« July 30, 2006 - August 5, 2006 | Home | August 13, 2006 - August 19, 2006 »

Week of August 6, 2006 - August 12, 2006

Channeling The Moose


I miss the Moose; I'll be glad when his antlers are rested. I really would love to have seen what he had to say over the last few days. In fact, I miss him so much I think I'm starting to channel him...

The Dog ponders the vile, traitorous, America-hating left.

The British today uncovered an Al Quaeda plot to bomb several airplanes bound from Great Britain to the United States. After a threat of that nature, any real American would have the guts to finally stand up and admit they were wrong about Iraq.

But no. The vile, fever-swamp, traitorous, anti-Semitic, baby-raping demagogues of Leftist Blogostan will stop at nothing in their secret mission to destroy America for having the fortitude to stand by Israel in her time of need.

As a nation we must put our head down and butt our way forward. We must put our head down and butt our way forward. We must put our head down and butt our way forward.

When the Democratic Party wakes up to the reality that only warmongers get elected, then Scoop Jackson can stop spinning in Teddy Roosevelt's grave.

------------

Ow. That hurts.

I put the plug way down here: go check out my new blog at Matt Smith's (LieberDem's) new place: demprogress.blogspot.com. Let me know what you think.

Speaking of hacking, while our hair is on fire...


Hey, I'm not asking the FBI to look into it or anything, but it DID happen.

I'm what they call a "white hat". If you are not in the business, this means I know many ways to hack into this, that, and the other system, but I use my powers for good, kind of like Batman. I'm not really a security guy any more, meaning I don't stay up with the bleeding edge, though I've done that in a small way in past jobs; I am a software developer. But I do need a pretty complete working knowledge of how to hack into systems in order to keep people from doing it to ME.

This is something that is hard to get the layman to understand. In some IT jobs, you really must know a bit of the Dark Magic in order to do your job well.

So when I'm posting as Sundog, my Blogger account name, on LieberDem's Blogger site and I start seeing phony messages from me in the comments,, complete with "Sundog said" link pointing to my blog, implying someone has hacked my account, I naturally start trying to figure out how they did it.

I tried several fairly obvious approaches but I was not able to reproduce the effect. And yet, I am unconvined that whoever it was actually hacked my Blogger account for two reasons:

One, I was not the only victim; the commenter known as Lieberman4Lieberman was apparently attacked in an identical way, at about the same time. The chances against someone simultaneously hacking our accounts and using that information seem remote to me. LieberDem has (wisely in my view) turned of comments at this point, but I'm sure a record exists somewhere. I would happily swear that the counterfeit messages were not from me.

Two, no one has actually posted counterfeit entries in my Blogger blog itself, which leads me to think that only the commenting system was hacked. But damned if I can figure out how they did it.

Hey, I'm nobody. I'm absolutely nobody. And I'm completely aware that whatever tricks happened on LieberDem's website are absolutely insignificant in the scheme of things. But Lieberman's guys are making such a noise about their website getting hacked, let's remember that there is a demonstrable instance of a Lieberman supporter - not necessarily a member of the campaign, let's stop that silliness - hacking LieberDem's Blogger website in support of Lieberman, ironic as that might seem to any sane person.

Litmus Test


There's been a lot of talk about "litmus tests" being applied to Joe Lieberman. I'd like to suggest one of my own.

As many have pointed out, yesterday's election had an extraordinarily large turnout, quite the contrary of what the Lieberman camp expected. They started weeks ago spinning this as an election that could potentially be hijacked by the leftists in the party, and thus the results could be worthless.

Instead, what we saw was a beautiful, textbook example of little-D democracy in action. People coming out in large numbers and casting votes. In my book, you can't be a big-D Democrat without being a little-D democrat, and little-d democracy spoke plainly yesterday.

That's my litmus test. And by showing clearly that he disdains the little-D democratic process to the extent of issuing his own Signing Statement about it - "I will not let this stand" - he fails miserably. Joe Lieberman is no Democrat, and apparently never was.

WTMR: Another Delicious Moose Moment


Here's another delicious column from the Moose. For full schadenfreude effect, I reproduce his May 22 post in its entirety:

NETROOTS LOSE AGAIN

The Moose observes that the McGovernites with Modems cannot do math.

By an overwhelming majority, Joe Lieberman is the officially endorsed candidate of the Connecticut Democratic Party. No matter how you spin it, if you are on the short end of 67 to 33 - you lose - unless if you live in the parallel universe of the netroots. It is there that Howard Dean is President of the United States. In that territory, Rodriguez defeated Cuellar back in Texas.

When one has a modem, anything is possible.

Joe Lieberman continues to face a fight for re-election because he has stood for principle, pure and simple. While others have retreated, Joe realizes that defeat in Iraq would be disastrous to America and to the Iraqi people. For that stand, Joe is confronting the wrath of the left.

