« Testing | stillidealistic's Blog | Being An Ostrich Is Pretty Cool Until People Start Eating Them... »

My Hair Is On Fire, Too...


Well, I just got back in after seeing "Capitalism: A Love Story" and like FlowerChild, my hair is on fire.

In the space of 2 hours and forty minutes I went from the "baby steps" I was encouraging earlier today to wondering if Chicken has pitchforks in bulk, or if I need to buy my own. At this moment, I'm ready for a revolution.

Now, I need to say, I have never been a Michael Moore fan. He has always been the face of the "libruls" in America to me, and not someone whose opinion I even wanted to hear, let alone ever thought I would agree with. Now he is my new hero.

The film is simplistic, but seems to be pretty accurate. I couldn't find much anything to disagree with, and found myself cheering (out loud, mind you) in the theater. My husband, the Libertarian, didn't even jab me in the ribs. Seems as if he couldn't find much to disagree with, either.

On the way home we had a discussion about Obama's Presidency and we pretty much agreed that he needs to step up to the plate and start cleaning house in Washington. If it makes him a one term President, so be it. In addition to the mundane things he has to do like get us out of Iraq and Afghanistan, and get us free from our dependence on foreign oil, and get our country back to work again, he needs to fulfill his promise of change. His promise of hope. If he doesn't, I believe this country will have lost it's best, and perhaps last, chance to correct it's course. 


I want desperately to see him get rid of any and all lobbyists he has around him, discontinue taking ANY money from them, and start working on legislation to do away with the lobbyists, period. They have a stranglehold on this country, and until they are unable to "buy" our leaders, "we, the people" will never get control of our country.

I want desperately to see regulations reinstated in the financial industry, and I want to see visible proof the issue is being dealt with immediately. Do you remember the anti-smoking commercial where a guy has a hole in his throat, is talking through some voice machine, then sticks his cigarette through the hole in his throat so he can continue to smoke, even though he is obviously killing himself? That's how the banking industry is...they are so addicted to the big bucks,  they can't help themselves. Even after taking the country to the brink of financial disaster, they are back to their old tricks. Without regulation and serious oversight from someone other than the rats themselves, they will do it all again, and "we, the people" will be the ones to suffer. Again.

I want desperately to see actual, real live reform of the health care/insurance industry, not this bull crap it looks like we are going to end up with. In my heart of hearts, I am not an advocate of getting the government involved in health care. I don't trust them, and every time I have an unpleasant encounter with a government employee, it makes the hair on the back of my neck stand up thinking of them being involved with my health care. (My latest was with a TSA employee, and had I not had a fear of being put on the no fly list, I would probably have made a scene. There is something about little people being put in positions of total power, that turns them into unthinking monsters who are just "following the rules" and are no longer able to see the "people" they are supposed to be protecting.) But, since the industry has basically told us that they are going to increase rates dramatically if this health care bill passes, I say screw 'em. I want to see serious regulation of the industry like we do with utilities...no more outrageous profits, no preexisting conditions, no getting bounced when you get sick. I want to see preventive medicine covered, I want to see tort reform, I want to see competition across state lines, and I want to see members of Congress have to purchase their own insurance, rather than get it through their employer, so that they have to live with the same coverage and prices "we, the people" the live with. If these measures don't result in affordable health care for all, then I guess we'll have no choice other than TSA for health care. God help us.

I want desperately to see ethics in Washington, for a change. I want an end to the hypocrisy. I want to see our leaders live by the laws they pass for the rest of us. I don't want to hear, "well, it was just sloppy bookkeeping"  coming from the Chairman of the Ways and Means Committee when he fails to disclose $500K in assets. When a guy can't even keep track of his own finances, should he be in charge of the Ways and Means Committee, even if he is a really nice guy? I want to see our leaders prosecuted when they break laws. I want to see them publicly disciplined and stripped of their chairmanships or kicked out of office when they are found guilty of ethics violations. They are in positions of public trust, and when they violate that trust, it HAS to be a big deal, no matter what party they are in. They need to put the country first, not themselves, and if they can't do that, they need to get a different job. "We, the people" deserve that much.

