« When Do Markets Work? | Tom Hollenbach's Blog | Uh-Oh. »

Channeling Obama's Thoughts as He Prepares to Take Office


Well, it's been a hell of a year.  All worked out pretty much the way I hoped.  I knew when I decided to run I had a pretty good shot, considering the competition.  When I got to the Senate in '04 and saw how little game all the Big Leaguers had, I figured I had to go for it.  The country's a big mess, somebody's got to fix it, and I didn't like the idea of leaving it to any of the others.  I try to stay humble, but it was hard to do that looking around at my Senate colleagues. 

And it went even better than I thought it would.  Hillary spent all her money on fancy hotels and didn't even bother to campaign in half the country, and McCain picked a VP that made Dan Quayle look like a Nobel Laureate and then couldn't stay on message for five minutes.  And all the others couldn't even beat those two.  Then Bush finally crashed the economy after years of trying, just in time for the election, and the close win I'd planned for turned into a rout.  Now I've got a mandate, but I'm really gonna need it to clean up all Bush's messes. 

The transition's going pretty well, too, except for this crazy Blagojevich business.  Boy, is that guy off his meds.  I came up clean through the cesspool of Chicago politics and made sure everybody knew it, and he tries to auction my seat to the highest bidder.  Then, pretty much everyone on Planet Earth tells him they won't accept anyone he appoints, so he goes and appoints someone.  Unbelievable.  Hope he enjoys his room in the Illinois Governors Wing of the federal pen. 

He won't be alone, though.  The big thing I have going for me right now is that the Republicans, instead of worrying about stopping my legislation, are too busy worrying about not going to jail.  The only Cabinet nominee they want to fight about is Holder in Justice, and that's just because they figure they won't look too good in ankle bracelets.  They want Barney Fife for AG, and any Democrat I name with a brain wave and a pulse is going to make half the Republican establishment lose bladder control.  Well, it's their own damn fault. 

I'm glad the public's finally getting fed up with corruption, really, it's about time.  When black voters start tossing out black guys for corruption, you know something is up.  Like that idiot Jefferson, boy, am I glad he's gone.  Ninety grand in his kitchen freezer.  Yeah, like if people come looking they'll definitely never find it there.  Even Charley Rangel, who's probably smart enough to have a storage locker somewhere, is starting to feel the heat now. 

What amazes me is, I'm the first black President, and still, Republicans haven't noticed how much blacks have changed.  Nowadays, most blacks go to work Monday through Friday, see a Tyler Perry movie on Saturday, and then go to bed early to get up for church on Sunday.  It's like "Leave it to Beaver" with melanin.  If the Republican ever stopped being racist, half the black vote would run right over to them.   But that'll never happen. 

But now it's up to me to fix everything.  Really, Bush just ran the whole damn country into a big giant ditch, and I'm not sure we've got enough horsepower to pull ourselves out.  The crisis really helps in a way, though, because I can toss half my agenda into a big stimulus plan and make the Republican look horrible if they say no. 

The big problem is that stupid filibuster rule in the Senate.  This would all be so much easier if it wasn't for that.  So now I have to play to the middle, because I need two-thirds of the country behind me to get to sixty in the Senate.  Looks like I've got it so far, in fact, even a lot of Republicans want me to succeed now, because they're so afraid of losing their money.  I can probably drive the stimulus plan through pretty quick, though I'll bet Mitch McConnell tries to stall and play for time, without doing a phone-book-reading type filibuster.  He knows if he tries that, the stock market will tank, and he'll have to cave. 

The problem is it might not be enough.  Even 800 billion might not do it, but if I start talking trillions people will freak.  I know what the Republican are hoping for.  That I get my package, the economy still sucks, they make a comeback in 2010 and block me until 2012.  If things are still horrible then, maybe they can take me out.  My best move is to accumulate every bit of political capital I can and spend it only on fixing the economy, until it bounces back.  If the economy rebounds, then I'm a hero, and I'll have enough political capital to push through everything else.  Until then a lot of other stuff may just have to wait.  

