomic process that did not actually engage my conscious attention, I have actually a done a great deal of this work over the last two years. This was most fortunate. It is now my understanding that failure to do this work would have resulted in cessation of the payments I've been getting from them as I pursued my actual vocation of frantically checking polls and news and fundraising figures, writing comments and blog posts at TPM, and doing volunteer work for the campaign.
Yet another unexpected discovery: schadenfreude is tricky stuff. Wednesday night, I dropped by "hillaryis44.org," a place that has long since ceased even pretending not to be a Republican front, to do a little private gloating. Instead, after I read the latest long crazy rant from "the Administrator," as they call him, I dove into the comments and found myself feeling only pity. I rebuked myself for the low and unworthy desire that had motivated the trip, turned off the computer and went to bed.
The next day, however, I drove to a high end deli I favor for a lunch date and, on the way inside, had to pass between two tables-full of what I've come to call "the tennis biddies." These are the aging wives of the handful of rich old white guys who, not so long ago, used to run this town like it was their private little game of Sim City. I instinctively disliked this class of women even before I'd lived here long enough to figure out who they were. These are women who've lived out lives of perfectly useless country club Republican indolence, playing tennis, organizing stultifying parties, participating in so-called charities that do no actual good other than postponing cocktail hour. Week after week, they come to this busy restaurant during the lunch hour in their horrifically expensive, repulsively skimpy tennis outfits and blather endlessly away about nothing long after their meals are finished, haughtily ignoring the people with actual jobs (did I mention it turns out I have one?) walking around with their trays of food and looking in vain for an empty table. This day, however, there was little blathering. Instead, they looked, to a woman, simultaneously stunned, mortified and utterly despondent. Their whole world had been turned upside down. Their fear of imminent Islamofacist pillage and rapine and socialist expropriation was palpable. It was thoroughly delightful to behold.
And finally, another, less morally suspect, discovery I made a few minutes earlier, that same day. Since last February, I've have been telling everyone I know, and via the Internet, many people I do not know, that this country is not what they think it is. When people have said that the Democrats were dead and/or that the country still wasn't ready for a black president, I've been the guy insisting that changing demographics, the slow decay of ideological racism among whites into a soft prejudice that merely creates a rebuttable presumption against blacks made it possible. For two years, I've been telling disbelieving friends and relatives that there was a steadily rising disaffection with all things Republican that, unnoticed by our somnolent media, began about fifteen minutes after George W. Bush was sworn in for his second term and that that disaffection would sweep the Democrats back into power by huge margins. I've been strident about it at times, though I've tried to stay on the good side of "shrill."
Not tooting my own horn or bragging about my presience, because, this week, I've, most ironically, discovered the difference between belief and hope. Turns out, all these things I believed, were merely hope. I know this because on Thursday afternoon, the first full day after I recovered from Tuesday, I was driving to the aforementioned lunch date and heard these words on the radio:
"From National Public Radio, this is Lakshmi Singh. President-Elect Obama . . ."
I didn't hear the rest. My throat suddenly closed up and my vision fogged over. To prevent an accident, I had to hastily pull into a nearby bank parking lot where, for about thirty seconds, I did that choking-weeping thing that guys do in lieu of actually crying. Turns out, a part of me didn't really believe any of that stuff. Instead, I was just hoping it was true. Having your beliefs proven brings quiet satisfaction. Only hope fulfilled can make you cry.





Beautiful, Steve! I sure do appreciate your presence here. You've always brought a touch of rationality when the crowd starts wigging out. But, here you are, getting a little farklempt. Loved it.
November 8, 2008 3:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Holy crap! After reading your post, I performed some intensive investigative work, and discovered that I, too, have one of these "jobs"! However, I'm sure they will understand that obsessively keeping up to date on political news needs to take precedence over any activities that merely contribute to the growth or continued health and well-being of the entity that gives me the money.
Thank you for this wonderful post. I'm still occasionally choking up, in a manly sort of way, sometimes even in response to cartoons.