I want desperately to see those who run the businesses in America treating their employees like partners instead of commodities. There should be major tax incentives for companies who pay their employees a living wage rather than the minimum wage. For publicly held companies, the pay of the CEOs need to be tied to the pay of the lowest wage earners. No one actually EARNS $100M a year, and no one who works 40 hours a week should EVER be homeless or hungry or have to chose between medicine and food. Something is seriously wrong with a country where this is possible.

To be honest, there's not much going on in this country right now that ISN'T pissing me off. There is so much wrong that  even if I were to be the "Benevolent Dictator" I don't know that I would know where to start with getting us to where I want us to be, so I don't know why I think President Obama should be able to do it. But he promised me change. So I allowed myself to hope. I allowed myself to believe it was possible for us to be the country I dream of. So, dammit, that's what I want. I don't need it to be done in a day or a week or a month, or even a year. But I need to hear from my President that the change he promised is coming, in spite of the best efforts of some to stop it.  I need to see that it has started. And THAT I need NOW.


 

66 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

He's turning this big-ass ship port-side, but it's taking time.

Just his being there with the captain's hat on is almost enough for me.

His crew needs to get on, and stay on, board. But I'm glad you're a crew mate of mine.

user-pic

I have just witnessed a baptism of fire. It is your soul on fire Stilli, not your hair.

What the repubs do is take three or four scenes or paragraphs from the script that are easiest to deny, even when the denial is an outright lie. Then they just call Mike a communist, or left wing nut or whatever.

He has a way with the camera. Fat with a slight lisp and that stupid baseball cap. AND I LOVE THE GUY. HAHAHAHAHAH

Good for you. On your own. Let us see what this man, who has sold hundreds of millions of tickets and dvds, has to say.

Wonderful.

There has to be a God because God is hope and you give me hope tonite.

user-pic

i hear you. but i still believe that Obama has the big picture in mind. rope-a-dope. as community organizer will learn, lasting change will occur only when the neighborhood first chooses itself to go down the path it needs to go down. Getting to that point takes time.

user-pic

I believe he does, as well, Acamus. I just need reassurance from him from time to time that he is on schedule, since we can't SEE the progress.

user-pic

i suspect that now that the senate bill is out there we will see a different Obama.

user-pic

i should add that i think this will bring some reassurance in that Obama the scrapper (that appeared from time to time during the elections) will appear when it comes to HCR. With the physicians, hospitals, and phamaceuticals basically behind him, he knows it just the GOP and the insurance industry standing between him and real change (even if it is somewhat diluted). He's not going to back down.

user-pic

Oh Lord I hope so! Along with millions of others this nonsense has got everyone half crazy, we are at the point of turning it all off, just don't think I have another call, e-mail, letter or anything left in me.

user-pic

I doubt it unless you mean a different Obama from the one who campaigned on change. He is what he is and this weird hope of some that he will suddenly surprise everyone by being a liberal is a pipe dream with no justification. It's Obama via Emmanuel working hard to dump the public option, working hard to suppress pictures of American war crimes, working hard to kiss up to and service the criminal financial industry leaders, working hard to deepen and widen the conflict in Afghanistan. That is the essence of a status quo/DLC standard bearer which, except for rhetoric he always has been and always will be. Stop listening to the platitudes and look what he's doing and you will be hard pressed to find the community organizer anywhere.

user-pic

'Fraid you are right, bro. People keep mapping their own hopes and dreams onto this guy, for no objective reason that I can see. I wish it were otherwise, but he is just another PR man's creation to sell product while the oligarchy leads us into oblivion.

user-pic

I just can't be that cynical yet. But if Obama turns out to not be the real deal, we will be faced with millions of new cynics in this country. It will be a nightmare.

user-pic

Stilli, just quit listening to what they say and focus on what they actually do. That's the key. When push comes to shove for Obama thus far it has been either copy the Bush policy or support the status quo---even while claiming verbally you are opposed. It is a clear pattern.

user-pic

But, oleeb, we don't know what kind of foundation is being laid behind the scenes...I know...as I write it, it sounds a little far-fetched, but it COULD be happening. I won't condemn him until I know for sure.

user-pic

And by then it will be far too late.