And foreign policy, that's gonna be trouble, too.  Bush said he was going to bring freedom and democracy to the Middle East.  So, what did he leave me?  War in Iraq, war in Afghanistan, the Taliban is back, so is Al Queda, Israel at war with Gaza, Iran building nukes, Pakistan terrorizing India, and to top it all off, we've even got fucking pirates there now.  Thanks a bunch, George.  Way to straighten everything out. 

But thank you, Jesus, that my middle name is Hussein.  That's going to come in handy.  I figure if I make a big, respectful speech to the Muslim world early on, I can move public opinion in some of those countries and put pressure on the extremists.  Those folks are all about honor and respect, if you give them some of that they love it.  Ahmedinejad in particular is just dying for me to pay some attention to him, and with no oil money coming in he needs a new friend.  If I can get him to play ball the whole region looks different. 

I think I can handle this.  I've played a lot of chess, and I've played a lot of poker.  If you can see a few moves ahead, and know when to bluff and when to call, then nothing's quite as hard as it looks. 


25 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Forgive me, Tom, but once again my view of how Obama would have an internal conversation is so very different from yours. I can't help but wonder why you try to "channel" Obama rather than own the analysis yourself. I really find it troubling that a man you've portrayed as so free in many ways of disabling decision-making problems is portrayed by you as so full of himself and so cynical.

Honestly, I just have to say it bothers me. He deserves better from you - based on that initial blog you did of his personality. And based on his own books - his own thinking.

I also think it does a disservice to our work and how any of us therapists might think of people's inner life.

It pains me to have written this. And I wish there were a different venue for me to have said this.

user-pic

Well, TheraP, I'm sorry it bothered you. I'm a great admirer of Obama, as I've said on several occasions, but I certainly don't worship him, or for that matter anybody, and I don't feel obligated to write in a manner that is overly deferential.

Of course, I have no idea what Obama's internal monologue really sounds like, but I would say a few things about the way I portrayed it:

First, the tone is meant primarily to entertain people by being funny. It's openly snarky, and I did that because it makes people laugh.

Second, I wouldn't actually be bothered if he really did think and feel the way I've portrayed him. Obama tries at all times to be incredibly respectful of others, and this is good, but there must be a part of him, as there is with all of us, that looks at others and thinks negative things. He's not going to show us that side of himself, but I think it's fun to speculate about it, and I doubt that his feelings would be hurt by anything like that.

Third, I do think that it's interesting to consider the internal experience of someone who sees accurately that he is more talented than those around him, even when those others are very talented also. I think the reason Obama ran for President is in fact what I put in the piece, that he correctly realized he was more qualified than anyone else. I don't think that there is anything wrong with him realizing that, if it's true.

user-pic

Well, with all due respect to your skills as a writer, which are wonderful skills, remember this. You are a therapist. You have patients. You are writing under your real name. And your patients may well read what you have written. If you're going to write about someone's inner life and thinking - while still trying to do therapy - then ask yourself what's going to happen if one day your patient fears you're having negative thoughts of them or that you think "they" too might be thinking as you view Obama thinking.

Again, I'm sincerely uncomfortable about having this kind of discussion on a blog. Nevertheless, it's important to consider how our patients might view "them" - depending on how compassionate or not we seem to be in our view of others.

So the issue here is not Obama. I doubt he would be upset. The issue is how it appears that you view others. How it appears that you imagine they think. Or, if you're being snarky, how that might appear to your patients.

Truly, this would not have bothered me, nor would I have taken the time to write so much about this, had you not made it clear in your bio that you are a practicing clinical psychologist. I really don't know what kind of therapy you do, but I imagine you make use of transference. It's hard to help people see that their transference problems belong to them if they happen to read your imagined (even for literary purposes) view of how a person thinks. I hope you can see how a less than compassionate description of another person's inner life might be troubling to your patient - especially if they themselves fear that you also might have a snarky view of their own inner life.

So, again, forgive my taking this to a professional level - especially on a public blog. We have an added responsibility - just as Obama does. We too are engaged in public service. I know I have my blind spots also. I'm just urging you, for the sake of your patients, current patients, future patients, to consider carefully how your writing might affect them.

I feel very, very pained to have written this way. It distresses me no end. But I'm trying to help you here. And for that reason, I hope you forgive my cautionary words.

