« 'Jon & Kate Plus 8' : Reel Tragedy | steve katz's Blog | Health Care Debate: Democrats Grow A Pair? »

Racism And Obama's Reverse "Southern Strategy"


The modern Republican, so-called, "Southern Strategy" had it's roots in the Johnson presidency with the signing of major Civil Rights legislation. 

Richard Nixon in the 1968 election saw the cracks in the Democratic south as an opportunity to tap into a group of voters who had long been beyond the reach of the Republican Party.

In an interview included in a 1970 New York Times article, Richard Nixon strategist Kevin Phillips articulated the strategies essence:
From now on, the Republicans are never going to get more than 10 to 20 percent of the Negro vote and they don't need any more than that... but Republicans would be shortsighted if they weakened enforcement of the Voting Rights Act. The more Negroes who register as Democrats in the South, the sooner the Negrophobe whites will quit the Democrats and become Republicans. That's where the votes are. Without that prodding from the blacks, the whites will backslide into their old comfortable arrangement with the local Democrats. (WikipediA)
The Southern Strategy was further recounted in a 2005 Bob Herbert, NYT column, Impossible, Ridiculous, Repugnant:

Listen to the late Lee Atwater in a 1981 interview explaining the evolution of the G.O.P.'s Southern strategy:

''You start out in 1954 by saying, 'Nigger, nigger, nigger.' By 1968 you can't say 'nigger' -- that hurts you. Backfires. So you say stuff like forced busing, states' rights and all that stuff. You're getting so abstract now [that] you're talking about cutting taxes, and all these things you're talking about are totally economic things and a byproduct of them is [that] blacks get hurt worse than whites.

''And subconsciously maybe that is part of it. I'm not saying that. But I'm saying that if it is getting that abstract, and that coded, that we are doing away with the racial problem one way or the other. You follow me -- because obviously sitting around saying, 'We want to cut this,' is much more abstract than even the busing thing, and a hell of a lot more abstract than 'Nigger, nigger.'''

Atwater, who would manage George H.W. Bush's successful run for the presidency in 1988 (the Willie Horton campaign) and then serve as national party chairman, was talking with Alexander P. Lamis, a political-science professor at Case Western Reserve University. Mr. Lamis quoted Atwater in the book ''Southern Politics in the 1990's.''

The truth is that there was very little that was subconscious about the G.O.P.'s relentless appeal to racist whites. Tired of losing elections, it saw an opportunity to renew itself by opening its arms wide to white voters who could never forgive the Democratic Party for its support of civil rights and voting rights for blacks.
Enter the Obama, "Reverse Southern Strategy." 

Triggered by Tuesday's announcement of Rep. John McHugh (R-N.Y.) as President Barack Obama's nominee for Army secretary, Politico wrote that the appointment was no accident in, Stealth War: Barack Obama sabotages Republicans:
It's an event that's happening with enough frequency to suggest the presence of a design, a plan that not only sketches the outline of a reelection strategy but manages to drive a wedge into the opposition at the same time. Call it a Sherman's March in reverse -- an audacious attempt by Obama to burn down any lines of escape for Republicans from their one refuge of popularity, the deep South.

Since taking office in January, Obama has made an effort to convert GOP moderates in nearly every region of the country, ranging from a former Midwestern congressman, Ray LaHood, who became transportation secretary, to Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, who was recently named ambassador to China.
An academic finds the Obama strategy far reaching:
"Boxing the Republicans into a South-dominated party is very good strategy, because the more you reduce the Republican Party, the more conservative and reactionary it will become, and thus less attractive to moderates," said Tom Schaller, a University of Maryland-Baltimore County professor and the author of "Whistling Past Dixie: How Democrats Can Win Without the South." "The Midwest and the Northeast are the places where there are still remnants of old-line Rockefeller Republicans. And these are the places where the Democrats will build durable majorities."
Recent Gallup Poll data reinforces the Obama strategy:
More than 6 in 10 Republicans today are white conservatives, while most of the rest are whites with other ideological leanings; only 11% of Republicans are Hispanics, or are blacks or members of other races. By contrast, only 12% of Democrats are white conservatives, while about half are white moderates or liberals and a third are nonwhite.
And how are the Republicans handing Obama's plan, like lemmings to a cliff.

While Pat Buchanan acknowledges that the GOP is a "Heavily White Party" he can't keep his racism in check as reported by Jason Linkins; Buchanan's Creepy Racial Obsessions Continuously Rewarded By Media.  While, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich back pedaled from his earlier remarks calling Judge Sonia Sotomayor a racist, de facto Republican leader, Rush Limbaugh led his show today by insisting that his words on Sotomayor "have not been too strong," adding, "I'm not retracting it."

