<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
   <title>storm&apos;s Blog</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/" />
   <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/atom.xml" />
   <id>tag:www.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk/blogs/storm//1905</id>
   <updated>2008-05-19T01:43:03Z</updated>
   
   <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.21-en</generator>


<entry>
   <title>obama-mccain debate on comedy central</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/obamamccain-debate-on-comedy-c.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.195719</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-19T01:43:03Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-19T01:43:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Though I don&apos;t think it likely I am hoping for at least one good debate during the GE. I think Jon Stewart would be much better than any moderator we are likely to see. Does anyone have any idea how...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[Though I don't think it likely I am hoping for at least one good debate during the GE. I think Jon Stewart would be much better than any moderator we are likely to see. <br />Does anyone have any idea how to push to make it happen? Or can someone suggest a better moderator?<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>where can I find a candidate how will treat the gas tax the way I think it should be?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/05/where-can-i-find-a-candidate-h.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.192980</id>
   
   <published>2008-05-04T16:04:04Z</published>
   <updated>2008-05-04T16:04:04Z</updated>
   
   <summary>every month increase the tax by a nickel/gallon. Cap it so that the price of gas is never more than 50% tax. Put the money into various energy(non fossil) and transport(rail) projects needed for a country using less oil....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[every month increase the tax by a nickel/gallon. Cap it so that the price of gas is never more than 50% tax. Put the money into various energy(non fossil) and transport(rail) projects needed for a country using less oil.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>leaked sheet revisited</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/04/leaked-sheet-revisited.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.190984</id>
   
   <published>2008-04-24T05:13:17Z</published>
   <updated>2008-04-24T05:13:17Z</updated>
   
   <summary>As an exercise i just looked back at the 2/6 leaked obama speadsheet.contest, total delegates, projected obama delegates, actual obama result minus projectedLA 56, 31, +3NE 24, 15, +1VI 3, 2, +1WA 78, 49, +4ME 24, 10, +5DC 15, 9,+3MD...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[As an exercise i just looked back at the 2/6 leaked obama speadsheet.<br /><br />contest, total delegates, projected obama delegates, actual obama result minus projected<br />LA 56, 31, +3<br />NE 24, 15, +1<br />VI 3, 2, +1<br />WA 78, 49, +4<br />ME 24, 10, +5<br />DC 15, 9,+3<br />MD 70, 37,+5<br />VA 83, 43,+11<br />HI 20, 11,+3<br />WI 74, 40,+2<br />OH 141, 68,-1<br />RI 21, 8,+0<br />TX 193, 92,+7<br />VT 15, 9,+0<br />WY 12, 7,+0<br />MS 33, 20,+0<br />PN 158, 75,-1<br />IN 72, 39<br />NC 115, 61<br />WV 28, 13<br />KY 51, 23<br />OR 52, 28<br />MT 16, 9<br />SD 15, 8<br />PR 55,25<br /><br />thoughts:<br />1. the estimates have been very good.<br />2. the estimates give a 67 delegate win to obama and he has out performed them.<br />3. It looks to me like the nomination was won in the potomac primaries.<br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>projected that iowa adds 8 more</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/projected-that-iowa-adds-8-mor.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.183711</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-16T00:21:06Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-16T00:21:06Z</updated>
   
   <summary>7 more to Obama in second round of iowa caucus+1 bonus likely now that he has the majority.I wonder if it isn&apos;t going to be clearly over before PA?...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[<a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080315/ap_on_el_pr/democrats_iowa_4;_ylt=AgfTsvPjR0oJ0gdvw64qOpwE1vAI">7</a> more to Obama in second round of iowa caucus<br /><a href="http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/convention-math-remember-the-u.php">+1</a> bonus likely now that he has the majority.<br /><br /><br />I wonder if it isn't going to be clearly over before PA?<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>who is running against Rep. Steve King (R-IA) that i can donate money to?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/who-is-running-against-rep-ste.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.182363</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-08T17:21:34Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-08T17:21:34Z</updated>
   
   <summary><![CDATA[&nbsp;...]]></summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[&nbsp;]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>hopefully a baker&apos;s dozen</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/03/hopefully-a-bakers-dozen.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.181440</id>
   
   <published>2008-03-05T00:25:03Z</published>
   <updated>2008-03-05T00:25:03Z</updated>
   