So far no one else has commented on this thread. So you could easily erase this blog if you choose to. But before you do that, you might want to save my comments for future reference or to run them by a few other colleagues whom you trust.

Whatever you choose to do with this blog or any future efforts to "channel" Obama or anyone else, that's up to you. But do it with caution. Consider your patients and their needs. That has to come first.

I extend my peace and my sincere best wishes.

user-pic

Correction: 2nd paragraph... "how our patients might imagine we view them - depending upon how compassionate or not we are in our view of others. (This is as true for what we write here or how we discuss others in their life when doing therapy.)

user-pic

TheraP, thank you for all your thoughts and your concern. I should tell you that, although I was trained psychodynamically, I have over the years moved to a stly e of treatment that is much more eclectic, with a large cogitive-emotional component. I don't do a lot of transferential work with patients, although I of course address it when it's pertinent. I really stopped being a "blank slate" a long time ago, and if my patients were to read this post I don't think that they would see any side of me that they weren't already aware of.

user-pic

Hum, FYI, you two could always step outside. Just sayin. There is private messaging there, and as you're both registered, you might want to have a nice little private conversation some time. Just click on one anothers name, and a window will open up.

I liked Tom's blog, and I respect Thera's concern.

Happy New Year!

Yer buddy,
the chicken

user-pic

Bwakfat, thanks very much for the suggestion, but I must be doing something wrong. I clicked on TheraP's name and it took me to her blog, which is still public. I had always wondered if there was a way to communicate privately with other people on the site, which at times I wanted to do.

user-pic

Tom, not at this site. in the chatroom.

I linked it to the words, 'step outside.' You'd both have to be there at the same time. This site no longer has private messaging, which is a pity.

user-pic

I only just got back to this. And dear bwakfat, I think you've proposed a good solution. I didn't realize the chatroom had private messaging. Bless you, dear friend.

user-pic

I've been otherwise occupied, Tom. And having read bwakfat's suggestion, I'm certainly willing to have a talk about this at the chatroom at some point - using their private messaging feature - which I'm honestly not acquainted with (I've only just joined).

According to bwakfat apparently we both need to be there. But with my husband scheduled for surgery this Wed, I'm not honestly sure when we can do that - because of his surgery and his being in the hospital for a bit (which means me being there a lot too). So maybe not till the weekend.

I appreciate bwakfat's suggestion. And if we can manage it this weekend, perhaps we can talk a bit. But I'll really leave that up to you - or perhaps you prefer to discuss it with a colleague or two, whom you know well.

Just remember, Tom, transference operates - whether you deal with it or not. I'm sure you know that.

Peace and best wishes. (And you can let me know one way or another whether you'd like to discuss this further or not. I've pretty much said my peace already... but would certainly be willing to discuss this at whatever length you'd want to.)

user-pic

I guess I was less worried about this, Tom, and though I'm not a psychologist (now there's a frightening thought!) and can't comment on your role/stance as a professional.... I HAVE known politicians who were psychologists, which created some relevant conversations.

Politicians speak a whole range of ways when they discuss politics, the people, the context, and how they themselves appear and act - just as we all do about our lives. And they certainly have the ability to SEE themselves this way. If you can't see yourself through this lens, you're doomed.

The Newsweek article on Obama a few months back also showed a bit of this sort of light through its cracks, if you remember. Here was Obama on debates and dumb questions:

"So when Brian Williams is asking me about what's a personal thing that you've done [that's green], and I say, you know, 'Well, I planted a bunch of trees.' And he says, 'I'm talking about personal.' What I'm thinking in my head is, 'Well, the truth is, Brian, we can't solve global warming because I f–––ing changed light bulbs in my house. It's because of something collective'."

5 cents. Just leave the fucking light bulbs out of it, willya? ;-)

user-pic

Can you imagine being a community organizer in Chicago and saying golly gee, oh darn it all the time? I got a kick out of that article too.

And you do not have friends like Axelrod and Rahm without having some real depth.

user-pic

I appreciate your thoughts, and I am glad you put them here. I also know that you did not go into Barack Obama's head and transcribe his thoughts.

It was an interesting take on what you think his thought process might be. It was also entertaining, and captured what I have gleaned from his own writings.