November 8, 2008 4:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
I admire the way you think and the way you write -- so much so that you were the first person I "followed."
So it is with respect that I ask you to have some sympathy, if not empathy, for the tennis "biddies" of America. They are despondently aware that they are anachronisms; nonetheless, they are still somewhat baffled by the discrepancy between the expectations for women of the era (and perhaps geography) in which they were raised, and their current status as bait for ridicule. Some of the women you observed this week looked shell-shocked to you for the reasons you cite: because they bought the party line of their parents and marital partners. But some of them looked forlorn because they have devoted decades to diligently playing a part that wasted their native gifts in favor of doing what they perceived as properly supporting their men, their community and their demographic. Perhaps you missed the few of them who looked stressed because, as Bslev suggested in another post, they were secret Obama supporters whose only satisfaction was to be found in the privacy of the voting booth. For them, the current task is harder. Privately, pleased, they must nonetheless, echo the party line in public. Otherwise, their endless role goes on.
There are those of us who could have ended up in their unenviable shoes, who were mercifully saved from their fate by "misfortune."
Just sayin'.
November 8, 2008 4:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
As usual, Wendy, you astound me with your highly-developed sense of empathy, and all-around insight into the human condition.
Grazi, my friend.
November 8, 2008 8:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Coralsea:
Thank you for that. Cirinf those who profess to be all about equality who, when the chips -- or the table at the restaurant are down -- indulge in an unconscious misogyny, is really depressing. Thank you for your genuine support of women, of all ages and class.
November 11, 2008 5:59 PM | Reply | Permalink
That would be "citing those..." not "cinrif." Reminder to self: touch typing is not what it once was; check the entry before hitting "submit."
November 11, 2008 6:01 PM | Reply | Permalink
Sorry to burst Steve's rabidly stereotypical bubble, but he should hang out in the Hamptons sometime and see how the liberal Democratic wives of the grossly overpaid behave. Vacuous chatter does not know a tax bracket or party affiliation.
Steve's got a glaring case of class envy. Get over it.
November 9, 2008 10:19 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not clear on where I indicated any belief that vacuuous chatter was limited to any particular class or party.
November 9, 2008 11:43 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Vacuous chatter?" NC Steve: I know precisely why you say this. I, too, have been embarrassed by women who "should" know better. But, please. Who sang: "have a heart..."? Wasn't it Bonnie Raitt? A white woman of privilege?
November 11, 2008 6:25 PM | Reply | Permalink
Correction: you were the second person I followed. Apologies, Lux.
November 11, 2008 5:50 PM | Reply | Permalink
What a terrific post! I, too, despite my gleeful gloating over the misery of Bushamericans, have found myself repeatedly choked-up these last few days, most recently when I read the following words written by Baraini blogger Esra'a (appearing at http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/07/opinion/08webdelap.html?hp):
This is a win for all of us, not just America.
This is a win for civil rights and justice.
For all the pessimists out there, allow us to enjoy this moment. If you learned anything from this campaign, you would learn that it starts with hope — not cynicism. And hope is what I have right now, for America and the Middle East.
We can do it, and this time, we can be sure that we can do it together.
I haven’t said this in a really long time, but I am loving America right now.
November 8, 2008 5:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, it hits us at the most amazing times. I find myself waking up in a state of semi-disbelief but with mixture of feeling I'm now "safe."
Thanks, Steve, for a wonderful post!
November 8, 2008 5:45 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yes, I agree, we've come a long way. Just a year ago, we couldn't even call him a black candidate ;-)
November 8, 2008 6:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
I had the same reaction when I heard Singh do the lead-in, except I was safely at home.
November 8, 2008 6:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Your comments about the tennis biddies sounds bitter and envious. Do you know any of these women? If not, then why not have some liberal charity and assume the best about them.
November 8, 2008 6:18 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lakshmi Singh is so good to listen to. I like her. You said:
Love this post, NCSteve, I want you to know you've made my evening. This is a class of women that I detest with a red hot passion. Yikes! And they seem to be such a fixture in certain parts of VA too, particularly in the mid and southern parts of this state and apparently in your state too. Yes, I do believe there is a stunned silence within their psyches and in their country clubs. Yay, I say!!! I'm so happy Obama won VA that I cannot cannot help being happy. Also, Warner won. I canvassed for both. I feel so happy.