There was a lot of criticism when President Obama called out the likes of Limbaugh.  Well it seems to be working.  And, the South, the home of the Southern Strategy, it's changing under the racist's very nose,  becoming more ethnically diverse, educated, and middle class.  You can look to the Obama justice department enforcing  voting rights, and ensuring fair elections.

Barack Obama may very well be on the way to being one of our greatest Presidents.  He is already showing that he has what it takes to be one of our greatest and most astute politicians.



54 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

This is a great post, Steve. I love it every time the White House points to Limbaugh as the leader of the GOP. The more these guys attack people like Sotomayer, the wider the margin of victory will be for Obama in 2012.

user-pic

Thanks for the comment. It seems the more obvious the trap Obama sets for Republicans the more they run over each other to jump into it.

Hey, who am I to judge...

user-pic

Yes. Buchanan is one of the most obvious examples of that dynamic. I think it's fair to say that Pat Buchanan appears to be well educated and is often quite thoughtful, EXCEPT when it comes to ethnicity (races don't exist). His decent education and intellect are wholly subjugated to his bigotry. He can't help it. I think this is true for far too many Republicans and that explains why they cannot resist stepping in to Obama's traps. They cannot resist the bait.

user-pic

Well said, my boy, well said!

user-pic

Oh, I believe they can help it, but they feel much stronger if they perpetuate the racist propaganda. Afterall, they believe they are on top. Delusions of grandeur.

user-pic

Terrific post and info.

'There was a lot of criticism when President Obama called out the likes of Limbaugh.' And yet as you note, per all factual data, this was a positive action - but the vast majority of repubs are even now, despite the proof, not confronting Rush's (and his ilk) destructive dialogue which only seems to be getting worse.

Does he have 'files' on these people or are they really his disciples? He leads and they follow?

It seems that the overt 'white man demagogue rants' are beoming louder again. Hopefully, it is the last gasps of their release of rancid gas before they accept they are no longer relevant.

user-pic

Your comment made me think of the old bromide, used in the South, in reverse, "Give them enough rope..."

user-pic

Great post, Steve. Thank you. What I really like about the current batch of media loving repug clowns is Dems don't have to say a word against them - they are doing a great job of it themselves. I know there is a small percentage of white supremacist racist pricks out there that love listening to their crap, but the American public has a short attention span and will soon get bored listening to them. If Newty wants to run for president in 2012 he needs to pull back. By the time primaries roll around Newty will be old stale news. And Pawlenty may be going the same route.

user-pic

What Obama's strategy has done is to put the "repugs" in a goldfish bowl where one and all can see them for who they are...and they are damn proud of it...

Thanks for the comment.

user-pic

"Repugs"? How is this any different than "nigger, nigger, nigger"?

user-pic

Um, you have to CHOOSE to be a republican.

user-pic

I've been called both; each is an ugly epithet used to demonize "the Other". Hatred is not the exclusive domain of one political party.

user-pic

Although I find all name-calling to be somewhat childish, there's a huge difference between "repug" and "nigger". If you honestly don't know the difference, then I feel sorry for you. Here it is in a nutshell: no one ever got killed while being called a "repug".

user-pic

I knew several registered Republicans who never made it back home from Iraq. Just a bunch of dead "Repugs" to you.

user-pic

Right, and there's some association there? Did they get killed because of their political affiliation? Either you're incredibly dense or you're just pretending to be. I suspect the latter.

user-pic

Bless your heart. You are right I am wrong. Have a great day. Smiles and waves.

user-pic

Guess maybe you are feeling guilty for voting for the crew that put them there and that's why the name reThug stings so much.

user-pic

You're no different from those whom you claim to despise.

user-pic

Thanks for this, Steve, which give us hope we can believe in.

user-pic

I agree on your assessment of our President's ability wholeheartedly as one of the greatest minds to occupy the office.

user-pic

In a reverse-reverse southern strategy, this is how the Orlando Magic beat the Cleveland Cavaliers to go to the NBA finals: (1) Let Lebron score his 38: (2) Keep the rest of the team under 50; (3) Win.

GOP = Gulfstates Only Party. The South will live forever -- far away from us.

user-pic

What a bouncy mind you have Doc, and yet, I followed every dribble!

user-pic

They just can't help thenselves... From the Dallas Morning News Collin County GOP official apologizes for e-mail some called racist

user-pic

I have become convinced Steve that rush is in it for the money. I mean he loves fame and not so deep down he is a racist and happy to be in the moneyed class.

Pat B. is something else. He is a conservative in the sense that he does not like change. His forefathers were slave owners and he is proud of that. He liked segregation and waxes positively about it at times. But if he just wished to make money he would not attempt to sell a book that praises Hitler.

