Tankard's Blog

Tankard2 Commented on Sarah Should Take Her Shirt Off by Tankard2

2009-11-22T13:30:45Z

Bulldog, don't you have something better to do than display your pudenda among people who actually have something to talk about? That's all you ever do here, you know.

You are not welcome in my blogs.

Really, do yourself a favor (and us a huge favor): Grab Middle Class Bull (he likes that) and complain about Obama's birth certificate and plan your next Oklahoma City. Just do it somewhere else.

Tankard2 Commented on Sarah Should Take Her Shirt Off by Tankard2

2009-11-22T11:12:03Z

Good so far, John. Now see if you can take that to the next step.

Here's a couple of hints:

-- Everyone talked about John Edwards' and Dan Quayles' looks, too, as well as their lack of substance, so this gender-related.

-- If John Edwards and Dan Quayle had posed on the cover of magazines in ways that empasized primary or secondary sexual characteristics, Tankard have been all over it.

-- Tankard really give a shit whether you consider him sexist and will toying with you the very moment that doing so ceases to amuse him.

Tankard2 Commented on Sarah Should Take Her Shirt Off by Tankard2

2009-11-22T02:53:37Z

Tits are tits, after all.
Au contraire, ma soeur! Speaking as a (dirty) old and devout connoisseur of the human mammary, may I say that the delightful differences in size, shape, and firmness make for an extremely entertaining aspect of being an upright mammal.

Sarah is cashing in solely on her looks; she has NOTHING else!

Of course. I'm sure you understand, even if John down below does not, that was my point.

Tankard2 Commented on Sarah Should Take Her Shirt Off by Tankard2

2009-11-22T02:44:29Z

Sorry, but you're not even in the same county as my point. See if you can figure out why, and if you can, come back and talk about it. Otherwise, I'd advise you to avoid making a fool of yourself.

Tankard2 Commented on Sarah Should Take Her Shirt Off by Tankard2

2009-11-22T01:55:33Z

I'd love to see her naked, Bill. Now take it somewhere else.

Tankard2 Commented on Sarah Should Take Her Shirt Off by Tankard2

2009-11-22T01:53:30Z

Bwa-ha-ha-ha-ha. You're serious??? Really?!?!?! Bwahaha-ha-ha!!!

Tankard2 recommended All about the 60 by WOODY

2009-11-21T04:39:44Z

Tankard2 Commented on Sarah Should Take Her Shirt Off by Tankard2

2009-11-22T01:48:05Z

Interesting linkage, Jan. Yes, Palin is a professional victim, and the leader of millions of over-privileged who build their political attitudes around their own imagined victimization. She's a bit of a monster.

But really, I do hope I get to see her tits.

Tankard2 Commented on 'All About the 60' - A Response by trblmkr

2009-11-22T00:45:59Z

I think they probably take all the tourist groups there. That was probably the most memorable and exciting two weeks of my life. A sensational vacation.

Tankard2 Commented on What a mess! (Updated) by TheraP

2009-11-21T22:44:05Z

She probably also knows the meaning of the "projection."

Tankard2 Commented on 'All About the 60' - A Response by trblmkr

2009-11-21T22:08:43Z

That is correct.

Tankard2 Commented on 'All About the 60' - A Response by trblmkr

2009-11-21T20:46:28Z

Gee, wouldn't that require a Constitutional amendment (is it 66 senators and 3/4 of the States?)?

No, actually, it would not require a Constitutional amendment. The cloture rule is a simple Senate rule. A 51-vote majority could change it. Permanently. The Republicans called this "the nuclear option." It would mean the death of protection for large minorities.

Tankard2 Commented on Sarah Should Take Her Shirt Off by Tankard2

2009-11-21T20:41:27Z

Do you think she'd get JEM's vote?

Tankard2 recommended Sarah Should Take Her Shirt Off by Tankard2

2009-11-21T13:26:43Z

Tankard2 Commented on What Pro-Choice Is Not by Skybolt

2009-11-21T13:07:30Z

I disagree with some of your points, but strongly agree with your last two paragraphs. Those who want to make abortion a yes-or-no, all-or-nothing, with-us-or-against-us argument are playing rugby on the Wingnuts' home field.

Tankard2 Commented on What a mess! (Updated) by TheraP

2009-11-21T13:01:14Z

To make this about "religion" misses the point!
I strongly disagree. How can you write post about a celibacy rule that makes no sense outside of a religious context, then say that this is not about religion? Of course it's about religion! Celibacy is about religion. The Catholic Church -- aka the Vatican -- is about religion. The abortion debate is mostly about religion. Religion has fundamental influence on political behavior almost everywhere in the world almost every day.

In other words, and at risk of being annoyingly repetitive, religion poisons everything.

Tankard2 Commented on What a mess! (Updated) by TheraP

2009-11-21T12:52:29Z

I must be missing something here, TheraP. Surely you know that the Vatican and the Catholic Church are the same thing? Same people, same leadership, same pernicious global influence. The Pope is the king of the Vatican and of the Church. Money put into the collection basket in church on Sunday is sent to the Vatican. So what's the distinction and why are you making it?

Tankard2 Commented on What Pro-Choice Is Not by Skybolt

2009-11-21T12:44:14Z

Read the statement I was responding to. To say that all people who are opposed to abortion are evil misogynists is to play their game -- the game of hate and misinformation. You'll lose that game -- they're much better at it than you are and more committed to winning it.

Wake up, my friends. Debate more than you bash. Think with your mind rather than your gonads. In other words, don't be them.

Tankard2 Commented on What a mess! (Updated) by TheraP

2009-11-21T02:23:35Z

If by "this entity" you mean religion, it's been doing that since the beginning of the human race. But I suppose you mean the Catholic Church, so it has only been befouling the Western world for about 1800 years. Beginners.