« Love him or hate him, but at least know what he is | Tankard2's Blog | All liberals are guilty racists. Discuss. »

The Bill of Rights is Dead. Long live the Unitary Executive.


The acrid smoke had barely cleared the Manhattan skyline when the facists who composed the American government began tightening the screws that would replace The Rule of Law with The Rule of the Unitarity Executive.

Not that the Executive acted alone. A Republican legislature passed the USAPATRIOT Act with full cooperation from its Democratic lackeys. Then it passed the Military Commissions Act. Then, as the Cheney Administration accelerated its campaign of political repression, a Democratic Congress voted to indemnify the corporate partners of the usurpers. In the meantime, habeas corpus was fatally wounded and personal privacy faded while government secrecy bloomed in darkness.

The current administration stands firmly in support of the new American political paradigm. Even its token gesture of closing the torture camp in Cuba shows signs of falling by the wayside. When this happens, President Obama will express his unhappiness, but he will do so with a smile on his face.

Most sadly, the whole anti-civil-liberties program has been accomplished with the active and overwhelming support of its victims. The American public, the modern counterparts of the Tories during the Revolution, loves the fact that people can be thrown in jail for life without charges -- provided of course that the prisoners' names have a Middle-Eastern sound to them. The people whose homes can now be broken into by government agents on a whim and without a writ are pleased to accept torture as an "effective" means of gathering information. They are happy to have their phones tapped, to have their protests restricted to the ironically-labed "free-speech zones," to have their "safety" enhanced through the process of exiling their fellow American citizens.

Fear of tiny groups of extremists is the factor that drives this seizure of power from the people and to the already-powerful. Fear is carefully nutured and tended by those who benefit from the power transfer, of course, but that is no excuse. The people need to put aside their fear and require their government to safeguard their ability to be politically free. But we are soft now, and unwilling to require our public "servants" to safeguard anything but our cozy, little, meaningless lives, our iPhones, and our 56-inch HDTVs.

If one needs a an amplifier to hear the sound of liberty's death-knell in the once-proud United States of America, one needs only listen to the stridency of self-proclaimed liberals and progressives right here on one of the most liberal and progressive blogs in the world. These defenders of freedom are in full voice pleading at the top of their lungs for their guardians to protect them by further eroding the right to free speech in America. "Make the right-winger talk shows stop being mean," they snivel. "Make the 'hate-speech' go away." Liberals. Ha! Progressives? Only in America.

The Bill of Rights is Dead. It died of neglect. Long live the Unitary Executive.


21 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

I'm afraid the Unitary Executive is Bipartisan.

user-pic

My point exactly. Shall we call it the Biunary Executive?

user-pic

We could. We could also start a tertiary party.

user-pic

Sure. We'll call it the TriBi Unip-arty. They'll flock to us in droves. Bunches? Would you believe somebody would saunter over and ask for directions?

user-pic

You seem to make a unitary executive for some kind of autocracy.

user-pic

Would you like to restate that in English? You know how it is. At my age, I start losing languages like Wing-Nut as soon as I stop using them.

user-pic

Sorry, "mistake a unitary executive..."


user-pic

Where's the mistake? A government that denies rights guaranteed in the Constitution IS authoritarian.

user-pic

Yes, you do mistake a unitary executive for an autocracy, or you're playing Humpty Dumpty and offering an idiosyncratic definition of 'unitary executive' -- many people seem to make the same mistake. You're using it as a code word phrase to mean something other than what it properly means -- that the Constitutional Executive authority and powers are unitary, "there can be only one". It doesn't mean the Executive trumps Congress or or SCOTUS or the Constitution and can assume any or all powers, only that there are not two or more executives operating independently of each other. For instance, while the CIA, DIA, NSA, and the FBI might have turf wars so that Intelligence is not unitary, they all report to the White House, the unitary Executive Branch.

user-pic

You are technically correct. As with most instances where someone is technically correct, you are wrong.

user-pic

You use labels errantly. That doesn't make me wrong, it makes you a lesser human.

How about you rationally establish a position which you believe makes me "wrong" despite my point being correct, true, on the mark and apparently right as far as it went?

user-pic

No can do. I'm a lesser human.

To re-phrase: May a lesser human ask a favor a fully-realized demigod such as yourself? If you have a minute, please go fuck yourself. Thanks.

user-pic

May I quote a local authority in reply? Okay:

"...and you folks don't even care enough to comment on it. This country is fucked."

Looks like your personals ad should be entitled

" fucked and miserable, seeking company "


Now if you want to discuss something other than the unitary executive point, feel free to find your good manners...

user-pic

I'll not even peek into the back of my closet to find good manners to respond to a "person" who refers to a potential debate opponent as a lesser human being.

Now, I believe you had an appointment with your own anus, so I won't be keeping you. Ta-da.

user-pic

"a "person" who refers to a potential debate opponent as a lesser human being"

Evidently you need reading comprehension classes and/or a sense of humor transplant! I merely pointed out the logic of your labeling, I didn't call you anything you hadn't already demonstrated yourself to be (if I actually called you a name in the first place). Thank goodness you wouldn't qualify as an actual debate opponent, huh!

Are you done venting yet?

user-pic

Sense of humor, is it? How's this:

Are you another Middle Class Bill? What do I have to say to make you go away and stop bothering people who actually have an IQ above the atomic number of tungsten?

Let's try this another way: You clearly lack the intellect to uphold your responsibilities in a cogent dialog and therefore must resort to name-calling. I will play that game with you if you insist, but you will lose in an extremely embarrasing way.

Now, if you have have the slightest vestige of the native self-preservation instinct that nature gave your parents, the boll weevil and the pond scum, you will simply fade into the right-wing blogosphere where everyone has a level of consciousness similar to yours.

This will be goodbye, then, unless you would care to have me introduce you to some member of the Pteridophyta phylum, with whom you might have a chance in a debate.

user-pic

In my final sentence above, not that I used the word "might."

user-pic

You might decide to get back on some topical point, if you're finally done venting.

Since it's "technically" not a unitary executive issue, what is your preferred label for the issue about which you care ever so much?

user-pic

...and you folks don't even care enough to comment on it. This country is fucked.

user-pic

I never get tired of venting when having blood sucked from my by leeches.

Now see what you've done? You caused me to piss off a bunch of perfectly decent leeches by comparing them to you.

GO AWAY, YOU INCREDIBLY STUPID ASSHOLE!

user-pic

You have very strange ideas about both having fun and serious discussion. May I offer you a mirror?

"GO AWAY, YOU INCREDIBLY STUPID ASSHOLE!"


I hope that helps!

Leave a comment

Tankard2

user-pic

Following: 1
Followers: 12

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location Pittsburgh
  • Party Registered Democrat by default
  • Politics Extreme centrist -- that is: What you would probably call a radical liberal

Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address