But he will prevail. Although the ranks of the activists of the Democratic Party are overwhelmingly anti-war, a clear and unmistakable majority of the delegates of the Connecticut Democratic Party delegates stood with Joe because they appreciate his integrity and recognize his progressive record.

Unlike his opponent, Joe didn't just recently get involved in the fight for civil rights and the environment. For decades, Joe has been there for progressive causes. And even in the face of a massive national campaign against him, Joe continues to win the support of the large majority of Democratic activists in his state.

While Commissar Krugman kvetches from the cozy confines of the Princeton faculty lounge that Joe is insufficiently following the party line of the Upper West Side, the good Senator will press forward fighting for the cause of Scoop Jackson progressivism. And, when will the press focus on the fact that Mr. Lamont chose a co-star for his first commercial who once denigrated the deaths of Americans at the hands of terrorists?

Meanwhile, maybe the netroots should take a remedial summer math class.

Naderman


Just thought I'd coin it before anyone else did.

Now the hard work starts. Thanks a lot, Joe. We won't forget.

Lieberman Concedes He's a Traitor to the Democratic Party


Ned wins.

And I have looooots to blog about until November.

Win-win situation, really.

The 7% Solution


93% in, 52/48. Please, please, please...

OK God...


... I'm sorry. Pull this one out for Ned, please.

Impound That Server


Right about now, Junior Webmaster has yelled for help and someone who actually knows what they're looking at is finally poking around some logs.

This will result either in an "AHA!" audible from miles away, or an increasing sense of doom followed closely by panic.

Terrible, terrible charges have been hurled around today. If they were hurled without proper investigation or, worse yet, entirely incorrectly, someone is going to have to be held accountable.

Impound that server, the router, and any logs or backup tapes right now.

Lieberman Spokesperson: Internet Like Long Series of Tubes


AIEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!

Anyone who's following this at all and has any hacking knowledge, try to count the hilarious mistakes in the following:

Lieberman campaign spokeswoman Marion Steinfels described the effort to topple the Web site as "denial of service." She then suggested a virus had been placed on the Web host's computer through what's called a "SQL injection" technique. Hackers who want to sneak code onto a Web host computer can sometimes construct long strings of characters — thousands of characters long — and paste them into Web forms designed to accept entries for name, address, and the like. On some occasions, these text strings will trick the computers into accepting rogue code. A virus could be placed on a Web host that way.

Complete, unforgivably stupid, malicious nonsense. First off, they are purposely conflating a common hacker attack a few days ago with this supposed denial of service attack. That attack was apparently performed through SQL injection, which Steinfels has hilariously confused with buffer-overrun attacks and viruses until it's just a huge mishmash of Scary Computer Stuff. Then the Big Bad Injected Virus caused a Denial of Service attack. Through sheer magic, I suppose, since a DOS attack by definition comes from outside.

Absolute, complete, utter gobbledygook. And all this without a single scrap of evidence that there's been an attack at all yet.

I have to take a break. My head is going to explode.

DOS = Denial Of Senator


"We have nobody with a security background helping with this," Geary told me. "It's just us, what we know, how we work with our server network."

So you ADMIT you're incompetent to judge a security event. But that didn't stop you guys from leaping to about 15 conclusions about your website outage and spraying accusations like spittle all over the landscape, did it?

Amateur.

He didn't have any more information about the nature of the supposed attack. "I've spent 99% of my time speaking [to reporters] about the story," he said.

That's the way to operate a website company. Spread what you don't know to the press first, THEN investigate. Or rather, hire someone to investigate, since you're so cluelss you're not even sure you've been attacked.

Inexcusable. My money is on the simple explanation: they exceeded their bandwidth, or their servers couldn't handle the legitimate load. And they freaked and hurled accusations everywhere, on election day, without a scrap of evidence.

Someone needs to be held accountable for that.

Photoshop is for Losers


Photoshop is for losers.

If you're the kind of person who gets that warm fuzzy feeling all over when you see one of your political enemies Photoshopped into some absurd caricature of themselves, you have some issues. You have some hate you need to let go of in some healthier way.

You need to go read 1984 again. Big Brother would have loved Photoshop.

Photoshopped pictures (and certain bloggers) hit that same satisfying nerve of hatred that right wing talk radio does. You don't need a point, you don't need facts, you don't need an argument. Just Photoshop your enemy into something people will point and laugh at.

At some point, SOMEONE has to raise the tone of the debate again in America. Too many on the left are more than ready to jump into the mosh pit with the righties. What is needed is not to stoop to their level; what is needed is so much reasoned debate that their level becomes irrelevant again, that they once again are relegated to object-of-ridicule status where they've been for most of American history.

« July 30, 2006 - August 5, 2006 | Home | August 13, 2006 - August 19, 2006 »

Sundog

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address