   <summary>vt makes 12 blowouts in a row....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[vt makes 12 blowouts in a row. <br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>a case against uber-tuesday</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/a-case-against-ubertuesday.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.180099</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-26T03:55:26Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-26T03:55:26Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Jan 13: Clinton 42%, Obama 27% Feb 3: Clinton 41%, Obama 41% Feb 25: Obama 54%, Clinton 38%...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[Jan 13: Clinton 42%, Obama 27%<br />
Feb 3: Clinton 41%, Obama 41%<br />
Feb 25: Obama 54%, Clinton 38%]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>a Go player&apos;s analogy</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/a-go-players-analogy.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.179823</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-23T19:15:08Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-23T19:15:08Z</updated>
   
   <summary>In another life, before job, religion, and family were important, I was obsessed with the game of go. If you haven&apos;t studied go at least a little bit, I expect you will find my thought gibberish.I believe how one plays...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[In another life, before job, religion, and family were important, I was obsessed with the <a href="http://usgo.org">game of go</a>. If you haven't studied go at least a little bit, I expect you will find my thought gibberish.<br /><br />I
believe how one plays go is insightful to at least one's intelligence,
if not their character. And Obama would be a much better go player than
Clinton.<br /><br />Clinton's go personality:<br />She is a strong tactical fighter. But she tries to win with <a href="http://gobase.org/online/intergo/?query=%22hamete%22">hamete</a>
(plagiarism claims ...) and plays her stones heavily (i.e.big state,
all in). She destroys weak opponents. She is not the most fun to play
against. Her style of play is more Korean.<br /><br />Obama's go personality:<br />He plays a large <a href="http://http://gobase.org/online/intergo/?query=%22moyo%22">Moyo</a>
strategy(i.e. 50state). He playes lightly, and is hard to force him
into a tactical fight. He lets the little stuff go, his strategy to is
to handily beat, not crush. His opponents will be able to save face.
His play is Japanese.<br /><br />Tactics vs Strategy: <br />
While a knowledge of tactics are needed to play, a good strategist can
repeatedly make tactical concessions locally, but make up for it with
strategic vision. A strong president should focus on strategy, not tactics.<br />
<br /><br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>recommend (yes / no / troll)</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/recommend-yes-no-troll.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.177818</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-10T18:33:11Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-10T18:33:11Z</updated>
   
   <summary>I don&apos;t mind looking at posts that i disagree with, but reading trolls is a waste of time. Combine being able to mark posts, with being able to filter and we have a better system....</summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[I don't mind looking at posts that i disagree with, but reading trolls is a waste of time. Combine being able to mark posts, with being able to filter and we have a better system.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>Why is there a large gender difference in who shows to vote?</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/why-is-there-a-large-gender-di.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com,2008:/talk//17.177016</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-05T06:01:23Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-05T06:01:23Z</updated>
   
   <summary>on another thread it was suggested that 58.5% of dem primary voters so far have been women. why?1. old people vote more. old men are more likely to be dead?2. women take voting more seriously?3. dames are more likely to...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[on another thread it was suggested that 58.5% of dem primary voters so far have been women. why?<br />1. old people vote more. old men are more likely to be dead?<br />2. women take voting more seriously?<br />3. dames are more likely to be dems?<br />4. women are more excited about current candidates?<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

<entry>
   <title>me vs we</title>
   <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/2008/02/me-vs-we.php" />
   <id>tag:tpmcafe.com,2008:/talk//17.176722</id>
   
   <published>2008-02-03T02:42:18Z</published>
   <updated>2008-02-03T02:42:18Z</updated>
   
   <summary>Just a pet peeve of mine.When a leader takes credit for something using the first person, where the third person is more accurate.I think it says alot about a person. and limits how effectively they can work with people that...</summary>
   <author>
      <name>storm</name>
      
   </author>
   
      <category term="Cafe" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
      <category term="Election Central" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
   
   
   <content type="html" xml:lang="en-us" xml:base="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/storm/">
      <![CDATA[Just a pet peeve of mine.<br />When a leader takes credit for something using the first person, where the third person is more accurate.<br />I think it says alot about a person. and limits how effectively they can work with people that don't agree with them on every detail.<br />That said, I think it is quite clear which candidate is a 'we' sayer, and which is a 'me' sayer.<br />]]>
      
   </content>
</entry>

</feed>

 
