« June 4, 2006 - June 10, 2006 | Home | June 18, 2006 - June 24, 2006 »

Week of June 11, 2006 - June 17, 2006

Bears and Moose and Bear Cubs, Oh My!


Every once in a while in the political fog comes a clarifying moment; a moment when the clouds draw back and we are presented with a breathtakingly clear picture of the facts. The back-and-forth of who-did-what is halted for a moment and we get to peek into the unspun minds of the contenders.

Such a moment occurred today with the posting of Joe Lieberman's "bear cub" ad. So cruel, insulting, dishonest, and un-Democratic a piece of propaganda is it that it provides instant moral clarity on the issue of the primary race against Lamont. And what it shows is that Lieberman has apparently completely lost his mind. Unable to believe Lamont is an actual challenge to his Democratic principles, Lieberman dishonestly portrays him as a tool of Lowell Weicker when it simply... isn't... true.

I admit I'm rather shocked. Lieberman is just not a good guy. And being a naive lefty, I refuse to lie down with swine. I find that this approach always narrows the field splendidly.

From the New Haven Independent:

...he (Lieberman) sides with right-wing Republicans on the issues most important to Connecticut Democrats these days, such as the Iraq war, civil liberties, the right to dissent, appointees like Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez and Supreme Court Justice John Roberts, gay marriage, and the Bush-Cheney energy bill. On all those issues, as well as universal health care and tax policy toward the wealthy, Lamont is squarely in the camp of the Democratic opposition.

Quite. Which is why it's so maddening when DINO's like Marshall Wittman slam Lamont supporters as simply being opposed to the war. No, Moose: we are rising up against Lieberman because, like you, he just isn't a Democrat, Scoop Jackson style or any other style. (Maybe Zell Miller style.) Wittman assumes otherwise because he can't imagine that these other issues actually mean anything to anyone. Not being a true progressive, they're all just meaningless words to him.

Time to turn the old guard out. Hit the yellow brick road, phony Democrats.

Evolution vs. The Moose


So what shall we do with Marshall Wittman's office after his head explodes?

I think it should be turned into some sort of little museum dedicated to the fact that Democrats, too, can be insanely, disastrously, unshakeably wrong. Or maybe coated with tinfoil and turned into a UFO museum.

Of course, Wittman isn't a Democrat. No one seems able to explain to me why this slow-witted quadruped, who spends the vast majority of his blogging time attacking elements of what he claims is his own party, is able to walk unchallenged through the door of any institution with the word "Democratic" in its name.

Care to try an interesting experiment? Look through a month of Wittman. Make two lists: one for the derisive terms and epithets used against people on the left, and one for the right. Do you see what I see? Why on Earth would someone ostensibly advising Democrats reserve their most bitter vile for the fringes of their own party?

I'll tell you why. Wittman isn't on our side at all; he's a shill. He doesn't want to get his old conservative buddies TOO mad at him by calling them the names he uses daily against his supposed fellow-travelers. At some point, like Lieberman, he will sadly tut-tut that the party has abandoned him and go back to his old haunts.

You want to talk about litmus tests? Here's a good one. Someone who spends as much time and energy as Wittman does denigrating ANY group of Democrats with the bile he regularly as Old Faithful secretes upon Kossacks and the netroots, needs to be thrown out of the club so hard he bounces. Twice. We have enough slobbering righties calling us the "tinfoil hat brigade". Taking it from our side too doesn't work for me.

What Wittman doesn't realize after YearlyKos is that his goose is cooked. He is extinct. We all saw the Kossacks and you know what? They weren't the hysterical bunch Wittman wishes they were at all. Aside from one wild-eyed hippie with a sign taped to his shirt, it was a model of intelligent discussion - discussion on a level that would have passed right over the Moose's head.

Marshall Wittman, the Master of Conflated Thinking:

America simply cannot afford a defeat that emboldens our enemies - we already experienced that in the aftermath of Vietnam. As others have observed, if America withdraws now, we would hand a posthumous victory to Zarqawi. And the Democratic Party would be branded for the next generation as the party of retreat.

He left out "and it would make the Baby Jesus cry." I don't know how to BEGIN to address the flawed thinking in this rantlet. (I just copyrighted that word - I want credit, LOL) Anyone here ever hear of Zarqawi before the war? Did we go to Iraq to fight him? Who were these terrible enemies that were emboldened by Vietnam - did I miss something? Wittman buys into the whole shifting-goalposts thing of the Bush administration.

Here's another conflated rantlet:

And all of those wing nuts who thought they would be celebrating "Fitzmas" with a Rove indictment should understand that the corruption issue is turning into a dud. The American people increasingly cannot discern who are the good guys and who are the bad guys.

Oh, so Wittman wouldn't have been celebrating with us if it had gone the other way? How very interesting. We're "wing nuts" for recognizing that the President and his staff committed TREASON. And how VERY interesting that clearly, in his mind, the Plame investigation and the Abramoff matter and all the rest simply become swirled into "the corruption issue". The issue in the Plame case isn't corruption, Moosehead - the issue is TREASON! Not the shrill cry of the righties, to whom any disagreement with their ideas is treason. No, good, old fashioned, betray-your-country treason. To Wittman, that can all be filed under "corruption". What a mental giant.

Moosie can't get it through his head - it is not just the extreme left wing of the party behind all this action and noise. It is a broad swath of the Democratic Party. And if they can't wake up to this reality, we shall happily consign the likes of Wittman, Lieberman, and Schumer to the dustbin of history and turn their offices into day-care centers or something useful.

All Hail the HypnoMarkos!


Markos, I love ya buddy, but lose the eye thing.

Seriously, YearlyKos was an incredible thing to have pulled off and you are a marvelous, thoughtful, and extremely well spoken exponent for the causes we all believe in. I am delighted to see you get airtime.

But you know that widening thing you do with your eyes when someone asks you a really stupid question? For a moment there you look like the Hypno-Toad. (Apologies to Matt Groening.) It's just a little unsettling.

Work on that poker face and keep the appearances coming. And congratulations for a job well started. And for adding a few more pounds of pressure to the dangerously-overpressurized head of Marshall Wittman.

The rest of us, learn a lesson from the Dixie Chicks tour debacle/hit album paradox: reading blogs and opening your pocketbooks will never be enough.

« June 4, 2006 - June 10, 2006 | Home | June 18, 2006 - June 24, 2006 »

Sundog

user-pic

Following:
Followers:

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address