Sarah Palin is...
 
1 part George W. Bush
1 part Richard Nixon
1 part Vegas cocktail waitress.

The nomination of Sarah Palin has caused many a lot of concern - mostly due to the fact that she has little demonstrated experience dealing with national issues, and we really don't know that much about her before the election.

As it has been well documented, Palin has not answered questions from the press until finally agreeing to be interviewed by Charlie Gibson this weekend.  The McCain campaigns justification for Palin being kept from the press is that she is being withheld until the campaign felt she would be treated with “deference.”

So we can assume, then that McCain believes that, as a matter of principle, politicians new on the political scene should be, as a general rule, treated first with "deference"?  Right?  (stop laughing)

When considering the Palin/press interview situation, it is helpful to recall the story of former Arizona Governor Rose Mofford.

Mofford, the Arizona Secretary of State, assumed the Arizona governorship after the previous governor was ousted under the threat of impeachment and/or a recall vote.  However, after she took office, opponents of Mofford continued with the recall efforts.  I'll let reporter Amy Silverman take it from here:

In Arizona, when a governor leaves office early, the secretary of state ascends. In this case, that was Rose Mofford, an old-school Democrat from the small mining town of Globe, a lady with a bright white beehive that Arizona Republic cartoonist Steve Benson once famously drew as a cone-full of Dairy Queen.

Mofford had served as secretary of state for decades. She'd never aspired to the state's top spot. But she accepted graciously and agreed to serve out the remaining 2 1/2 years of Mecham's term. She never showed interest in running for another term after that, although she was enormously popular.

As the story goes, John McCain and his friends wanted her out immediately. And, they figured, they had the mechanism in place to do it. Mecham was gone, but the recall effort was still in place. Why not shift gears and target Mofford instead?

The Democrats didn't like that one bit and asked the Arizona Supreme Court to consider the legality.

In mid-April 1988, Mofford and some staff flew to Washington for, as one former aide puts it, the "perfunctory wet kiss" meeting with the Arizona congressional delegation. Even in mean old D.C., there's such a thing as protocol, and the tour was expected to go along without incident.

At 10 in the morning on April 12, Mofford testified before the Senate Energy and Water Development Subcommittee on Appropriations on the topic of the Central Arizona Project.

Now, Mofford had been governor for only eight days. Before that, her main task had been running the state's elections department. This appearance (there was a similar one, later that day, before the House) had been billed as ceremonial. She was not familiar with the particulars of federal water law. Nor did her staff think she'd be expected to be — just then.

But, apparently, Senator James McClure, a Republican from Idaho, did. After a lot of looking, that librarian and I (actually, it took three librarians) tracked down the testimony from that day. McClure asked Mofford a series of questions that would leave any water expert's mouth dry. Her staff jumped in to try to answer, but even so, ultimately they had to file an addendum to the testimony.

Word spread quickly about what had happened.

Coincidentally, that very same day, Pat Murphy, then publisher of the Arizona Republic, was also in Washington to meet with the delegation. He and his wife had lunch plans with McCain, and as Murphy recalls, they went to the hearing room where Mofford was testifying, to meet up with him. Murphy had written glowingly of McCain and considered him a personal friend.

As Murphy recounted in an e-mail recently (he left the Republic many years ago, and now lives in Idaho), the incident crushed him. He says it was the beginning of the end of his respect for and friendship with McCain.

"We peeked in the room," wrote Murphy. "McCain saw us, excused himself, and we three went to the Senate dining room for lunch.

"During lunch, McCain said, almost with mischievous glee, that he had slipped some highly technical questions to [James McClure] to ask Mofford — questions she wouldn't be prepared to answer or expected to answer.

"Flabbergasted, I asked McCain why would he want to sabotage Mofford's testimony, when in fact the CAP was the nonpartisan pet of Republicans and Democrats — such as far-left Udall and far-right Goldwater — since its inception.

"His reply, as near as I remember, was, 'I'll embarrass a Democrat any time I get the chance.'

"The lunch continued in strained chit-chat. We then walked back to McCain's office, where a few reporters, all of them from Arizona papers, as I recall, were waiting. One said there was a rumor McCain had tried to sabotage Mofford's testimony, to which he said something like, 'I'd never do anything like that.'"

There was more. Another rumor, later reported in the Republic, held that McCain had brought in a private film crew to tape the proceedings, so that the tape could be used to embarrass Mofford in the recall election. At the time, Jay Smith, McCain's campaign media consultant, was quoted in the Republic as declining comment; he did not deny the rumor.

The next day, the Republic ran a story about Mofford's trip to Washington. There was another story that very same day about the Arizona Supreme Court's decision not to allow the recall election to go forward. John Rhodes, the former congressman who had been tapped to run against Mofford, sounded relieved. He and Mofford were old friends.

Mofford, who lives in Phoenix and is involved with local charities, is hesitant to say much negative.

"I've known Cindy since she was a little girl, and the Hensleys have always been very good to me," she says of McCain's wife and her family. "I don't hold grudges."

But, she adds, regarding the CAP hearing, "that hurt me more than anything . . . to be set up like that."

So, in summary:  When the governor from McCain's home state, who just ascended to governor 8 days prior due to resignation, makes a ceremonial appearance before congress, McCain will embarrass and humiliate her even if it jeopardizes a crucial, non-partisan domestic project highly valued in his home state.  But...

When McCain nominates a VP with no experience on national issues and minimal documentation of her views on a practically all the major issues of the day 67 days before the general election, she gets withheld from interviews until she is shown "deference".

How's that for double standards?

To understand this post, you have to read this very carefully.

An example of a couple successful politicians who understood this "bitch slap theory" well are here and here.

An example of a politician who didn't get this at all is here.

One of the big reasons that I believed Obama was a good bet to win the Dem nominaiton, and the reason I've believed he was always a good bet to win in the general, is because he seemed to understand quite well the BSTEP. Throughout the primaries, when he was attacked, he almost always either held his ground and/or responded as appropriate, and did it much better than the Kerry campaign ever did. There was early evidence that he understood this. This is an awesome example (Obama from 1:35-2:45).

Lately, now that the Rove proteges have moved in and McCain has been throwing lots of ridiculous claims at Obama - blaming him for high gas prices, saying he'd lose a war to win an election, saying that he doesn't have time for visiting, and therefore doesn't care about the troops, etc. None of these things make any sense on an intellectual level to anyone who already isn't a deeply partisan republican. At all.

What these are these are classic Rovian bitch slaps, and team Obama's response has been surprisingly weak in the past few weeks. I don't think the attacks are nearly as good (in a political sense) as the Swift Boat stuff, but they are out there.

As a TPM commenter recently noted:

Quote: This game of pushback has little to do with the truth and more to do with who wins the bitchslap contest. No one really believes the swiftboaters, but neither does anyone respect a candidate who will not fight back. Maybe the McCain campaign isn't as overmatched by the Obama campaign as it previously appeared. Keep an eye out to see if team Obama gets its head out of its ass. If they don't get better at responding to this, McCain may have a chance.

Finally, an effective response is NOT to complain and say, "McCain is running a dishonorable campaign." That is pathetic whining. Rather it is to say, "McCain is the one responsible for high gas prices, McCain is the one who is willing to send Americans to die to win the election, McCain is the one who doesn't care about the troops, etc." Team Obama hasn't shown they have the balls to make these claims, even though there is certainly as much intellectual support for these claims as McCain's.