November 8, 2008 7:43 PM | Reply | Permalink
'course, I'd be happier if TPM liked the whole of me instead of just my ass. Just sayin....
November 8, 2008 7:44 PM | Reply | Permalink
This the best post that has ever or will ever be made on a blog.
November 8, 2008 8:56 PM | Reply | Permalink
Til his next one. (C'mon dude, keep the pressure on. I want NCSteve & the Tennis Biddies - The SEQUEL!")
Great piece, NCSteve.
November 8, 2008 11:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
quiet, humane wisdom. Thanks NCsteve
November 8, 2008 10:06 PM | Reply | Permalink
Lux: this is the first time I am disappointed in you. Yes, it is a great post --- except for the ridicule heaped on a demographic of women who are, in fact, least able to defend themselves. Economic privilege, coupled with a personal definition of doing one's best, according to outmoded definitions of same, does not equal either consciousness or street smarts.
For God's sake, what is the matter with y'all? You have sympathy, if not always empathy, for every other demographic there is. WHY? is it older white women who unleash this mob-mentality scapegoating?
Here's a suggestion for all of you: try focusing on the real culprits: the unrepentant white southern men who boast, without remorse, that the social hierarchy consists of, AND I QUOTE, ad nauseum: " white men; their hunting dogs and children (notice the order of precedence); their black Amahs from childhood, their wives and sisters; white men from 'off' (meaning Yankees); white women from 'off' (meaning Yankees)..... and black men."
Interesting that: who is the lowest on the southern totem pole? Black men. But, from all of you: "older white women of privilege."
Goddamnit. How condescending can you be? Black men... or white women. Both marginalized, dehumanized. When both black men and white women are just human.
Think about it.
November 11, 2008 6:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
Rec'd here too.
I had my own "President-elect Obama" moment; not nearly as dramatic: I was was pulling into a parking parking at work the other morning when I heard the hourly news come on the radio.
I merely shouted "YEAH"!
November 9, 2008 1:42 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ah, schadenfreude.
I indulged an impulse to drop by noquarterusa.net so I could ask Larry where that "whitey" tape was. Happily, though, I've forgotten my login at that site, so I couldn't fully indulge the impulse.
November 9, 2008 2:52 AM | Reply | Permalink
I'm at the point where I giddily await the first "President Elect Obama" every time I turn on the news. Just truly glorious. The best part is that in a just over 2 months, we get to hear a long series of newscasters and commentators referring to "President Obama".
I would love to have been a fly on the wall at Wednesday afternoon country club lunches across the land. I can't even begin to imagine.
November 9, 2008 10:01 AM | Reply | Permalink
Nice post and recommended. You did a fine job, with a certain notable exception in my book (wink), during the campaign. Well done, except I do think you were a little unfair to those nice old ladies. :)
November 9, 2008 10:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
CindyMaxParsingThrough:
When you say: "It's doubtful her life or her awareness will change appreciably, particularly with respect to the shift in American consciousness from exclusion to inclusion and the notion America has to be re-built from the ground up...."
Then, what I say, gently, is this: what you don't understand yet, that Tena and I get in spades, is that the cardinal Taliban-like "sin" of these women is that they still presume to gather together in public -- in, as NC Steve put it so scathingly -- as if he were a fundamentalist of whatever persuasion: "repulsively skimpy outfits."
Is it, NC Steve, equally repulsive when 50-70 year old men play tennis in skimpy shorts, and gather together, afterwards, for lunch?
Tena is right. There is not enough time left, for older women, of whatever class or circumstance, to enjoy respect for their experience, of whatever nature.
These women, in particular, bet on the wrong horse. It is too late for them. And rather than feeling sorry, that they got it so wrong, our culture reviles them.
Why not just cut a few more ice floes from the remaining polar block, and set them out to sea?
