« October 12, 2008 - October 18, 2008 | Home | February 8, 2009 - February 14, 2009 »

Week of January 4, 2009 - January 10, 2009

Sen. Diane Feinstein's anti-Panetta posturing.


At the outset let me make this abundantly clear, I hold no brief for Leon Panetta. And if the President-elect Barack Obama wants him as a Director of the CIA, he must have him. It should'nt be Senator Diane Feinstein who decides what the appropriate qualification for that CIA Director position should be. After all Feinstein has been one of the most surreptiously pro-George Bush members of the Senator. In the last 8 years she has sided with Republicans on many pseudo-security issues. Recently she undermined Democratic efforts in the Senate's Judicial  Committee to vote down the nomination of Judge John Muckasey for attorney-general. She is now nit-picking on, and seem intent on derailing Panetta's nomination on the grounds that Panetta lacks intelligence experience. This woman's effort to undermine his nomination is as treacherous to President-elect's transition effort as her  undercutting Democratic efforts to derail Muckasey's nomination. Feinstein did this selling-out despite Muckasey's undisguised propensity toward blind and extreme partisan support of Bush's anti-human rights and authoritanian security measures against American citizens. Even before she can even be made to account for those earlier transgression against her party, she is intent on another transgression, and, this time against Obama's Presidential transition process. Mark my word, if this woman is not sufficiently upbraided for this, she will get away with even more serious anti-Democratic infringements, with unconstructive consequences to the Obama-Democratic agenda.

Israel's Disproportionate Response and Hamas's Recklessness.


Granted, Hamas fired rockets into Israel, thereby plausibly threatening the security of Israel and endangering the lives of its people. Israel would have been irresponsible not to respond to protect its people. But does its responsibility to defend its citizens justify the destruction of another nation? The profundity of this question necessarily invokes the question: Did the damage caused by the rockets warrant the extent to which Israel has responded, resulting in such gruesome civilian casualty? Israel has a lot to answer for. This, nonetheless does not in the least justify, nor partially excuse Hamas for its reckless behavior that ultimately consumed Israel with an unforgiving sense of unbridled vengeance fuelled largely by domestic political consideration. But in view of the ever-escalating Palestinian civilian casualty one has ask: At what point is Israel going to say,"enough with the killing of civilians?" Some apologists of Israel have justified the killing on the grounds that the majority of Palestinians elected Hamas, therefore they deserve what they get. If this line of argument make any sense at all it is because the same apologists  have not wondered why the killing of Israeli civilians would'nt be justified on same grounds. 
But Israel, undaunted and unrestrained by any sense humanity tramples on and on in Gaza with impunity from the standpoint of its overwhelming military preponderance. They don't seem give one damn what anybody thinks, much less the international community, as long as they assured of  American support, with President Bush always in common agreement with them. There is nothing wrong with that per se, other than that Israel knows the US come what may.
 
In the midst of all this, however, Hamas cannot escape blame. How can they, with any sense of national responsibility, subordinate its people to what should have been a predictable risk of unfettered carnage in the face of unadulterated and utterly disproportionate Israeli retaliation. A rational civil authority should at the very least have foreseen the likelihood of Israel's response to their rockets being fired at its civilian centers. Hama either did not expect such an highly forceful and robust response from Israel, or they simply were too reckless to care. Whatever the case, it was a miscaculation on their part which is causing them the lives of hundreds of civilians, a tragedy that should pursuade the Palestinians to conclude that , despite its patriotic commitment to the liberation of Palestine, Hamas is not the one that's going to take them to a full-fledged Palestinian sovereign statehood.
« October 12, 2008 - October 18, 2008 | Home | February 8, 2009 - February 14, 2009 »

Thabo Mda

user-pic

Following:
Followers: 5

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address