« Jindalmania: "Bobby at the Bat" | steve katz's Blog | Rush Under Attack! »

Something Wrong With Rush?


Rush Limbaugh's speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference, (CPAC) on Saturday was painful to watch.  It wasn't just his words, we've heard them before, it was Rush himself.

Taylor Marsh of the Huffington Post, was there, she blogged; Rush's Ramblings at CPAC:

Like almost immediately something manifested that looked horribly wrong. Rush was sweating profusely and fidgeting like he was about to come out of his skin. The room was very cold, with people around me shivering, putting on their coats, while Rush proclaimed how hot it was. It's doubtful the lights on Rush made the difference. It had to be nerves. Well, why not? He sits in his EIB studio bubble every day. Now he's in front of everyone, including being televised on cable, as he mentioned continually until not even his audience was laughing at the joke anymore. He was actually face to face with real, live people. But whatever he delivered it wasn't a speech. More like a steam of conscious babble, just like he does on radio, though there were no commercials to mercifully break the blather.

Below are quotes extracted from transcript provided by Fox News.  They call the speech; "On conservative conference's final day, talk radio host delivers impassioned address, drawing immense ovation."

Words can speak volumes of what goes through a person's mind - this is how Rush opened:

I learned that Fox, God love them, is televising this speech on the Fox News Channel, which means, ladies and gentleman, this is my first ever address to the nation. [Applause] Now, I have someone in back taking phone numbers. In fact, I would like to introduce to you my security chief, a man who runs all of my security. His name is Joseph Stalin. Joseph, would you please -- [Laughter ] I am safe from any liberal attack, in public, because they would be afraid of offending Stalin.

The other night Janeane Garofalo described Rush as a "self-loathing narcissist:"

 ...just want to get this up front -- is that I'm pompous. [Laughter] And that I am arrogant. Neither of these things are remotely true. I can tell you a joke to illustrate this. Larry King passed away, goes to heaven. He's greeted by Saint Peter at the gates. Saint Peter says, "Welcome, Mr. King, it's great to have you here. I want to show you around, give you an idea of what's here, maybe you can pick a place that you'd like to reside." King says, "I just have one question: Is Rush Limbaugh here?" "No, he's got a lot of time yet, Mr. King." So Saint Peter begins the tour. Larry King sees the various places and it's beyond anything we can imagine in terms of beauty. Finally, he gets to the biggest room of all, with this giant throne. And over the throne is a flashing beautiful angelic neon sign that says "Rush Limbaugh." [Laughter] And Larry King looks at Saint Peter and says: "I thought you said he wasn't here." "He said, he's not, he's not. This is God's room. He just thinks he's Rush Limbaugh."  [Laughter] [Applause] So you see I'm not pompous.

On conservatives and racism:

We don't hate anybody. We don't -- I mean, the racism in this country, if you ask me, I know many people in this audience -- let me deal with this head on. You know what the cliche is, a conservative: racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe. Excuse me, ladies and gentlemen of America, if you were paying attention, I know you were, the racism in our culture was exclusively and fully on display in the Democrat primary last year. [Applause]

On bipartisanship: (emphasis mine)

The notion of partisanship, false premise. Let me define bipartisanship for you. Bipartisanship -- everybody seems to go orgasmic over the concept of bipartisanship. Don't worry, I checked with Fox, that word's okay. [Laughter] [Applause] 

Remember, they covered the Lewinsky thing, so that's my -- bipartisanship occurs only after one other result, and that is victory. In other words, let's say as conservatives liberals demand that we be bipartisan with them in Congress. What they mean is: We check our core principles at the door, come in, let them run the show and agree with them. That's bipartisanship to them. To us, bipartisanship is them being forced to agree with us after we politically have cleaned their clocks and beaten them. And that has to be what we're focused on. [Applause]

On how "the liberals" are going after the banks:

They (Northern Trust) took $1.6 billion. As you know, they went out and they sponsored the LA Riveria Open two weeks ago that Phil Mickelson barely hung on and won. [Applause] And we find out they hired some liberals to entertain, but it still wasn't good enough. They hired Sheryl Crow. And they hired the rock crooner group Chicago, but they had the audacity, Northern Trust did, to entertain their clients, to try to reward their best customers, to get new customers, banking is in trouble, Northern Trust is trying to do what they always do, what all businesses do, and that is mine for new clients and reward existing good customers. Not since they took $1.6 billion, I guess. The haughty John Kerry wrote a piece of legislation said: He's getting sick and tired, sick and tired of these CEOs using taxpayer money to throw all these lavish parties. And I'm saying where do you get yours, Senator? [Applause]

