« My Hair Is On Fire, Too... | stillidealistic's Blog | Is It Possible The Insurance Companies Stepped On Their Wangers? »
Being An Ostrich Is Pretty Cool Until People Start Eating Them...
I was born of and raised by ostriches. Then I married an ostrich, and gave birth to and raised more ostriches. Therefore it has been difficult to pull my head out of the sand and pay attention to what is happening in the world. I mean, after all, it was a pretty comfortable life.
I was poor (by today's standards) growing up. My parents bought their first house for $19,000 using his G.I. Bill benefit. He worked at an auto parts store, and my mom stayed at home and ignored us kids as much as possible. We mostly fended for ourselves, except when we were "really bad." Then Mom pulled out the "just wait until your dad gets home card." He'd come home from a hard day at work, receive his instructions to spank us, and he did, without question. Everyone in our small world was pretty much just like us. No one had much, but we didn't know there was any other way to live. Seriously, my first recollection of "rich" people was watching "Dallas" on t.v
Politics must have been discussed at least a little, because I knew who President Kennedy was, I knew that when he was killed it was an awful thing. It made my dad cry, which I had never seen before. I knew he had a pretty wife and two little kids. And I knew that them not having a daddy anymore made me very sad.
In 8th grade I had a debate class, and I was assigned to the "anti-Vietnam war" side of the debate. I had nothing to contribute. My family supported the war, and I had nothing to base any other feeling on. My teacher tried to tell me it didn't matter, just gather information for the side you were assigned and debate it. I think I decided then that politics pretty much sucks. I stuck my head back in.
Over the next 45 years I pulled it out every once in awhile. I volunteered for Bobby Kennedy briefly, went to a few candlelight vigils against the war (Okay, so maybe it wasn't such a good idea now that guys I knew were being drafted and a college deferment was the only thing keeping my boyfriend out.) 18 year olds didn't get the vote until I was 20, and I registered republican, just like my family and new husband.
But life was pretty good. There didn't seem to be much to complain about. Interest rates went crazy for awhile, there was gas rationing briefly...but life went on. We had everything we needed, and we were slowly getting ahead. It didn't seem to matter which party was in power.
When George senior was in office, I paid just enough attention to know that I didn't like repubs either and voted for Perot. That got the Clinton's in office. When HiIlary decided I should pay for health insurance for my employees I sent her a copy of my schedule C, showing a $10,000 dollar profit (and I didn't take a salary, that $10,000 was what I got -before taxes- for working 60-80 hours a week) and asked her where the hell money for health insurance premiums was supposed to come from??? HRC failed, and I was safe for awhile...head back in, but this time having learned the lesson that voting against repubs was a bad thing.
It took almost 7 years of bush2 and a speech from Obama to change that. If george the younger hadn't started feasting on ostriches, I'd probably still be a republican.
There are a lot of ostriches in America. In fact, I would venture to guess the majority of Americans are ostriches. They pull their heads out of the sand every once in awhile to make sure the outside world is still there, but then, once having ascertained they are not in imminent danger (or maybe realize they are, but are so overwhelmed they don't know what to do about it?) stick them back in again.
The ones that are not ostriches (and I get to count myself in that camp now) are divided into the fringe left, the left, the center, the right, and the fringe right. The battle is for the center. The left of center won decisively last time, having induced a whole bunch of ostriches to come out and participate in a big way. But now the leaders of the left of center don't appear to have a clue how to unite long enough to accomplish anything much with its victory. The right of center is waging a fierce, dirty war to reclaim the center, and is within striking distance of doing it. If they can keep Obama from accomplishing anything, if they can get him mired down in Afghanistan, defeat him on health care reform and obstruct efforts to improve the economy, they will take over again.
It is hard to be an informed, participating voter. It takes time and work to sort through all the b.s. and come up with something close to the truth. Once you do it, you expect to be rewarded for your efforts. If you are not, it simply just makes more sense to go back to your life and forget about all the garbage that is politics.