The repub leaders I think just wish to get back in power, stay in their Congressional seats and give money to rich contributors.

The Dems can play these different factions against each other.

What is interesting to me was that for eight years or seven anyway, rove would just fax the talking points to everyone and listen to them being recited on radio and tv.

Who is writing the talking points now?

user-pic

I am among those that think racism is ingrained, genetic. Most interested in what you think.

Re Pat, he's all over the map, one day Obama is Stalin today he liked his Egypt speech, go figure.

Re the Rep talking points you raise an excellent point, who? Maybe it's Rush? I smell a blog here...

user-pic

For me, racism is an old throwback to evolution. Now, I'm not saying racists are more evolved, or one race more evolved then another. I think our differences were formed related to our environments, and it is only related to those environemnts that one race is more adapted then another.

I believe that when we act aggresively to each other, we are living no better then chickens, (no offense to Bwak). We peck at someone who is different because a fear response has overwhelmed our rational minds. But we know we can override this mentality and the benefits are extraordinary.

A curious thing about the pecking order. In the grand scheme of things, males behave against their own best interests when they are overwhelmed by their breeding desires. They expend more energy and they age more quickly. They are subject to all manner of unnecessary injuries. WJClinton and John Edwards are prime human examples. It would have been better if they could have managed their hormones more judiciously for all of us!

Therefore, the evolutionary step humans must take is to learn to cohabitate and to acquire the benefits of the local environments and cultures to appreciate and live more synergistically with the region in which they do live. Of course, I am not throwing away all innovation, just saying we have thrown more then a few babies out with the bathwater when it comes to medicine, or architectural designs, for instance. Bottomline, we have a choice. We always have a choice, although some choices are more difficult then others, especially since there does appear to be something still in our DNA that may date back to when we were more closely related to chickens, workign against us.

Unless you're Bwak, don;t be a chicken!!! Oh, and hearing that account from Bwak near the holidays, I suspect, Bwak is no chicken anyway. But i can't be sure.

{Befuddled expression, scratches head}

user-pic

This is really confusing. The evolutionary mechanism that allowed us to succeed as a species was our ability to co-operate with each other.

user-pic

Wot?

Now what ever happend to survival of the fittest, and the strongest, and all that male BS?!? I thought that was how the species survived? My suggestion is that we need to move past that to take another step, if there is one. I suppose our next step really is space, and we need the best and the brightest in a cooperative effort to get there successfully. But I digress.

user-pic

Don't tell that to enlightened acolytes of Ayn Rand.

Cooperation! Pshaw! What matters is determination! A vanguard of the willful worshipped for their ideas!

user-pic

...our ability to cooperate with each other against "The Other".

I agree that racism stems from an evolved instinct against the other, just as infidelity stems from man's desire to spread his seed. Both instincts can and should be fought against.

user-pic

When chickens are considered to be brave compared to Dems, it is one f'd up world. About that pecking order, the prime motivator is wealth and greed. I hope, that notion has been busted.

You haz this chickens stamp of approval for using her ownself as an example. We can't help what we are, much. People can, though.


user-pic

Uh, how many Republicans has Obama actually brought over? This post notes 2, I think there are 3 prominent ones total. (Not sure if you can credit Obama for Specter). Gregg never completed his transition. Seems more like wishful thinking.

user-pic

The question right back at you - how many did Bush? I can only think of one in 8 years...

user-pic

I didn't claim Bush had a strategy. You claim Obama has one. Your move.

user-pic

Steve I think your post is spot on. I think it isn't necessarily how many Republicans he has brought over but which Republicans he charmed. I will give him points on being a shrewd politician.

user-pic

These 3 prominent GOPers (1 a prominent former GOPer) are part of a trend. Didya look at the electoral map from the last Presidential election? I mean, my God, the GOP was limited to a region, and even that region had been nibbled away, losing a few states below the Mason-Dixon.

A mixed race man. With an ethnic name. With no family connections to established power.

Now, the only point I would add is that Obama expanded upon, refined, and in other ways improved the 50 state strategy... with the current angle being (and I called it) hanging the opposition party leadership on someone who can not present new policy ideas: Rush Limbaugh. He is a pawn that thinks he's a queen. When I wrote that, I meant that Rush doesn't have interns and paiges let alone his own ideas necessary to craft policy statements and legislation. He can only criticize what is presented, attack, apologize, and wax nostalgic. When the nation wants change, when the nation is finding itself repulsed by the last 8 years of governance, then the nation wants ideas. And Rush walked right into it, taking the entire party with him. The only option was obstruction, i.e., playing with their hand on fire.