He defends the bankers.  At the end of the thought, his inner-bully emerges:

If you ask yourself this, you'll realize your life is no better off. That the Democrats and Obama are asking you to feel better simply on the basis that they're going to get revenge for you, but your life isn't going to improve, somebody else's is just going to be destroyed and they want you to be happy over that. That's sick. And that is not the United States of America. [Applause] Besides, as far as John Kerry is concerned, if it wasn't for his varicose veins, he would be totally colorless. [Laughter]

How's this for denial and intransigence?:

Now let's talk about the conservative movement as it were. We, ladies and gentlemen, have challenges that are part and parcel of a movement that feels it has just suffered a humiliating defeat when it's not humiliating. This wasn't a landslide victory, 52 to, what, 46. Fifty-eight million people voted against Obama. There would have been more if we would have had a conservative nominee. [Applause] I don't mean that -- I mean that in an instructive way, as a lead-in to what I'm talking about here. No humiliating defeat here. I can't -- sometimes I get livid and angry. We do have an organizational problem. We have a challenge. We've got factions now within our own movement seeking power to dominate it, and worst of all to redefine it. Well, the Constitution doesn't need to be redefined. Conservative intellectuals, the Declaration of Independence does not need to be redefined and neither does conservatism. Conservatism is what it is and it is forever. It's not something you can bend and shape and flake and form. [Applause]

Do, "happy people" need to profess their happiness?:

Conservatives are naturally happy. We seek happiness. We pursue it. It's part of who we are. So what can you do? Live your life. I swear, folks, you do not know in just the everyday life that you live in your homes, your neighborhoods, the favorite word of this administration, your "communities." Remember the root word there is "commune." [Applause]

Explaining away his remark that he wants President Obama to fail.

We're in the process of winning the war. The last thing they wanted was to win. They hoped George Bush failed. So what is so strange about being honest to say that I want Barack Obama to fail if his mission is to restructure and reform this country so that capitalism and individual liberty are not its foundation? Why would I want that to succeed? [Applause]

What was scheduled to be a 20 minute speech ends at almost 90.  Rush concludes with some good-old right-wing authoritarianism:

You still can't outdo the absolute joy and awe and thanks I feel for all of you. I've been doing this for 20 years and the numbers just keep growing. And I can't tell you how appreciative I am and proud to be in a movement with the same passions, desires and core beliefs that all of you have, because we know that it's right for the country, and we know it's right for people. It's not something that has to be forced on them. It's not something that has to be authoritatively pressed on them. We are what is, and that's why we are an enemy because we're effective. The people that do want control look at us as the enemy. We're always going to be -- don't ever measure your success by how many Drive-By Media reports you see that are fair to us. Never going to happen. Don't measure your success by how many people like you. Just worry about how they vote. And then at the end of the day how they live, but that's really none of your business once they close the doors. Thank you all very much. It's been great.

Taylor Marsh sums up Rush's speech:

But I'm really at a loss of what to make of Rush's performance on the whole. It was a rambling, sometimes incoherent, self-indulgent mess. There was something pathetically insecure about the lack of structure to the speech, but also Rush's herky jerky, sweat wiping, water drinking, fist bumping, awkward pauses, note looking, never ending regurgitation of what Rush thought everyone had to hear. Because he was addressing the nation, you know, which he repeated so many times he even got sick of it.

Maybe, Rush was just nervous.  I don't want to make any accusations but I did look up the counter indications of a prescription drug that Rush has been known to habit.  There are some similarities.


23 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Thanks for providing the overview, Steve. I just couldn't bring myself to watch it, but reading the highlights was entertaining w/o having to actually subject myself to his yuckiness...

user-pic

Steve, good post as always. I read an article this morning on this. It concluded that the first half hour was 'well delivered' and then faded into mush.

In answer to the question posed by your title:
Just about everything I can think of.

Yeah, all the liberals and Dems are the real racists. His mouth is so full of venom and hate and vitriol and lies....That all I can think of is swear words. And what if I attempted to answer him on each charge.

No, Obama's campaign was not racist.

It would take two hours to do it justice. I think everything he says has to be met head on. Or it will survive.