If the left of center cannot deliver a better America for all of us, especially those who pulled their heads out and paid attention last time, and quickly, the right of center will regain power, and a whole group of newly participating Americans will tune out. Gazzillions more ostriches will be one of the legacies of the Obama Presidency. This is not fair, but it IS reality. IMHO.
I was poor (by today's standards) growing up. My parents bought their first house for $19,000 using his G.I. Bill benefit. He worked at an auto parts store, and my mom stayed at home and ignored us kids as much as possible. We mostly fended for ourselves, except when we were "really bad." Then Mom pulled out the "just wait until your dad gets home card." He'd come home from a hard day at work, receive his instructions to spank us, and he did, without question. Everyone in our small world was pretty much just like us. No one had much, but we didn't know there was any other way to live. Seriously, my first recollection of "rich" people was watching "Dallas" on t.v
Politics must have been discussed at least a little, because I knew who President Kennedy was, I knew that when he was killed it was an awful thing. It made my dad cry, which I had never seen before. I knew he had a pretty wife and two little kids. And I knew that them not having a daddy anymore made me very sad.
In 8th grade I had a debate class, and I was assigned to the "anti-Vietnam war" side of the debate. I had nothing to contribute. My family supported the war, and I had nothing to base any other feeling on. My teacher tried to tell me it didn't matter, just gather information for the side you were assigned and debate it. I think I decided then that politics pretty much sucks. I stuck my head back in.
Over the next 45 years I pulled it out every once in awhile. I volunteered for Bobby Kennedy briefly, went to a few candlelight vigils against the war (Okay, so maybe it wasn't such a good idea now that guys I knew were being drafted and a college deferment was the only thing keeping my boyfriend out.) 18 year olds didn't get the vote until I was 20, and I registered republican, just like my family and new husband.
But life was pretty good. There didn't seem to be much to complain about. Interest rates went crazy for awhile, there was gas rationing briefly...but life went on. We had everything we needed, and we were slowly getting ahead. It didn't seem to matter which party was in power.
When George senior was in office, I paid just enough attention to know that I didn't like repubs either and voted for Perot. That got the Clinton's in office. When HiIlary decided I should pay for health insurance for my employees I sent her a copy of my schedule C, showing a $10,000 dollar profit (and I didn't take a salary, that $10,000 was what I got -before taxes- for working 60-80 hours a week) and asked her where the hell money for health insurance premiums was supposed to come from??? HRC failed, and I was safe for awhile...head back in, but this time having learned the lesson that voting against repubs was a bad thing.
It took almost 7 years of bush2 and a speech from Obama to change that. If george the younger hadn't started feasting on ostriches, I'd probably still be a republican.
There are a lot of ostriches in America. In fact, I would venture to guess the majority of Americans are ostriches. They pull their heads out of the sand every once in awhile to make sure the outside world is still there, but then, once having ascertained they are not in imminent danger (or maybe realize they are, but are so overwhelmed they don't know what to do about it?) stick them back in again.
The ones that are not ostriches (and I get to count myself in that camp now) are divided into the fringe left, the left, the center, the right, and the fringe right. The battle is for the center. The left of center won decisively last time, having induced a whole bunch of ostriches to come out and participate in a big way. But now the leaders of the left of center don't appear to have a clue how to unite long enough to accomplish anything much with its victory. The right of center is waging a fierce, dirty war to reclaim the center, and is within striking distance of doing it. If they can keep Obama from accomplishing anything, if they can get him mired down in Afghanistan, defeat him on health care reform and obstruct efforts to improve the economy, they will take over again.
It is hard to be an informed, participating voter. It takes time and work to sort through all the b.s. and come up with something close to the truth. Once you do it, you expect to be rewarded for your efforts. If you are not, it simply just makes more sense to go back to your life and forget about all the garbage that is politics.
If the left of center cannot deliver a better America for all of us, especially those who pulled their heads out and paid attention last time, and quickly, the right of center will regain power, and a whole group of newly participating Americans will tune out. Gazzillions more ostriches will be one of the legacies of the Obama Presidency. This is not fair, but it IS reality. IMHO.