Look, I don't mean to be insulting here, but it's time to get real. There is no tooth fairy, no Santa, and there's no foundation being laid stilli. You saw the Moore movie right? Wasn't it clear to you from the thorough condemnation of Summers and Geithner that nobody who would appoint those two crooks would be laying the foundation for real change? How could anyone who would let those two screw us as they are clearly doing, be contemplating any real, substantive changes that benefit the common people of this country? Other than hoping against all evidence there is no way.

user-pic

I don't have any choice, oleeb. I am mentally unprepared to lube up and bend over just yet. There is historic precedent for hiring a thief to beef up a security system. Maybe Geithner is our thief. Maybe. I'll give up when I need to. But I don't need to yet.

And what do you see as the alternative to hope and patience? So we accept we've been screwed over (and I don't) what is the game plan then?

user-pic

BTW, I don't consider honest, civil discourse to be insulting. You have an opinion, and it is worth listening to. Start calling me names, and well... :-)

user-pic

Do you honestly not see that you (and the whole country) are already bent over? Sometimes when a thief has been hired it's because he's a friggin thief and he's gonna steal you blind. That's what he's doing to and it's pretty easy to see.

user-pic

Sorry, didn't adress the second part.

What do we do? Organize. Protest. Demand better from our President instead of giving him forever before calling him on the carpet for bad decisions and appointments. Encourage, contribute to and vote for those who will not go along with this game any longer. Rise up.

user-pic

Yeah, but every time he comes out to reassure us that he is working on his promises, he gets slammed for being all talk.

You have to remember that it did not take 9 months to get into this crisis. And as many times we accuse members of Congress of being paid off and owned, we should not expect Obama to always get what he wants. And for as long as I can remember the government, no matter who's president, has always been accused of being slow (red tape) and I don't expect a faster pace from this administration.

user-pic

Viva, I really don't expect it all right now. I know he can't just wave a magic wand. I know Congress does not have his back (although I THOUGHT we told them pretty emphatically that we wanted them to have it!) But, realistically speaking, he is nearing the end of the first quarter, and we have seen NOTHING in terms of re-regulating the banking industry, very little in terms of the transparency promised, continuing misconduct in the Congress, the appearance that the lobbyists are STILL in control, no apparent progress on getting rid of don't ask don't tell...the list goes on. I saw a list recently of accomplishments, and I agree it no small feat to have accomplished that much...But we need some more "readily apparent" stuff to keep up the enthusiasm.

I mean, I REALLY like this guy. REALLY, REALLY like him. And if I am feeling this frustrated, there are many, many more who feel much more frustrated. I don't want to lose the momentum and hope that was built up with his election...and right now we need something big and concrete and visible to keep it going. A watered down mess of a pseudo-health care reform bill just isn't going to be enough to point to in the mid-terms.

user-pic

Yeah, but every time he comes out to reassure us that he is working on his promises, he gets slammed for being all talk.

While I do not mean this as a criticism of you, Viva, I do find this remark curious. It is readily apparent that this is a talking point echoing throughout the babblesphere in the solar system, Putrid Punditry. When Obama speaks, we get a look into what he is doing and what he wants to do. It is transparency. Then the abusive pundits come out and slam him, so we blame him for being all talk, when the abuse is coming from the pundits, not the President. The President is the victim of this abuse, and the people are led to blame him. If he was wrong, or misleading, they might atttack his message. Instead they attack the messenger. I hope this trend is only a fad in this country.