I am also completely capable of recognizing that this is a fictional account and I am not worried about how this will affect our new President's ability to govern.

If anyone had done a similar attempt of channeling George Bush...maybe the electorate would have been so distraught that he would not have been able to steal that second election.

user-pic

Quinn, DD, thanks for the comments. Really, it just seems to me that a basically principled guy like Obama must look around at a lot of other people in politics and frequently be pretty disgusted by what he sees. He can't say it for public consumption, but everyone's human.

I've been reading his book "Dreams of my Father", which is very good, and at times I get a glimpse, like you, Quinn, of a very dominant part of him wrestling with a very ethical part.

And DD, you're right about him being friends with Emanuel. He's not Mr. Nice Guy, but apparently Obama's comfortable with him.

user-pic
And DD, you're right about him being friends with Emanuel. He's not Mr. Nice Guy, but apparently Obama's comfortable with him."


I wish I "felt" the word to use, but comfortable is too neutral
to use at this level of political interaction.

I wish could even guess, but the cerebral atmosphere
keep the clues of emotion out of view.

user-pic

Thanks CVD. I think if I tried to channel Dubya's thoughts there wouldn't be much to write about.

user-pic

Ha!

user-pic

There are many kinds of channels. Channels for sewage, for instance.

user-pic
"If anyone had done a similar attempt of channeling George Bush...

Actually, it would have been equally as entertaining as "Gone in Thirty Seconds" as you watched the Bush mind career down a dead end cul de sac and end up in a pile of twisted junk, leaving an oil slick and shards of uselessly shattered glass as all to show for the effort.

Just supposin', is all...

user-pic

Channeling Bush....hahahaha. Hahahaha. "Boy, that is terrible that God decided to kill all those soldiers. Hey, is that a peanut butter sandwich?"

user-pic

I'll bet you didn't know that "the President" has suffered more than anyone about this war. I didn't either. Only Laura and George know that. Because their idea of suffering is having to answer questions.

user-pic

Thanks for your take on BHO's thought processes Tom. It was an enjoyable read.

user-pic

Thanks, MH2O. Glad you liked it. That's really all I was trying for.

user-pic

I can see Obama as an idealist who's willing to fight dirty. If it's true, Kudos to him for hanging in there for all these years. But I really can't say what a politician would be like; I've never have that kind of...drive. A politician, to me, is part salesman, celebrity and public servant, with sufficient personal ambition combined with a minimum amount tolerance for evil and, I sincerely hope, a belief in the greater good. Someone had to pick Obama as the party's future (and if anyone knows who that is, please let me know!) but he DID have to accept. No matter how much humility he may have felt, you can't tell me there wasn't at least a little part of him that didn't accept for more...personal...reasons. That's got to go to your head.

user-pic

The real CHANNELing.... a word (or two) from the President-elect-in-two-weeks: My fellow Americans, this is what I REALLY want to say about our recent economic turmoil but can't say because..... I DON'T WANT TO END UP LIKE PRES GARFIELD AND LINCOLN by the greater powers of the Central Bank and the pseudo governmental institution of the Federal Reserve so I will channel my inner thoughts through my successful internet campaigning methods. With that in mind, check out this Youtube video--it's long, about 3.5 hours, produced in 1995 (that foresaw and warned about the recent financial crisis of 2008!) The title of the Youtube video is called The Money Masters - How Bankers Gained Control of America or link here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OnwLgrSJZKs&feature=email

I'm almost POTUS Barack Obama and I approve this week's address to the nation.

Leave a comment

Tom Hollenbach

user-pic

Following: 6
Followers: 21

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location New Jersey
  • Party Democrat
  • Politics Social liberal and economic and foreign policy centrist

Favorites

  • Favorite Blogs TPM, Paul Krugman, fivethirtyeight.com, politicalwire.com
  • Favorite Books How the Mind Works - by Steven Pinker, The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order - by Samuel Huntington, The Story of Civilization - by Will and Ariel Durant
  • Favorite Quotes God gave you a brain and he meant you to use it - My Nana

Bio

I am a Clinical Psychologist in private practice. I also am writing a book that explains changes in the value systems of societies over time using insights from evolutionary psychology.

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address