Advertisement
















The converse is that if nothing gets accomplished that the excitement of last year will just melt away, becoming ostriches. The right of center's loud, but off-reality, base also threatens to make most non-crazy Republicans to also ostrich-ize.
The worry that I have is that no action will lead to an even less participatory populace and government, no matter which way the wind blows in 2010.
And what we need is the opposite, with more primary participation. More writing. More op-eds and blogs. More asking why that particular Rep listens more to a company lobbyist than clamoring citizens. Because to fight the lobbyists in the environment as it's set up now, we need clamor.
October 20, 2009 4:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
matyra, I'm afraid there are a lot of people out there that don't even realize that it is the lobbyists who are in control of the country right now...
That's a whole 'nuther can of worms!
October 20, 2009 5:11 PM | Reply | Permalink
And the irony of it is that Obama ran on the premise of getting people more involved, in order to take America back from the lobbyists. And the American people's reaction? Sit back, pop a beer, and wait for Obama to do it all himself.
October 20, 2009 6:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
In Albuquerque, we recently had a mayoral race and the turnout was abysmal and we elected a Republican for the first time since 1981.
Even local turnout is low. I've read JEM's blogs about increased primary turnout ending in both parties being more progressive than they are now, but right now apathy is where we seem to be. And why not? Congress makes a snail seem like a sprinter. We've real problems and they fixate on health care, and their fixation is leading to nothing thus far actually accomplished(I do think that we are going to get universal health care, which is an achievement of monumental proportions. But couldn't we have moved a bit faster and with less capitulation?)
October 20, 2009 6:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Albuquerque mayor elect Berry's victory may have had more to do with his two opponents splitting both the Democratic AND the Hispanic vote than voter apathy....though the retirees that don't have to skip work to vote DO trend republican.
October 21, 2009 4:04 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yep, there's that, too. Nuthin's simple.
October 20, 2009 6:32 PM | Reply | Permalink
I might have a more germane comment later, but I can say this for sure: ostrich meat tastes terrible. I got nuttin' on how that fits into your metaphor; sorry. :-}
October 20, 2009 5:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stilli -- I couldn't agree with you more when you say:
"Gazzillions more ostriches will be one of the legacies of the Obama Presidency. This is not fair, but it IS reality."
UNLESS he does something he does not, at this point, seem likely to do: face down the naysayers, stick to principle and serve the people who elected him.
What are the odds of that? Not good, given the evidence to date.
Why is that every employee of every airline is required to take a psychological test to determine how he, or she, would react in a crisis, and yet our President and Senate/Congress critters are not required to do the same?
Seriously. Yes, the lives of 200+ people may depend on the sanity of an airline's crew. We get that.
But the lives of hundred of millions of Americans are impacted by the choices made by Obama et al.
I'm dashed, Stilli. I believed in this man. I thought his street smarts would overcome his pathology, by which I mean the understandable syndrome he has-- given his background -- to yearn to unite, rather than to challenge.
But if he cannot overcome that somewhat craven desire to be liked, to be accepted, by the majority, it is not he who will suffer; it is everyman, woman and child who does not have the luxury of being angst-ridden about his or her past.
Ostriches? There will be plenty. Because we cannot deal with the tragedy of electing a man born to be a leader who was, inside his head and heart, too afraid to lead.
Sigh.
October 20, 2009 6:07 PM | Reply | Permalink
WW, I want so badly to disagree with you, but I can't. I still have hope that he will pull this out, that there is a plan...but with each passing day it becomes less likely. I truly hope to have to eat those words in a couple of years. But I am afraid you may be right. And the very thought of the possibility of it being true makes me want to cry.
October 20, 2009 6:30 PM | Reply | Permalink
What she said!!!!
(hi, wendy)
October 20, 2009 6:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
If any of these new to the process ostriches thought that all they had to do was show up and pull a lever on Election Day to change the country, their heads were even further buried than I thought.