I like to know what a President is doing and thinking, or more importantly, I agree with what this President is doing and thinking. I'm also impatient, but I have not found much to oppose with this one, except I wish he would move faster. Now, the last President, whenever he spoke, my ears ached, my brain hurt and I had a sore throat from screaming at the TV. The most prominent reaction to Dubya was that when he was not drooling with a contrived patriotic machismo to move the masses, he was lying, and if we was telling the truth, he was not going in a direction with which I agreed.

user-pic

You got it Stilli. And it isn't just that it's wrong but is so simplistically wrong. A straight answer from a politician is a relic. A truth is just a jumble of indistinguishable words without meaning. We've strayed so far from reality to some unknown place, I can't make heads or tails of where we are. All I know is the road signs have us pointed in the direction of a progressively more screwed up place than where we already are. We're already in Bizarroland. Next stop Fruitcake City. Who knows after that? We've lost our way, lost the map, can't go back and don't know which way is forward. What we're doing makes a Chinese fire drill look like a precision military drill team. I must be halucinating.

user-pic

One other thing to keep in mind, Stilli, is that Obama is not a dictator or king. Unlike Bush, who clearly fancied himself such.

Let's place much of the responsibility where it belongs.

Congress is where ideas go to die.

user-pic
Congress is where ideas go to die.

I agree, and I don't blame him for what Congress is doing. But I hired Obama to get them to knock that crap off. And so far, I haven't seen any indication he's going to, or that they intend to do it themselves. I would LOVE to see him take it to the people, and get them riled up about it, big time.

I know politics is complicated and that it has, in large part, been a series or backroom agreements that gets things done. But we voted for change. For transparency. For ethics. I KNOW and accept it can't be done over night. But I need to know he hasn't forgotten. Because right now, it just doesn't look all that different.

user-pic

I'm glad you got fired up, still. Have you watched the Moyers interview with Marcy Kaptur and Simon Johnson yet?
http://www.pbs.org/moyers/journal/10092009/watch.html
Transcripts are also available. The main point to me is that Obama chose Wall Street Insiders as his economic team. No progressives in the lot of them. Someone posted yesterday a link saying that the White House has shelved financial reform due to mega-pressure from Big Banking. If so, *^%#%#@**!

user-pic

Thanks for the link, Wendy. I'm at a computer that doesn't have the flash I need to watch it (and I don't have administrative privileges, so I can't load it) but I will tonight...I'm with you on the &#@&*#...it's soooo frustrating!

user-pic

Just today, Democrats moved for change in regulation of derivatives. "Big banking" and their allies like candidate John McCain say no, the market should decide.

The President doesn't get any credit for that?

user-pic

Full credit only occurs if the reforms pass. He gets partial credit for trying...but this had better pass. The lobbyists in cahoots with Congress just cannot score another win.

user-pic

'Doesn't he get any credit for that?'
I don't keep a scorecard. I hunted on the financial sites for the derivative reforms you mentioned, finally found this on Huffpo. What they should have done was simply erase the Commodity Futures Modernization Act, but plenty of Dems don't want to do that either. If this passes Congress, let's see if the President signs it. It will be pretend-reform.
If you haven't, watch the Moyers interview with Marcy Kaptur and Simon Johnson, link above. Or read the transcript, there's a box to click to get it. Kaptur says it's time for New Economic Generals; the Chicago Boys economics ain't cuttin' it for anyone but Wall Street.
Johnson said months ago that he was not adverse to the poacher turning gamekeeper IN THEORY; then he was hoping for the best, but now he is worried about a true depression. You decide.

user-pic

Oopsie; sorry, Over. I just found the open tab with the huffpo link, realized I'd probably forgotten it:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/15/derivatives-reform-weaken_n_322280.html

user-pic

Confusing Huffington Post. It's actually just bouncing around committees (they said that, but the order was confusing), and if this Congresswoman gets her poison pills into final bill, she has much weakened it, yes. If not, she merely earned her campaign contributions from derivatives lobby!

