A Dune Reference: Is Obama going to be Paul or Feyd?
During the
dark days of the Bush era, I was one of millions who looked to Obama as a hope
for the future. However, I remember when Obama voted for the telecom
immunity bill. Up to that point I had been regularly contributing to
his campaign, but I never did again after that, and I wrote his campaign a
letter about the issue. However, I forgave him, and I even was fortunate
enough to attend his inauguration.
Dune is one of the few books I have read multiple times. To briefly
summarize; Dune is a book about galactic political intrigue, and is set in the
distant future. The evil Baron Harkonnen plots to control the planet
Arrakis. He conquers the Atreides family and installs one of his two
nephews as the ruler of the planet. He chooses the brutal Rabban to take
control of Arrakis and thus begins a reign of terror. The Baron plans to
wait until the inhabitants have suffered greatly to the point of breaking and
he will then have Rabban executed and install Feyd to take over as Ruler.
He hopes Feyd will be welcomed as the Savior of Arrakis. However, Feyd is in
fact even more sadistic than Rabban, just more refined. He is a surgeon
rather than a meat cutter. In this situation, Paul Atreides finds himself struggling
to survive after his family is defeated by the Harkonnens. He is exiled
to the desert where he gathers the natives and returns to defeat the Harkonnens
and become the true savior of the planet Arrakis. Good defeats Evil.
Around the time of the telecom bill vote, I happened to catch Dune on
television for the hundredth time. I remember having a conversation about
this with my family. My mind made a connection between Bush and Obama
with regard to the Rabban, Feyd, and Paul relationship.
As we know, Bush and his evil "Uncle" Cheney had spent quite an
effort in establishing sweeping new authoritarian powers for the
President. These powers would not just disappear into thin air after the
election. The next US President would find him or herself in a new office
with new powers over the US
population that are unprecedented in our history. This is a very tempting
situation for anyone. As the old saying goes, power corrupts. My
hope was that Barack Obama would reverse the Bush/Cheney unitary executive
powers, but I also realized there was a great risk he would not when he voted
for telecom immunity.
President Obama has made some disturbing choices regarding personal liberty and
government secrecy. Obama's
Preventive Detention proposal goes beyond anything Bush ever publicly
proposed. We should all be nervous about the future. Power
corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. I hope Mr. Obama
changes course on these important issues.
I hope we elected a Paul and not a Feyd...
















or a Leto ...
July 11, 2009 8:46 AM | Reply | Permalink