October 21, 2009 4:13 PM | Reply | Permalink
Are you telling us the Hillaryites need to give you idealistic ostriches a pep talk?
I was afraid it would come to this. ;-)
October 20, 2009 7:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Oh, GAWD.....I hadn't thought about it like that! LOL!
But, seriously, I doubt we would be singing a much different tune if Hill had won...lobbyists are lobbyists, and they STILL would own the country. And dems would still be dems...even with Hill in charge they wouldn't know how to act like winners.
I mean, really...being an ostrich is just SOOOOO much easier.
October 20, 2009 7:37 PM | Reply | Permalink
All Hillary theorizing aside, I don't know if being an ostrich is so easy anymore, unless you work for Goldman Sachs. According to those who don't work at Goldman, the banks are not all right and 1 in 6 Americans lives in poverty (1 in 6!) in this (formerly) great country. Even if you wanted to keep your focus in your own backyard instead of nationally, California is teetering on the brink of spectacular collapse.
In other words, the state of the union is impossible to ignore. The genie is out of the bottle: Abu Ghraib, Katrina, Lehman Brothers, torture. These aren't just bad-apple scenarios; they are beyond comprehension and morally sickening.
Seems the only reliable thing we've got is each other, not the government and not a single individual named Barack Obama. If I recall correctly, that's how he told us it would be: He said we've got to push him as hard as we can, we've got to make our pain and passion known.
In the meantime and in addition, we have to take care of each other and those who need help. Because maybe only we can embody our ideals; maybe Obama can't and won't. And maybe he shouldn't. Maybe the lesson is, we are supposed to face the brutal truth when it screams at us to look. Maybe it's simply time to be involved and engaged and interested.
In some ways the story you tell about yourself reveals this lesson, stilli. When political events affected you on a personal level throughout your life, you became engaged, interested, and involved. So now is just one of those times again.
I don't really know, of course. I just think it's a good thing to keep your head above the sand.
Thanks for the interesting story about yourself.
October 21, 2009 12:07 AM | Reply | Permalink
Rec this comment!
October 21, 2009 12:22 AM | Reply | Permalink
I've been crazy about you since day one, Blow. You get me.
Thanks for the pep talk...I don't know if that is what you intended it to be, but I'm feeling better after reading your comment!
I promise to keep my head above the sand!
October 21, 2009 12:32 AM | Reply | Permalink
I was hoping it would help, stilli. I can't explain how this internet-community thing works, but you help me too. :-)
You too, miguelito. ;-)
October 21, 2009 7:47 AM | Reply | Permalink
Still, I just read this article in WaPo.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/19/AR2009101902176.html
Maybe you've already seen it, maybe not. But, it brightened my hopes a little.
Here's a quote I liked...
(my bold)And....
"They're very good at this, because that's how business has been done in Washington for a very long time," he said. "In fact, over the last 10 years, the Chamber alone spent nearly half a billion dollars on lobbying -- half a billion dollars."
See? He doesn't like lobbyists any more than you or I do. But something that's been going on for so damn long doesn't come to a screeching halt overnight.
I will admit I have been seesawing about whether or not Obama is gonna be a different kind of Prez. Right now, I'm swinging back to thinking he will pull this off. All we have to do is keep pressure on our Congress.
We are gonna get significant HCR. We will get a decent public option. And lobbyists will burn in hell.
It is written. ;o)
October 20, 2009 8:16 PM | Reply | Permalink
Flower, one of the things I like about this is that when some of us are down, others are there to pull us up and vice versa...thanks for the support!
October 20, 2009 8:55 PM | Reply | Permalink
This country deserves exactly what government it gets. If 30% believe fox and rush and such, screw them.
If the rest cannot figure it out, screw them.
Its getting to the point where i dont care anymore.
October 20, 2009 9:31 PM | Reply | Permalink
Not you,too, Arthur! When I'm down you're supposed to be up...then when you're down, I'll be up...we can't both be down at the same time!
October 20, 2009 10:12 PM | Reply | Permalink
Well said...and a very good post. Thanks.