Speaking of which, Marcy Kaptur on Moyers wants the Cleveland Fed to have same authority as NY Fed. Okay, but it's not really likely; neither is her overall conclusion that we need to get money out of politics.

Sure most people agree with that, but how? Makes me wonder how effective she is. Her constituents are all being thrown out of their houses and this is her solution? Seriously.

I agree overall that an opportunity to overall regulation may have been missed. I think it was a hard period, though, with change of Presidents, new team not in place for a while, world teetering on edge of Second Great Depression, etc.

user-pic

Okay, Wendy.

Thank you for dedicating your efforts my education. Am now downloading the Moyers deal.

Best,
OT

user-pic

A system of this scale changes direction slowly.

He is doing those things, while pushing his agenda uphill against institutional inertia.

What we need right now is a better group of Senators and Representatives. People who are not as wedded to yesterday's vision. For that to happen, the people - us, the voters - need to be more involved. Push the current officeholders, and replace the ones who are in the way.

And yet, term limits are a terrible idea often floated when these topics appear. They throw the good out with the bad, and are profoundly anti-democracy. The best form of term limitation I know is an election.

user-pic

People who are not as wedded to yesterday's vision.

You are far too kind here, OG, unless that vision is one of re-election. Producing legislation that benefits the people who elected them doesn't appear to be a part of any vision, yesterday's, today's or tomorrow's.

Excellent post, stilli!

user-pic

I always fiercely resist giving you any credit for anything, but I gotta say:

Another winning comment from the wise Old Grouch!

user-pic

It is Ken Thomas; the link was about corporate tax haven reform. Still, it sucks.
http://tpmcafe.talkingpointsmemo.com/talk/blogs/kenneth_thomas/2009/10/while-were-all-focused-on-heal.php?ref=reccafe

user-pic

Stilli,

I will have to wait to see Moore's documentary (most likely until it comes out in dvd as we have no movie theater here), but...

If it continues to generate the same type of emotions and common sense as your post depicts, then perhaps it will motivate and generate the actions needed to help President Obama clean up the horrific mess!

It is, after all, We, The People, who ultimately bear the responsibility and possess the means to clean house. We must ensure that we do our part, but taking care that we choose the right tools and actions.

(I sincerely hope you submit your post to your newspaper and send a copy to the WH - it is powerful and on target! I believe he needs and wants your message delivered.)

Thanks Stilli. Strongly Rec'd!

user-pic

I just saw the film yesterday myself Stilli.

On fire is the best way to describe my energy.

Through his movie Moore is making his attempt to provide leadership and advocacy for 'we, the people' and we need more people who have had success with 'capitalism' to do likewise.

I highly recommend getting as many people as possible to go see this movie. Spreading the message and info in it is valuable to all of us and frankly I want him too keep making movies like this so I will do whatever I can to support his box office count.

If people want to donate money to a good cause, support families losing their homes, and stop the general fleecing of America, please go see the film:)

user-pic

I had never seen one of his films before, so now I'm going to be going back and renting the older ones. He had me laughing, crying, getting pissed and getting hopeful within seconds of each other...quite the roller coaster of emotions.

