« Blue Dogs - Dirty Dogs - Bird Dogs | steve katz's Blog | Pearlstein On Krugman »

White House Set To Announce Sweeping Financial Regulations


The New York Times is reporting that; triggered by the public fury over bonuses the White House is expected unveil this week a plan for increased oversight of executive pay at all banks, Wall Street firms and possibly other companies. 

The proposal is part of a sweeping plan to overhaul all financial regulations.  What should be most concerning to top executives, (and their lobbyists) is the possibility that the administration might put many of the changes into effect through regulations rather than through legislation.

One of the proposals could impose greater requirements on the boards of companies to tie executive compensation more closely to performance and to take other steps that big bonuses aren't paid before meeting financial goals.

The new rules will include all financial institutions, even those not receiving federal bailout money:

It will propose that many kinds of derivatives and other exotic financial instruments that contributed to the crisis be traded on exchanges or through clearinghouses so they are more transparent and can be more tightly regulated. And to protect consumers, it will call for federal standards for mortgage lenders beyond what the Federal Reserve adopted last year, as well as more aggressive enforcement of the mortgage rules.

The plan is broad reaching

An important part of the plan still under debate is how to regulate the shadow banking system that Wall Street firms use to package and trade mortgage-backed securities, the so-called toxic assets held by many banks and blamed for the credit crisis.

Administration officials are also debating how tightly to supervise hedge funds. A broad consensus has emerged among regulators and administration officials that hedge funds must be registered and more closely monitored, probably by the Securities and Exchange Commission. But officials have not decided how much the funds will have to disclose about their investments and trading practices.
There are hints that complete takeovers of troubled companies could very well happen.

A central aspect of the plan, which has already been announced by the administration, would give the government greater authority to take over and resolve problems at large, troubled companies that are not now regulated by Washington, like insurance companies and hedge funds.

That proposal would, for instance, make it easier for the government to cancel bonus contracts like those given to executives at the American International Group, which have stoked a political furor. Under the proposal, the Treasury secretary would have the authority to seize and wind down a struggling institution after consulting with the president and upon the recommendation of two-thirds of the Federal Reserve board.

The release of the plan is timed to President Obama's first foreign summit meeting in early April and would signal Europe that he intended to crack down on the risk-taking and other free-wheeling practices by the worldwide financial industry.

There is a very strong message here in general, if you want to make a lot of money be a private company, you want to be owned by the public, play by the rules, our rules.

And, to the money changers, what you have done to the world's economy can not, and will not happen again.

Obama Seeks to Increase Oversight of Executive Pay

13 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Again, there is a brilliant chess game being played here. The populace is hopping mad over Wall Street excess, and what better time to restore some serious oversight and tight regulation of the financial sector? The GOP will lose another round, as none of them are going to stand up and say a thing about regualtion in the face of the anger that is out there right now.

Score another one for Team Obama! (and the rest of us, for that matter).

user-pic

Could not agree with you more. Us, true believers really needed this. Should keep the cable magpies chattering all of next week.

Gotta set the VCRs for all the Sunday morning shows. This is big.

user-pic

Checkmate!

Good post too! Needed.

Appreciate both post and comment.

user-pic

If Obama can get ahead (stay ahead?) of the issue, the Democrats stand to make a huge advance in progressive reform.

Note that in the midst of this scandal and uproar, Obama is immediately talking about the need for regulation. But hasn't that been his plan all along? ;) He -- and Congress -- will have the wind, We the people, at his back.

user-pic

I saw this earlier.The faith of a mustard seed is all it takes sometimes. Go Mr. President!!!

user-pic

When the media kept saying this AIG anger could thwart Obama I thought, huh? are they serious? Obama wants to make sweeping changes to the system, this AIG outrage is the perfect time to bring about his plans. If I knew that, then the media should have known that.

user-pic

I just started reading this great blog. I agree it's quite possible even someone as awesome as Krugman may not be able to predict better than a "practitioner." We don't know Geithner is protecting the moneyed class - I doubt it. He's been a public servant almost all his life (and his wife is a social worker for crimeney sakes!)

user-pic

Geithner, being a Wall Streeter, has two things to his advantage: he knows the nuances, so cannot be slammed as being an amatuer; he has first-hand witnessing of what needs to be corrected.

(And I'd been thinking that he has his values ass-backward: that his constituency is Wall Street, rather than We the people.)

I'm prepared to see my sense that Obama is brilliant, perhaps a genius, become the revealed reality.

I think it is now relatively obvious that Obama's proposed reforms were drawn up long ago; and that this is the perfect time to move those forward.

user-pic

It's interesting how this is not on the front page of TPM.

user-pic

Hummmm....I'm form Missouri. I'll believe it when (and if) I see it. When the Wall Street crowd are quaking in their boots and the Dow has taken a 300 point dive because of it.


C

user-pic

A quick glance at the comments. Collective agreement - Obama (Democrats) are cleverly using the AIG moment to push through some plan, thought up long ago (nods of agreement). Republicans, through the clever games of chess imposed by the Dems, would not dare oppose it. Blah blah blah.

Funny, how it's starting to feel that this bi-partisan president is not that different from the last one. They both promised to bring change to Washington while campaigning. They both ended up using a crisis to push through ideology-driven "change".

Why do people always buy into promise of "change"? Don't they know that "change" refers only to party in power?

I'm starting to think that liberals were right during the primaires and the election, that Americans are just a bunch of ignorant stupid idiots.

user-pic

A crisis of any kind is a call for change. It's like a brick to the head that something needs to be done differently - immediately, whether you are ready to make those changes or not.

I see nothing wrong with Obama using this time to push for regulation when people are paying attention. When they are seeing and feeling what happens when no boundaries are set in place. He can do this with the help of Republicans - if they put aside their ideology and use common sense.

By the way, Washington is not an actual machine. Obama can't come in and change a few parts and all will be well. Especially not in 60 days - so I think you're ignorant to believe otherwise.

user-pic

Perhaps. The key problem, however, is understanding what that "something" really means.

For the young Democratic government that's so high on being back in power that "something" means a predictable reflexive impluse to "run" things - to get into managing the economy by physically running the banks (and soon, the auto industry, etc). They have been doing it for several months now - with spectacularly terrible grades (see, AIG).

I agree with you, however, that an astonishing spending proposal, tax hikes, numerous bailouts - all in 60 days - is too soon to draw conclusions.

Let's give him 4 years before we conclude they fucked it up and vote the republicans back in office.

And on and on and on and on, back and forth, ad infinitum.

Leave a comment

steve katz

user-pic

Following: 97
Followers: 41

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location CA
  • Party Dem
  • Politics Left of center

Favorites

  • Favorite Quotes "Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein

    "The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams" - Eleanor Roosevelt

Bio

Sound, music, film

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address