October 20, 2009 9:54 PM | Reply | Permalink
Stilli,
I agree with Flower. I think Obama is dumb like a fox. He waited for the Repubs to implode (and they have) and now public option polls show a steady rise if favor of a stron PO. As I stated before, I was disappointed in the initial rollout of the HCR but now it seems as if with all the plans, meetings and mess the people are finally taking care of business and demanding the same of many of their elected politicos. Seems to be working. And it was the people's process and fervor (which is as it should be).
As usual, Ol Grouch was absolutely correct in his comment.
This was a terrific post Stilli - but I have a question....If you are not an ostrich any longer, what kind of 'bird' are you now? (Flock together and all that....just sayin'!)
Rec'd with appreciation.
October 20, 2009 10:21 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'll have to think about that...I'd like to say a hawk, but I'm not predatory. Maybe a stellar jay because I squawk a lot, but they're greedy, and I'm not. I don't know? Any ideas?
October 20, 2009 10:26 PM | Reply | Permalink
Hmmm. I really don't know much about birds, but I would think an Eagle would be perfect. Whatcha' think?
October 20, 2009 10:29 PM | Reply | Permalink
Yeah, eagle...I can do eagle!
October 20, 2009 10:35 PM | Reply | Permalink
Penguin! Stays grounded, stays loyal and can endure the longest, coldest days. Hope you like fish! ;-{)>
October 21, 2009 2:51 AM | Reply | Permalink
Is there such a thing as a vegetarian penguin????
October 21, 2009 11:02 AM | Reply | Permalink
Not for long...
October 21, 2009 1:03 PM | Reply | Permalink
LOL!!!!! Yeah probably aren't too many fruits, vegetables and tofu growing in their habitat, huh?
October 21, 2009 1:20 PM | Reply | Permalink
I'm still hoping Flower is right...I just get soooo discouraged. I think my survival instincts are kicking in...if I start preparing myself for the worst now, I won't fall so far if it happens.
So, enough of that. I'm going to start meditating on the positives and get rid of this doom and gloom...Hopefully in a week or so I'll be back to myself and do a "yes we can!" post.
October 20, 2009 10:34 PM | Reply | Permalink
The main change is that you went through an experience that left you no longer a virgin; you were sullied by facts, and they are dashing your hopes. It is a tough thing to go through. Up or down, we have to keep working toward some end, even if we are realtively impotent to affect change. Dick is right; a certain amount of detachment may be neccessary at times. Then there's tomorrow...
October 20, 2009 10:41 PM | Reply | Permalink
'Innocence' was the word I couldn't dredge up, Still. You have lost your 'innocence.' It did occur to me that that is what is neccessary for us to get crackin'. NOT the Obama-plays-chess-while-they-play-checkers meme. That puts the onus on HIM, not us.
If there ends up being good HCR, it won't be because Congress and the White House had some Moral Moment, or an It Makes Economic Sense moment; it will be because people demonstrated to them that we care enough to go a little crazy about it. IMHO, of course. :-}
October 21, 2009 8:58 AM | Reply | Permalink
There is some truth to that, Wendy. In fact, Blow mentioned that Obama said during the campaign that we would have to push him to do things, and I recall that as well.
I know it is an odd feeling to have a President that wants to do what we want him to do, rather than having an agenda of his own. It almost seems as if we have been held prisoner by our government for so long, having little or no say, and now that we discover the prison doors may be unlocked, we are standing around nervously trying to decide if we want to try to leave and face the uncertainty of freedom, or stay within the the security of the prison walls.
October 21, 2009 11:36 AM | Reply | Permalink
Maybe we need a President with the courage of OUR convictions! :-}
October 21, 2009 12:23 PM | Reply | Permalink
"Maybe we need a President with the courage of OUR convictions! "
-- Wendy Davis
Now there is a bumper sticker to get behind.