These few defections are crucial. When taken in the grand scheme, the whole pattern shows the effective marginalization of the opposition into an antebellum reactionary sideshow. And until the opposition can recognize the deficiency and retool, then it will schism.

user-pic

The Republicrap Party was not "hanged" on Rush by anyone other then themselves. Rush had the audacity to proclaim himself their leader and no one had been able to state anything different without having to call his show and grovel later.

His competition is Cheney, who also feels HE is the leader of the GOP, having the capacity to reject Colin Powell's party memebership, and Gingrich, who is also a self-appointed Republicrap leader commenting on any show that will host thim.

While I shudder whenever a group follows a personality around and caters to their every whim, there is a need for direction here and the GOPers do not seem to have one at this time.

user-pic

There's a difference between knowing the election's demographics and saying Obama's managing amazing defections from the GOP since the election through some strategy. If anything, the GOP has been more effective at cutting back on him than guessed. Obama now owns Gitmo, has doubled down for Pakistan, has told progressives to just cool it, and every one of his nominations gets slow-balled. Judd Gregg backed away, they're labeling Obama a socialist, and he's having to explain away his Supreme Court choice while they try to push the hearings back to September. So he picks a couple of Republicans - there's a whole nation of nutcakes out there to replace that bunch of 3. Now, the number of Republicans who are choosing not to run might be more important.

user-pic

Is he having to explain away his SCOTUS nominee? Is he reallY?

user-pic

Desidero,
That's GOP happy talk. Seriously.
Frankly I've been amazed that Prez O has held up so well. A lesser leader would have his popularity in the gutter, what with the economy and the wars overseas. The man has style and charisma, you gotta give him that. But he also has something you aren't seeing and very few do. He is constantly setting his advisaries up to hang themselves. He has palyed the GOP like a fiddle since the election. And you are really underplaying the significance of the GOP appointments (forget Specter, that is something else). By picking moderate non southerner repubulicans and removing them from field of play Obama is shutting down the opportunities the GOP has to find a leader who can give them a new appeal. He's literally consuming the GOPs future and incorporating it into a big tent Democratic Party future. Amazing.

user-pic

How many of those moderate GOPs did he consume? (Not that Specter is terribly moderate, and who knows what to call Lieberman).

user-pic

Okay - Obamacans, I googeled it - got 157,000 hits. Check. Your move.

user-pic

Excellent work, Mr. Katz.... deserves a frontpage mention by Josh. You've honed and crystallized many of our loose thoughts on this matter.

On a personal note, a recent peeve of mine committed by my fellow lib commenters..... the cutesy distortions of the term "Republican": variously "Repuglican", "Rethuglican" "Repuklicant" etc.

Actions, people.... describing their actions is enough to sway; let's leave the not-so-cutesy name-calling to the cry-baby sociopaths on freerepublic.

user-pic

Don't forget Republicunt.

user-pic

You want to know why people call republicans names, like rethugs, or repugs? Gp here:

http://thinkprogress.org/2009/06/04/sessions-crying-child/#comments

user-pic

I'm with you on the 'cutesy name distortions'. They are all about preaching to the choir, and not at all about garnering success for liberal or progressive ideas in the political marketplace.

user-pic

but when I hear them referring to the "Democrat Party," I tend to refer to them as "Publicans." Not too nasty, but at least a little message, no?

user-pic

Of course. And I'm not suggesting we should refrain from calling an a$$hole and a$$hole either. I just find the name modifying, such as the Rs calling the Ds the 'Democrat Party', and vice versa kind of dumb, and unnecessarily polarizing in any debate.

user-pic

Excellent Post! Typically I like to add to the conversation / listen to my own voice but nothing left to say here.

user-pic

Thanks, Goldspinner. I never heard that one before.

Let's not forget "Defeatocrat".

And "Democrat Socialist Party" was nearly adopted as official policy, before Steele managed some fancy dance steps around it.

user-pic

The name distortions are fine.
It's payback for 30 years of Democrat.
The scales must be balanced.

user-pic

I've been frustrated by some of the posters here at TPM who exected Obama to turn every thing around in a few months. He's not a magician and I think he's doing remarkably well considering he's proceeding without support even from his own party in many cases. It's always nice to read postive opinions about him, onpinion that I share. Thanks, Steve.

user-pic

When one looks at Obama's accomplishments as President to date in their entirety they are monumental! Today was a grand slam home run. Think Bill Clinton this deep into his presidency, don't ask don't tell, Hilliary Care, and a tax hike...

user-pic

As Jackie Gleason use to say "how sweet it is!" LOL

Leave a comment

steve katz

user-pic

Following: 97
Followers: 41

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location CA
  • Party Dem
  • Politics Left of center

Favorites

  • Favorite Quotes "Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein

    "The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams" - Eleanor Roosevelt

Bio

Sound, music, film

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address