Right now I am at a loss over this demagogue. The demagogue who thinks he is a demigod. They will always be with us, these would be tyrants. Simple stimulus response dictates it. If you can receive hundreds of millions of dollars for spewing out the garbage he can, there will always be someone there to replace you.

I do sincerely hope he is ill, that he suffers a great deal of pain and dies a horrible death.
And he can take glenn, and sean and savage and the rest with him.

That is being too hopeful, I am afraid. I do think that at this time and place, his message is dead. But it will arise again.

user-pic

It's funny, the difference between you and Rush is only the ideology. The venom is identical. You should have seen Ann Coulter. She would have given you a heart attack there and then. I think she was channeling some kind of stand up comic, all she ever said were one-liners denigrading Obama and hoping for laughter.

user-pic


trollattackscan....

...heart attack... (scan pos)

...venom..... (scan pos)

... end

rating: trite, overused, ineffectual
action: ignore

user-pic

where did you get that trollscan widget? Did you download it from Firefox?

user-pic

I think everything he says has to be met head on. Or it will survive.

I totally agree. The Zom-Bush/dittoheads who perpetuate his blathering do wo before they ever question it. Unless we question it, they will not. It is likely these Zom-Bush/dittoheads will not change their minds, but they may stop repeating BS because people stopped listening. Then they can retreat to that sanctuary Rush mentions where they do not worry about what others think. They just worry what Rush thinks for them.

user-pic

.

Well . . .

All things do eventually come to a certain end . . .

~OGD~

user-pic

Hahahaahhaahaha. The guy who played him in the movie with Baldwin as Jackson, really well performed.

Sometimes the good guys win and the bad guys lose.

user-pic

He looks and acts exactly as he did when he was 'self-medicating'. He has the intellect and ethics of his political party's symbol (jackass, nee donkey).

user-pic

Uh... actually, "we" are the donkey. "They" are the elephant.

user-pic

So. You're saying we're the, er, asses?

user-pic

No, they're the mammoth, slowly going extinct.

user-pic

It amazes me how much Limbaugh - and the rest of them- sound like Communists did after the fall of the Soviet Union:

Conservatism is what it is and it is forever. It's not something you can bend and shape and flake and form.

I have a poster in my house, which was an official Soviet poster from 1987: it features an anvil with a hammer and sickle, and in Russian the slogan says, "Union born of October," as if to proclaim exactly the same durability that Limbaugh claims here.

user-pic

Conservatism is what it is and it is forever.

And in 2009, what IS conservatism? Maybe Rush need to define it clearly.

user-pic

Give a guy with unusual appetites a pocketful of Viagara, a long weekend in the Dominican Republic and there's no telling what kind of he could be suffering from.

user-pic

"Conservatism is what it is and it is forever."

I'd bet The Lump never studied Metternicht.

Forever is a terribly long time for any ideology to claim. Too many people use the word for self identity, not political opinion or ideological definition, they just use it like a label because their peers and superiors use it.

Few, if any self-proclaimed conservatives have even a vague notion of what the word really means.

These days, it has come to mean "wingnuts."

Which may actually be quite appropriate.

user-pic

CLARIFICATION; Too many people use the word CONSERVATIVE for self identity...

user-pic

and I meant Metternich, not Metternicht, for anyone who might want to google...

user-pic

Does this sound like someone who might have spoken as CPAC?
from the WIki, about Metternich;
"the very name Metternich was synonymous with a system in which nothing but senseless opposition to progress could be discerned."

Sound familiar?

user-pic

You left out this wonderful Coulteresque bit:

It is not their task, it is not their right to remake this nation to accommodate their psychology. I sometimes wonder if liberalism is not just a psychosis or a psychology, not an ideology. It's so much about feelings, and the predominant feeling liberalism is about is feeling good about themselves.

user-pic

I wonder how conservatives feel about themselves now that they've trashed the economy? Oh, that's right, it was not their fault, so they probably feel pretu good in an Oxycontin kinduva way.

user-pic

Something wrong with Rush?

How much time do you have?

user-pic

I wonder if his ex wives have nondisclosure agreements in their divorce settlements. There must be some REALLY bad things about him that not one, not two, but THREE gold diggers couldn't stomach.

Leave a comment

steve katz

user-pic

Following: 97
Followers: 41

Posts
Comments & Recommends


  • Location CA
  • Party Dem
  • Politics Left of center

Favorites

  • Favorite Quotes "Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein

    "The future belongs to those who believe in the beauty of their dreams" - Eleanor Roosevelt

Bio

Sound, music, film

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address