October 21, 2009 1:02 PM | Reply | Permalink
IMO, what's got the democrats all tied up is Obama's insistence on bipartisanship. It should be obvious to the most casual observer the republicans are using the olive branch handed to them as a switch against the hand that gave it. The republicans have no heart for cooperating with democrats because if they, the democrats, succeed in any of their endeavors, the republicans will be on the side benches for quite a few years. Seems to be a serious disconnect between the kind of country the democrats believe the US is and the one the republicans believe.
The real problem is all the legislation since Reagan have all been short-sighted for the immediate goal - nothing long term. We have to get past that obstacle and that's were health care reform is going to fail. Whatever we end up with will not be worth the paper its' written on and will be trashed completely once the republicans regain power.
October 20, 2009 10:48 PM | Reply | Permalink
Newt said as much today. He wants to be the President.
October 20, 2009 11:00 PM | Reply | Permalink
There's a big disconnect between the need to insure all of us and the means that it is probably going to be achieved SI. In the short run it is beginning to appear that we are going to saddle those least well equipped to afford it with high healthcare costs while rewarding the bad actors in the healthcare and insurance industries with subsidies. It is a failure of government if it comes to pass and will require many subsequent amendments to rectify. I am holding my breath, and composing a short story where Americans are sneaking into Mexico to escape bad gumint in the US.
October 21, 2009 12:16 AM | Reply | Permalink
I don't know, piggy...I'm watching the Ed Show, and he's practically giddy about the prospects for a public option, as are some of his guests...Do you suppose they are going to pull a rabbit out of the hat?
October 21, 2009 12:40 AM | Reply | Permalink
I truly don't know at this point Stilli. I'm in the camp of Jim eichner at this point. Meanwhile, I've got my moto packed and I'm an hour and a half from the border. ;)
October 21, 2009 12:54 AM | Reply | Permalink
Great writing this, Stilli. I am optimsistic. I thnk Obama understands timing and has been sandbagging this whole thing. Sure, he wanted it done in September, but giving the GOP this small victory really irritated the people and now there is more involvement then ever. I think it sent a message to people, Obama got there because we put him there and he still needs us to get the things done that we want done. That is how we will get a public option, IMHO. and I hope they manage to create the means to achieve it. The Senate is the biggest obstacle, but if Harry gets this through, he will have his position for the rest of his life.
October 21, 2009 2:56 AM | Reply | Permalink
Ostriches forgot how to fly and grew big on the fact they had no natural predators. We've done the same and are suffering for it. The predators are just kicking our collective ass all over the place.
I don't know how many times (more than I can count or recall) I have had this coversation with people and have encouraged them to just pick up the phone, call your rep and voice your opinion. Most of the time the response is it won't do any good. Of course we know this is false.
If we were to decide to do something besides bury our heads in the sand there is a very good chance we would be in a very different circumstance. I've grown way too cynical about this and have given up on the dumbasses and idiots who don't give any of this a moments thought. And I don't bother any more to hide the fact that I think those persons are dumbasses and idiots. What I realized is that's a lie and lies have everything to do with the mess we've created.
We lie to ourselves and everyone around us until we've all turned into dumbasses with our own special version of reality to soothe us to sleep.
The downside is this raises havoc with relationships. But I decided it isn't my responsibility to look after persons who have made a conscious choice to be a dumbass. I just inform them of their dumbassery and leave it up to them to sort it out.
October 21, 2009 4:10 AM | Reply | Permalink
"Dumbassery" great term! Yeah, relationships do suffer in times like this. I can't talk to my family about health care reform at all...just have to ignore the subject all together. It makes me feel bad to have things that we can't discuss.
The good news is that, although they support the status quo, they are part of the silent group. They won't take 2 minutes out of their day to voice their opinion to their representatives.
The most ridiculous part is that the majority of the things we want to do will help them. Go figure.
October 21, 2009 11:24 AM | Reply | Permalink
That they choose to be silent might indicate they don't want to be bothered to examine this and perhaps sort it out. It's a lot of work and takes some real efort. The question I would ask is do we really have a choice? This country isn't a buffet where you can pick and choose what you want. All the pieces coexist as one.
October 21, 2009 2:35 PM | Reply | Permalink