I don't know if it hasn't been getting much attention, or I just haven't been PAYING attention, but it is certainly a worthwhile use of one's time. My daughter tends to be on the conservative side (a side effect of my past behavior that I am attempting to correct) and was questioning whether she would be able to sit through it. I told her it was more about class warfare and how the workers in this country are getting hosed, than about liberal vs. conservative...I'm hoping she will go see it. I'm anxious to see if it has the same effect on a conservative as it did on this newly emerged liberal.

user-pic

A conservative is going to get riled up at a Moore film because it is about class warfare. Liberals refer to the struggle as warfare, and conservatives have no issue with economic disparity. The only way to get ahead is on your own, they say, but these corporations are not one person against the world, pulling themselves up by their bootstraps. They are an organized group of people with buildings and meetings and shared bank accounts who loathe individuals who would want to come together to have their own buildings, meetings, and shared bank accounts.

user-pic

I haven't seen it, Stilli. Could be a while before I do. But they say this is his best.

user-pic

Then I'm glad it was my first...I was really impressed. It is not easy to illicit all those emotions in one film, especially when it is real stuff and not the figment of the writer's imagination.

user-pic

I have never been a Michael Moore fan. He has always been the face of the "libruls" in America to me, and not someone whose opinion I even wanted to hear, let alone ever thought I would agree with. Now he is my new hero.

Glad you finally were able to shake the 'librul' stereotype of Moore portrayed by corporate media and 'hear' what he had to say, and then make a judgment on your own.

Moore has been doing exactly the same type of documentary work for 20 years. If more people start thinking for themselves this country may still have a chance.

user-pic

I feel quite embarrassed that I made a judgment of him based on what I "heard" about him...You would think people would outgrow things like that. Better late than never, I guess. I'm anxious to see what else I've missed.

I've seen him interviewed several times lately and liked what I heard, which is what made us decide to go see the movie. I wish more people would give him a shot instead of just dismissing him because of what they THINK they know about him. Pretty intense stuff, and very thought provoking.

user-pic

Thanks, Stilli, for saying so eloquently what many of us have begun to think, but have been too discouraged to say.
If it is true that running an administration is not the same thing as running a campaign -- that candor must necessarily be out once the candidate is in -- why is that?
Should what seems to be a dismaying lack of communication between Obama and his electorate be accepted with a shrug of resignation?
Trust in an Obama "master game plan" would be a great deal easier to believe in were it not for his appointments of Summers/Geithner and his back room deal with BigPharma and the insurance industry before real healthcare reform discussion even began.
We did not vote for Obama as a demonstration of faith. We did not vote for Obama to guarantee him a second term. We voted for Obama because we believed in his integrity, as well as his street smarts, both of which were to be used in our interests.
We'll see.

user-pic

Yes, running an administration is different, but what we've seen in this case is the olderst trick in the political book. Tell them what they need to hear to get elected and then proceed with maintaining the status quo without any substantive changes once elected. Call yourself a pragmatist and dismiss and defame the progressive ideas, organizations, and voters who elected you and paid for your campaign. Typical DC Democratic politics brought to you by the Democratic corporate centrist and other DLC clones.

It doesn't have to be that way at all, but it would take some courage and backbone not to. There has been a severe shortage of both among DC Democrats for 40 years. Nothing has changed.

user-pic

I think that you're going to have to wait awhile before you can be in any way sure of that, Oleeb. It takes quite a while to work your way out of this big of a shit heap.

user-pic

There is absolutely no evidence that there is any effort underway of any kind to indicate Obama is tryng to get us out of the shit heap you mention. Zero. And when I talk about evidence I'm not talking about statments, but actions. All we have in the actions category is replication of the worst of Bush's policies or ongoing support for the status quo. That's it. I dont' think we have to wait any longer. If it looks like a duck and quaks like a duck and walks like a duck it's probably a duck.

user-pic

"Probably" being the key word, Oleeb. Don't give up just yet. He has 3+ more years. He can still pull it out. If he is not able to do this, it will be the biggest waste of political talent in the history of the universe, and will cause an even huger amount of apathy in this country. We may as well just sign the title for the country over to the lobbyists and resign ourselves to serfdom or looking for a new country to call home. I can't do it yet, and I hope you won't either. Let's keep the pressure up, encourage our representatives to support him, and do whatever we can to help. It ain't over 'till it's over.

user-pic

"able"? He isn't even making an attempt Stilli. There's no time to lose in making the point that we are unwilling to wait and see. We need to demand to see some evidence he's working for change instead of the con game of smoke and mirrors we've been fed since last November.

user-pic
Trust in an Obama "master game plan" would be a great deal easier to believe in were it not for his appointments of Summers/Geithner and his back room deal with BigPharma and the insurance industry before real healthcare reform discussion even began.

