Kali Star's Blog | Revised Death Toll Because of No Health Insurance/UK Government Acts on Alzheimer's »

How Many People Without Health Insurance Have Died Since Obama Took Office?


Imagine the frustration and even the agony of people without health insurance who are sick and who voted for Obama as a last hope. How can they keep hoping when they don't hear Obama talk about the issue? I wondered how many will die waiting. It seems fair that we count them. That is the least we can do. One estimate is 55 people a day. I think that this number is way too low. The article suggests that the number is increasing. I'm choosing 85. What do you think? I will use this number to keep a count of the Americans who have died since Obama and the new Congress took office. This number belongs to them.

Today the number is 1,190.


27 Comments

| Leave a comment
user-pic

Not rec'd. Look, I want universal health care too. But please look up the word 'fallacy' and then decide which ones your post relies upon.

user-pic

Co-sign.

user-pic

Actually, during the period in question more insureds than uninsureds died -- thus, proving that having health insurance is dangerous to one's health.

user-pic

The American Cancer Society once analyzed the ages of death of its smoking and non-smoking membership.

It discovered that its smokers had a life expectancy significantly greater than the life expectancy of the American people in general, a population which at that time included a bit less than 40% smokers.

Thus, proving that smoking increases life expectancy.

user-pic

What the good Padre said.

user-pic

Post hoc, ergo propter hoc.

Always been my favorite.

I'm with the padre.

user-pic

There is something in what Kali says. It is hard to know what Health Care for profit costs this country in lives, lost productivity, and direct consumer dollars. It doesn't make much sense from a public policy standpoint; only from a political one.

user-pic

You're hearing from the "give him a break" chorus which is no surprise. Obama deserves a little breathing room... but not a whole lot on health care for the very sort of reason you mention. I think it's valid to point out that he isn't saying much at all about health care. Now, the political "reasoning" behind this is they are focused on the stimulus. However, we are hearing lots of things about plenty of other issues here and there. It could well be they have a tight lid on the issue so that they can go full bore as soon as the stimulus is done. I hope that is the case.

I also hope that Obama's plan for massive subsidies to the rapacious insurance interests hits very stormy waters quickly so the nation can start talking about real solutions instead of simply different ways to prolong the reign of the greedy, uncaring insurance men who are making billions off of making sure people don't get the care they need.

Medicare for all, in my opinion, is the only real option that makes health care for all a reality.

user-pic

Sure. Because in less than two weeks, everything simply has to be perfect. Everyone becomes wealthy and ends up living in a fine house, with a great job. World peace suddenly breaks out, as the IRA and Orange Order travel to the Middle East to show Israel and Palestine the way. We all get taller and better looking, too.

Oh, and your dog comes back to life, your mother gets out of prison, your wife comes back, and you sober up. Oops, wait, that's what happens when you play country music backwards.

All snarkitude aside, don't you see that something of this scale is not going to happen instantaneously? Seriously, don't you see that?

user-pic

I think you're missing the point.

The point is the silence on the subject not that nothing has "happened" magically or been solved. It is a reasonable conclusion that with all the information swirling about in the media and emanating from the White House on so many other issues that the silence on health care and any signal of a determination to do something about it anytime soon is of concern. If you were someone whose top concern is health care you would not be being irrational to perhaps be worried that the President is not going to move very swiftly on it.

user-pic

Some people's top concern is avoiding a massive depression that will throw millions out of work and out of their employer provided health care plans, not to mention their houses, etc...

It's like the house is on fire and you want us to stop and ponder how to re-design the kitchen when the house gets re-built. there is certainly a time for that, but the first priority has to be getting this stimulus bill done and financial system bailout done.

The idea that they have given up on HC or are ignoring it is profoundly myopic. Why do you think they are fighting for Daschle?

user-pic

Nobody is implying they are "giving up" on health care. That's what you are saying.

Why are they fighting for Daschle? I'm not sure why to be honest with you other than his personal connection to Obama. He was one of the most ineffective Majority Leaders in modern times, he proposes to prop up the rotten system we have through a complicated and expensive setof subsidies to the insurance companies, and he has prostituted himself to the highest bidder ever since he left the Senate. His bad judgement on the tax thing is embarassing and reveals a not too attractive aspect of Daschle for all the world to see. I don't have grave objections to him myself, but I don't see him as much of an asset either.

user-pic

Looks like the Daschle issue is no more. He has withdrawn. Kind of a surprising turn eh?

user-pic

I am never short of amazed by the willingness of serious left wing types to believe that people are motivated purely by big "E" Evil.

No one sets out to be evil. Sometimes it happens, sure, but evil isn't what paves the road to Hell, if you'll recall.

user-pic

You don't die because of a lack of insurance. You die because of a lack of health care. If your insurance company's major goal is trying to deny you as much care as possible to increase their profit margin it doesn't matter that you have a theoretical right to health care.

Don't focus on the insurance. The Blue Dogs will bait and switch us inside out and backwards while they sell us out to insurance lobbies. Focus on whether the solution is to provide health care.

user-pic

Actually, you need to take a further step back.