November 11, 2008 7:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Bslev:
I respect you. I want to achieve detente with you. But, please, "those nice old ladies"?
What defines an "old" lady? Not many old ladies I know, whether southern country club types, or not, would be caught dead in a restaurant in "repulsive skimpy clothes." That is because women who are actually "old ladies" are in their late 70's and 80's and could not play tennis if their lives depended on it.
I don't want to antagonize you, as we have begun to establish a kinder, gentler dialogue. But -- do you realize that you are talking about women the age and stage of HRC? Who might have ended up, having lunch, wearing tennis clothes, had she not challenged the beliefs of her day.
Here's to Hillary. And to her Doppelgangers -- the ladies who lunch.
November 11, 2008 7:22 PM | Reply | Permalink
I enjoyed this post. wwstaebler's insight offered another important view of some of these women.
My mom called one of my cousins who languishes in the Virgin Islands the day after the election. Her official residence is Houston.
When my mom mentioned how great it was that Obama had been elected, she was met with a long awkward silence. Just weeks before, my cousin had told her she would vote for Obama, but her husband was rock-solid for McCain.
My dear, talented cousin has paid a price for being able to do all the things she loves at her leisure all these years. I'm not sure she's aware of it though.
That we are at last in the process of shedding the pall of the last eight oppressive years will take some time to get used to. The magnitude and reach of the carnage wreaked by Bush, Cheney, et al was so devastating, many months will likely pass before many of us have acclimated to the new reality -- that the Bush administration is really GONE.
November 9, 2008 10:34 AM | Reply | Permalink
I hear that. I've spent 7 years telling people Americans are better than they seem to be. Having my faith in Americans justified has been humbling. I really did believe in us and we delivered.
But who delivered is instructive - those women's lives really are over in ways nobody gets yet - this country is going to be run not by them, but by a coalition of Hispanics and African Americans and us - the internet. We did this and we make is possible for the Democrats to continue to hold power and make gains - it's a new day for real. It just hasn't come quite together yet to hit some people - but it will. This is huge change.
November 9, 2008 10:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Tena, I wholeheartedly agree with much of what you said. I'm not sure I understand this:
My cousin will continue to enjoy her husband's pampering and the lifestyle they lead. It's doubtful her life or her awareness will change appreciably, particularly with respect to the shift in American consciousness from exclusion to inclusion and the notion America has to be re-built from the ground up.
I suspect people of that ilk, along with the religious radicals, will simply tighten their ranks and become more extreme, covering their eyes and ears, and pretend it's not really happening.
November 9, 2008 11:31 AM | Reply | Permalink
All right, a quick response to all who have jumped to the defense of the tennis biddies because my description of them triggers their sexism and or classism detectors.
My contempt is not easily earned, nor is it frivilously bestowed. My job has put me into close contact with the rich, the powerful and the country club Republicans of this town for close to two decades now. Having been born into predominately Republican families (albeit a Republicanism handed down to them since the Civil War) I know better than to prejudge. In working with, and for, them, I have found that many of them are decent people, concerned, by their lights, for the country and for their fellow man. Many of the rich ones give genrously of their time and their money for causes which, if not necessarily the ones I would choose, are nonetheless ones which do good. I likewise have found myself feeling great compassion for many of the women in this class who were raised to be ornaments and who find themselves unfulfilled and unequipped to find fulfillment when they get older. All too often, they seem to have been hit with a case of ennui in their thirties that led directly to long term drinking problems, and I feel great compassion for them and for their families.
Likewise, I often find myself wincing when people who throw around words like "rethug" and "repug" because I know that many rich Republicans are decent, well-intentioned people, although many are hopelessly blinkered by having been born into privilege and can no more understand the reality of what it means to be poor than I can understand the idea of snacking on of fish eggs.
That's not these women, nor is it their husbands. They are worth about as much of your kind regard and defense as Leona Helmsley and Martha Stewart. And actually, that's being grossly unfair to Martha.
November 9, 2008 11:32 AM | Reply | Permalink