Yup...I'm trying very hard not to lose faith and to keep my enthusiasm up, but it IS hard in the face of so much evidence to the contrary, to believe things are changing. Don't ask, don't tell seems like an easy thing to deal with...why is it not done already? Reinstating banking regulations will take awhile, but why would it be out of line to say outloud and forcefully "Regulations are being written as we speak. They will prevent the banking industry from ever doing this to us again"?

I am confident our President is capable of walking and chewing gum and juggling 100 balls at the same time. He is a great at delegating.

Come on! The quarter is almost over...let's get some points on the board!

And, yeah, I know...winning the game is more important than getting some points on the board...but this game is different. If you don't get the points up, at half time the opposing team gets to bring in more of their team members, and you get less...

user-pic

Don't believe for a second that Obama isn't navigating a minefield with his very life on the line goring the oxes he has promised for dinner. He must be very careful how he hunts and when he goes in the kill.

user-pic

"but it IS hard in the face of so much evidence to the contrary, to believe things are changing"

It is hard for a reason: things are not changing. At least they aren't changing in the way little people like us wanted it to. The situation does continue to change quite favorably in the interests of the corporations, the wealthy and the powerful and our present administration has done nothing to level the playing field let alone change the rigged game that is being played.

user-pic

Stilli,

I've been away for a awhile and what a surprise for me upon my return. I always felt you had it in you. After reading many of your always excellent posts, you now strike me as having attained a new an higher orbit. Great post. You may not think of yourself as a "librul" or progressive but, beautiful woman, you are, from the tip of your populist toes to the top of your Tom Joad head.

I hold my finger down on the recommend link to you.

user-pic

Oh, my de-ah...y'all may have given me a case of the vapahs (in my best southern drawl...) Thank you for your kind words.

Yes, effin...I have made the transition, happily. I am in lock-step with no one, but I do self-identify more as a liberal than a conservative. I like to think I have some progressive leanings, with a bit of pragmatism tossed in, with a few moderate genes tucked in there, as well...guess that really makes me a mutt, but then I have always favored pound puppies to purebreds.

Have you seen the flick? You will enjoy...

user-pic

...but then I have always favored pound puppies to purebreds.

One of the reasons I love you!

user-pic

Yes. I saw it last night and wasn't disappointed. I have a fan of MM for several years. I can attest to the fact all his films are excellent and I can't say one is better than the other, save for "Roger and Me" which I haven't yet seen. Sicko was, like he always is, direct and to the point and, hard to argue with.

I had the pleasure of seeing "Farenheight 911" at a theater in Toronto. Excellent movie but watching it with a theater full of people dressed up, throwing popcorn, laughing and yelling was just over the top. I hadn't experienced anything like that since.....well, you know that Saturday midnight kinky costume movie.

Don't miss "Slacker" either. That one may be my favorite of his.

user-pic

Stilli (why isn't it Still?), I can't see you torturing yourself over some decision on all this. Often it seems that folks think they are supposed to be monolithic pro- or anti-Obama. You can have hope and like him, I do, and I love Michelle. But that doesn't have to mean we don't critique his actions honestly. There are fronts I give him credit on; his economic team isn't one, and I am bummed about that, because for me economic justice is a hugely important to the success of the Nation. If our taxes keep migrating upward to the Uber-wealthy, what will be left for education, health care, social safety nets, infrastructure, enforcing regulations in food safety, water, etc. ad infinitum. The stuff we consider our taxes well-spent for!
I ordered my Obama chia pet today; you should get one, and water that sucker after you soak the clay and spread the paste. He's gonna look pretty handsome with green hair. And every time you water him, check out things you like he's doing, and things you don't like. You made an honest change in your belief that All is Great from Obama. Send him an email when you think he's off-track.
Huge numbers of Americans have forgotten what actually ocurred under Reagan and Clinton. I swear, the myths are far different from the reality. It's our job right now to see the differences; rose-colored glasses don't help much. The White House says it's about to activate the Change organization; I don't know if we'll like the health bill enough to campaign for it. We'll see. Good luck to you; I'm just happy you are letting new info in.