You don't die because of insurance (the entire idea is nonsense). You don't die because of lack of health care, either. You die because, for one reason or another, a bit or bits of your physical makeup aren't working properly.

And you're going to, you know. Eventually. Even if you have insurance.

Basic health care can extend your life sometimes. Advanced technology and well educated physicians can do it more often. An insurance company might make it a little cheaper (or more expensive).

Ain't nobody that can give you a theoretical right to it, anymore than your neighbor's donkey.

user-pic

Food can extend your life too. But I guess we can go down your road and let Americans starve.

user-pic

Another interpretation of his post is to say that we should invest in well-being instead of the most expensive way to treat diseases. In your analogy would you rather encourage the most efficient way to produce food, or simply promise that is someone is hungry you'll find some way to feed them. They are not mutually exclusive, but it's foolish to only focus on the one out of a misdiagnosis of what the problem is...

user-pic

Excuse me, but I think if you'll check what's been written you are the only person using the word evil. I think the insurance companies are greedy, uncaring, self-interested and even pathological organizations whose purpose is profit and not health care. I think that is a real problem. In fact, I think that is the central problem in our health care structure today. And I guess all of us "serious left wing" types think that way for some strange reason. Wonder what it is?

user-pic

If I were an absentee owner, and the United States was my business, and I came back to take a personal look to see how it stacked up to against other industrialized competitors, I would shit a fucking brick and start looking heads to put on a platter with respect to the job being done providing availability to health care.

user-pic

If I owned Scandinavia and the US; I'd rent out the US and live in Scandinavia. (...and really hate cold weather)

user-pic

Me too on both living in Scandinavia and hating the cold weather. But ya never read about people over there freezing because they can't pay for heat in winter so maybe we have something to learn from them eh?

user-pic

Talk is cheap. What is stopping you from moving to Scandinavia? Maybe if enough people moved people would get the idea.


user-pic

That's just a tiresomely stupid and puerile thing to say.

user-pic

Health care is a serious issue that I care about, so I'm disappointed by what seems to be treating the subject cheaply and disrespectfully. Let's deal in truths.

In the UK, the country Michael Moore claimed gave exceptional health care access to it's people, including home health care visits, a little girl, 11 years old, had her legs amputated, because she had contracted meningitis, and it was not diagnosed, by an uncaring doctor. He dismissed her and her parents, claiming it was just an infection. He tossed them a prescription for antibiotics. Her parents told him that they doubted she'd be able to take them, because she was unable to keep anything down. A few days later she was seriously worse, with a high temperature. The family called the doctor to ask for a home visit, as she was too sick to be moved. He refused, and told them to bring her temperature down with cold baths and an otc medication. When she was hospitalized later that day, it was ultimately found that she had meningitis and that it had broken through, and her legs needed to be amputated. Here's an article on what happened http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1134408/My-little-girl-lost-legs-meningitis-GP-refused-make-home-visit.html&cid=1300146537&usg=AFQjCNEM0hTV_914oxW_3zDfBLQVLOtv3w

I read the foreign press, and stories like that are all too common. Doctors and hospitals attempting to deny care to disabled children, the critically ill abandoned by state paid carers to starve and die alone. The NHS shutting down health centers in communities and instead opening up private clinics. The poor suffer the most there, because the health services have become a bureaucratic nightmare, staffed by appointees who are friends of the well connected. It's even worse in France.

I don't know what the answer is, but emulating Europe won't work, especially when the state allows excessive immigration to bloat the system until it's unaffordable. Nor is the fad Oregon and Washington state have adopted, forcing people to kill themselves when the state's universal health care plan decides it's too expensive to treat their illness. I read about a woman with cancer, whose doctor was forced by the state to deny her care, and only offer her pills that she could go home and take to die.

In the UK, Baroness Warnock, an elderly aristocrat is now demanding that poor elderly and disabled people have a duty to die, so as not to be a burden on society.. when I read her op-ed online, my first thought was that she should lead by example, as she's obviously passed her sell by date. It's fascism, nothing humanitarian about the excesses pushed to by the far left. Hitler was a green as well, and look where that got the German people.

user-pic

Well, those are all terrible stories, but as I'm sure you know, anecdotal evidence doesn't do much far as supporting arguments goes.

The simple fact is, all other major industrialized nations provide universal health coverage, and most of them have comprehensive benefit packages with no cost-sharing by the patients.

From what I've read, citizens abroad do wait longer - to have elective surgeries. America is faster in that regard, but Germany is actually even better.

We have the greatest equity gap of all.

Actually, this article about sums it up:
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/12/opinion/12sun1.html

And Kali. Personally, I'd stick with the 55 number simply to avoid easy criticism. That's still 825 people. Too many. Sometimes, putting a number or some faces on it will drive it home for some.

And I do wish Obama were speaking about it more. I'm of the hopes that someone will start speaking of it after the stim bill gets through.

user-pic

The plural of anecdote is not facts.

Leave a comment

Kali Star

user-pic

Following: 14
Followers: 18

Posts
Comments & Recommends


Favorites

All Reader Posts
How to use myTPM

Advertise Liberally
Share
Close Social Web Email

"To" Email Address

Your Name

Your Email Address