user-pic

Thanks for all your comments today, Wendy.

I go weeks without giving in to my frustration, then it builds up, I see something like Moore's movie and it all comes gushing out. Then I'm on an even keel until it starts to build up again. I'm not used to caring about politics yet, and I haven't completely perfected my coping mechanism. It takes a while to adjust to no longer being an ostrich.

I'm glad I have you guys to pull me off the wall!

As to the Still/Stilli? It started out Still, and some continue to call me that (Barefoot, Bwak, Blow.) LisB started calling me Silly Stilli as a term of endearment in chat, and somehow Stilli stuck. Most call me Stilli, but I answer to both, whichever you prefer.

user-pic

Kewl! Hang in there.

user-pic

Still...have you visited Michael Moore's website yet? http://www.michaelmoore.com/

He and I are about the same age, grew up in the same part of Michigan...actually, we went to rival highschools. :o) I never met him, but I would see him occasionally outside the old house where the office for his Flint Voice newspaper was. Driving by once with my dad, we spotted him and my dad said to me, "Watch out for that guy...he's gonna do things." To this day, I do not know if he meant it as praise or as a warning. ;o)

user-pic

Thanks for the link...there is a GREAT editorial on there dated 10/10...well worth reading.

I keep forgetting you are in Michigan!

user-pic

Yup SI. It's becoming nearly impossible to maintain a positive attitude, and I really hte that. Meanwhile I've got the solution for your hair problem.

user-pic

YIKES! Yeah, piggy, it is. I do better on some days than others. Once I got the rant out of my system I felt better, but jeez, those seeds of doubt are taking root...

user-pic

What are you going to DO about it?

"They have a stranglehold on this country, and until they are unable to "buy" our leaders, "we, the people" will never get control of our country."

Hint: where do "they" get their money?

Where do you shop? Bank? Your cleaning products?

What did you change today?

Good luck!

user-pic

Thanks, guys...I enjoyed the discussion!

user-pic

Hey Stilli, regarding financial reform - Barney Frank isn't one of the good guys here. Yesterday he just weakened the regs on derivatives trading. It's depressing and scary. If you're hoping to see progress, look at what Chris Dodd does in the Senate.

As for Obama and his administration, I guess I'm less ... idealistic ... than you. I've given up posting periodic criticisms around here on their financial policy moves. People seem to see such remarks as just 'antagonistic', and hence react badly.

Which brings me to the more pragmatic question: what is the more constructive attitude - (i) retaining faith in Obama and supporting what he does in this regard, or (ii) attacking him for what he does that is bad on the objective merits? I still don't see how the former approach helps much, but maybe I lack some political sophistication.

Thanks for this.

Leave a comment

stillidealistic

user-pic

Following: 123
Followers: 87

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location California
  • Party Democrat (recovering Republican)
  • Politics More and more left of center everyday...whoddathunk?

Favorites

  • Favorite Books
    Shelfari: Book reviews on your book blog
  • Favorite Quotes "The older I get, the more I feel like me." "Life is not meant to be a gentle journey to the grave arriving in pristine condition, but rather a wild rollercoaster of a trip, sliding in sideways, a mocha in one hand and a bar of chocolate in the other, completely used up and screaming whoooeeee! What a ride!" "What is, is. Accept it and learn to live with it or work around it."

Bio

Would fill a book! stillidealistic@ymail.com

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address